Separate domains of Rev1 mediate two modes of DNA damage bypass in mammalian cells

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 3113-3123

  Jansen, Jacob G ^a   Tsaalbi Shtylik, Anastasia ^a   Hendriks, Giel ^a   Gali, Himabindu ^b   Hendel, Ayal ^c   Johansson, Fredrik ^d   Erixon, Klaus ^d,e   Livneh, Zvi ^c   Mullenders, Leon H F ^a   Haracska, Lajos ^b   De Wind, Niels ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e Erixon Scientific Consulting   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA POLYMERASE REV1; DNA; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; PYRIMIDINE DIMER; PYRIMIDINE PYRIMIDONE DIMER; PYRIMIDINE-PYRIMIDONE DIMER; REV1L PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; FIBROBLAST; MAMMAL CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WILD TYPE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FIBROBLASTS; G2 PHASE; MICE; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PYRIMIDINE DIMERS; S PHASE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 66349089259     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00071-09     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Acharya, M. K., R. E. Johnson, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2006. Complex formation with Rev1 enhances the proficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase zeta for mismatch extension and for extension opposite from DNA lesions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:9555-9563.
2. Akagi, J. I., C. Masutani, Y. Kataoka, T. Kan, E. Ohashi, T. Mori, H. Ohmori, and F. Hanaoka. 2009. Interaction with DNA polymerase eta is required for nuclear accumulation of REV1 and suppression of spontaneous mutations in human cells. DNA Repair 8:585-599.
3. Andersen, P. L., F. Xu, and W. Xiao. 2008. Eukaryotic DNA damage tolerance and translesion synthesis through covalent modifications of PCNA. Cell Res. 18:162-173.
4. Avkin, S., M. Goldsmith, S. Velasco-Miguel, N. E. Geacintov, E. C. Friedberg, and Z. Livneh. 2004. Quantitative analysis of translesion DNA synthesis across a benzo[a]pyrene-guanine adduct in mammalian cells: the role of DNA polymerase kappa. J. Biol. Chem. 279:53298-53305.
5. Avkin, S., Z. Sevilya, L. Toube, N. E. Geacintov, S. G. Chaney, M. Oren, and Z. Livneh. 2006. p53 and p21 regulate error-prone DNA repair to yield a lower mutation load. Mol. Cell 22:407-413.
6. Baynton, K., A. Bresson-Roy, and R. P. Fuchs. 1998. Analysis of damage tolerance pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a requirement for Rev3 DNA polymerase in translesion synthesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:960-966.
7. Blastyák, A., L. Pintér, I. Unk, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and L. Haracska. 2007. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 28:167-175. (Pubitemid 47542303)
8. Cheo, D. L., H. J. Ruven, L. B. Meira, R. E. Hammer, D. K. Burns, N. J. Tappe, A. A. van Zeeland, L. H. Mullenders, and E. C. Friedberg. 1997. Characterization of defective nucleotide excision repair in XPC mutant mice. Mutat. Res. 374:1-9.
9. Dirac, A. M., and R. Bernards. 2003. Reversal of senescence in mouse fibroblasts through lentiviral suppression of p53. J. Biol. Chem. 278:11731-11734.
10. Edmunds, C. E., L. J. Simpson, and J. E. Sale. 2008. PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. Mol. Cell 30:519-529.
11. Enders, G. H. 2008. Expanded roles for Chk1 in genome maintenance. J. Biol. Chem. 283:17749-17752.
12. Friedberg, E. C. 2005. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:943-953.
13. Friedberg, E. C., A. R. Lehmann, and R. P. P. Fuchs. 2005. Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? Mol. Cell 18:499-505. (Pubitemid 40726227)
14. Friedberg, E. C., G. C. Walker, W. Siede, R. D. Wood, R. A. Schultz, and T. E. Ellenberger. 2005. DNA repair and mutagenesis, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
15. Gibbs, P. E. M., J. McDonald, R. Woodgate, and C. W. Lawrence. 2005. The relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol η, Pol ζ, Rev1 protein and Pol32 in the bypass and mutation induction of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer. Genetics 169:575-582. (Pubitemid 40404295)
16. Guo, C., P. L. Fischhaber, M. J. Luk-Paszyc, Y. Masuda, J. Zhou, K. Kamiya, C. Kisker, and E. C. Friedberg. 2003. Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 22:6621-6630. (Pubitemid 38009608)
17. Guo, C., E. Sonoda, T. S. Tang, J. L. Parker, A. B. Bielen, S. Takeda, H. D. Ulrich, and E. C. Friedberg. 2006. REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 23:265-271. (Pubitemid 44081878)
18. Guo, C., T. S. Tang, M. Bienko, J. L. Parker, A. B. Bielen, E. Sonoda, S. Takeda, H. D. Ulrich, I. Dikic, and E. C. Friedberg. 2006. Ubiquitin-binding motifs in REV1 protein are required for its role in the tolerance of DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:8892-8900.
19. Guo, D., Z. Xie, H. Shen, B. Zhao, and Z. Wang. 2004. Translesion synthesis of acetylaminofluorene-dG adducts by DNA polymerase zeta is stimulated by yeast Rev1 protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1122-1130. (Pubitemid 38854714)
20. Haracska, L., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2002. Yeast Rev1 protein is a G template-specific DNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 277:15546-15551.
21. Haracska, L., I. Unk, R. E. Johnson, E. Johansson, P. M. Burgers, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 2001. Roles of yeast DNA polymerases delta and zeta and of Rev1 in the bypass of abasic sites. Genes Dev. 15:945-954. (Pubitemid 32323545)
22. Hendel, A., O. Ziv, Q. Gueranger, N. Geacintov, and Z. Livneh. 2008. Reduced efficiency and increased mutagenicity of translesion DNA synthesis across a TT cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, but not a TT 6-4 photoproduct, in human cells lacking DNA polymerase eta. DNA Repair 7:1636-1646.
23. Hishida, T., Y. Kubota, A. M. Carr, and H. Iwasaki. 2009. RAD6-RAD18-RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light. Nature 457:612-615.
24. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141. (Pubitemid 35025438)
25. Jackson, D. A., and A. Pombo. 1998. Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 140:1285-1295. (Pubitemid 28152979)
26. Jansen, J. G., M. I. Fousteri, and N. de Wind. 2007. Send in the clamps: control of DNA translesion synthesis in eukaryotes. Mol. Cell 28:522-529. (Pubitemid 350137799)
27. Jansen, J. G., P. Langerak, A. Tsaalbi-Shtylik, P. C. van den Berk, H. Jacobs, and N. de Wind. 2006. Strand-biased defect in C/G transversions in hypermutating immunoglobulin genes in Rev1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 203:319-323.
28. Jansen, J. G., A. Tsaalbi-Shtylik, P. Langerak, F. Calléja, C. M. Meijers, H. Jacobs, and N. de Wind. 2005. The BRCT domain of mammalian Rev1 is involved in regulating DNA translesion synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:356-365. (Pubitemid 40276957)
29. Johansson, F., A. Lagerqvist, K. Erixon, and D. Jenssen. 2004. A method to monitor replication fork progression in mammalian cells: nucleotide excision repair enhances and homologous recombination delays elongation along damaged DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:e157.
30. Larimer, F. W., J. R. Perry, and A. A. Hardigree. 1989. The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis. J. Bacteriol. 171:230-237.
31. Lebofsky, R., R. Heilig, M. Sonnleitner, J. Weissenbach, and A. Bensimon. 2006. DNA replication origin interference increases the spacing between initiation events in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 17:5337-5345.
32. Lehmann, A. R., and R. P. P. Fuchs. 2006. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: rediscovering old models. DNA Repair 5:1495-1498. (Pubitemid 44739451)
33. Lemontt, J. F. 1971. Mutants of yeast defective in mutation induced by ultraviolet light. Genetics 68:21-33.
34. Lopes, M., M. Foiani, and J. M. Sogo. 2006. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 21:15-27. (Pubitemid 43017845)
35. Majka, J., S. K. Binz, M. S. Wold, and P. M. Burgers. 2006. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5′-DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 281:27855-27861.
36. Majka, J., A. Niedziela-Majka, and P. M. Burgers. 2006. The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 24:891-901. (Pubitemid 44960097)
37. Masuda, Y., and K. Kamiya. 2006. Role of single-stranded DNA in targeting REV1 to primer termini. J. Biol. Chem. 281:24314-24321.
38. Masuda, Y., M. Ohmae, K. Masuda, and K. Kamiya. 2003. Structure and enzymatic properties of a stable complex of the human REV1 and REV7 proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278:12356-12360.
39. Masuda, Y., M. Takahashi, S. Fukuda, M. Sumii, and K. Kamiya. 2002. Mechanisms of dCMP transferase reactions catalyzed by mouse Rev1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277:3040-3046.
40. Motegi, A., H. J. Liaw, K. Y. Lee, H. P. Roest, A. Maas, X. Wu, H. Moinova, S. D. Markowitz, H. Ding, J. H. Hoeijmakers, and K. Myung. 2008. Polyubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen by HLTF and SHPRH prevents genomic instability from stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:12411-12416.
41. Murakumo, Y., T. Roth, H. Ishii, D. Rasio, S. Numata, C. M. Croce, and R. Fishel. 2000. A human REV7 homolog that interacts with the polymerase zeta catalytic subunit hREV3 and the spindle assembly checkpoint protein hMAD2. J. Biol. Chem. 275:4391-4397.
42. Nelson, J. R., P. E. M. Gibbs, A. M. Nowicka, D. C. Hinkle, and C. W. Lawrence. 2000. Evidence for a second function for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1p. Mol. Microbiol. 37:549-554.
43. Nelson, J. R., C. W. Lawrence, and D. Hinkle. 1996. Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein. Nature 382:729-731. (Pubitemid 26282181)
44. Nelson, J. R., C. W. Lawrence, and D. C. Hinkle. 1996. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase zeta. Science 272:1646-1649. (Pubitemid 26200022)
45. Ohashi, E., Y. Murakumo, N. Kanjo, J. I. Akagi, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, and H. Ohmori. 2004. Interaction of hREV1 with three human Y-family DNA polymerases. Genes Cells 9:523-531. (Pubitemid 38877782)
46. Parrilla-Castellar, E. R., S. J. Arlander, and L. M. Karnitz. 2004. Dial 9-1-1 for DNA damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp complex. DNA Repair 3:1009-1014. (Pubitemid 38997943)
47. Paulovich, A. G., C. D. Armour, and L. H. Hartwell. 1998. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics 150:75-93.
48. Prakash, S., R. E. Johnson, and L. Prakash. 2005. Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74:317-353.
49. Ross, A. L., L. J. Simpson, and J. E. Sale. 2005. Vertebrate DNA damage tolerance requires the C terminus but not BRCT or transferase domains of REV1. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:1280-1289. (Pubitemid 41439921)
50. Sabbioneda, J., B. K. Minesinger, M. Giannattasio, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and S. Jinks-Robertson. 2005. The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with Polζ and is partially required for spontaneous Polζ-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:38657-38665. (Pubitemid 43853768)
51. Shachar, S., O. Ziv, S. Avkin, S. Adar, J. Wittschieben, T. Reissner, S. Chaney, E. C. Friedberg, Z. Wang, T. Carell, N. Geacintov, and Z. Livneh. 2009. Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J. 28:383-393.
52. -/- keratinocyte cultures. DNA Repair 4:1337-1344.
53. Szüts, D., A. P. Marcus, M. Himoto, S. Iwai, and J. E. Sale. 2008. REV1 restrains DNA polymerase zeta to ensure frame fidelity during translesion synthesis of UV photoproducts in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:6767-6780.
54. Tissier, A., P. L. Kannouche, M. P. Reck, A. R. Lehmann, R. P. P. Fuchs, and A. M. Cordonnier. 2004. Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase Polη and REV1 protein. DNA Repair 3:1503-1514. (Pubitemid 39221748)
55. Ulrich, H. D. 2004. How to activate a damage-tolerant polymerase: consequences of PCNA modifications by ubiquitin and SUMO. Cell Cycle 3:15-18. (Pubitemid 40268577)
56. Unk, I., I. Hajdú, K. Fátyol, J. Hurwitz, J. H. Yoon, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and L. Haracska. 2008. Human HLTF functions as a ubiquitin ligase for proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:3768-3773.
57. Unk, I., I. Hajdú, K. Fátyol, B. Szakál, A. Blastyák, V. Bermudez, J. Hurwitz, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and L. Haracska. 2006. Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:18107-18112.
58. van Hoffen, A., J. Venema, R. Meschini, A. A. van Zeeland, and L. H. Mullenders. 1995. Transcription-coupled repair removes both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts with equal efficiency and in a sequential way from transcribed DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum group C fibroblasts. EMBO J. 14:360-367.
59. Van Zeeland, A. A., C. A. Smith, and P. C. Hanawalt. 1981. Sensitive determination of pyrimidine dimers in DNA of UV-irradiated mammalian cells. Introduction of T4 endonuclease V into frozen and thawed cells. Mutat. Res. 82:173-189.
60. Van Zeeland, A. A., and A. R. Filon. 1982. Post-replication repair: elongation of daughter strand DNA in UV-irradiated mammalian cells in culture. Prog. Mutat. Res. 4:375-384.
61. 2-guanine adduct by the sequential action of yeast Rev1 and DNA polymerase ζ. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:6900-6906.
62. 2/M phase rather than S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:8971-8976.
63. Wood, A., P. Garg, and P. M. Burgers. 2007. A ubiquitin-binding motif in the translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 mediates its essential functional interaction with ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 282:20256-20263.
64. Yu, X., C. C. Chini, M. He, G. Mer, and J. Chen. 2003. The BRCT domain is a phospho-protein binding domain. Science 302:639-642. (Pubitemid 37310919)
65. Zhang, H., and C. W. Lawrence. 2005. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:15954-15959.
66. Zhang, Y., X. Wu, O. Rechkoblit, N. E. Geacintov, J. S. Taylor, and Z. Wang. 2002. Response of human REV1 to different DNA damage: preferential dCMP insertion opposite the lesion. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1630-1638. (Pubitemid 34679738)
67. Zhuang, Z., R. E. Johnson, L. Haracska, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and S. J. Benkovic. 2008. Regulation of polymerase exchange between Polη and Polδ by monoubiquitination of PCNA and the movement of DNA polymerase holoenzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:5361-5366.