Replication and recombination factors contributing to recombination-dependent bypass of DNA lesions by template switch

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Vanoli, Fabio ^a,d   Fumasoni, Marco ^a,b   Szakal, Barnabas ^a   Maloisel, Laurent ^c   Branzei, Dana ^a  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c Direction des Sciences du Vivant   (France)

^d MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; CROSSOVER JUNCTION ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE DELTA; DNA TOPOISOMERASE; EXONUCLEASE; HELICASE; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD55 PROTEIN; RAD57 PROTEIN; RAD59 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; FUNGAL DNA; REPLICATION FACTOR A; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TEMPLATE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGAL GENETICS; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SWITCHING; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHROMOSOME; ENZYMOLOGY; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION;

CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; EXONUCLEASES; GENOME, FUNGAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TEMPLATES, GENETIC;

EID: 78649702212     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001205     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, et al. (2009) Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73: 134-154.
2. Branzei D, Foiani M (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 208-219.
3. Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP (2006) Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1495-1498.
4. Friedberg EC (2005) Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 943-953.
5. Higgins NP, Kato K, Strauss B (1976) A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 101: 417-425.
6. Goldfless SJ, Morag AS, Belisle KA, Sutera VA, Jr., Lovett ST (2006) DNA repeat rearrangements mediated by DnaK-dependent replication fork repair. Mol Cell 21: 595-604.
7. Branzei D, Foiani M (2009) The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 1038-1046.
8. Blastyak A, Pinter L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S, et al. (2007) Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell 28: 167-175.
9. Michel B, Flores MJ, Viguera E, Grompone G, Seigneur M, et al. (2001) Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8181-8188.
10. Liberi G, Maffioletti G, Lucca C, Chiolo I, Baryshnikova A, et al. (2005) Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev 19: 339-350.
11. Karras GI, Jentsch S (2010) The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141: 255-267.
12. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM (2006) Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 21: 15-27.
13. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M (2008) SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915-920.
14. Wu L, Hickson ID (2003) The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426: 870-874.
15. Mankouri HW, Ngo HP, Hickson ID (2007) Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4062-4073.
16. Mankouri HW, Hickson ID (2006) Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. Mol Biol Cell 17: 4473-4483.
17. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and Mms21-Mediated Sumoylation Counteracts Recombinogenic Events at Damaged Replication Forks. Cell 127: 509-522.
18. Sollier J, Driscoll R, Castellucci F, Foiani M, Jackson SP, et al. (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1671-1682.
19. Bridges BA, Sedgwick SG (1974) Effect of photoreactivation on the filling of gaps in deoxyribonucleic acid synthesized after exposure of Escherichia coli to ultraviolet light. J Bacteriol 117: 1077-1081.
20. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P (1968) Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 31: 291-304.
21. Prakash L (1981) Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol Gen Genet 184: 471-478.
22. Gangavarapu V, Prakash S, Prakash L (2007) Requirement of RAD52 group genes for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7758-7764.
23. Torres-Ramos CA, Prakash S, Prakash L (2002) Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22: 2419-2426.
24. Falbo KB, Alabert C, Katou Y, Wu S, Han J, et al. (2009) Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 1167-1172.
25. Ulrich HD, Jentsch S (2000) Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. Embo J 19: 3388-3397.
26. Bailly V, Lamb J, Sung P, Prakash S, Prakash L (1994) Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev 8: 811-820.
27. Krogh BO, Symington LS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233-271.
28. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257.
29. Paques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349-404.
30. Sung P (1997) Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J Biol Chem 272: 28194-28197.
31. Sung P (1997) Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev 11: 1111-1121.
32. Fortin GS, Symington LS (2002) Mutations in yeast Rad51 that partially bypass the requirement for Rad55 and Rad57 in DNA repair by increasing the stability of Rad51-DNA complexes. EMBO J 21: 3160-3170.
33. Mozlin AM, Fung CW, Symington LS (2008) Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 paralogs in sister chromatid recombination. Genetics 178:113-126.
34. Liu Y, Masson JY, Shah R, O'Regan P, West SC (2004) RAD51C is required for Holliday junction processing in mammalian cells. Science 303: 243-246.
35. Brenneman MA, Wagener BM, Miller CA, Allen C, Nickoloff JA (2002) XRCC3 controls the fidelity of homologous recombination: roles for XRCC3 in late stages of recombination. Mol Cell 10: 387-395.
36. Nagaraju G, Hartlerode A, Kwok A, Chandramouly G, Scully R (2009) XRCC2 and XRCC3 regulate the balance between short- and long-tract gene conversions between sister chromatids. Mol Cell Biol 29: 4283-4294.
37. Akamatsu Y, Tsutsui Y, Morishita T, Siddique MS, Kurokawa Y, et al. (2007) Fission yeast Swi5/Sfr1 and Rhp55/Rhp57 differentially regulate Rhp51-dependent recombination outcomes. EMBO J 26: 1352-1362.
38. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, Haghnazari E, McDonald WH, et al. (2006) Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 8396-8409.
39. Dong Z, Fasullo M (2003) Multiple recombination pathways for sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of RAD1 and the RAD52 epistasis group genes. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 2576-2585.
40. Gonzalez-Barrera S, Cortes-Ledesma F, Wellinger RE, Aguilera A (2003) Equal sister chromatid exchange is a major mechanism of double-strand break repair in yeast. Mol Cell 11: 1661-1671.
41. Coic E, Feldman T, Landman AS, Haber JE (2008) Mechanisms of Rad52-independent spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 199-211.
42. Ui A, Seki M, Ogiwara H, Lai MS, Yamamoto K, et al. (2007) Activation of a novel pathway involving Mms1 and Rad59 in sgs1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 356: 1031-1037.
43. Signon L, Malkova A, Naylor ML, Klein H, Haber JE (2001) Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2048-2056.
44. Ruiz JF, Gomez-Gonzalez B, Aguilera A (2009) Chromosomal translocations caused by either pol32-dependent or pol32-independent triparental breakinduced replication. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5441-5454.
45. McEachern MJ, Haber JE (2006) Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 111-135.
46. Lydeard JR, Jain S, Yamaguchi M, Haber JE (2007) Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448:820-823.
47. Malkova A, Signon L, Schaefer CB, Naylor ML, Theis JF, et al. (2001) RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev 15: 1055-1060.
48. Malkova A, Naylor ML, Yamaguchi M, Ira G, Haber JE (2005) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 25: 933-944.
49. Davis AP, Symington LS (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 2344-2351.
50. Davis AP, Symington LS (2001) The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics 159: 515-525.
51. Waga S, Stillman B (1998) The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 721-751.
52. Kesti T, Flick K, Keranen S, Syvaoja JE, Wittenberg C (1999) DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability. Mol Cell 3: 679-685.
53. Dua R, Levy DL, Campbell JL (1999) Analysis of the essential functions of the C-terminal protein/protein interaction domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae pol epsilon and its unexpected ability to support growth in the absence of the DNA polymerase domain. J Biol Chem 274: 22283-22288.
54. Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundstrom EB, Johansson E, Kunkel TA (2007) Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 317: 127-130.
55. Nick McElhinny SA, Gordenin DA, Stith CM, Burgers PM, Kunkel TA (2008) Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol Cell 30: 137-144.
56. Chilkova O, Stenlund P, Isoz I, Stith CM, Grabowski P, et al. (2007) The eukaryotic leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases are loaded onto primer-ends via separate mechanisms but have comparable processivity in the presence of PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 6588-6597.
57. McIlwraith MJ, Vaisman A, Liu Y, Fanning E, Woodgate R, et al. (2005) Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol Cell 20: 783-792.
58. Kawamoto T, Araki K, Sonoda E, Yamashita YM, Harada K, et al. (2005) Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 20: 793-799.
59. Wang X, Haber JE (2004) Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNAbinding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol 2: e21. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020021.
60. Kantake N, Sugiyama T, Kolodner RD, Kowalczykowski SC (2003) The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from singlestranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J Biol Chem 278: 23410-23417.
61. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399-409.
62. Umezu K, Sugawara N, Chen C, Haber JE, Kolodner RD (1998) Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148: 989-1005.
63. Ooi SL, Shoemaker DD, Boeke JD (2003) DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray. Nat Genet 35: 277-286.
64. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
65. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808-813.
66. Onoda F, Seki M, Miyajima A, Enomoto T (2000) Elevation of sister chromatid exchange in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sgs1 disruptants and the relevance of the disruptants as a system to evaluate mutations in Bloom's syndrome gene. Mutat Res 459: 203-209.
67. Bernstein KA, Shor E, Sunjevaric I, Fumasoni M, Burgess RC, et al. (2009) Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair. EMBO J 28: 915-925.
68. Clerici M, Baldo V, Mantiero D, Lottersberger F, Lucchini G, et al. (2004) A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol Cell Biol 24:10126-10144.
69. Zou L, Elledge SJ (2003) Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300: 1542-1548.
70. Lucca C, Vanoli F, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, et al. (2004) Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23: 1206-1213.
71. Kim HS, Brill SJ (2001) Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3725-3737.
72. Kanoh Y, Tamai K, Shirahige K (2006) Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks. Gene 377: 88-95.
73. Tran PT, Erdeniz N, Symington LS, Liskay RM (2004) EXO1-A multi-tasking eukaryotic nuclease. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 1549-1559.
74. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2009) DNA end resection: Many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 983-995.
75. Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, et al. (2005) Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 17: 153-159.
76. Segurado M, Diffley JF (2008) Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 22: 1816-1827.
77. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, et al. (2008) Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 27: 2400-2410.
78. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-774.
79. Gravel S, Chapman JR, Magill C, Jackson SP (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22: 2767-2772.
80. Zhu Z, Chung WH, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981-994.
81. Conrad MN, Newlon CS (1983) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc2 mutants fail to replicate approximately one-third of their nuclear genome. Mol Cell Biol 3:1000-1012.
82. Budd ME, Campbell JL (1993) DNA polymerases delta and epsilon are required for chromosomal replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 13: 496-505.
83. Maloisel L, Bhargava J, Roeder GS (2004) A role for DNA polymerase delta in gene conversion and crossing over during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167: 1133-1142.
84. Gerik KJ, Li X, Pautz A, Burgers PM (1998) Characterization of the two small subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase delta. J Biol Chem 273:19747-19755.
85. Burgers PM, Gerik KJ (1998) Structure and processivity of two forms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase delta. J Biol Chem 273: 19756-19762.
86. Lee JA, Carvalho CM, Lupski JR (2007) A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131: 1235-1247.
87. Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, et al. (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3799-3811.
88. Wyatt MD, Pittman DL (2006) Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. Chem Res Toxicol 19:1580-1594.
89. Branzei D, Foiani M (2008) Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 297-308.
90. Torres-Ramos CA, Prakash S, Prakash L (1997) Requirement of yeast DNA polymerase delta in post-replicational repair of UV-damaged DNA. J Biol Chem 272: 25445-25448.
91. Deem A, Barker K, Vanhulle K, Downing B, Vayl A, et al. (2008) Defective break-induced replication leads to half-crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 1845-1860.
92. Smith CE, Lam AF, Symington LS (2009) Aberrant double-strand break repair resulting in half crossovers in mutants defective for Rad51 or the DNA polymerase delta complex. Mol Cell Biol 29: 1432-1441.
93. Maloisel L, Fabre F, Gangloff S (2008) DNA polymerase delta is preferentially recruited during homologous recombination to promote heteroduplex DNA extension. Mol Cell Biol 28: 1373-1382.
94. Suszek W, Baranowska H, Zuk J, Jachymczyk WJ (1993) DNA polymerase III is required for DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 24: 200-204.
95. Blank A, Kim B, Loeb LA (1994) DNA polymerase delta is required for base excision repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 9047-9051.
96. Muzi Falconi M, Piseri A, Ferrari M, Lucchini G, Plevani P, et al. (1993) De novo synthesis of budding yeast DNA polymerase alpha and POL1 transcription at the G1/S boundary are not required for entrance into S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 10519-10523.
97. Lemoine FJ, Degtyareva NP, Kokoska RJ, Petes TD (2008) Reduced levels of DNA polymerase delta induce chromosome fragile site instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 28: 5359-5368.
98. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
99. Branzei D, Seki M, Enomoto T (2004) Rad18/Rad5/Mms2-mediated polyubiquitination of PCNA is implicated in replication completion during replication stress. Genes Cells 9: 1031-1042.
100. Branzei D, Seki M, Onoda F, Enomoto T (2002) The product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae WHIP/MGS1, a gene related to replication factor C genes, interacts functionally with DNA polymerase delta. Mol Genet Genomics 268: 371-386.
101. Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD (2008) Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein a. Mol Cell 29: 625-636.
102. Huang J, Huen MS, Kim H, Leung CC, Glover JN, et al. (2009) RAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 11: 592-603.
103. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M (2002) Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602.
104. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H (2007) Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10364-10369.