Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 32, Issue , 2012, Pages 83-110

  Boers, Frank ^a   Lindstromberg, Seth ^b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b Hilderstone College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884519771     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190512000050     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2009). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67-82.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2009). Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 59, 755-795.
4. Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52, 323-363.
5. Beréndi, M., Csábi, S., & Kövecses, Z. (2008). Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 65-99). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
7. Bishop, H. (2004). The effect of typographic salience on the look up and comprehension of unknown formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 227-247). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
8. Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553-571.
9. Boers, F. (2011). Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: An assessment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 227-261.
10. Boers, F. (in press). Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching: Surveys and Studies.
11. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (in press). Gauging the effectiveness of exercises on verb-noun collocations. Language Teaching Research.
12. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing (pp. 53-78). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
13. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, H. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10, 245-261.
14. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2006). Means of motivating multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits, and cognitive-style variables. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Eurosla Yearbook 6 (pp. 169-190). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
15. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11, 43-62.
16. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2005). Finding ways to make phrase learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33, 225-238.
17. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2012). Are alliterative word combinations comparatively easy to remember for adult learners? RELC Journal, 43, 127-135.
19. Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 189-216). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Boers, F., & Stengers, H. (2008). A quantitative comparison of the English and Spanish repertoires of figurative idioms. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 355-374). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
21. Boers, F., Piquer Ṕiriz, A.M., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms? Language Teaching Research, 13, 367-382.
22. Bybee, J. (2002). Phonological evidence of exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 215-221.
23. Carpenter, S. K., & Olson, K. M. (2012). Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 92-101.
24. Cermak, L. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Chan, T.-P., & Liou, H.-C. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verb-noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 231-250.
26. Cieslicka, A. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22, 115-144.
27. Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary (6th ed.). (2008). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning; Glasgow, Scotland: HarperCollins.
28. Columbus, G. (2010). Processing MWUs: Are MWU subtypes psycholinguistically real? In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (194-210). New York, NY: Continuum.
29. Condon, N. (2008). How Cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 133-158). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29, 72-89.
31. Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17, 391-401.
32. Dai, Z., & Ding, Y. (2010). Effectiveness of text memorization in EFL learning of Chinese students. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 71-87). New York, NY: Continuum.
33. De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533-568.
34. De Ridder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension and the reading process? Language Learning & Technology, 6, 123-146.
35. Ding, Y. (2007). Text memorization and imitation: The practices of successful Chinese learners of English. System, 35, 271-280.
36. Durrant, P. (in press). Formulaic morphology in an agglutinating language: The case of Turkish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.
37. Durrant, P., & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psycholinguistically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6, 125-155.
38. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 157-177.
39. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners' retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26, 163-188.
40. Dziemianko, A. (2010). Paper or electronic? The role of dictionary form in language reception, production and the retention of meaning and collocations. International Journal of Lexicography, 23, 257-273.
41. Dziemianko, A. (2011). Does dictionary form really matter? In K. Akasu & S. Uchida (Eds.), Asialex 2011 Proceedings. Lexicography: Theoretical and practical perspectives. (pp. 92-101). Kyoto, Japan: The Asian Association for Lexicography.
42. Ellis, N. C., Frey, E., & Jalkanen, I. (2009). The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (1): Lexical access. In U. Römer & R. Schulze (Eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface (pp. 89-114). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
43. Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375-396.
44. Erten, I. H., & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System, 36, 407-22.
45. Eyckmans, J. (2007). Taking SLA research to interpreter training: Does knowledge of phrases foster fluency? In F. Boers, J. Darquennes, & R. Temmerman (Eds.), Multi-lingualism and applied comparative linguistics: Pedagogical perspectives (pp. 89-104). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
46. Eyckmans, J., Boers, F., & Stengers, H. (2007). Identifying chunks: Who can see the wood for the trees? Language Forum, 33, 85-100.
47. Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 369-383.
48. Forsberg, F. (2010). Using conventional sequences in L2 French. IRAL, 48, 25-51.
49. Gatbonten, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on accuracy and fluency. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 61, 325-353.
50. Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183-206.
51. Gries, S.T. (2011). Phonological similarity in multiword units. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 491-510.
52. Gürsoy, E. (2008). The noticing of formulaic sequences by Turkish learners of English. (Unpublished master's thesis). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
53. Hamilton, M., & Rajaram, S. (2001). The concreteness effect in implicit and explicit memory tests. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 96-117.
54. Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London, UK: Rout-ledge.
55. Hsu, J.-Y. (2010). The effects of collocation instruction on the reading comprehension and vocabulary learning of Taiwanese college English majors. Asian EFL Journal, 12, 47-87.
56. Hsu, J.-Y., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2008). Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency of college EFL learners in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 181-204.
57. Hu, Y.-H., & Fong, Y.-Y. (2010). Obstacles to conceptual-metaphor guided L2 idiom interpretation. In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 293-317). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
58. Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O'Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29, 24-49.
60. Jiang, N., & Nekrasova, T. M. (2007). The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 433-445.
61. Jones, M., & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 269-300). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
62. Kasahara, K. (2011). The effect of known-and-unknown word combinations on intentional vocabulary learning. System, 39, 491-499.
63. Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 81-92.
64. Kim, Y. (2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 100-140.
65. Komuro, Y. (2009). Japanese learners' collocation dictionary retrieval performance. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple perspectives (pp. 86-98). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
66. Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17, 326-355.
67. Kuiper, K. (1996). Smooth talkers: The linguistic performance of auctioneers and sportscast-ers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Kuiper, K., Columbus, G., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Acquiring phrasal vocabulary. In Susan Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 216-240). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
69. Kuiper, K., Van Egmond, M.-E., Kempen, G., & Sprenger, S. (2007). Slipping on superlem-mas: Multiword lexical items in speech production. Mental Lexicon, 2, 313-357.
70. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
71. Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary acquisition. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), EUROSLA Yearbook 5 (pp. 223-250). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
72. Laufer, B. (2011). The contribution of dictionary use to the production and retention of collocations in a second language. International Journal of Lexicography, 24, 29-49.
73. Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694-716.
74. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement, Applied Linguistics, 22, 1-26.
75. Laufer, B., & Roitblat-Rozovski, B. (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 15, 391-411.
76. Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners' English. Language Learning, 61, 647-672.
77. Laurent, J.-P., Denhières, G., Passerieux, C., Iakimova, G, & Hardy-Baylé, M.-C. (2005). On understanding idiomatic language: The salience hypothesis assessed by ERPs. Brain Research, 1068, 151-160.
78. Lea, D., Crowther, J., & Dignen, S. (Eds.). (2002). Oxford collocations dictionary for students of English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79. Lewis, M. (1993) The lexical approach. Hove, UK: LTP.
80. Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach. Hove, UK: LTP.
81. Li, T. F. (2009). Metaphor, image, and image schemas in second language pedagogy. Köln, Germany: Lambert Academic.
82. Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2010). The development of collocation use in academic texts by advanced L2 learners: A multiple case study approach. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 22-46). New York. NY: Continuum.
83. Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26, 241-261.
84. Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008a). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29, 200-222.
85. Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008b). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The mnemonic power of assonance. System, 36, 423-436.
86. Littlemore, J., Chen, P.T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32, 408-429.
87. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (5th ed.). (2009). Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
88. Martinez, R., & Murphy, V. A. (2011). Effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 267-290.
89. Millar, N. (2010). The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32, 129-148.
90. Moon, R. E. (1992). There is reason in the roasting of eggs: A consideration of fixed expressions in native-speaker dictionaries. In H. Tommola, K. Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen, & J. Schopp (Eds.), Euralex '92 Proceedings (pp. 493-502). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere Department of Translation Studies.
91. Mueller, C. M. (2011). English learners' knowledge of prepositions: Collocational knowledge or knowledge based on meaning? System, 39, 480-490.
92. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
93. Nekrasova, T. M. (2009). English L1 and L2 speakers' knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 59, 647-686.
94. Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
95. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
96. Peters, E. (2009). Learning collocations through attention-drawing techniques: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple perspectives (pp. 194-207). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
97. Peters, E. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: The effect of two attention-drawing techniques. Language Learning Journal, 40, 65-79.
98. Petchka, K. (2010). Input enhancement, noticing, and incidental vocabulary acquisition. Asian EFL Journal, 13, 228-255.
99. Peters, E., Hulstijn, J. H., Sercu, L., & Lutjeharms, M. (2009). Learning L2 German vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language Learning, 59, 113-151.
100. Qi, Y., & Ding, Y. (2011). Use of formulaic sequences in monologues of Chinese EFL learners. System, 39, 164-174.
101. Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.
102. Samuels, S. J. (1970). Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes. Review of Educational Research, 40, 397-407
103. Schmitt, N. (Ed.) (2004). Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
104. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95, 26-43.
105. Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 119-139.
106. Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N. (2008). L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 429-458.
107. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251-272.
108. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. (2011). Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 776-784.
109. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
110. Skoufaki, S. (2008). Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two idiom presentation methods. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (101-132). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
111. Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161-184.
112. Staehr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577-607.
113. Steinel, M. P., Hulstijn, J. H., & Steinel, W. (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449-484.
114. Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2010). Does "chunking" foster chunk-uptake? In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (99-117). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
115. Stengers, H., Boers, F., & Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 321-343.
116. Szczepaniak, R., & Lew, R. (2011). The role of imagery in dictionaries of idioms. Applied Linguistics, 32, 323-347.
117. Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, 37, 529-540.
118. Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second Language Research, 13, 138-163.
119. Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Language Learning, 61, 569-613.
120. Tribble, C., &Jones, G. (1997). Concordances in the classroom: A resource book for teachers. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
121. Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 153-172). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
122. Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25, 261-274.
123. Waring, R. & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 130-163.
124. Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 55-77.
125. Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2011). Learning collocations: Do the number of collocates, position of the node word, and synonymy affect learning? Applied Linguistics, 32, 259-276.
126. Webb, S., Newton, J., & Chang, A. C. S. (in press). Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning.
127. Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 13-33.
128. Wood, D. (2009). Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 39-57.
129. Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. New York, NY: Continuum.
130. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
131. Wray, A. (2004). "Here's one Iprepared earlier": Formulaic language learningontelevision. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 249-268). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
132. Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
133. Wray, A., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2010). Pushing learners to the extreme: The artificial use of prefabricated material in conversation. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 37-51.
134. Wu, S., Witten, I. H., & Franken, M. (2010). Utilizing lexical data from a web-derived corpus to expand productive collocation knowledge. ReCALL, 22, 83-102.
135. Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647-668.
136. Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 250-273.
137. Yu, X. (2009). A formal criterion for identifying lexical phrases: Implications from a classroom experiment. System, 37, 689-699.
138. Zyzik, E. (2011). Second language idiom learning: The effects of lexical knowledge and pedagogical sequencing. Language Teaching Research, 15, 413-433.