The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 9, Issue , 2004, Pages 153-172

  Underwood, Geoffrey ^a   Schmitt, Norbert ^a   Galpin, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127289036     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Carpenter, P.A. and Just, M.A. 1983. What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In: Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes, K. Rayner (ed.), 275-307. New York: Academic Press.
2. Cobb, T. The Compleat Lexical Tutor (v.2). Internet resource available at . Accessed February 2003.
3. Ehrlich, S. F. and Rayner, K. 1981. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 641-655.
4. Inhoff, A.W. and Rayner, K. 1986. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 40: 431-439.
5. Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87: 329-354.
6. Nattinger, J.R. and DeCarrico, J.S. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.
7. Pawley, A. and Syder, F.H. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J.C. Richards and R.W. Schmidt (eds), 191-225. London: Longman.
8. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124: 372-422.
9. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S.A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 14: 191-201.
10. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., and Pollatsek, A. 2000. Eye movement control in reading: Updating the E-Z Reader model to account for initial fixation locations and refixations. In Reading as a Perceptual Process, A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, and J. Pynte (eds), 701-719. Oxford: Elsevier.
11. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., and Rayner, K. 1998. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 105: 125-157.
12. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek, A. 1999. Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research 39: 4403-4411.
13. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., and Pollatsek,A. 2003. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in press.
14. Tinker, M.A. 1958. Recent studies of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin 55: 215-231.
15. Underwood, G. (ed.). 1998. Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception. Oxford: Elsevier.
16. Underwood, G. and Batt, V. 1996. Reading and Understanding. Oxford: Blackwells.
17. Underwood, G., Binns, A., and Walker, S. 2000. Attentional demands on the processing of neighbouring words. In Reading as a Perceptual Process, A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, and J. Pynte (eds), 247-268. Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Warren, H. (ed). 1994. Oxford Learner's Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford: OUP.
19. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.