Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition

Optimizing a Lexical Approach to Instructed Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-194

  Boers, Frank ^a   Lindstromberg, Seth ^b  

^a Erasmus University College   (Belgium)

^b Hilderstone EFL College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994318645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230245006     Document Type: Book

References (360)

1. British National corpus, http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk.
2. Cambridge International corpus, http://www.cambridge.org/elt/corpus/interna tional_corpus.htm.
3. CANCODE is part of the Cambridge International Corpus.
4. Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner’s English Dictionary (2006, 5th edition) (Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers).
5. Collins Cobuild Dictionary of Idioms (2002, 2nd edition) (Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers).
6. Collins Cobuild Wordbanks, http://www.collins.co.uk/corpus/CorpusSearch.aspx.
7. LTP Dictionary of Selected Collocations (1997) (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
8. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (2007, 2nd edition) (Oxford: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.).
9. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of English (2000, 6th edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
10. Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English (2002) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
11. Oxford Dictionary of English (2005, 2nd revised edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12. Oxford Idioms Dictionary for Learners of English (2001) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
13. Oxford Phrasal Verbs Dictionary for Learners of English (2006) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
14. Oxford Dictionary of Idioms (1999), ed. Jennifer Speake (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
15. The Concise Oxford Dictionary (1990, 8th edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
16. Aitchison, J. (2003) Words in the Mind (3rd edn) (Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell).
17. Anderson, J. R. (1982) ‘Acquisition of cognitive skill’, Psychological Review, 89: 369-406.
18. Anderson, J. R. (1984) ‘Spreading activation’ in J. R. Anderson and S. M. Kosslyn (eds.) Tutorials in Learning and Memory, pp. 61-90 (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman).
19. Anderson, J. R. (1993) Rules of the Mind (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
20. Arnaud, P. J. L. and S. J. Savignon (1997) ‘Rare words, complex lexical units and the advanced learner’ in J. Coady and T. Huckin (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, pp. 157-73 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21. Asher, J. J. (1966) ‘The learning strategy of the total physical response: a review’, Modern Language Journal, 50: 79-84.
22. Asher, J. J. (1988) Learning Another Language Through Actions: A Teacher’s Guidebook (3rd edn) (Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks).
23. Atkinson, R. C. (1975) ‘Mnemontechnics in second-language learning’, American Psychologist, 30: 821-8.
24. Avila, E. and M. Sadoski (1996) ‘Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquiring English vocabulary’, Language Learning, 46: 379-95.
25. Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
26. Bachman, L. F. and A. S. Palmer (1996) Language Testing in Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
27. Baddeley, A. (1997) Human Memory: Theory and Practice (Hove: Psychology Press Ltd.) [Revised from Baddeley, A. (1990) Human Memory: Theory and Practice (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon)].
28. Baker, J. (1998) ‘Metaphor’, English Teaching Professional, 7: 13-14.
29. Barcelona, A. (2000) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
30. Barcroft, J. (2002) ‘Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition’, Language Learning, 52: 323-63.
31. Barfield A. and H. Gyllstad (eds.) (in press) Researching Second Language Collocation Knowledge (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
32. Barlow, M. and S. Kemmer (eds.) (2000) Usage Based Models of Language (Palo Alto: CSLI Publications).
33. Bartlett, J. C. and P. Snelus (1980) ‘Lifespan memory for popular songs’, American Journal of Psychology, 93: 551-60.
34. Baugh, A. C. and T. Cable (1993) A History of the English Language (4th edn)(London: Routledge).
35. Becker, J. D. (1975). ‘The phrasal lexicon’ in Proceedings of the 1975 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, Cambridge, MA, pp. 70-7(Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics).
36. Bensoussan, M. and B. Laufer (1984) ‘Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension’, Journal of Research in Learning, 7: 15-32.
37. Beréndi, M., S. Csábi and Z. Kövecses (2008) ‘Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.)Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 65-99(Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
38. Bishop, H. (2004) ‘Noticing formulaic sequences: a problem of measuring the subjective’, LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 4: 15-19. (Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison).
39. Bobrow, S. A. and S. M. Bell (1973) ‘On catching on to idiomatic expressions’, Memory and Cognition, 1: 343-6.
40. Boers, F. (2000a) ‘Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading’, English for Specific Purposes, 19: 137-47.
41. Boers, F. (2000b) ‘Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention’, Applied Linguistics, 21: 553-71.
42. Boers, F. (2001) ‘Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesising about their origin’, Prospect, 16: 35-43.
43. Boers, F. (2003) ‘Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor’, Metaphor and Symbol, 18: 231-8.
44. Boers, F. and M. Demecheleer (1998) ‘A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions’, English Language Teaching Journal, 53: 197-204.
45. Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg (2005) ‘Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration’, System, 33: 225-38.
46. Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg (2008a) ‘Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 330-53 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
47. Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg (2008b) ‘From empirical findings to pedagogical practice’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 375-93 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
48. Boers, F. and S. Lindstromberg (2008c) ‘How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 1-61 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
49. Boers, F. and H. Stengers (2008a) ‘A quantitative comparison of the English and Spanish repertoires of figurative idioms’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 355-74 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
50. Boers, F. and H. Stengers (2008b) ‘Adding sound to the picture: An exercise in motivating the lexical composition of metaphorical idioms in English, Spanish and Dutch’ in M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron and M. C. Cavalcanti (eds.) Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach, pp. 63-78(Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
51. Boers, F., M. Demecheleer and J. Eyckmans (2004a) ‘Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms’ in P. Bogaards and B. Laufer (eds.)Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition and Testing, pp. 53-78(Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
52. Boers, F., M. Demecheleer and J. Eyckmans (2004b) ‘Cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms’, European Journal of English Studies, 8: 375-88.
53. Boers, F., J. Eyckmans and H. Stengers (2007) ‘Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics?’ Language Teaching Research, 11: 43-62.
54. Boers, F., J. Eyckmans, J. Kappel, H. Stengers and M. Demecheleer (2006)‘Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test’, Language Teaching Research, 10: 245-61.
55. Boers, F., S. Lindstromberg, J. Littlemore, H. Stengers and J. Eyckmans (2008)‘Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 189-216 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
56. Boers, F., A. M. Piquer Píriz, H. Stengers and J. Eyckmans (2009) ‘Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms?’ Language Teaching Research, 12.
57. Branford, H. (1994) Dimanche Diller in Danger (London: Collins Children’s Books).
58. Brugman, C. (1981) Story of Over. MA thesis (University of California, Berkeley).
59. Bugelski, B. R. (1982) ‘Learning and imagery’, Journal of Mental Imagery, 6(1): 1-92.
60. Butler, C. (2005) ‘Forumulaic language: an overview with particular reference to the cross-linguistic perspective’ in C. Butler, M. Gómez-González, S. Doval-Suarez (eds.) The Dynamics of Language Use, pp. 221-42 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
61. Bybee, J. (2002) ‘Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24: 215-21.
62. Bybee, J. and S. Thompson (2000) ‘Three frequency effects in syntax’, Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23: 65-85.
63. Byrne, D. (1976) Teaching Oral English (Harlow, UK: Longman).
64. Cacciari, C. and P. Tabossi (1988) ‘The comprehension of idioms’, Journal of Memory and Language, 2: 668-83.
65. Cadierno, T. (2004) ‘Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective’ in M. Achard and S. Niemeier (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching (Studies on Language Acquisition, 18), pp. 13-49 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
66. Castagnaro, P. J. (2006) ‘Audiolingual Method and Behaviorism, from misunderstanding to myth’, Applied Linguistics, 27: 519-26.
67. Cermak, L. S. and F. I. M. Craik (1979) Levels of Processing in Human Memory.(Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
68. Cheng, P. W. (1985) ‘Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition’, Psychological Review, 92: 414-23.
69. Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
70. Cieślicka, A. (2006) ‘Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners’, Second Language Research, 22: 115-44.
71. Cieślicka, A. (2008) ‘Formulaic language in L2: Storage, retrieval, and production of idioms by second language learners’, Paper presented at the 33rd International LAUD Symposium, March 10-13, 2008. University of Duisburg-Essen.
72. Colson, J. P. (2008) ‘Cross-linguistic phraseological studies: an overview’ in S. Granger and F. Meunier (eds.) Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 191-206 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
73. Condon, N. (2008) ‘How Cognitive Linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 133-58 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
74. Conklin, K. and N. Schmitt (2008) ‘The processing advantage of formulaic sequences’, Applied Linguistics, 29: 72-89.
75. Conzett, J. (2000) ‘Integrating collocation into a reading and writing course’ in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach, pp. 70-87 (Hove: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
76. Cook, G. (2000) Language Play, Language Learning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
77. Corson, D. (1985) The Lexical Bar (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
78. Coulmas, F. (1981) ‘Introduction: conversational routine’ in F. Coulmas (ed.)Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, pp. 1-18 (The Hague: Mouton).
79. Coxhead, A. (2000) ‘A new academic word list’, TESOL Quarterly, 34: 213-38.
80. Croft, W. (2001) Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
81. Cruttenden, A. (1981) ‘Item-learning and system-learning’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10: 79-88.
82. Csábi, S. (2004) ‘A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching’ in M. Achard and S. Niemeier (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, pp. 233-56 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
83. Cutting, J. C. and Bock, K. (1997) ‘That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends’, Memory and Cognition, 25: 57-91.
84. Daller, H., J. Milton and J. Treffers-Daller (2007) Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
85. Day, E. and S. Shapson. (2001) ‘Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study’, Language Learning, 51: 7-80.
86. de Bot, K. (1992) ‘A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted’, Applied Linguistics, 13: 1-24.
87. de Bot, K. (1996) ‘The pyscholinguistics of the output hypothesis’, Language Learning, 46: 529-55.
88. Dechert, H. W. (1983) ‘How a story is done in a second language’ in C. Faerch and G. Kasper (eds.) Strategies for Interlanguage Communication, pp. 175-95(London: Longman).
89. De Cock, S. (2004) ‘Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, New Series, 2: 225-46.
90. Deignan, A., D. Gabrys and A. Solska (1997) ‘Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities’, ELT Journal, 51: 352-60.
91. DeKeyser, R. (2001) ‘Automaticity and automatization’ in P. Robinson (ed.)Cognition and Second Language Instruction, pp. 125-51 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
92. DeKeyser, R. (2007) ‘Situating the concept of practice’ in R. DeKeyser (ed.)Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, pp. 1-18 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
93. De Ridder, I. (2002) ‘Visible or invisible links: Does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension and the reading process?’ Language Learning and Technology, 6: 123-46.
94. De Rycker, T. (2004) ‘Lists, boxes or maps? Recording and retrieving Collocations in an ELT/ESP context’, Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, New Series, 2: 315-28.
95. Dewhurst, S. and C. Robinson (2004) ‘False memories in children: Evidence for a shift from phonological to semantic associations’, Psychological Science, 15: 782-6.
96. Doughty, C. and J. Williams (eds.) 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
97. Draaisma, D. (2000) Metaphors of Memory: A History of Ideas about the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). [Originally published in Dutch in 1995.]
98. Ellis, N. (1996a) ‘Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18: 91-126.
99. Ellis, N. (1996b) ‘Analyzing language sequence in the sequence of language acquisition: some comments on Major and Ioup’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18: 361-8.
100. Ellis, N. (2002) ‘Frequency effects in language processing’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24: 143-88.
101. Ellis, N. (2008a) ‘Phraseology: The periphery and the heart of language’ in F. Meunier and S. Granger (eds.) Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 1-13 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
102. Ellis, N. (2008b) ‘The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition’, The Modern Language Journal, 92: 232-49.
103. Ellis, N. and D. Larsen-Freeman (2006) ‘Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics’ (introduction to the Special Issue), Applied Linguistics, 27: 558-89.
104. Ellis, N., R. Simpson-Vlach and C. Maynard (2008) ‘Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL’, TESOL Quarterly, 42: 375-96.
105. Ellis, R. (1990) ‘Individual styles in classroom second language development’in J. de Jong and G. Stevenson (eds.) Individualizing the Assessment of Language Abilities (Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters).
106. Ellis, R. (2003) Task-based Language Learning and Teaching (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
107. Ellis, R. and G. Barkhuizen (2005) Analysing Learning Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
108. Erman, B. and B. Warren (2000) ‘The idiom principle and the open choice principle’, Text, 20: 87-120.
109. Erten, İ. H. and M. Tekin (2008) ‘Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets’, System, 36: 407-22.
110. Eyckmans, J. (2007) ‘Taking SLA research to interpreter-training: Does knowledge of phrases foster fluency?’ in F. Boers, J. Darquennes, R. Temmerman (eds.)Multilingualism and Applied Comparative Linguistics: Pedagogical Perspectives, pp. 89-104 (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing).
111. Eyckmans, J. (in press) ‘Towards an assessment of learners’ receptive and productive syntagmatic knowledge’ in A. Barfield and H. Gyllstad (eds.) Researching Second Language Collocation Knowledge (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
112. Eyckmans, J., F. Boers and M. Demecheleer (2004) ‘The Deleted-Essentials Test: an effective and affective compromise’, Humanising Language Teaching 6. www.hltmag.co.uk (Pilgrims).
113. Eyckmans, J., F. Boers and H. Stengers (2007) ‘Identifying chunks: Who can see the wood for the trees?’ Language Forum, 33: 85-100.
114. Fallon, A., K. Groves and G. Tehan (1999) ‘Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN’, International Journal of Psychology, 34: 301-7.
115. Fillmore, C. (2000 [1979]) ‘On fluency’ in H. Riggenbach (ed.) Perspectives on Fluency, pp. 43-60 (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press).Reprinted from C. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. Wang (eds.) (1979) Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, pp. 85-101 (New York: Academic Press).
116. Fillmore, C., P. Kay and M. O’Connor (1988) ‘Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions’, Language, 64(3): 501-38.
117. Finkenstädt, T. and D. Wolff (1973) Ordered Profusion: Studies in Dictionaries and the English Lexicon (Heidelberg: Carl Winter).
118. Firth, J. R. (1930) Speech (London: Ernest Benn).
119. Firth, J. R. (1957) ‘General linguistics and descriptive grammar’ in Papers in Linguistics 1934-1965, pp. 216-28 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
120. Fitzpatrick, T. and A. Wray (2006) ‘Breaking up is not so hard to do: Individual differences in L2 memorization’, Canadian Modern Language Review, 63: 35-57.
121. Fodor, J. A. (1981) ‘Imagistic representation’ in N. Block (ed.) Imagery, pp. 63-86(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
122. Forsberg, F. (2006) Le Langage Préfabriqué en Français L2: Etude Acquisitionelle et Comparative (Stockholm: Stockholm University).
123. Freeborn, D. (2006) From Old English to Standard English: A Course Book in Language Variation across Time (3rd edn) (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
124. Fries, C., R. Lado and the Staff of the Michigan English Language Institute (1958) English Pattern Practices: Establishing the Patterns as Habits (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
125. Furumoto, L. (1991) ‘From "Paired Associates" to a psychology of self: The intellectual odyssey of Mary Whiton Calkins’ in G. A. Kimble, M. Wertheimer and C. White (eds.) Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology, pp. 57-72 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
126. Gatbonton, E., and N. Segalowitz (2005). ‘Rethinking communicative language teaching: a focus on access to fluency’, Canadian Modern Language Journal, 61: 325-53.
127. Gates, R. (2009) ‘A balanced strategy: reprogramming the Pentagon for a new age’, Foreign Affairs, January/February. (Accessed on the internet via Slate Magazine in Nov. 2008).
128. Gibbs, R. W. Jr (1980) ‘Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation’, Memory and Cognition, 8: 449-56.
129. Gibbs, R. W. Jr (1985) ‘On the process of understanding idioms’ Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14: 465-72.
130. Gibbs, R. W. Jr (1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
131. Glucksberg, S. (1991) ‘Beyond literal meanings: the psychology of allusion’, Psychological Science, 2: 146-52.
132. Glucksberg, S. (1993) ‘Idiom meanings and allusional context’ in C. Cacciari and P. Tabossi (eds.) Idioms, Proccessing, Structure, and Interpretation, pp. 3-27(Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
133. Glucksberg, S. (2001) Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
134. Godfroid, A., A. Housen and F. Boers (2009) ‘A procedure for testing the Noticing Hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition’ in M. Pütz and L. Sicola (eds.) Inside the Learner’s Mind: Cognitive Processing and Second Language Acquisition (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
135. Goldberg, A. E. (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
136. Gombrich, E. H. (2004 [1960]) Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (London: Phaidon).
137. Gombrich, E. H. (1985 [1972]) Symbolic Images (Edinburgh: Phaidon).
138. Granger S. (1998) ‘Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae’ in A. P. Cowie (ed.) Phraseology, Theory, Analysis and Applications, pp. 145-60 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
139. Grant, L. and L. Bauer. (2004) ‘Criteria for re-defining idioms: Are we barking up the wrong tree?’ Applied Linguistics, 25: 38-61.
140. Gupta, P., J. Lipinski and E. Aktunc (2005) ‘Re-examining the phonological similarity effect in serial recall: The roles of type similarity, category cueing, and item recall’, Memory and Cognition, 33: 1001-16.
141. Han, Z., E. S. Park and C. Combs (2008) ‘Textual enhancement of input: Issues and Possibilities’, Applied linguistics, 29: 597-618.
142. Hargreaves, P. (2000) ‘Collocating and testing’ in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation, pp. 205-23 (Hove: LTP).
143. Harmer, J. (2001) The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd edn) (Harlow, UK: Longman).
144. Hatch, E. V. and C. Brown (1995) Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
145. Hill, J. (2000) ‘Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success’in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach, pp. 47-68 (Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle).
146. Hill, J., M. Lewis and M. Lewis (2000) ‘Classroom strategies, activities and exercises’in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach, pp. 88-116 (Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle).
147. Hoey, M. (2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language (London: Routledge).
148. Holme, R. (2004) Mind, Metaphor and Language Teaching (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
149. Hopper, P. and E. Traugott (1993) Grammaticalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
150. Howarth, P. (1998) ‘Phraseology and second language proficiency’, Applied Linguistics, 19: 24-44.
151. Howatt, A. P. R. (2004) A History of English Language Teaching (revised edn)(Oxford: Oxford University Press).
152. Hu, M. and P. Nation (2000) ‘Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension’, Reading in a Foreign Language, 13: 403-30.
153. Huckin, T. and J. Coady (1999) ‘Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21: 181-93.
154. Hulstijn, J. (1992) ‘Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning’ in P. J. L. Arnaud and H. Béjoint (eds.)Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, pp. 112-25 (London: Macmillan).
155. Hulstijn, J. (1993) ‘When do foreign-language learners look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables’, The Modern Language Journal, 77: 139-47.
156. Hulstijn, J. (2001) ‘Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity’ in P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction, pp. 258-86 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
157. Hulstijn, J. and B. Laufer (2001) ‘Some empirical evidence for the Involvement Load Hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition’, Language Learning, 51: 539-58.
158. Hulstijn J., M. Hollander and T. Greidanus (1996) ‘Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words’, The Modern Language Journal, 80: 327-39.
159. Ilson, R. (1983) ‘Etymological information: Can it help our students?’ English Teaching Journal, 37: 76-82.
160. Ioup, G. (1996) ‘Grammatical knowledge and memorized chunks’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18: 355-60.
161. Irujo, S. (1993) ‘Steering clear: Avoidance in the production of idioms’, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 31: 205-19.
162. Jackendoff, R. (2003) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
163. Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Reason and Imagination (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
164. Jusczyk, P., M. Goodman and A. Baumann (1999) ‘Nine-month-olds’ attention to sound similarities in syllables’, Journal of Memory and Learning, 40: 62-82.
165. Kecskes, I. (2002) Situation-bound Utterances in L1 and L2 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).
166. Kelly, P. (1990) ‘Guessing: No substitute for the systematic learning of lexis’, System, 18: 199-208.
167. Kennedy, G. (2008) ‘Phraseology and language pedagogy: Semantic preference associated with English verbs in the British National Corpus’ in F. Meunier and S. Granger (eds.) Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 21-41 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
168. Kies, D. (1990) ‘Three principles underlying iconicity in literature: the poetics of nonsense in children’s and general literature’. A paper prepared for the Seventeenth International Systemic Congress, July 3-7, 1990, at the University of Stirling, Scotland. http,//papyr.com/hypertextbooks/grammar/iconicity.htm. Accessed, 26 Nov. 2008.
169. Klein-Braley, C. (1997) ‘C-Tests in the context of reduced redundancy testing: An appraisal’, Language Testing, 14: 47-84.
170. Knight, S. (1994) ‘Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities’, The Modern Language Journal, 78: 285-99.
171. Kövecses, Z. (1990) Emotion Concepts (New York: Springer).
172. Kövecses, Z. and P. Szabó (1996) ‘Idioms: A view from Cognitive Semantics’, Applied Linguistics, 17: 326-55.
173. Krashen, S. D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
174. Krashen, S. D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications (London: Longman).
175. Krashen, S. D. (1989) ‘We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input hypothesis’, Modern Language Journal, 73: 440-64.
176. Krashen, S. D. and T. D. Terrell (1983) The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom (Hayward, CA: Alemany Press).
177. Kuiper, K. (1996) Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
178. Lakoff, G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
179. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
180. Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
181. Langacker, R. W. (1990) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 2: Descriptive Applications (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
182. Langacker, R. W. (2000) ‘A dynamic usage-based model’ in M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.) Usage-Based Models of Language, pp. 1-63 (Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications).
183. Laufer, B. (1989) ‘What percentage of text lexis is necessary for comprehension?‘in C. Lauren and M. Nordman (eds.) Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines, pp. 316-23 (Clevedon: Multilingual Matters).
184. Laufer, B. (1997) ‘The lexical plight in second language reading’ in J. Coady and T. Huckin (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, pp. 20-34 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
185. Laufer, B. (2005) ‘Focus on form in second language vocabulary acquisition’ in Susan Foster-Cohen (ed.) EUROSLA Yearbook 5, pp. 223-50 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
186. Laufer, B. and N. Girsai (2008) ‘Form-focussed instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation’, Applied Linguistics, 29: 694-716.
187. Laufer, B. and M. Hill (2000) ‘What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention?’ Language Learning and Technology, 3: 58-76.
188. Laufer, B. and J. Hulstijn (2001) ‘Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement’, Applied Linguistics, 22: 1-26.
189. Laufer, B. and P. Nation (2001) ‘Passive vocabulary size and the speed of meaning recognition: Are they related?’ in S. H. Foster-Cohen and A. Nizegorodcew (eds.) EUROSLA Yearbook 1, pp. 7-28 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
190. Laufer, B. and D. Sim (1985) ‘An attempt to measure the threshold of competence for reading comprehension’, Foreign Language Annals, 18(5): 405-11.
191. Lazar, G. (1996) ‘Using figurative language to expand students’ vocabulary’, ELTJournal, 50: 43-51.
192. Lazar, G. (2003) Meanings and Metaphors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
193. Lea, R. B., D. N. Rapp, A. Elfenbein, A. D. Mitchel and R. S. Romine (2008)‘Sweet silent thought: Alliteration and resonance in poetry comprehension’, Psychological Science, 19: 709-16.
194. Leeman, J. (2007) ‘Feedback in L2 learning: responding to errors during practice’in R. M. DeKeysar (ed.) Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, pp. 111-37 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
195. Lennon, P. (1990) ‘Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach’, Language Learning, 40(3): 387-417.
196. Leow, R. P. (2000) ‘A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behaviour: Aware versus unaware learners’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22: 557-84.
197. Levelt, W. (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (Cambridge, MA: MITPress).
198. Lewis, Michael (1993) The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
199. Lewis, Michael (1997) Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
200. Lewis, Michael (ed.) (2000) Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
201. Lewis, Morgan (2000) ‘There is nothing as practical as a good theory’ in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach, pp. 10-27 (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
202. Libben, M. R. and D. A. Titone (2008) ‘The multidetermined nature of idiom processing’, Memory and Cognition, 36: 1103-21.
203. Lindstromberg, S. (1997) English Prepositions Explained (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
204. Lindstromberg, S. and F. Boers (2005a) ‘From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs’, Applied Linguistics, 26: 241-61.
205. Lindstromberg, S. and F. Boers (2005b) ‘Means of mass-memorisation of multiword expressions, part one: The power of sounds’, Humanising Language Teaching, 7; www.hltmag.co.uk (Pilgrims).
206. Lindstromberg, S. and F. Boers (2008a) ‘Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: the mnemonic power of assonance’, System, 36: 423-36.
207. Lindstromberg, S., and F. Boers (2008b) ‘The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks’, Applied Linguistics, 29: 200-22.
208. Lindstromberg, S. and F. Boers (2008c) Teaching Chunks of Language (Rum, Austria: Helbling Languages).
209. Littlemore, J. (2001) ‘Metaphor as a source of misunderstanding for overseas students in academic lectures’, Teaching in Higher Education, 6: 333-51.
210. Littlemore, J. and G. Low (2006) Figurative Thinking and Foreign Language Learning (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
211. Logan, G. (1988) ‘Toward an Instance Theory of automatization’, Psychological Review, 95: 492-527.
212. Logan, G. (1997) ‘Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the Instance Theory of automatization’, Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13: 123-46.
213. Long, M. H. (1991) ‘Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology’in K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg and C. Kramsch (eds.) Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, pp. 39-52 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
214. Lord, A. (1956) ‘The role of sound patterns in Serbo-Croatian epic’ in M. Halle, H. Lunt, H. McLean and C. van Schooneveld (eds) For Roman Jakobson. Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 301-5 (The Hague: Mouton).
215. Lord, A. (1964) The Singer of Tales (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
216. MacArthur, F., and J. Littlemore (2008) ‘A discovery approach to figurative language learning with the use of corpora’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 159-88 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
217. Mackey, A., J. Philp, T. Egi, A. Fujii and T. Tatsumi (2002) ‘Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development’in P. Robinson (ed.) Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, pp. 181-209 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
218. MacLennan, C. H. G. (1994) ‘Metaphors and prototypes in the teaching and learning of grammar and vocabulary’, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32: 97-110.
219. Major, R. (1996) ‘Chunking and memory: a response to Ellis’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18: 351-54.
220. McCarthy, M. (1998) Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
221. McCrone, J. (1999) ‘States of mind’, New Scientist 2178: 30-33.
222. McDermid, V. (2007) Beneath the Bleeding (London: HarperCollins).
223. McQuarrie, E. and D. Mick (1999) ‘Visual rhetoric in advertising: textinterpretative, experimental and reader-response analyses’, Journal of Consumer Research, 26: 37-54.
224. Meara, P. (1980) ‘Vocabulary acquisition: a neglected aspect of language learning’, Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 13: 221-46.
225. Mondria, J. A. (2003) ‘The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings: An experimental comparison of the "meaning-inferred method" and the "meaning-given method" ', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25: 473-99.
226. Moon, R. (1998a) ‘Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English’ in A. P. Cowie (ed.) Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications, pp. 79-100(Oxford: Clarendon Press).
227. Moon, R. (1998b) Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
228. Mothersbaugh, D., B. Huhmann and G. Franke (2002) ‘Combinatory and separative effects of rhetorical figures on consumers’ effort and focus in ad processing’, Journal of Consumer Research, 28: 589-602.
229. Myles, F., J. Hooper and R. Mitchell (1998) ‘Rote or rule: Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning’, Language Learning, 48: 323-64.
230. Naciscione, A. (2001) Phraseological Units in Discourse: Towards Applied Stylistics (Riga: Latvian Academy of Culture).
231. Nagy, W. (1997) ‘On the role of context in first-and second language vocabulary learning’ in N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (eds.) Vocabulary: Description, Acquistion and Pedagogy, pp. 64-83 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
232. Nänny, M. and O. Fisher (eds.) (1999) Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
233. Nation, P. (2000) ‘Learning vocabulary in lexical sets: Dangers and guidelines’, TESOL Journal, 9: 6-10.
234. Nation, P. (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
235. Nation, P. and P. Meara (2002) ‘Vocabulary’ in N. Schmitt (ed.) An Introduction to Applied Linguistics, pp. 35-54 (London: Arnold).
236. Nattinger, J. R. (1988) ‘Some current trends in vocabulary teaching’ in R. Carter and M. McCarthy (eds.) Vocabulary and Language Teaching, pp. 62-82 (Harlow: Longman).
237. Nattinger, J. R. and J. S. DeCarrico (1992) Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
238. Nehls, D. (1991) ‘Do/Make compared with German tun/machen and Dutch doen/maken: a synchronic-diachronic approach’, International Review of Applied Linguistics, 29: 303-16.
239. Nelson, D. L., V. S. Reed and J. R. Walling (1976) ‘Picture superiority effect’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2: 523-8.
240. Nesselhauf, N. (2003) ‘The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching’, Applied Linguistics, 24: 223-42.
241. Nosofsky, R. M. and T. J. Palmieri (1997) ‘An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification’, Psychological Review, 104: 266-300.
242. Nőth, W. (1995) ‘Can pictures lie?’ The Semiotic Review of Books, 6: 10-12.
243. O’Keeffe, A., M. McCarthy and R. Carter (2007) From Corpus to Classroom: Language Use and Language Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
244. Oppenheim, N. (2000) ‘The importance of recurrent sequences for non-native speaker fluency and cognition’ in H. Riggenbach (ed.) Perspectives on Fluency, pp. 220-40 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
245. Paivio, A. (1986) Mental Representations: A Dual-coding Approach (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
246. Paivio, A. and A. Desrochers (1979) ‘Effects of an imagery mnemonic on second language recall and comprehension’, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33: 17-28.
247. Paivio, A., J. C. Yuille and S. A. Madigan (1968) ‘Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns’, Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 76 (1), pt. 2: 1-25.
248. Palmer, H. E. (1999 [1925]) ‘Conversation’. Reprinted in R. C. Smith (ed.) (1999)The Writings of Harold E. Palmer, pp. 185-91 (Hon-no-Tomosha).
249. Paribakth, T. S. and M. Wesche (1997) ‘Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition’ in J. Coady and T. Huckin (eds.) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, pp. 174-200 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
250. Parry, M. (1971) ‘The making of Homeric verse’ in A. Parry (ed. and trans.) The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, pp. 1-239 (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
251. Paulston, C. B. (1971) ‘Structural pattern drills: A classification’, Foreign Language Annals, 4: 187-93.
252. Pawley, A. and F. Syder (1983) ‘Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency’ in J. Richards and R. Schmidt (eds.) Language and Communication, pp. 191-226 (London: Longman).
253. Pawley, A. and F. Syder (2000 [1976]) ‘The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis’ in H. Riggenbach (ed.) Perspectives on Fluency, pp. 163-99 (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press). A revised version of a paper read at the First National Conference of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand, Auckland, August 1976.
254. Peters, A. M. (1983) Units of Language Acquisition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
255. Peters, E. (2007a) ‘Manipulating L2 learners’ online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word recognition’, Language Learning and Technology, 11 (June).
256. Peters, E. (2007b) ‘The relationship between L2 learners’ online dictionary use and word retention’, Language Forum, 33(2): 45-64.
257. Petitjean, J. (2008) El papel de la traducción en la adquisición semi-incidental de vocabulario. MA Thesis (Erasmus University College Brussels, Belgium).
258. Pierson, H. D. (1989) ‘Using etymology in the classroom’, English Teaching Journal, 43: 57-63.
259. Pimsleur, P. (1967) ‘A memory schedule’, Modern Language Journal, 51: 73-5.
260. Ponterotto, D. (1994) ‘Metaphors we can learn by: How insights from cognitive linguistic research can improve the teaching/learning of figurative language’, Forum, 32: 2-7.
261. Powell, M. (1996) Business Matters (Hove, UK: LTP /Boston: Thomson Heinle).
262. Prabhu, N. S. (1987) Second Language Pedagogy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
263. Pressley, M., J. Levin and M. McDaniel, (1987) ‘Remembering versus inferring what a word means: mnemonic and contextual approaches’ in M. McKeown and M. Curtis (eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition, pp. 107-27 (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
264. Pullum, G. K. and B. C. Scholz (2002) ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review, 19: 9-50.
265. Radden, G. and K. U. Panther (eds.) (2004) Studies in Linguistic Motivation (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
266. Ranta, L. and R. Lyster (2007) ‘A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: the Awareness-Practice-Feedback sequence’in R. M. DeKeysar (ed.) Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology, pp. 141-60 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
267. Read, J. and P. Nation (2004) ‘Measurement of formulaic sequences’ in N. Schmitt (ed.) Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use, pp. 23-35 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
268. Richards, J. C. and T. S. Rodgers (1986) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
269. Rivers, W. M. and M.S Temperley (1978) A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second Language (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
270. Robinson, P. (1995) ‘Task complexity and second language narrative discourse’, Language Learning, 45(1): 99-140.
271. Robinson, P. (1997) ‘Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition,19: 223-47.
272. Robinson, P. (2003) ‘Attention and memory during SLA’ in C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 631-78(New York: Blackwell Publishing).
273. Robinson, P. and M. Ha (1993) ‘Instance theory and second language rule learning under explicit conditions’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13: 413-38.
274. Robinson, P., S. Ting and J. Unwin (1995) ‘Investigating second language task complexity’, RELC Journal, 26(2): 62-79.
275. Roediger, H. (1980) ‘Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology’ Memory and Cognition, 8: 231-46.
276. Rosa, E. and R. P. Leow (2004) ‘Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2development’, Applied Psycholinguistics, 25: 269-92.
277. Rosa, E. and M. D. O’Neill (1999) ‘Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21: 511-56.
278. Rott, S. and J. Williams (2003) ‘Making form-meaning connections while reading: a qualitative analysis of word processing’, Reading in a Foreign Language, 15: 45-75.
279. Rowling, J. K. (2007) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.).
280. Rubin, D. (1995) Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes (London: Oxford University Press).
281. Rumelhart, D., J. McClelland and the PDP Research Group (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing, vol. I (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
282. Rundell, M. (2001) ‘Cats, conversations, and metaphor’, Humanising Language Teaching, 3 (www.hltmag.co.uk. Pilgrims).
283. Sag, I., T. Baldwin, F. Bond, A. Copestake and D. Flickinger (2002) ‘Multiword expressions: a pain in the neck for NLP’ in A. Gelbukh (ed.) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Third International Conference, Mexico City, pp. 1-15 (Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
284. Sanchez, C. S. (forthcoming) ‘Improving word-learnability with lexical decomposition strategies’ in S. De Knop, F. Boers and T. De Rycker (eds.) Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency Through Cognitive Linguistics (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
285. Schmidt, R. W. (1990) ‘The role of consciousness in second language learning’, Applied linguistics, 11: 129-58.
286. Schmidt, R. W. (1992) ‘Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14: 357-85.
287. Schmidt, R. W. (1993) ‘Awareness and second language acquisition’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13: 206-26.
288. Schmidt, R. W. (2001) ‘Attention’ in P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction, pp. 3-32 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
289. Schmitt, N. (1997) ‘Vocabulary learning strategies’ in N. Schmitt, and M. McCarthy (eds.) Vocabulary, Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, pp. 199-236 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
290. Schmitt, N. (2008) ‘Instructed second language vocabulary learning’, Language Teaching Research, 12: 329-63.
291. Schmitt, N. and R. Marsden (2006) Why is English Like That? Historical Answers to Hard ELT Questions (Michigan: The University of Michigan Press).
292. Schmitt, N. and D. Schmitt (1995) ‘Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions’, ELT Journal, 49: 133-43.
293. Schneider, W. and J. M. Chein (2003) ‘Controlled and automatic processing: From mechanisms to biology’, Cognitive Science, 27: 525-59.
294. Schneider, W. and R. Shiffrin (1977) ‘Controlled and automatic human information processing. Part 1, Detection, search and attention’, Psychological Review, 84: 1-66.
295. Scott, M. (1994) ‘Metaphors and language awareness’ in L. Barbara and M. Scott (eds.) Reflections on Language Learning, pp. 89-104 (Clevedon: Multilingual Matters).
296. Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
297. Segalowitz, N. (2000) ‘Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance’in H. Riggenbach (ed.) Perspectives on Fluency, pp. 200-19 (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press).
298. Segalowitz, N. S. (2003) ‘Automaticity and second languages’ in C. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp. 282-308(Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).
299. Segalowitz, N. (2007) ‘Access fluidity, attention control, and the acquisition of fluency in a second language’, TESOL Quarterly, 41: 181-6.
300. Segalowitz, N. S. and J. Hulstijn (2005) ‘Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning’ in J. F. Kroll and A. M. B. De Groot (eds.) Handbbook Of Bilingualism, Psycholinguistic Approaches, pp. 371-88 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
301. Shapiro, A. M. and D. L. Waters (2005) ‘An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the keyword method of foreign vocabulary learning’, Language Teaching Research, 9: 129-46.
302. Sharifian, F. (2002) ‘Memory enhancement in language pedagogy: implications from cognitive research’, TESL-EJ, 6(2), A-2; http://tesl-ej.org/ej22/a2.html; accessed 21 Dec. 2008.
303. Shiffrin, R. and W. Schneider (1977) ‘Controlled and automatic human information processing. Part 2, Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory’, Psychological Review, 84: 127-90.
304. Shin, D. and P. Nation (2008) ‘Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English’, ELTj, 62: 339-48.
305. Sinclair, J. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
306. Sinclair, J. and A. Mauranen (2006) Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
307. Siyanova, A., K. Conklin and N. Schmitt (2008) ‘Are idioms processed differently by native speakers and second language learners?’ Paper presented at the SLRF 2008 conference, 19 Oct. 2008, University of Hawaii.
308. Skehan, P. (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Teaching (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
309. Skehan, P. and P. Foster (1999) ‘The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings’, Language Learning, 49: 93-120.
310. Skoufaki, S. (2008) ‘Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two idiom presentation methods’ in F. Boers and S. Lindstromberg (eds.) Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, pp. 101-32 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
311. Slobin, D. (2000) ‘Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism’ in S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds.) Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, pp. 107-38 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
312. Smith, N. (1973) The Acquisition of Phonology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
313. Sőkmen, A. J. (1997) ‘Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary in N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (eds.) Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, pp. 237-57 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
314. Sprenger, A. S., W. J. M. Levelt, and G. Kempen (2006) ‘Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases’, Journal of Memory and Language, 54: 161-84.
315. Stengers, H. (2007) ‘Is English exceptionally idiomatic? Testing the waters for a lexical approach to Spanish’ in F. Boers, J. Darquennes and R. Temmerman (eds.) Multilingualism and Applied Comparative Linguistics: Pedagogical Perspectives, pp. 107-25 (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing).
316. Stengers, H. (2009) Putting the Idiom Principle to the Test: An Exercise in Applied Comparative Linguistics. Unpublished PhD dissertation (Free University of Brussels).
317. Stevick, E. (1986) Images and Options in the Language Classroom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
318. Strässler, J. (1982) Idioms in English: A Pragmatic Analysis (Tűbingen: Gunter Narr Verlag).
319. Stubbs, M. (1995) ‘Collocations and semantic profiles: on the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies’, Functions of Language, 2(1): 23-55.
320. Swain, M. (1985) ‘Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development’ in S. Gass and C. Madden (eds.) Input in Second Language Acquisition, pp. 235-56 (New York and Rowley, MA: Newbury House).
321. Swain, M. (1993) ‘The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough’, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50: 158-64.
322. Swain, M. (2000) ‘The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue’ in J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, pp. 97-114 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
323. Swan, M. (2006) ‘Legislation by hypothesis: the case of task-based instruction’, Applied Linguistics, 26(3): 376-401.
324. Sweetser, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
325. Swinney, D. and A. Cutler. (1979) ‘The access and processing of idiomatic expressions’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 18: 523-34.
326. Talmy, L. (1985) ‘Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms’ in T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 57-149 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University press).
327. Talmy, L. (1988) ‘Force dynamics in language and cognition’, Cognitive Science, 12: 49-100.
328. Taylor, J. (2002) Cognitive Grammar (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
329. Taylor J. (2006) ‘Polysemy and the lexicon’ in G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven and J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, pp. 51-80 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
330. Thompson, I. (1987) ‘Memory in language learning’ in A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds.) Learner Strategies in Language Learning, pp. 43-56 (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
331. Titone, D. A. and C. M. Connine (1999) ‘On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions’, Journal of Pragmatics, 31: 1655-74.
332. Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
333. Traugott, E. and R. Dasher (2002) Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
334. Tucker, G. (2007) ‘Between lexis and grammar: towards a systemic functional account of phraseology’ in R. Hasan and C. Matthiessen (eds.) Continuing Discourse in Language: A Functional Perspective, pp. 1951-75 (London: Equinox).
335. Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of Episodic Memory (New York: Oxford University Press).
336. Ullmann, S. (1957) The Principles of Semantics (Oxford: Blackwell).
337. Underwood, G., N. Schmitt and A. Galpin (2004) ‘The eyes have it: an eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences’ in N. Schmitt (ed.)Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, pp. 153-72 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
338. van de Weijer, J. (2003). ‘Consonant variation within words’ in D. Archer, P. Rayson, A. Wilson and T. McEnery (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference. University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language Technical Papers, Vol. 16, pp. 184-90 (Lancaster University, UK).
339. van de Weijer, J. (2005). ‘Listeners sensitivity to consonant variation within words’, Lund Working Papers 51, pp. 225-39 (Lund: University of Lund).
340. VanPatten, B. (1990) ‘Attending to form and content in the input: an experiment in consciousness’, Studies in Second language Acquisition, 12: 287-301.
341. Vihman, M. (1978) ‘Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language’ in J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Language, vol. 2, Phonology, pp. 281-334 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
342. Wallace, W. (1994) ‘Memory for music: Effect of melody on recall of text’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20: 1471-85.
343. Waring, R. (1997) ‘The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: a replication’, System, 25: 261-74.
344. Waring, R. and P. Nation (2004) ‘Second language reading and incidental learning’, Angles on the English Speaking World, 4: 11-23.
345. Watanabe, Y. (1997) ‘Input, intake, and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19: 287-307.
346. Weinert, R. (1995) ‘The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: a review’, Applied Linguistics, 16: 185-205.
347. Weir, C. (1990) Communicative Language Testing (Hemel Hemptstead: Prentice Hall).
348. Weir, C. (2005) Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-based Approach (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
349. Wiese, R. (1984) ‘Language production in foreign and native languages: same or different?’ in H. Dechert, D. Möhle and M. Raupach (eds.) Second Language Productions, pp. 11-25 (Tűbingen: Gunter Narr).
350. Williams, J. (1999) ‘Memory, attention and inductive learning’, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21: 1-48.
351. Willis, D. (1990) The Lexical Syllabus: A New Approach to Language Teaching (London: Collins ELT).
352. Willis, J. (1996) A Framework for Task-based Learning (Harlow, UK: Longman).
353. Wooland, G. (2000) ‘Collocation -encouraging learner independence’, in M. Lewis (ed.) Teaching Collocation, pp. 28-46 (Hove: LTP).
354. Wray, A. (2000) ‘Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principles and practice’, Applied Linguistics, 21: 463-89.
355. Wray, A. (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
356. Wray, A. (2008) Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
357. Wray, A. and T. Fitzpatrick (2008) ‘Why can’t you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of native-like competence’ in F. Meunier and S. Granger (eds.), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 123-47 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
358. Wray, A. and M. R. Perkins (2000) ‘The function of formulaic language: an integrated model’, Language and Communication, 20: 1-28.
359. Ziegler, J., M. Muneaux and G. Grainger (2003) ‘Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation’, Journal of Memory and Language, 48(4): 779-93.
360. Zipf, G. K. (1949) Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology (Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley).