The effect of known-and-unknown word combinations on intentional vocabulary learning

System

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 491-499

  Kasahara, Kiwamu ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collocation; Intentional learning; Vocabulary acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555168216     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aitchison J. Words in the Mind 2003, Blackwell, Oxford. third ed.
2. De Groot A., Keijzer R. What is hard to learn is easy to forget: the roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning 2000, 50(1):1-56.
3. Durrant P., Schmitt N. To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?. IRAL 2009, 47:157-177. 10.1515/iral.2009.007.
4. Fitzpatrick T., Al-Qarni I., Meara P. Intensive vocabulary learning: a case study. Language Learning Journal 2008, 36(2):239-248.
5. Folse K.S. Vocabulary Myths 2004, The University of Michigan Press.
6. Higham P.A. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30(1):67-80.
7. Higham P.A., Tam H. Generation failure: estimating metacognition in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:595-617.
8. Hsu J. Lexical collocations and their relation to the online writing of Taiwanese college english majors and non-english majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 2007, 4(2):192-209.
9. Ishizuka H. The effect of learning method on efficacy of lexical memory retrieval. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan 2005, 111-120.
10. JACET JACET List of 8000 Basic Words: JACET 8000 2003, JACET, Tokyo.
11. Katagiri K. Examining the rationale of vocabulary size tests based on word-frequency levels. JLTA Journal 2007, 10:36-55.
12. Kasahara K. Comparison in vocabulary size and lexical inference between Japanese high school and college students. Tsukuba Review of English Language Teaching 2005, 26:21-39.
13. Kasahara K. Producing a revised version of the Mochizuki vocabulary size test. JLTA Journal 2006, 9:55-72.
14. Kasahara K. Are two words better than one for intentional vocabulary learning?. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan 2010, 21:91-100.
15. Lado R. Toward a lexico-semantic theory of language and language learning. The Georgetown Journal of Languages and Linguistics 1990, I(1):96-100.
16. Laufer B., Girsai N. Form-focused instruction in second language learning: a case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics 2008, 29(4):694-716.
17. Laufer B., Shmueli K. Memorizing new words: does teaching have anything to do with it?. RELC Journal 1997, 28:89-108.
18. Lewis M. The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward 1993, Language Teaching Publications, London.
19. Lewis M. Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach 2000, Language Teaching Publications, London.
20. McCarthy M. Vocabulary 1990, Oxford University Press.
21. Milton J. Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition 2009, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
22. Mochizuki, M., 1998. Nihonjin eigo gakushusha no tameno goi saizu tesuto (A vocabulary size test for Japanese learners of English). The Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 12, 27-53.
23. Nakagawa C. Effects of link strength between cues and targets on word retrieval. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan 2008, 19:161-170.
24. Nation I.S.P., Waring R. Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy 1997, 6-19. Cambridge University Press. N. Schmitt, M. McCarthy (Eds.).
25. Nattinger J.R., DeCarrico J.S. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching 1992, Oxford University Press.
26. Prince P. Second language vocabulary learning: the role of context versus translation as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 1996, 80.:478-493.
27. Schmitt N. Formulaic Sequences 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
28. Schmitt N. Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual 2010, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
29. Schmitt N., Carter R. Formulaic sequences in action: an introduction. Formulaic Sequences 2004, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. N. Schmitt (Ed.).
30. Simpsom-Vlach R., Ellis N.C. An academic formulas list: new methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 2010, 31(4):487-512.
31. Sinclair J. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation 1991, Oxford University Press.
32. Siyanova A., Schmitt N. Native and non-native use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs. IRAL 2007, 45:119-139. 10.1515/IRAL.2007.005.
33. Sökmen A.J. Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy 1997, 237-259. Cambridge University Press. N. Schmitt, M. McCarthy (Eds.).
34. Thomson D.M., Tulving E. Associative encoding and retrieval: weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 86:255-262.
35. Vermeer A. The relation between lexical richness and vocabulary size in Dutch L1 and L2 children. Vocabulary in a Second Language 2004, 173-189. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. P. Bogaards, B. Laufer (Eds.).
36. Webb S. Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: the effect of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research 2007, 11(1):63-81.
37. Wilkins D.A. Linguistics in Language Teaching 1972, Edward Arnold, London.
38. Wray A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon 2002, Cambridge University Press.