Processing MWUs: Are MWU Subtypes Psycholinguistically Real?

Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 194-210

  Columbus, Georgie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894436912     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 390–412.
2. Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (Eds.). (1986). The BBI combinatory dictionary of English: A guide to word combinations (1st ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
3. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Lexico-grammar. In D. Biber, S. Conrad, & R. Reppen, Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
5. Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idiomatic expressions: the contribution of word meanings. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 217–40). North Holland: Elsevier.
6. Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–83.
7. Columbus, G. (in preparation). Processing of different MWU-types in L1 and L2 speakers of English. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta, Canada.
8. Columbus, G. (2008). An eye-movement study for disambiguating types of multiword units. Poster presented at The Sixth Mental Lexicon, University of Alberta, Banff, Canada, October 7–10, 2008.
9. Cutting, J., & Bock, K. (1997). That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends. Memory and Cognition, 25 (1), 57–71.
10. Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28 (7), 1109–15.
11. Gibbs, R. (1985). On the process of understanding idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14 (5), 465–72.
12. Gibbs, R. (1986). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes, 9, 17–30.
13. Kuiper, K., Columbus, G., & Schmitt, N. (2009). The acquisition of phrasal vocabulary. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 216–240). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Kuiper, K., McCann, H., Quinn, H., Aitchison, T., & van der Veer, K. (2003). A syntactically annotated idiom database. Philadelphia: Linguistics Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
15. Lehmann, H-M., Hoffmann, S., & Schneider, P. (2002). BNCweb interface, v. 2.0. http://homepage.mac.com/bncweb/manual/bncwebman-home.htm.
16. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: LTP.
17. Moon, R. (1996). Fixed expressions and idioms in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Moon, R. (1998). Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 79–100). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19. R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http:// www.R-project.org.
20. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye-movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (3), 372–422.
21. Schmitt, N. (2005). Formulaic language: Fixed and varied. ELIA: Estudios de Linguïstica Inglesa Aplicada, 6, 13–39.
22. Schmitt, N., Grandage, S., & Adolphs, S. (2004). Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 127–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
23. Schmitt, N., & Underwood, G. (2004). Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task. In N. Schmitt (Ed.) Formulaic sequences (pp. 173–89). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
24. Sprenger, S., Levelt, W., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–84.
25. Swinney, D., & Cutler, A., (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–34.
26. Titone, D., & Connine, C. (1994). Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effects of predictability and literality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20 (5), 1126–38.
27. Tremblay, A., Derwing, B. L., Libben, G., & Westbury, C., (submitted). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading experiments, word and sentence recall tasks, and off-line semantic ratings.
28. Tremblay, A., Tucker, B. V., Gagnon, C., & Lemke, S. (in preparation). The production of four-word sequences.
29. Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 153–72). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
30. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.