Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 325-353

  Gatbonton, Elizabeth ^a   Segalowitz, Norman ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746559711     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.61.3.325     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combination. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and application (pp. 101-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical strategy in the second language classroom: A qualitative study of teachers' practices and cognition. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95-126.
3. Brown, H.D. (2001) Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Longman.
4. Burnaby, B., & Sun, Y. (1989). Chinese teachers' views of Western language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 219-238.
5. Coulmas, F. (1981). Introduction: Conversational routine. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 1-18). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
6. Day, E., & Shapson, S. (2001). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 51, 47-80.
7. DeKeyser, R.M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
10. Ellis, R. (1982). Informal and formal approaches to communicative language teaching. ELT Journal, 36, 73-81.
11. Ellis, R. (1999). Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics, 20, 460-480.
12. Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
13. Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473-492.
14. Gatbonton. E., & Segalowitz, N. (2002). Identifying formulaic utterances in everyday speech functions: Methodological perspectives. Paper presented at the International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language Annual Conference, York, United Kingdom.
15. Goldberg, A. (1998). Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 203-219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 145-160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 287-297.
18. Harmer, J. (1982). What is communicative? ELT Journal, 36, 164-168.
19. Healy, A., Barshi, I., Crutcher, R. J., Tao, L., Rickard, T. C., Marmie, W. R., Schneider, V. I., Feldman, A., Buck-Gengler, C. J., Romero, S. G., Sherrod, N. B., Parker, J. T., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1998). Toward the improvement of training in foreign languages. In A. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 3-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Hymes, D. (1989). Postscript. Applied Linguistics, 10, 245-250.
23. Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers' attitudes to the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50, 187-198.
24. Kecskes, I. (2002). Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M. (1999). A usage-based conception of language. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. xii-xxiii). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
26. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
27. Larsen-Freeman, D. (Ed.). (2000). Grammar dimensions: Form, meaning, and use. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
28. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.) (pp. 251-299). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
29. Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
30. Li, D. (1998). It's always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-703.
31. Li, X. (1984). In defense of the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 38, 2-13.
32. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Long, M.H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.). Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
36. Manes, L. (1983) Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In N.Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 96-102). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37. Miller, L., & Aldred, D. (2000). Student teachers' perceptions about communicative language teaching methods. RELC Journal, 2, 1-19.
38. Moon, R. (1998). Frequencies and forms of phrasal lexemes in English. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 79-100). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
39. Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49-80.
40. Nassaji, H. (1999). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 84, 241-250.
41. Nattinger, J. R., & De Carrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136-145.
43. Paulston, C. B. (1971). Structural pattern drills: A classification. Foreign Language Annals, 4, 187-193.
44. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). New York: Longman.
45. Peters, A. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Reber, A. S. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88-94.
47. Read, J., & Nation, P. (2004). Measurement of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use (pp. 23-35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Rivers, W., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Roediger, H. L., III, & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197-236). New York: Academic Press.
50. Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. Modern Language Journal, 83, 494-517.
51. Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165-210). London: Academic Press.
52. Schmitt, N. (Ed.) (2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525-559.
54. Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 85-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200-219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
56. Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382-408). Oxford: Blackwell.
57. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173-199.
58. Segalowitz, N., & Gatbonton, E. (1995). Automaticity and lexical skills in second language fluency: Implications for computer assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 129-149.
59. Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369-385.
60. Skehan, M. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
61. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68-83.
62. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
63. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
65. Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal, 50, 9-15.
66. Tickoo, M. L. (1986). Prendergast and the 'mastery method': An assessment. ELT Journal, 40, 52-58.
67. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385-395.
68. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
69. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Widdowson, H. G. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability to use. Applied Linguistics, 10, 128-137.
71. Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Harper Collins.
72. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.
73. Wolfson, N. (1983) An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 82-95). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.