Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics

Language Learning

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 755-795

  Bardovi Harlig, Kathleen ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conventional expressions; Formulaic expressions; Formulas; Interlanguage pragmatics; L2 pragmatics; Pragmatic formulas; Production of formulas; Recognition of formulas

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450278690     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00525.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersen, R. W. (1984). The one-to-one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34, 77 95.
2. Andersen, R. W. (1990). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee (Eds. Second language acquisition-foreign language learning (pp. 45 78). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters. (Reprinted from IDEAL, 3, 111-138).
3. Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam and Å. Viberg (Eds. Progression & regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological, & linguistic perspectives (pp. 309 339). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). The interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677 713.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds. Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13 32). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2006). On the role of formulas in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. S. Omar (Eds. Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 11, pp. 1 28). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2008). Recognition and production of formulas in L2 pragmatics. In Z.-H. Han (Ed. Understanding second language process (pp. 205 222). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (in press). Recognition of formulaic sequences in L2 pragmatics. In G. Kasper, D. Yoshimi, H. Nguyen, & J. Yoshioka (Eds. Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 12). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
9. Bardovi-Harlig, K. Bastos, M. T., Burghardt, B., Chappetto, E., Nickels. E. L., & Rose, M. (in press). The use of conventional expressions and utterance length in L2 pragmatics. In G. Kasper, D. Yoshimi, H. Nguyen, & J. Yoshioka (Eds. Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 12). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
10. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic vs. grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233 259.
11. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Refining the DCT: Comparing open questionnaires and dialogue completion tasks. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds. Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 4, pp. 143 165). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign : Division of English as an International Language.
12. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Nickels, E., & Rose, M. (2008). The influence of first language and level of development in the use of conventional expressions of thanking, apologizing, and refusing. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 113 130). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Also available at http://www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2007/ index.html
13. Beeckmans R., Eyckmans J., Janssens, V., Dufranne, M., & Van de Velde, H. (2001). Examining the yes/no vocabulary test: Some methodological issues in theory and practice. Language Testing, 18, 279 318.
14. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Too many words: Length of utterance and pragmatic failure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 165 180.
15. Coulmas, F. (1981). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague : Mouton.
16. De Cock, S. (2000). Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds. Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory (pp. 51 68). Amsterdam : Rodopi.
17. Edmonds, A. (in press). "Je suis vraiment désolé" ou comment s'excuser en interlangue [I'm very sorry" or how to apologize in interlanguage]. In B. de Buron Brun (Ed Identité, alterité, interculturalité [Identity, Alterity and Interculturality]. Paris : L'Harmattan.
18. Edmondson, W., & House, J. (1991). Do learners talk too much? The waffle phenomenon in interlanguage pragmatics. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds. Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 273 287). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
19. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297 339.
20. Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds. Collocations and idioms 1. Papers from the first Nordic conference on syntactic freezes, Joensuu, Finland, May 10-20, 2006 (pp. 86 99). Joensuu, Finland : Joensuu University Press.
21. Eyckmans, J., Van de Velde, H., Van Hout, R., & Boers, F. (2007). Learners' response behaviour in yes/no vocabulary tests. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds. Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 59 76). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
22. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds. Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75 93). Harlow, UK : Longman.
23. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In A. P. Cowie (Ed. Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 145 160). Oxford : Clarendon.
25. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225 252.
26. Howarth, P. (1998). The phraseology of learners' academic writing. In A. P. Cowie (Ed. Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 161 186). Oxford : Clarendon.
27. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds. Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 1 17). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
28. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
29. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149 169.
30. Kecskes, I. (2000). Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances. Links & Letters, 7, 145 161.
31. Kecskes, I. (2003). Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin : Mouton.
32. Krashen, S., Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1982). Language two. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
33. Meara, P. (1989). Matrix models of vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 6, 66 85.
34. Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48, 323 363. (Pubitemid 128127574)
35. Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
36. Nesselhauf, N. (2004). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
37. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds. Language and communication (pp. 191 226). London : Longman.
38. Raupach, M. (1984). Formulae in second language speech production. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds. Second language productions (pp. 114 137). Berlin : Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.
39. Roever, C. (2005). Testing ESL Pragmatics: Development and validation of a web-based assessment battery. Berlin : Peter Lang.
40. Scarcella, R. C. (1979). Watch up Working Papers in Bilingualism, 19, 79 88.
41. Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In E. Judd & N. Wolfson (Eds Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137 174). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
42. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1 63). Honolulu : Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
43. Schmitt, N. (Ed. 2004). Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
44. Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action. In N. Schmitt (Ed.) Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 1 22). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
45. Schmitt, N., & Underwood, G. (2004). Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task. In N. Schmitt (Ed Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 173 189). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
46. Spöttl, C., & McCarthy, M. (2004). Comparing knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3, L4. In N. Schmitt (Ed Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 191 225). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
47. Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency Applied Linguistics, 26, 90 120.
48. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
49. Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication, 20, 1 28.
50. Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (Eds. Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 55 72). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.