The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary

Second Language Research

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 138-163

  Tinkham, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUAM   (Guam)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141808268     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026765897672376469     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, R.C. and Pearson, P.D. 1984: A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In Pearson, P.D., editor, Handbook of reading research, New York: Longman, 255–291.
2. Brewer, W.F. and Nakamura, G.V. 1984: The nature and function of schemas. In Wyer, R.S. and Srull, T.K., editors, Handbook of social cognition. Vol. 1, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlba um Associates, 119–160.
3. Carroll, J.B., Davies, P. and Richman, B. 1971: Word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.
4. Crowder, R.G. 1976: Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Fillmore, C.J. 1985: Semantic fields and semantic frames. Quaderni di Semantica 6, 222–254.
6. Gairns, R. and Redman, S. 1986: Working with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Harmer, J. and Maybin, D. 1989: Coast to coast 3. White Plains, NY: Longman.
8. Higa, M. 1963: Interference effects of intralist word relationships in verbal learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2, 170–175.
9. Hunt, R.R. and Elliott, J.M. 1980: The role of nonsemantic information in memory: orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109, 49–74.
10. Hunt, R.R. and Mitchell, D.B. 1982: Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8, 81–87.
11. Jolly, J. and Robinson, L. 1988: Real-life English 3. Austin, TX: Steck-Vaughn.
12. Kittay, E.F. and Lehrer, A. 1992: Introduction. In Lehrer, A. and Kittay, E.F., editors, Frames, fields, and contrasts, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–18.
13. Lavie, N.E., Briggs, S.J., Raht, C. and Denman, B.R. 1991: In contact 2. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
14. Markman, E.M. and Hutchinson, J.E. 1984: Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology 16, 1–27.
15. Marzano, R.J. and Marzano, J.S. 1988: A cluster approach to elementary vocabulary instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Molinsky, S.J. and Bliss, B. 1989: Side by side 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Richards, J.C. 1990: Interchange 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Rodgers, T.S. 1969: On measuring vocabulary difficulty:an analysis of item variables in learning Russian–English vocabulary pairs. IRAL (International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching) 7, 327–343.
19. Tinkham, T.M. 1993: The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. System 21, 371–380.
20. Walker, M. 1991: New horizons in English 1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Wilkins, D.A. 1976: Notional syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.