Choreography of recombination proteins during the DNA damage response

DNA Repair

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1068-1076

  Lisby, Michael ^a   Rothstein, Rodney ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA double strand break repair; Foci; Homologous recombination; Mammalian; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME LOSS; DNA DAMAGE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE TARGETING; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; MAMMAL CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 68249125048     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (151)

1. Shaner N.C., Steinbach P.A., and Tsien R.Y. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 2 (2005) 905-909
2. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Kitagawa R., Melander F., Kastan M.B., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173 (2006) 195-206
3. Wyman C., and Kanaar R. DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40 (2006) 363-383
4. Dudasova Z., Dudas A., and Chovanec M. Non-homologous end-joining factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28 (2004) 581-601
5. Takata M., Sasaki M.S., Sonoda E., Morrison C., Hashimoto M., Utsumi H., Yamaguchi-Iwai Y., Shinohara A., and Takeda S. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17 (1998) 5497-5508
6. Moore J.K., and Haber J.E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 2164-2173
7. Mao Z., Bozzella M., Seluanov A., and Gorbunova V. Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7 (2008) 1765-1771
8. Lee S.E., Paques F., Sylvan J., and Haber J.E. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 767-770
9. Hefferin M.L., and Tomkinson A.E. Mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4 (2005) 639-648
10. Essers J., Houtsmuller A.B., van Veelen L., Paulusma C., Nigg A.L., Pastink A., Vermeulen W., Hoeijmakers J.H., and Kanaar R. Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 2030-2037
11. Wu D., Topper L.M., and Wilson T.E. Recruitment and dissociation of nonhomologous end joining proteins at a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178 (2008) 1237-1249
12. Martin S.G., Laroche T., Suka N., Grunstein M., and Gasser S.M. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell 97 (1999) 621-633
13. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response; spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
14. Milne G.T., Jin S., Shannon K.B., and Weaver D.T. Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 4189-4198
15. Hopfner K.P., Karcher A., Craig L., Woo T.T., Carney J.P., and Tainer J.A. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 105 (2001) 473-485
16. Chen L., Trujillo K., Ramos W., Sung P., and Tomkinson A.E. Promotion of Dnl4-catalyzed DNA end-joining by the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 and Hdf1/Hdf2 complexes. Mol. Cell 8 (2001) 1105-1115
17. Lee S.E., Moore J.K., Holmes A., Umezu K., Kolodner R.D., and Haber J.E. Saccharomyces Ku70, Mre11/Rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94 (1998) 399-409
18. Mimitou E.P., and Symington L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455 (2008) 770-774
19. Zhu Z., Chung W.H., Shim E.Y., Lee S.E., and Ira G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134 (2008) 981-994
20. Trujillo K.M., and Sung P. DNA structure-specific nuclease activities in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50*Mre11 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 35458-35464
21. Keeney S., and Kleckner N. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5′ strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 11274-11278
22. Moreau S., Morgan E.A., and Symington L.S. Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159 (2001) 1423-1433
23. Lobachev K.S., Gordenin D.A., and Resnick M.A. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 108 (2002) 183-193
24. Limbo O., Chahwan C., Yamada Y., de Bruin R.A., Wittenberg C., and Russell P. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 28 (2007) 134-146
25. Clerici M., Mantiero D., Lucchini G., and Longhese M.P. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 38631-38638
26. Lobachev K., Vitriol E., Stemple J., Resnick M.A., and Bloom K. Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 2107-2112
27. Lisby M., Antúnez de Mayolo A., Mortensen U.H., and Rothstein R. Cell cycle-regulated centers of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle 2 (2003) 479-483
28. Nakada D., Matsumoto K., and Sugimoto K. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1957-1962
29. Rogakou E.P., Pilch D.R., Orr A.H., Ivanova V.S., and Bonner W.M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 5858-5868
30. Redon C., Pilch D.R., Rogakou E.P., Orr A.H., Lowndes N.F., and Bonner W.M. Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 4 (2003) 678-684
31. Rogakou E.P., Boon C., Redon C., and Bonner W.M. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146 (1999) 905-916
32. Toh G.W., O'Shaughnessy M., Jimeno A.S., Dobbie I.M., Grenon M., Maffini S., O'Rorke A., and Lowndes N.F. Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5 (2006) 693-703
33. Huertas P., Cortes-Ledesma F., Sartori A.A., Aguilera A., and Jackson S.P. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455 (2008) 689-692
34. Deng C., Brown J.A., You D., and Brown J.M. Multiple endonucleases function to repair covalent topoisomerase I complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170 (2005) 591-600
35. McKee A.H., and Kleckner N. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146 (1997) 797-816
36. Prinz S., Amon A., and Klein F. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146 (1997) 781-795
37. Barlow J.H., Lisby M., and Rothstein R. Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks in G1. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 73-85
38. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431 (2004) 1011-1017
39. Bonilla C.Y., Melo J.A., and Toczyski D.P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 30 (2008) 267-276
40. Soutoglou E., and Misteli T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 320 (2008) 1507-1510
41. Hays S.L., Firmenich A.A., and Berg P. Complex formation in yeast double-strand break repair: participation of Rad51, Rad52, Rad55, and Rad57 proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 6925-6929
42. Milne G.T., and Weaver D.T. Dominant negative alleles of RAD52 reveal a DNA repair/recombination complex including Rad51 and Rad52. Genes Dev. 7 (1993) 1755-1765
43. Davis A.P., and Symington L.S. The Rad52-Rad59 complex interacts with Rad51 and replication protein A. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2 (2003) 1127-1134
44. Kwon Y., Seong C., Chi P., Greene E.C., Klein H., and Sung P. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologous recombination factor Rdh54. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 10445-10452
45. Shinohara M., Shita-Yamaguchi E., Buerstedde J.M., Shinagawa H., Ogawa H., and Shinohara A. Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147 (1997) 1545-1556
46. Sung P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11 (1997) 1111-1121
47. de Jager M., van Noort J., van Gent D.C., Dekker C., Kanaar R., and Wyman C. Human Rad50/Mre11 is a flexible complex that can tether DNA ends. Mol. Cell 8 (2001) 1129-1135
48. de Jager M., Wyman C., van Gent D.C., and Kanaar R. DNA end-binding specificity of human Rad50/Mre11 is influenced by ATP. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 4425-4431
49. Mimori T., and Hardin J.A. Mechanism of interaction between Ku protein and DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 261 (1986) 10375-10379
50. Kim J.S., Krasieva T.B., Kurumizaka H., Chen D.J., Taylor A.M., and Yokomori K. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 341-347
51. Spagnolo L., Rivera-Calzada A., Pearl L.H., and Llorca O. Three-dimensional structure of the human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 complex assembled on DNA and its implications for DNA DSB repair. Mol. Cell 22 (2006) 511-519
52. DeFazio L.G., Stansel R.M., Griffith J.D., and Chu G. Synapsis of DNA ends by DNA-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 3192-3200
53. Yang Y.G., Saidi A., Frappart P.O., Min W., Barrucand C., Dumon-Jones V., Michelon J., Herceg Z., and Wang Z.Q. Conditional deletion of Nbs1 in murine cells reveals its role in branching repair pathways of DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 5527-5538
54. Bressan D.A., Baxter B.K., and Petrini J.H. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (1999) 7681-7687
55. Moreau S., Ferguson J.R., and Symington L.S. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19 (1999) 556-566
56. Stiff T., O'Driscoll M., Rief N., Iwabuchi K., Lobrich M., and Jeggo P.A. ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 64 (2004) 2390-2396
57. Paull T.T., Rogakou E.P., Yamazaki V., Kirchgessner C.U., Gellert M., and Bonner W.M. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 886-895
58. Celeste A., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Kruhlak M.J., Pilch D.R., Staudt D.W., Lee A., Bonner R.F., Bonner W.M., and Nussenzweig A. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 (2003) 675-679
59. Celeste A., Petersen S., Romanienko P.J., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Chen H.T., Sedelnikova O.A., Reina-San-Martin B., Coppola V., Meffre E., Difilippantonio M.J., et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296 (2002) 922-927
60. Stucki M., Clapperton J.A., Mohammad D., Yaffe M.B., Smerdon S.J., and Jackson S.P. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123 (2005) 1213-1226
61. Lou Z., Minter-Dykhouse K., Franco S., Gostissa M., Rivera M.A., Celeste A., Manis J.P., van Deursen J., Nussenzweig A., Paull T.T., et al. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 187-200
62. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Melander F., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 201-211
63. Lee M.S., Edwards R.A., Thede G.L., and Glover J.N. Structure of the BRCT repeat domain of MDC1 and its specificity for the free COOH-terminal end of the gamma-H2AX histone tail. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 32053-32056
64. Chapman J.R., and Jackson S.P. Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 9 (2008) 795-801
65. Spycher C., Miller E.S., Townsend K., Pavic L., Morrice N.A., Janscak P., Stewart G.S., and Stucki M. Constitutive phosphorylation of MDC1 physically links the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex to damaged chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 181 (2008) 227-240
66. Melander F., Bekker-Jensen S., Falck J., Bartek J., Mailand N., and Lukas J. Phosphorylation of SDT repeats in the MDC1 N terminus triggers retention of NBS1 at the DNA damage-modified chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 181 (2008) 213-226
67. Goldberg M., Stucki M., Falck J., D'Amours D., Rahman D., Pappin D., Bartek J., and Jackson S.P. MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421 (2003) 952-956
68. Stewart G.S., Wang B., Bignell C.R., Taylor A.M., and Elledge S.J. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421 (2003) 961-966
69. Mailand N., Bekker-Jensen S., Faustrup H., Melander F., Bartek J., Lukas C., and Lukas J. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131 (2007) 887-900
70. Kolas N.K., Chapman J.R., Nakada S., Ylanko J., Chahwan R., Sweeney F.D., Panier S., Mendez M., Wildenhain J., Thomson T.M., et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318 (2007) 1637-1640
71. Huen M.S., Grant R., Manke I., Minn K., Yu X., Yaffe M.B., and Chen J. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131 (2007) 901-914
72. Sobhian B., Shao G., Lilli D.R., Culhane A.C., Moreau L.A., Xia B., Livingston D.M., and Greenberg R.A. RAP80 targets BRCA1 to specific ubiquitin structures at DNA damage sites. Science 316 (2007) 1198-1202
73. Wu J., Huen M.S., Lu L.Y., Ye L., Dou Y., Ljungman M., Chen J., and Yu X. Histone ubiquitination associates with BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29 (2008) 849-860
74. Yu X., Wu L.C., Bowcock A.M., Aronheim A., and Baer R. The C-terminal (BRCT) domains of BRCA1 interact in vivo with CtIP, a protein implicated in the CtBP pathway of transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 25388-25392
75. Kim H., Chen J., and Yu X. Ubiquitin-binding protein RAP80 mediates BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response. Science 316 (2007) 1202-1205
76. Wang B., Matsuoka S., Ballif B.A., Zhang D., Smogorzewska A., Gygi S.P., and Elledge S.J. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science 316 (2007) 1194-1198
77. Wang B., and Elledge S.J. Ubc13/Rnf8 ubiquitin ligases control foci formation of the Rap80/Abraxas/Brca1/Brcc36 complex in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007) 20759-20763
78. Wu L.C., Wang Z.W., Tsan J.T., Spillman M.A., Phung A., Xu X.L., Yang M.C., Hwang L.Y., Bowcock A.M., and Baer R. Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product. Nat. Genet. 14 (1996) 430-440
79. Hashizume R., Fukuda M., Maeda I., Nishikawa H., Oyake D., Yabuki Y., Ogata H., and Ohta T. The RING heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by a breast cancer-derived mutation. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 14537-14540
80. Cantor S.B., Bell D.W., Ganesan S., Kass E.M., Drapkin R., Grossman S., Wahrer D.C., Sgroi D.C., Lane W.S., Haber D.A., et al. BACH1, a novel helicase-like protein, interacts directly with BRCA1 and contributes to its DNA repair function. Cell 105 (2001) 149-160
81. Kim H., Huang J., and Chen J. CCDC98 is a BRCA1-BRCT domain-binding protein involved in the DNA damage response. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 (2007) 710-715
82. Greenberg R.A., Sobhian B., Pathania S., Cantor S.B., Nakatani Y., and Livingston D.M. Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 34-46
83. Yu X., Fu S., Lai M., Baer R., and Chen J. BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 1721-1726
84. Kim H., and Chen J. New players in the BRCA1-mediated DNA damage responsive pathway. Mol. Cells 25 (2008) 457-461
85. Botuyan M.V., Lee J., Ward I.M., Kim J.E., Thompson J.R., Chen J., and Mer G. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127 (2006) 1361-1373
86. Kim J., Daniel J., Espejo A., Lake A., Krishna M., Xia L., Zhang Y., and Bedford M.T. Tudor, MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 397-403
87. Huyen Y., Zgheib O., Ditullio Jr. R.A., Gorgoulis V.G., Zacharatos P., Petty T.J., Sheston E.A., Mellert H.S., Stavridi E.S., and Halazonetis T.D. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432 (2004) 406-411
88. Joo W.S., Jeffrey P.D., Cantor S.B., Finnin M.S., Livingston D.M., and Pavletich N.P. Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 583-593
89. Hirao A., Kong Y.Y., Matsuoka S., Wakeham A., Ruland J., Yoshida H., Liu D., Elledge S.J., and Mak T.W. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science 287 (2000) 1824-1827
90. Khanna K.K., and Jackson S.P. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27 (2001) 247-254
91. Caspari T. How to activate p53. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) R315-R317
92. Xie A., Hartlerode A., Stucki M., Odate S., Puget N., Kwok A., Nagaraju G., Yan C., Alt F.W., Chen J., et al. Distinct roles of chromatin-associated proteins MDC1 and 53BP1 in mammalian double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 28 (2007) 1045-1057
93. Wang B., Matsuoka S., Carpenter P.B., and Elledge S.J. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 298 (2002) 1435-1438
94. Paull T.T., and Gellert M. The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 1 (1998) 969-979
95. Nimonkar A.V., Ozsoy A.Z., Genschel J., Modrich P., and Kowalczykowski S.C. Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008) 16906-16911
96. Sartori A.A., Lukas C., Coates J., Mistrik M., Fu S., Bartek J., Baer R., Lukas J., and Jackson S.P. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450 (2007) 509-514
97. Chen L., Nievera C.J., Lee A.Y., and Wu X. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 7713-7720
98. Kobayashi J., Tauchi H., Sakamoto S., Nakamura A., Morishima K., Matsuura S., Kobayashi T., Tamai K., Tanimoto K., and Komatsu K. NBS1 localizes to gamma-H2AX foci through interaction with the FHA/BRCT domain. Curr. Biol. 12 (2002) 1846-1851
99. Raderschall E., Golub E.I., and Haaf T. Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (1999) 1921-1926
100. Costanzo V., Shechter D., Lupardus P.J., Cimprich K.A., Gottesman M., and Gautier J. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 203-213
101. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
102. Zou L., Cortez D., and Elledge S.J. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 198-208
103. Zou L., Liu D., and Elledge S.J. Replication protein A-mediated recruitment and activation of Rad17 complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 13827-13832
104. Majka J., Binz S.K., Wold M.S., and Burgers P.M. Replication protein A directs loading of the DNA damage checkpoint clamp to 5′-DNA junctions. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 27855-27861
105. Bermudez V.P., Lindsey-Boltz L.A., Cesare A.J., Maniwa Y., Griffith J.D., Hurwitz J., and Sancar A. Loading of the human 9-1-1 checkpoint complex onto DNA by the checkpoint clamp loader hRad17-replication factor C complex in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (2003) 1633-1638
106. Ward I.M., and Chen J. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 47759-47762
107. Lukas C., Falck J., Bartkova J., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 (2003) 255-260
108. Gasior S.L., Wong A.K., Kora Y., Shinohara A., and Bishop D.K. Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with Rad55 and Rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2208-2221
109. Tarsounas M., Davies D., and West S.C. BRCA2-dependent and independent formation of RAD51 nuclear foci. Oncogene 22 (2003) 1115-1123
110. Liu Y., and Maizels N. Coordinated response of mammalian Rad51 and Rad52 to DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 11 (2000) 85-90
111. Jacquemont C., and Taniguchi T. The Fanconi anemia pathway and ubiquitin. BMC Biochem. 8 Suppl. 1 (2007) S10
112. Yang H., Jeffrey P.D., Miller J., Kinnucan E., Sun Y., Thoma N.H., Zheng N., Chen P.L., Lee W.H., and Pavletich N.P. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA structure. Science 297 (2002) 1837-1848
113. Wong J.M., Ionescu D., and Ingles C.J. Interaction between BRCA2 and replication protein A is compromised by a cancer-predisposing mutation in BRCA2. Oncogene 22 (2003) 28-33
114. Wang X., Andreassen P.R., and D'Andrea A.D. Functional interaction of monoubiquitinated FANCD2 and BRCA2/FANCD1 in chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 5850-5862
115. Garcia S.N., and Pillus L. Net results of nucleolar dynamics. Cell 97 (1999) 825-828
116. Xia B., Sheng Q., Nakanishi K., Ohashi A., Wu J., Christ N., Liu X., Jasin M., Couch F.J., and Livingston D.M. Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol. Cell 22 (2006) 719-729
117. Vandenberg C.J., Gergely F., Ong C.Y., Pace P., Mallery D.L., Hiom K., and Patel K.J. BRCA1-independent ubiquitination of FANCD2. Mol. Cell 12 (2003) 247-254
118. Garcia-Higuera I., Taniguchi T., Ganesan S., Meyn M.S., Timmers C., Hejna J., Grompe M., and D'Andrea A.D. Interaction of the Fanconi anemia proteins and BRCA1 in a common pathway. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 249-262
119. Hussain S., Wilson J.B., Medhurst A.L., Hejna J., Witt E., Ananth S., Davies A., Masson J.Y., Moses R., West S.C., et al. Direct interaction of FANCD2 with BRCA2 in DNA damage response pathways. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13 (2004) 1241-1248
120. O'Regan P., Wilson C., Townsend S., and Thacker J. XRCC2 is a nuclear RAD51-like protein required for damage-dependent RAD51 focus formation without the need for ATP binding. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 22148-22153
121. Huber L.J., Yang T.W., Sarkisian C.J., Master S.R., Deng C.X., and Chodosh L.A. Impaired DNA damage response in cells expressing an exon 11-deleted murine Brca1 variant that localizes to nuclear foci. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 4005-4015
122. Bhattacharyya A., Ear U.S., Koller B.H., Weichselbaum R.R., and Bishop D.K. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 23899-23903
123. Tan T.L., Essers J., Citterio E., Swagemakers S.M., de Wit J., Benson F.E., Hoeijmakers J.H., and Kanaar R. Mouse Rad54 affects DNA conformation and DNA-damage-induced Rad51 foci formation. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 325-328
124. Bishop D.K., Ear U., Bhattacharyya A., Calderone C., Beckett M., Weichselbaum R.R., and Shinohara A. Xrcc3 is required for assembly of Rad51 complexes in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 21482-21488
125. Tarsounas M., Davies A.A., and West S.C. RAD51 localization and activation following DNA damage. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 87-93
126. van Veelen L.R., Essers J., van de Rakt M.W., Odijk H., Pastink A., Zdzienicka M.Z., Paulusma C.C., and Kanaar R. Ionizing radiation-induced foci formation of mammalian Rad51 and Rad54 depends on the Rad51 paralogs, but not on Rad52. Mutat. Res. 574 (2005) 34-49
127. Masson J.Y., Tarsounas M.C., Stasiak A.Z., Stasiak A., Shah R., McIlwraith M.J., Benson F.E., and West S.C. Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogs. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 3296-3307
128. Schild D., Lio Y.C., Collins D.W., Tsomondo T., and Chen D.J. Evidence for simultaneous protein interactions between human Rad51 paralogs. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 16443-16449
129. Liu N., Lamerdin J.E., Tebbs R.S., Schild D., Tucker J.D., Shen M.R., Brookman K.W., Siciliano M.J., Walter C.A., Fan W., et al. XRCC2 and XRCC3, new human Rad51-family members, promote chromosome stability and protect against DNA cross-links and other damages. Mol. Cell 1 (1998) 783-793
130. Forget A.L., Bennett B.T., and Knight K.L. Xrcc3 is recruited to DNA double strand breaks early and independent of Rad51. J. Cell. Biochem. 93 (2004) 429-436
131. Golub E.I., Gupta R.C., Haaf T., Wold M.S., and Radding C.M. Interaction of human Rad51 recombination protein with single-stranded DNA binding protein, RPA. Nucleic Acids Res. 26 (1998) 5388-5393
132. Sleeth K.M., Sorensen C.S., Issaeva N., Dziegielewski J., Bartek J., and Helleday T. RPA mediates recombination repair during replication stress and is displaced from DNA by checkpoint signalling in human cells. J. Mol. Biol. 373 (2007) 38-47
133. Tanaka K., Hiramoto T., Fukuda T., and Miyagawa K. A novel human Rad54 homologue, Rad54B, associates with Rad51. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 26316-26321
134. Otterlei M., Bruheim P., Ahn B., Bussen W., Karmakar P., Baynton K., and Bohr V.A. Werner syndrome protein participates in a complex with RAD51, RAD54, RAD54B and ATR in response to ICL-induced replication arrest. J. Cell Sci. 119 (2006) 5137-5146
135. Cheng W.H., Sakamoto S., Fox J.T., Komatsu K., Carney J., and Bohr V.A. Werner syndrome protein associates with gamma H2AX in a manner that depends upon Nbs1. FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 1350-1356
136. Baynton K., Otterlei M., Bjoras M., von Kobbe C., Bohr V.A., and Seeberg E. WRN interacts physically and functionally with the recombination mediator protein RAD52. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 36476-36486
137. Fujimori A., Tachiiri S., Sonoda E., Thompson L.H., Dhar P.K., Hiraoka M., Takeda S., Zhang Y., Reth M., and Takata M. Rad52 partially substitutes for the Rad51 paralog XRCC3 in maintaining chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 5513-5520
138. Park M.S., Ludwig D.L., Stigger E., and Lee S.H. Physical interaction between human RAD52 and RPA is required for homologous recombination in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996) 18996-19000
139. Lee K., Zhang Y., and Lee S.E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454 (2008) 543-546
140. Costanzo V., Paull T., Gottesman M., and Gautier J. Mre11 assembles linear DNA fragments into DNA damage signaling complexes. PLoS Biol. 2 (2004) 600-609
141. Lisby M., Mortensen U.H., and Rothstein R. Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat. Cell Biol. 5 (2003) 572-577
142. Kruhlak M.J., Celeste A., Dellaire G., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Muller W.G., McNally J.G., Bazett-Jones D.P., and Nussenzweig A. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172 (2006) 823-834
143. Soutoglou E., Dorn J.F., Sengupta K., Jasin M., Nussenzweig A., Ried T., Danuser G., and Misteli T. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 675-682
144. Aten J.A., Stap J., Krawczyk P.M., van Oven C.H., Hoebe R.A., Essers J., and Kanaar R. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 303 (2004) 92-95
145. Dimitrova N., Chen Y.C., Spector D.L., and de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 456 (2008) 524-528
146. Weinstock D.M., Brunet E., and Jasin M. Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 978-981
147. Torres-Rosell J., Sunjevaric I., De Piccoli G., Sacher M., Eckert-Boulet N., Reid R., Jentsch S., Rothstein R., Aragon L., and Lisby M. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9 (2007) 923-931
148. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., Varela E., Hediger F., Gasser S.M., and Krogan N.J. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322 (2008) 597-602
149. Shcheprova Z., Baldi S., Frei S.B., Gonnet G., and Barral Y. A mechanism for asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 454 (2008) 728-734
150. Henderson K.A., and Gottschling D.E. A mother's sacrifice: what is she keeping for herself?. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20 (2008) 723-728
151. Alvaro D., Lisby M., and Rothstein R. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 3 (2007) 2439-2449