Contextualization and Context Theorizing in Teams Research: A Look Back and a Path Forward

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 891-942

  Maloney, Mary M ^a   Bresman, Henrik ^b   Zellmer Bruhn, Mary E ^c   Beaver, Gregory R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^b INSEAD   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975497988     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1161964     Document Type: Article

References (163)

1. H.Aguinis,, & J.R.Edwards, (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 143–174. doi: 10.1111/joms.12058
2. C.N.AlexanderJr,, & G.W.Knight, (1971). Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Sociometry, 34(1), 65–82. doi: 10.2307/2786351
3. D.G.Ancona,, & D.F.Caldwell (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. doi: 10.2307/2393475
4. H.Arrow,, J.E.McGrath,, & J.L.Berdahl, (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. M.L.Baba,, J.Gluesing,, H.Ratner,, & K.H.Wagner, (2004). The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 547–587. doi: 10.1002/job.259
6. P.Badke-Schaub,, A.Neumann,, K.Lauche,, & S.Mohammed, (2007). Mental models in design teams: A valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/15710880601170768
7. P.Bamberger, (2008). Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 839–846. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789630
8. M.R.Barrick,, B.H.Bradley,, A.L.Kristof-Brown,, & A.E.Colbert, (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 544–557. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525781
9. M.R.Bashshur,, A.Hernández,, & V.González-Romá, (2011). When managers and their teams disagree: A longitudinal look at the consequences of differences in perceptions of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 558–573. doi: 10.1037/a0022675
10. C.M.Beckman,, & M.D.Burton, (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0311
11. K.J.Behfar,, E.A.Mannix,, R.S.Peterson,, & W.M.Trochim, (2011). Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127–176. doi: 10.1177/1046496410389194
12. K.Bezrukova,, S.M.B.Thatcher,, K.A.Jehn,, & C.S.Spell, (2012). The effects of alignments: Examining group faultlines, organizational cultures, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 77–92. doi: 10.1037/a0023684
13. J.W.Bishop,, K.Dow Scott,, M.G.Goldsby,, & R.Cropanzano, (2005). A construct validity study of commitment and perceived support variables: A multifoci approach across different team environments. Group & Organization Management, 30(2), 153–180. doi: 10.1177/1059601103255772
14. P.M.Blau,, & O.D.Duncan, (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: John Wiley.
15. P.M.Bosch-Sijtsema,, R.Fruchter,, M.Vartiainen,, & V.Ruohomäki, (2011). A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 275–307. doi: 10.1177/1059601111403625
16. H.Bresman, (2010). External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organization Science, 21(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0413
17. H.Bresman, (2013). Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 35–61. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0725
18. H.Bresman,, & A.Edmondson, (2012). Team learning domains: A contingency model relating learning behaviors to performance in innovation teams. INSEAD Working Paper, 2012/104/OB.
19. H.Bresman,, & M.Zellmer-Bruhn, (2013). The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team Structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24(4), 1120–1139. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0783
20. L.L.ten Brummelhuis,, T.van der Lippe,, & E.S.Kluwer, (2010). Family involvement and helping behavior in teams. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1406–1431. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350778
21. J.S.Bunderson, (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591. doi: 10.2307/3556637
22. B.M.Byrne,, & T.L.Campbell, (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure a look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555–574. doi: 10.1177/0022022199030005001
23. E.M.Campbell-Bush,, H.Liao,, A.Chuang,, & Y.Dong, (2013). Hot shots and cool reception: Social consequences of high performance at work. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14310.
24. A.A.Cannella Jr,, J.-H.Park,, & H.-U.Lee, (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784.
25. A.Carmeli, (2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 712–735.
26. J.B.Carson,, P.E.Tesluk,, & J.A.Marrone, (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. doi: 10.2307/20159921
27. C.-Y.Cheng,, R.Y.J.Chua,, M.W.Morris,, & L.Lee, (2012). Finding the right mix: How the composition of self-managing multicultural teams’ cultural value orientation influences performance over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 389–411. doi: 10.1002/job.1777
28. N.-W.Chi,, Y.-M.Huang,, & S.-C.Lin, (2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 698–726. doi: 10.1177/1059601109350985
29. T.S.Cho,, & D.C.Hambrick, (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4), 453–469. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192
30. A.M.Christie,, & J.Barling, (2010). Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 920–934. doi: 10.1037/a0019856
31. R.H.Coase, (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
32. B.P.Cohen,, & X.Zhou, (1991). Status processes in enduring work groups. American Sociological Review, 56(2), 179–188. doi: 10.2307/2095778
33. S.G.Cohen,, & D.E.Bailey, (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. doi: 10.1177/014920639702300303
34. A.E.Colbert,, A.L.Kristof-Brown,, B.H.Bradley,, & M.R.Barrick, (2008). CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 81–96. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.30717744
35. J.R.Cole,, & S.Cole, (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. S.Cole, (1978). Scientific reward systems: A comparative analysis. Research in Sociology of Knowledge, Sciences and Art, 1, 167–190.
37. T.D.Cook,, D.T.Campbell,, & A.Day, (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (Vol. 351). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38. W.H.Cooper,, & M.J.Withey, (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 62–72. doi: 10.1177/1088868308329378
39. M.A.Cronin,, L.R.Weingart,, & G.Todorova, (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 571–612. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
40. A.Cuervo-Cazurra,, P.Caligiuri,, U.Andersson,, & M.Y.Brannen, (2013). From the editors: How to write articles that are relevant to practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 285–289. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.17
41. J.N.Cummings, (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
42. R.M.Cyert,, & J.G.March, (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
43. M.Dalton, (1948). The Industrial ‘Rate Buster:’ A Characterization. Human Organization, 7(1), 5–18. doi: 10.17730/humo.7.1.f461ht3145154752
44. C.K.W.De Dreu, (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277795
45. C.K.W.De Dreu,, & L.R.Weingart, (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
46. A.De Jong,, K.De Ruyter,, & M.Wetzels, (2005). Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science, 51(11), 1610–1625. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0425
47. F.R.C.De Wit,, L.L.Greer,, & K.A.Jehn, (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. doi: 10.1037/a0024844
48. P.DiMaggio,, & W.W.Powell, (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
49. C.P.Earley,, & E.Mosakowski, (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26–49. doi: 10.2307/1556384
50. B.D.Edwards,, E.A.Day,, W.Arthur Jr,, & S.T.Bell, (2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 727–736. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.727
51. A.P.J.Ellis, (2006). System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 576–589. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794674
52. J.A.Espinosa,, S.A.Slaughter,, R.E.Kraut,, & J.D.Herbsleb, (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18(4), 613–630. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0297
53. S.Faraj,, & A.Yan, (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604–617. doi: 10.1037/a0014367
54. T.Felin,, N.J.Foss,, & R.E.Ployhart, (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2015.1007651
55. G.A.Forehand,, & G.von Haller, (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 62(6), 361–382. doi: 10.1037/h0045960
56. H.K.Gardner, (2012). Performance pressure as a double-edged sword: Enhancing team motivation but undermining the use of team knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 1–46. doi: 10.1177/0001839212446454
57. M.J.Gelfand,, M.Erez,, & Z.Aycan, (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 479–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085559
58. C.B.Gibson,, & J.L.Gibbs, (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3), 451–495.
59. C.B.Gibson,, & M.E.Zellmer-Bruhn, (2001). Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 274–303. doi: 10.2307/2667088
60. L.L.Gilson,, J.E.Mathieu,, C.E.Shalley,, & T.M.Ruddy, (2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 521–531. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407916
61. W.J.Goode, (1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a social control system. Berkeley: University of California Press.
62. J.R.Green,, & N.L.Stokey, (1983). A comparison of tournaments and contracts. The Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 349–364. doi: 10.1086/261153
63. M.R.Haas, (2006). Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Science, 52(8), 1170–1184. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530
64. M.R.Haas, (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989–1008. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533180
65. J.R.Hackman, (1999). Thinking differently about context. In R.Wageman (Ed.), Research in Managing Groups and Teams (Vol. 2, pp. 233–247). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
66. J.R.Hackman, (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 905–922. doi: 10.1002/job.226
67. J.R.Hackman, (2012). From causes to conditions in group research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 428–444. doi: 10.1002/job.1774
68. B.H.Hamilton,, J.A.Nickerson,, & H.Owan, (2003). Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 465–497. doi: 10.1086/374182
69. A.M.Hardin,, M.A.Fuller,, & R.M.Davison, (2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38(1), 130–155. doi: 10.1177/1046496406297041
70. D.A.Harrison,, & K.J.Klein, (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
71. P.S.Hempel,, Z.-X.Zhang,, & Y.Han, (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475–501. doi: 10.1177/0149206309342891
72. P.J.Hinds,, & D.E.Bailey, (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615–632. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872
73. P.J.Hinds,, & M.Mortensen, (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0122
74. M.Hoegl,, K.Weinkauf,, & H.G.Gemuenden, (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0053
75. B.J.Hoffman,, B.H.Bynum,, R.F.Piccolo,, & A.W.Sutton, (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 779–796. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870139
76. J.R.Hollenbeck,, B.Beersma,, & M.E.Schouten, (2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 82–106.
77. J.M.Howell,, & C.M.Shea, (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 180–211. doi: 10.1177/1059601104273067
78. C.H.Hui,, & H.C.Triandis, (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology a review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152. doi: 10.1177/0022002185016002001
79. S.E.Humphrey,, M.J.Mannor,, & F.P.Morgeson, (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48–61. doi: 10.1037/a0012997
80. D.R.Ilgen,, J.R.Hollenbeck,, M.Johnson,, & D.Jundt, (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
81. S.E.Jackson,, & A.Joshi, (2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 675–702. doi: 10.1002/job.265
82. K.A.Jehn,, & K.Bezrukova, (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 703–729. doi: 10.1002/job.257
83. J.M.Jensen,, P.C.Patel,, & J.L.Raver, (2014). Is it better to be average? High and low performance as predictors of employee victimization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 296–309. doi: 10.1037/a0034822
84. G.Johns, (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687
85. A.Joshi,, M.B.Lazarova,, & H.Liao, (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0383
86. A.Joshi,, & H.Roh, (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491
87. Journal of Organizational Behavior. (2015). Author guidelines. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379/homepage/ForAuthors.html#Regular
88. S.S.Kahai,, R.Huang,, & R.J.Jestice, (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 716–751. doi: 10.1177/1059601112462061
89. D.Katz,, & R.L.Kahn, (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
90. R.T.Keller, (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202–210. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.202
91. F.A.Kennedy,, M.L.Loughry,, T.P.Klammer,, & M.M.Beyerlein, (2009). Effects of organizational support on potency in work teams: The mediating role of team processes. Small Group Research, 40(1), 72–93. doi: 10.1177/1046496408326744
92. B.L.Kirkman,, K.B.Lowe,, & C.B.Gibson, (2006). A quarter century of “culture’s consequences”: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
93. B.L.Kirkman,, B.Rosen,, P.E.Tesluk,, & C.B.Gibson, (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175–192. doi: 10.2307/20159571
94. B.L.Kirkman,, B.Rosen,, P.E.Tesluk,, & C.B.Gibson, (2006). Enhancing the transfer of computer-assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 706–716. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.706
95. B.L.Kirkman,, & D.L.Shapiro, (1997). The impact of cultural values on employee resistance to teams: Toward a model of globalized self-managing work team effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 730–757.
96. K.J.Klein,, F.Dansereau,, & R.J.Hall, (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 195–229.
97. K.J.Klein,, A.P.Knight,, J.C.Ziegert,, B.C.Lim,, & J.L.Saltz, (2011). When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 114(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.004
98. T.Köhler,, C.D.Cramton,, & P.J.Hinds, (2012). The meeting genre across cultures: Insights from three German–American collaborations. Small Group Research, 43(2), 159–185. doi: 10.1177/1046496411429600
99. M.Kouchaki,, G.A.Okhuysen,, M.J.Waller,, & G.Tajeddin, (2012). The treatment of the relationship between groups and their environments: A review and critical examination of common assumptions in research. Group & Organization Management, 37(2), 171–203. doi: 10.1177/1059601112443850
100. S.W.Kozlowski,, & K.J.Klein, (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K.J.Klein, & S.W.Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
101. S.W.J.Kozlowski,, & B.S.Bell, (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of Psychology. Two: 14:333–375.
102. B.S.Kuipers,, M.J.Higgs,, N.V.Tolkacheva,, & M.C.de Witte, (2009). The influence of Myers-Briggs type indicator profiles on team development processes: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry. Small Group Research, 40(4), 436–464. doi: 10.1177/1046496409333938
103. C.W.Langfred, (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885–900. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
104. E.P.Lazear,, & S.Rosen, (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy,, 89, 841–864. doi: 10.1086/261010
105. E.P.Lazear,, & K.L.Shaw, (2007). Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources (No. w13653). National Bureau of Economic Research.
106. J.M.Levine,, & R.L.Moreland, (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101
107. J.Li,, & D.C.Hambrick, (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803923
108. R.Linton, (1936). The study of man: An introduction. New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century.
109. M.A.Marks,, S.J.Zaccaro,, & J.E.Mathieu, (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 971–986. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971
110. J.A.Marrone, (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4), 911–940. doi: 10.1177/0149206309353945
111. J.E.Mathieu,, L.L.Gilson,, & T.M.Ruddy, (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97–108. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97
112. J.E.Mathieu,, M.T.Maynard,, T.Rapp,, & L.Gilson, (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
113. J.E.Mathieu,, M.T.Maynard,, S.R.Taylor,, L.L.Gilson,, & T.M.Ruddy, (2007). An examination of the effects of organizational district and team contexts on team processes and performance: A meso-mediational model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 891–910. doi: 10.1002/job.480
114. J.E.Mathieu,, T.L.Rapp,, M.T.Maynard,, & P.M.Mangos, (2009). Interactive effects of team and task shared mental models as related to air traffic controllers’ collective efficacy and effectiveness. Human Performance, 23(1), 22–40. doi: 10.1080/08959280903400150
115. E.Mayo, (1949). Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Routledge.
116. J.E.McGrath, (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance (Vol. 14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
117. R.K.Merton, (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
118. R.K.Merton, (1988). The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(4), 606–623. doi: 10.1086/354848
119. A.Metiu, (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17(4), 418–435. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0195
120. R.D.Meyer,, & R.S.Dalal, (2009). Situational strength as a means of conceptualizing context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 99–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.01114.x
121. W.Mischel, (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N.S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
122. S.Mohammed,, L.Ferzandi,, & K.Hamilton, (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910. doi: 10.1177/0149206309356804
123. J.C.Molloy,, R.E.Ployhart,, & P.M.Wright, (2011). The myth of “the” micro–macro divide: Bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. Journal of Management, 37(2), 581–609. doi: 10.1177/0149206310365000
124. F.P.Morgeson,, D.S.DeRue,, & E.P.Karam, (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. doi: 10.1177/0149206309347376
125. R.T.Mowday,, & R.I.Sutton, (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 195–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001211
126. B.J.Nalebuff,, & J.E.Stiglitz, (1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 21–43. doi: 10.2307/3003535
127. National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
128. T.M.Nielsen,, D.G.Bachrach,, E.Sundstrom,, & T.R.Halfhill, (2012). Utility of OCB: Organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework. Journal of Management, 38(2), 668–694. doi: 10.1177/0149206309356326
129. M.B.O'Leary,, & M.Mortensen, (2010). Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0434
130. M.B.O'Leary,, M.Mortensen,, & A.W.Woolley, (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478.
131. L.A.Perlow,, J.H.Gittell,, & N.Katz, (2004). Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organization Science, 15(5), 520–536. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0097
132. J.Pfeffer,, & G.R.Salancik, (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
133. J.L.Raver,, & M.J.Gelfand, (2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 387–400. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407904
134. D.M.Rousseau, (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1–37.
135. D.M.Rousseau,, & Y.Fried, (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1002/job.78
136. H.Sarsons, (2015, August 9). Gender differences in recognition for group work (Harvard University Working Paper).
137. C.M.J.H.Savelsbergh,, B.I.J.M.van der Heijden,, & R.F.Poell, (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research, 40(5), 578–607. doi: 10.1177/1046496409340055
138. E.H.Schein, (1990). Organizational culture (Vol. 45), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
139. W.R.Scott, (1995). Institutions and organizations (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
140. P.Selznick, (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Evanston, Ill: Row, Peterson.
141. J.M.Shaver, (2008). Organizational significance. Strategic Organization, 6(2), 185–193. doi: 10.1177/1476127008090009
142. H.A.Simon, (1965). Administrative behavior (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
143. R.A.SingletonJr,, & B.C.Straits, (1999). Approaches to social research (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
144. M.Stein,, & J.Pinto, (2011). The dark side of groups: A “gang at work” in Enron. Group & Organization Management, 36(6), 692–721. doi: 10.1177/1059601111423533
145. P.Stephan, (2010). The economics of science. In B.Hall & N.Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 218–273). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
146. G.L.Stewart, (2010). The past twenty years: Teams research is alive and well at the journal of management. Journal of Management, 36(4), 801–805. doi: 10.1177/0149206310371512
147. G.L.Stewart,, S.H.Courtright,, & M.R.Barrick, (2012). Peer-based control in self-managing teams: Linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 435–447. doi: 10.1037/a0025303
148. R.J.Stout,, J.A.Cannon-Bowers,, E.Salas,, & D.M.Milanovich, (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(1), 61–71. doi: 10.1518/001872099779577273
149. S.Y.Sung,, & J.N.Choi, (2012). Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 118(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001
150. S.M.B.Thatcher,, & P.C.Patel, (2012). Group faultlines: A review, integration, and guide to future research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 969–1009. doi: 10.1177/0149206311426187
151. United States Census Bureau. (2015). North American industry classification system. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/
152. M.J.Waller,, N.Gupta,, & R.C.Giambatista, (2004). Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Management Science, 50(11), 1534–1544. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0210
153. G.L.Wamsley,, & M.N.Zald, (1973). The political economy of public organizations. Public Administration Review, 33(1), 62–73. doi: 10.2307/974786
154. M.Weber, (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
155. L.R.Weingart,, K.J.Behfar,, C.Bendersky,, G.Todorova,, & K.A.Jehn, (2015). The directness and oppositional intensity of conflict expression. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 235–262. doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0124
156. S.A.Wheelan, (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40(2), 247–262. doi: 10.1177/1046496408328703
157. J.L.Wildman,, M.L.Shuffler,, E.H.Lazzara,, S.M.Fiore,, C.S.Burke,, E.Salas,, & S.Garven, (2012). Trust development in swift starting action teams: A multilevel framework. Group & Organization Management, 37(2), 137–170. doi: 10.1177/1059601111434202
158. O.E.Williamson, (1975). Markets and hierarchies (pp. 26–30). New York, NY: MacMillan.
159. G.M.Wittenbaum,, A.B.Hollingshead,, P.B.Paulus,, R.Y.Hirokawa,, D.G.Ancona,, R.S.Peterson,, K.… Yoon, (2004). The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups. Small Group Research, 35(1), 17–43. doi: 10.1177/1046496403259459
160. S.-S.Wong, (2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organization Science, 15(6), 645–656. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0080
161. M.N.Zald, (1970). Power in organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
162. M.Zellmer-Bruhn,, & C.Gibson, (2006). Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 501–518. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794668
163. D.Zohar,, & G.Luria, (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 616–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616