The economics of science

Handbook of the Economics of Innovation

Volumn 1, Issue 1 C, 2010, Pages 217-273

  Stephan, Paula E ^a,b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Economics of science; Knowledge production; Patenting; Priority; Publishing; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956628740     PISSN: 22108807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01005-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (210)

1. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Feldman, M. (1992). "Real effects of academic research: Comment". American Economic Review 82, 363-367.
2. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Feldman, M. (1994). "R&D spillovers and recipient firm size". The Review of Economics and Statistics 76 (2), 336-340.
3. Adams, J. (1990). "Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth". Journal of Political Economy 98, 673-702.
4. Adams, J. (2002). "Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers". Journal of Economic Geography 2, 253-278.
5. Adams, J. (2006). "Learning, internal research, and spillovers". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (1), 5-36.
6. Adams, J., Black, G., Clemmons, R., Stephan, P. (2005). "Scientific teams and institution collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999". Research Policy 34 (3), 259-285.
7. Adams, J., Clemmons, R., Stephan, P. (2006). How Rapidly Does Science Leak Out? NBER Working Paper 11997.
8. Agrawal, A., Goldfarb, A. (2008). "Restructuring Research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation". American Economic Review 98, 1578-1590.
9. Agrawal, A., Henderson, R. (2002). "Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT". Management Science 48, 44-60.
10. Allison, P., Stewart, J. (1974). "Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage". American Sociological Review 39, 596-606.
11. Almeida, P., Kogut, B. (1999). "Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks". Management Science 45 (7), 905-917.
12. Andrews, F.M. (1979). Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Another Physics Department Down. (2006). Science 314, 1363.
14. Arrow, K.J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Arrow, K.J. (1987). "Reflections on the essays". In: Feiwel, G.R. (Ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. New York University Press, New York.
16. Arrow, K.J., Capron, W.M. (1959). "Dynamic shortages and price rises: The engineering-scientist case". Quarterly Journal of Economics 73, 292-308.
17. Atkinson, R.C. (1990). "Supply and demand for scientists and engineers: A national crisis in the making". Science 248, 425-432.
18. Audretsch, D.B., Stephan, P.E. (1996). "Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology". American Economic Review 86, 641-652.
19. Autant-Bernard, C. (2001). "Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case". Research Policy 30, 1069-1078.
20. Avveduto, S. (2005). Characteristics and Organization of Research in Italy: A Specific Glance on Human Resources. IRPPS-CNR, Rome.
21. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., Stuart, T. (2009). "The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output", Journal of Industrial Economics 57, 637-676.
22. BankBoston. (1997). MIT: The Impact of Innovation.
23. Barnett, A., Ault, R.W., Kaserman, D. (1988). "The rising incidence of co-authorship in economics: Further evidence". Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 539-543.
24. Black, G. (2004). The Geography of Small Firm Innovation. Kluwer, New York.
25. Blank, D., Stigler, G.J. (1957). The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
26. Bowen, W., Sosa, J.A. (1989). Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
27. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows, Journal of Economic Geography 9, 439-468.
28. Breschi, S., Francesco, L., Montobbio, F. (2007). "The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16, 101-118.
29. Brodetsky, S. (1942). "Newton: Scientist and man". Nature 150, 698-699.
30. Bush, V. (1945). Science: The Endless Frontier. U.S. GPO, Washington, DC.
31. Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., Vezzulli, A. (2007). "If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world". Research Policy 36, 303-319.
32. Callon, M. (1994). "Is science a public good? Fifth Mullins lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute". Science, Technology and Human Values 19, 395-424 23 March, 1993.
33. Cañibano, C., Bozeman, B. (2009). "Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: State-of-the-art". Research Evaluation 18 (2), 86-95.
34. Carayol, N. (2007). "Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (1&2), 71-99.
35. Chait, B.T. (2006). "Mass spectrometry: Bottom-up or top-down". Science 314, 65-66.
36. Coase, R. (1937). "The nature of the firm". Economica, New Series 4 (16), 386-405.
37. Cockburn, I., Henderson, R.M. (1998). "Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery". Journal of Industrial Economics 46, 20 (2), 157-182.
38. Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. (1989). "Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D". The Economic Journal 99, 569-596.
39. Cohen, W., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P. (2002). "Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D". Management Science 48 (1), 1-23.
40. Cole, J.R., Cole, S. (1973). "Social Stratification in Science". University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
41. Collins, F., Morgan, M., Patrinos, A. (2003). "The human genome project". Lessons from Large-Scale Biology, Science 300 (5617), 286-290.
42. Couzin, J. (2006). "Scientific misconduct: Truth and consequences". Science 313, 1222-1226.
43. Crespi, G., Geuna, A., Nomaler, O., Verspagen, B. (2010). "University IRPs and knowledge transfer: Is university ownership more efficient?" Economics of Innovation and New Technology Forthcoming.
44. Dasgupta, P. (1989). "The economics of parallel research". In: Hahn, F. (Ed.), The Economics of Missing Markets, Information, and Games. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
45. Dasgupta, P., David, P. (1987). "Information Disclosure and the Economics of Science and Technology". In: Feiwel, G.R. (Ed.), New York University Press, New York.
46. Dasgupta, P., David, P. (1994). "Toward a new economics of science". Research Policy 23, 487-521.
47. Dasgupta, P., Maskin, E. (1987). "The simple economics of research portfolios". Economic Journal 97, 581.
48. Dasgupta, P., Stiglitz, J.E. (1980). "Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D". Bell Journal of Economics 11, 1-28.
49. David, P. (1993). In: Knowledge, property and the system dynamics of technological change. Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. World Bank, Washington, DC.
50. David, P. (1994). "Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: Reopening another black box". In: Granstrand, O. (Ed.), The Economics of Technology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
51. Davis, G. (2005). "Doctors without orders". American Scientist 93 (3) Supplement.
52. De Figueiredo, J.M., Silverman, B. (2007). "How does the government (want to) fund science". In: Stephan, P., Ehrenberg, R. (Eds.), The Economics of Science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
53. Deng, Z., Lev, B., Narin, F. (1999). "Science and technology as predictors of stock performance". Financial Analysts Journal 55 (3), 20-32.
54. Diamond, A.M.Jr., (1984). "An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists". Scientometrics 6, 189-196.
55. Diamond, A.M.Jr., (1986a). "The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists". Journal of Gerontology 41, 520-525.
56. Diamond, A.M.Jr., (1986b). "What is a citation worth?" Journal of Human Resources 21, 200-215.
57. Ding, W., Murray, F., Stuart, T. (2006a). "Gender differences in patenting in academic life science". Science 313, 661-665.
58. Ding, W., Murray, F., Stuart, T. (2006b). "Commercial science: A new arena for gender stratification in scientific careers?" Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
59. Dreifus, C. (2007). Watching a Cell Fold, and Witnessing Disease. International Herald Tribune, April 26.
60. Edwards, M., Murray, F., Robert, Y. (2006). "Gold in the ivory tower: Equity rewards of outlicensing". Nature Biotechnology 24 (5), 509-515.
61. Ehrenberg, R.G. (1991). "Academic labor supply". In: Clotfelter, C. (Ed.), Economic Challenges in Higher Education. Part II. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
62. Ehrenberg, R.G. (1992). "The flow of new doctorates". Journal of Economic Literature 30, 830-875.
63. Ehrenberg, R.G., Zhang, L. (2005). "The changing nature of faculty employment". In: Clark, R., Ma, J. (Eds.), Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education: Building and Managing the Faculty of the Future. Edward Elgar, Northamption, MA.
64. Ehrenberg, R.G., Rizzo, M., Jakubson, G. (2003). Who Bears the Growing Cost of Science at Universities? NBER Working Paper 9627.
65. Eisenberg, R.S. (1987). "Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research". Yale Law Journal 97, 177-231.
66. Ellison, G. (2002). "Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory". Journal of Political Economy 110, 994-1034.
67. Enserink, M. (2006). "Unprecedented budget increase draws faint praise". Science 314, 1523-1525.
68. European Commission. (2003). Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. Directorate-General for Research, Brussels.
69. European Commission. (2004). Europe Needs More Scientists. Directorate-General for Research, Brussels.
70. Feigenbaum, S., Levy, D.M. (1993). "The market for (Ir) reproducible econometrics". Social Epistemolagy 7, 215-232.
71. Feist, G. (2006). The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
72. Feynman, R.P. (1999). The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. Perseus, Cambridge, MA.
73. Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
74. Fox, M.F. (1983). "Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review". Social Studies of Science 13, 285-305.
75. Fox, M.F. (1991). "Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science". In: Zuckerman, H., Cole, J.R., Bruer, J.T. (Eds.), The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community. W.W. Norton, New York.
76. Fox, M.F. (2005). "Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists". Social Studies of Science 35, 131-150.
77. Fox, M.F., Braxton, J.M. (1994). "Misconduct and social control in science: Issues, problems, solutions". Journal of Higher Education 65, 373-383.
78. Fox, M.F., Stephan, P. (2001). "Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender field". Social Studies of Science 31 (1), 109-122.
79. Frank, R., Cook, P. (1992). Winner-Take-All Markets. Cornell University.
80. Franzoni, C. (2009). "Do scientists get fundamental research ideas by solving practical problems?", Industrial and Corporate Change 18, 671-699.
81. Freeman, R.B. (1975). "Supply and salary adjustments to the changing science manpower market: Physics, 1948-1973". American Economic Review 65, 27-39.
82. Fuller, S. (1994). "Comments on 'The Economics of Science'". In: Arthur, J., Diamond, M. (Eds.), University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NB.
83. Gambardella, A. (1995). Science and Innovation: The U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry During the 1980s. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
84. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Throw, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications, London.
85. Gieryn, T.F., Hirsch, R.F. (1983). "Marginality and innovation in science". Social Studies of Science 13, 87-106.
86. Gonzalez-Brambilia, C., Veloso, F. (2007). The Determinants of Research Productivity: A Study of Mexican Researchers. Carnegie Mellon University.
87. Griliches, Z. (1979). "Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth". Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92-116.
88. Groen, J.A., Rizzo, M. (2007). "The changing composition of American-citizen PhDs". In: Stephan, P., Ehrenberg, R. (Eds.), Science and the University. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
89. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The Scientific Community. Basic Books, New York.
90. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper 8498.
91. Hall, B., Mairesse, J., Turner, L. (2007). "Identifying age, cohort and period effects in scientific research productivity: Discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (1 & 2), 159-177.
92. Hargens, L.L. (1988). "Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates". American Sociological Review 53, 139-151.
93. Harmon, L.R. (1961). "The high school backgrounds of science doctorates". Science 133, 679-688.
94. Heller, M., Eisenberg, R. (1998). "Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research". Science 280, 698-701.
95. Hermanowicz, J. (2006). "What does it take to be successful?" Science Technology and Human Values 31 (2), 135-152.
96. Hicks, D. (1995). "Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge". Industrial and Corporate Change 4, 401-424.
97. Hicks, D. (2007). "Research competition affects measured U.S. academic output". In: Stephan, P., Ehrenberg, R. (Eds.), Science and the University. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
98. Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., Hamilton, K. (2001). "The changing composition of innovative activity in the U.S". Research Policy 30 (4), 681-703.
99. Hollingsworth, J.R. (2006). "The dynamics of American science: An institutional and organizational perspective on major discoveries". In: Beckert, J., Ebbinghaus, B., Hassel, A., Manow, P. (Eds.), Transformationen Des Kapitalismus: Festschrift Fü r Wolfgang Streeck Zum Sechzigsten Geburstag. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt and New York.
100. Hounshell, D.A., Smith, J.K.Jr. (1988). Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902-1980. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
101. Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as a Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
102. Jaffe, A.B. (1989). "Real effects of academic research". The American Economic Review 79, 957-970.
103. Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. (2004). Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
104. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993). "Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations". The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3), 577-598.
105. Jefferson, T. (1967). Foley, In J.P. (Ed.), The Jefferson Cyclopedia. Russell and Russell, New York, vol. 1.
106. Jinyoung, K., Sangjoon, J.L., Marschke, G. (2005). The Influence of University Research on Industrial Innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 11447.
107. Johnson, H.G. (1972). "Some economic aspects of science". Minerva 10, 10-18.
108. Jones, B. (2005a). Age and Great Inventions. NBER Working Paper 11359.
109. Jones, B. (2005b). The Burden of Knowledge and the Death of the Renaissance Man: Is Innovation Getting Harder?. NBER Working Paper 11360.
110. Kean, S. (2006). "Scientists spend nearly half their time on administrative tasks, survey finds". Chronicle of Higher Education A23.
111. Kelchtermans, S., Veugelers, R. (2007). Top Research Productivity and Its Persistence. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.
112. Kohn, A. (1986). False Prophets. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
113. Kolbert, E. (2007). "Crash course: The world's largest particle accelerator". The New Yorker 68-78 May 14.
114. Lach, S., Schankerman, M. (2008). "Incentives and invention in universities". Rand Journal of Economics 39 (2), 403-433.
115. LaTour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
116. Lawani, S.M. (1986). "Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research". Scientometrics 9, 13-25.
117. Lazear, E.P., Rosen, S. (1981). "Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts". Journal of Political Economy 89, 841-864.
118. Leslie, L.R., Oaxaca, R.L. (1993). "Scientist and engineer supply and demand". In: Smart, J.C. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon Press, New York.
119. Levin, S., Stephan, P. (1991). "Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists". American Economic Review 81, 114-132.
120. Levin, S., Stephan, P. (1999). "Are the foreign born a source of strength for U.S. science?" Science 285 (5431), 1213-1214.
121. Levin, S., Stephan, P., Winkler, A. (2006). The Diffusion of Information Technology across Institutions of Higher Education: Effects on Productivity by Type of Institution and Gender. Proposal to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
122. Lichtenberg, F. (1988). "The private R&D investment response to federal design and technical competitions". American Economic Review 78, 550-559.
123. Lotka, A.J. (1926). "The frequency distribution of scientific productivity". Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16, 317-323.
124. Malakoff, D. (2000). "The rise of the mouse, biomedicine's model mammal". Science 288, 248-253.
125. Mansfield, E. (1991). "Academic research and industrial innovation". Research Policy 20, 1-12.
126. Mansfield, E. (1995). "Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing". The Review of Economic and Statistics 77, 55-65.
127. Markiewicz, K., Di Minin, A. (2004). Commercializing the Laboratory: The Relationship between Faculty Patenting and Publishing. University of California, Berkeley, CA.
128. Merton, R.K. (1957). "Priorities in scientific discoveries: A chapter in the sociology of science". American Sociological Review 22, 635-659.
129. Merton, R.K. (1961). "Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science". Paper read at Conference Commemorating the 400th Anniversary of the Birth of Francis Bacon. October 13, 1969.
130. Merton, R.K. (1968). "The Matthew effect in science". Science 159, 56-63.
131. Merton, R.K. (1969). "Behavior patterns of scientists". American Scientist 57, 1-23.
132. Merton, R.K. (1988). "The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property". Isis 79, 606-623.
133. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. NBER, Columbia University Press, New York.
134. Mowery, D.C., Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
135. Mueller, W.F. (1962). The origins of the basic inventions underlying DuPont's major product and process innovations, 1920 to 1950. Economic and Social Factors, NBER, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, The Rate and Direction of Innovative Activity.
136. Murray, F. (2006). The Ocomouse that Roared: Resistance and Accommodation to Patenting in Academic Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
137. Murray, F. (2007). "The stem-cell market-Patents and the pursuit of scientific progress". The New England Journal of Medicine 356 (23), 2341-2343.
138. National Academies. (2005). Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
139. National Research Council. (2000). Forecasting Demand and Supply of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers: Report of a Workshop on Methodology. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
140. National Science Board. (2003). The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America's Potential. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
141. National Science Board. (2004). Science and Engineering Indicators. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
142. National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
143. National Science Foundation. (1989). Future Scarcities of Scientists and Engineers: Problems and Solutions: Division of Policy Research and Analysis. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
144. National Science Foundation. (1996). Characteristics of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States 1993. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
145. National Science Foundation. (1999). Characteristics of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States 1997. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
146. National Science Foundation. (2006). Characteristics of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States 2003. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
147. National Science Foundation. (2007). Changing U.S. Output of Scientific Articles: 1988-2003. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
148. Nelson, R.R. (1959). "The simple economics of basic scientific research". The Journal of Political Economy 67, 297-306.
149. Nelson, R.R. (1962). "The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor". In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
150. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
151. Overbye, D. (2007). "A Giant Takes on Physics' Biggest Questions". New York Times D1, D4-D5 May 15, CLVI.
152. Oyer, P. (2006). "Initial labor market conditions and long-term outcomes for economists". Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (3), 143-160.
153. Pavitt, K. (2000). "Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased: A radical proposal". Science and Public Policy 27 (6), 455-460.
154. Philippe, A., Dewatripont, M., Stein, J.C. (2008). "Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation". Rand Journal of Economics 39 (3), 617-635.
155. Polanyi, M. (1962). "The republic of science". Minerva 1, 54-74.
156. Pollak, R., Wachter, M. (1975). "The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time". Journal of Political Economy 83, 255-277.
157. Price, D.J.D., Solla, D.E. (1986). Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.
158. Roe, A. (1953). The Making of a Scientist. Dodd, Mead, New York.
159. Romer, P. (1994). "The origins of endogenous growth". Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 3-22.
160. Rosenberg, N. (1974). "Science, invention and economic growth". Economic Journal 84, 90-108.
161. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
162. Rosenberg, N. (1990). "Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?" Research Policy 19, 165-174.
163. Rosovsky, H. (1990). The University: An Owner's Manual. Norton, New York.
164. Sauermann, H., Cohen, W. (2007). What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Industrial Innovation. Fuqua School of Business.
165. Scherer, F.M. (1966). "Time-cost tradeoffs in uncertain empirical research projects". Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 13, 71-82.
166. Scherer, F.M. (1967). "Review of technology, economic growth and public policy, by Richard R. Nelson, M.J. Peck, and E.D. Kalachek". Journal Finance 22, 703-704.
167. Scherer, F.M. (1982). "Demand-pull and technological innovation: Schmookler revisited". Journal of Industrial Economics 30, 225-238.
168. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
169. Schulze, G.G. (2008). "Tertiary Education in a Federal System-the Case of Germany". In: Albert, M., Schmidtchen, D., Voigt, S. (Eds.), Scientific Competition. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
170. Smith, A. (1982). The Wealth of Nations. Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK.
171. Sobel, R. (1986). RCA. Stein and Day, New York.
172. Stephan, P. (1996). "The economics of science". Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1199-1235.
173. Stephan, P. (2002). "Using human resource data to illuminate innovation and research utilization". In: Merrill, S., McGeary, M. (Eds.), Using Human Resource Data to Track Innovation. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
174. Stephan, P. (2004). "Robert K. Merton's perspective on priority and the provision of the public good knowledge". Scientometrics 60, 81-87.
175. Stephan, P. (2007). "Wrapping it up in a person: The location decision of new phds going to industry". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
176. Stephan, P. (2008). "Job market effects on scientific productivity". In: Albert, M., Schmidtchen, D., Voigt, S. (Eds.), Scientific Competition. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
177. Stephan, P., El-Ganainy, A. (2007). "The entrepreneurial puzzle: Explaining the gender gap". Journal of Technology Transfer 32, 475-487.
178. Stephan, P., Levin, S. (1992). Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. Oxford University Press, New York.
179. Stephan, P., Levin, S. (1993). "Age and the Nobel prize revisited". Scientometrics 28 (3), 387-399.
180. Stephan, P.E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A., Black, G. (2007a). "Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients". Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (2), 71-99.
181. Stephan, P.E., Black, G., Chaing, T. (2007b). "The small size of the small-scale market: The early-stage labor market for highly skilled nanotechnology workers". Research Policy 36 (6), 887-892.
182. Stern, S. (2004). "Do scientists pay to be scientists?" Management Science 50 (6), 835-853.
183. Stigler, G.J. (1980). Merton on multiples, denied and affirmed. In: Science and Social Structure: A Festschrift for Robert K. Merton. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science.
184. Stigler, G.J. (1983). "Nobel lecture: The process and progress of economics". Journal of Political Economy 91, 529-545.
185. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
186. Sunwoong, K. (2007). Brain Drain and/or Brain Gain: Education and International Migration of Highly Educated Koreans. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
187. Terviö, M. (2006). Network Analysis of Three Academic Labor Markets. Hass School of Business.
188. Thursby, J., Thursby, M. (2007). "Patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty". In: Stephan, P., Ehrenberg, R. (Eds.), Science and the University. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
189. Thursby, J., Thursby, M., Mukherjee, S. (2005). Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research: A Life-Cycle View. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
190. Thursby, J., Thursby, M., Fuller, A. (2009). "U.S. patenting activity: Inside and outside the university". Research Policy 38, 14-25.
191. Tuckman, H., Leahey, J. (1975). "What is an article worth?" Journal of Political Economy 83, 951-968.
192. Turner, S. (1994). "Comments on 'The Economics of Science'". In: Arthur, J., Diamond, M. (Eds.), University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE.
193. Turner, L., Mairesse, J. (2003). "Individual productivity differences in scientific research: An econometric study of publishing of French physicists". Paper presented at the Zvi Griliches Memorial Conference Paris, France.
194. Vogel, G. (2000). "The mouse house as a recruiting tool". Science 288, 2254-2255.
195. Vogel, G. (2006). "Basic science agency gets a tag-team leadership". Science 313, 1371.
196. Von Hippel, E. (1994). "Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation". Management Science 40 (4), 429-439.
197. Walsh, J.P., Cho, C., Cohen, W. (2005). "View from the bench: Patents and material transfers". Science 309, 2002-2003.
198. Walsh, J., Cho, C., Cohen, W. (2007). "Where excludability matters: Material vs. intellectual property in academic biomedical research". Research Policy 36, 1184-1203.
199. Weiss, Y., Lillard, L. (1982). "Output variability, academic labor contracts, and waiting times for promotion". In: Ehrenberg, R.G. (Ed.), Research in Labor Economics, vol. 5, pp. 157-188.
200. Wilson, R. (2000). "They may not wear armani to class, but some professors are filthy rich". Chronicle of Higher Education 46 (26), A16-A18 March 3.
201. Wolpert, L., Richards, A. (1988). A Passion for Science. Oxford University Press, New York.
202. Wuchty, S., Jones, B., Uzzi, B. (2007). "The increasing dominance of teams in the production of knowledge". Science 316, 1030-1036.
203. Xie, Y., Shauman, K. (1998). "Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle". American Sociological Review 63, 847-870.
204. Xie, Y., Shauman, K. (2003). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
205. Xin, H. (2006). "Scandals shake Chinese science". Science 312, 1464-1466.
206. Ziman, J. (1968). Public Knowledge. Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK.
207. Zucker, L., Darby, M. (2007). "Star scientists, innovation and regional and national immigration". Paper read at Kauffman-Max Planck Research Conference on Entrepreneurship July 19-21, Dana Point.
208. Zucker, L., Darby, M., Brewer, M. (1998a). "Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprise". The American Economic Review 88 (1), 290-306.
209. Zucker, L.G., Darby, M., Armstrong, J. (1998b). "Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets". Economic Inquiry 36 (1), 65-86.
210. Zuckerman, H.A. (1992). "The proliferation of prizes: Nobel complements and Nobel surrogates in the reward system of science". Theoretical Medicine 13, 217-231.