The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning

Organization Science

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1120-1139

  Bresman, Henrik ^a   Zellmer Bruhn, Mary ^b  

^a INSEAD   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Group processes; Group structure; Learning; Multilevel research; Structure; Team learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881010450     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0783     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Aiken M, Hage J (1971) The organic organization and innovation. Sociology 5:63-82.
2. Alderfer CP (1987) An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. Lorsch JW, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 190-222.
3. Ancona DG (1990) Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. 33:334-365.
4. Ancona DG, Bresman H (2007) X-Teams: How to Build Teams that Lead, Innovate, and Succeed (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
5. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1988) Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Groups Organ. Stud. 13:468-494.
6. Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37:634-665.
7. Argote L, Gruenfeld DH, Naquin C (2001) Group learning in organizations. Turner ME, ed. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 369-411.
8. Bailyn L (1985) Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management 24:129-146.
9. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173-1182.
10. Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1988) Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: The transnational solution. Calif. Management Rev. 31:54-74.
11. Birkinshaw JM, Bresman H, Håkanson L (2000) Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. J. Management Stud. 37:395-425.
12. Birkinshaw JM, Hood N, Jonsson S (1998) Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management J. 19:221-242.
13. Birkinshaw JM, Nobel R, Ridderstråle J (2002) Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure. Organ. Sci. 13:274-289.
14. Bliese PD (1998) Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organ. Res. Methods 1:355-373.
15. Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349-381.
16. Bollen KA (1999) Structural Equations with Latent Variables (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
17. Bower JL (1974) Planning and control: Bottom-up or top-down. J. General Management 1:20-31.
18. Bresman H (2010) External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. 21:81-96.
19. Bresman H (2013) Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Acad. Management J. 56(1). Forthcoming.
20. Bresman H, Birkinshaw JM, Nobel R (1999) Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 30:439-462.
21. Buck VE (1966) A model for viewing an organization as a system of constraints. Thompson JD, ed. Approaches to Organizational Design (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh), 103-172.
22. Bunderson JS, Boumgarden P (2010) Structure and learning in selfmanaged teams: Why "bureaucratic" teams can be better learners. Organ. Sci. 21:609-624.
23. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM (2003) Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. 88:552-560.
24. Burgelman RA (1983) A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 28:223-244.
25. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).
26. Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psych. 46:821-850.
27. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15:555-568.
28. Chan D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same context domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83:234-246.
29. Chen G, Bliese PD (2002) The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. J. Appl. Psych. 87:549-556.
30. Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6:1-22.
31. Choi JN (2002) External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Res. 33:181-208.
32. Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator's Dilemma (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
33. Cohen SG, Ledford GE (1994) The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment. Human Relations 47:13-43.
34. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:128-152.
35. Cordery JL, Mueller WS, Smith LM (1991) Attitudinal and behavioral effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Acad. Management J. 34:464-476.
36. Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50:352-364.
37. Daft RL (2004) Organizational Theory and Design (Thomson, Cincinnati).
38. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. 34:555-590.
39. Davenport TH, Nohria N (1994) Case management and the integration of labor. Sloan Management Rev. 35:11-23.
40. Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54:413-452.
41. Denison DR, Hart SL, Kahn J (1996) From chimneys to crossfunctional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Management J. 39:1005-1023.
42. Drazin R (1995) Differentiation. Nicholson N, Schuler R, Van de Ven AH, eds. The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behavior (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA), 137.
43. Drazin R, Van de Ven AH (1985) Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(4):514-539.
44. Edmondson AC (1996) Group and Organizational Influences on Team Learning (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
45. Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:350-383.
46. Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13:128-146.
47. Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspecives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Walsh JP, Brief AP, eds. Academy of Management Annals (Routledge, New York), 269-314.
48. Faraj S, Yan A (2009) Boundary work in knowledge teams. J. Appl. Psych. 94:604-617.
49. Feldman DC (1984) The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. 9:47-53.
50. Felin T, Foss NJ (2006) Individuals and organizations: Thoughts on a micro-foundations project for strategic management and organizational analysis. Ketchen DJ Jr, Bergh DD, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 253-288.
51. Fosfuri A, Ronde T (2009) Leveraging resistance to change and the skunk works model of innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 72:274-289.
52. Galbraith JR (1994) Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
53. George J, James L (1993) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 78:789-804.
54. Gerwin D, Kolodny H (1992) Management of Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Strategy, Organization, and Innovation (Wiley/Interscience, New York).
55. Ghoshal S (1987) Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management J. 10:425-440.
56. Gibson C, Birkinshaw JM (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. 47:209-226.
57. Gibson C, Vermeulen F (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48:202-239.
58. Gilbert GC (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48:741-763.
59. Gladstein DL (1984) Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29:499-517.
60. Grinyer P, Yasai-Ardekani M (1980) Dimensions of organizational structure: A critical replication. Acad. Management J. 23:405-421.
61. Haas MR (2010) Autonomy, external knowledge, and team effectiveness under knowledge and task contingencies in a multinational organization. Acad. Management J. 53:989-1008.
62. Hackman JR (1987) The design of work teams. Lorsch JW, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 315-342.
63. Hackman JR (1990) Creating more effective work groups in organizations. Hackman JR, ed. Groups That Work (And Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 479-493.
64. Hackman JR (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
65. Hackman JR, Oldham G (1980) Work Redesign (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
66. Hall RH (1967) Some organizational considerations in the professional-organizational relationship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12:462-477.
67. Hofmann DA, Jones LM (2005) Leadership, collective personality, and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 90:509-522.
68. Huang X, Kristal M, Schroeder R (2010) The impact of organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency view. Production Oper. Management 19:515-530.
69. Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. 48:999-1015.
70. Janz BD, Colquitt JA, Noe RA (1997) Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psych. 50:877-904.
71. Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management 12:7-19.
72. Kenny DA, La Voie L (1985) Separating individual and group effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48:339-348.
73. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3-90.
74. Langfred CW, Moye NA (2004) Effects of task autonomym performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. J. Appl. Psych. 89:934-945.
75. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
76. LeBreton JM, James LR, Lindell MK (2005) Recent issues regarding rWG, r* WG, rWG4J 5, and R *WG(J). Organ. Res. Methods 8:128-138.
77. Lenox M, King A (2004) Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management J. 25:331-345.
78. Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13:111-125.
79. Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95-112.
80. Libby R, Blashfield RK (1978) Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 21:121-129.
81. MacCormack A, Verganti R, Iansiti M (2001) Developing products on "Internet time": The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. 47:133-150.
82. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psych. Methods 7:83-104.
83. Maloney MM, Johnson SG, Zellmer-Bruhn ME (2010) Assessing group-level constructs under missing data conditions: A Monte Carlo simulation. Small Group Res. 41:281-307.
84. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:71-87.
85. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26:356-376.
86. Marrone JA (2010) Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. J. Management 36:911-940.
87. Miller D, Friesen PH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad. Management J. 23:591-614.
88. Miller EJ, Rice AK (1967) Systems of Organization: The Control of Task and Sentient Boundaries (Tavistock Publications, London). Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
89. Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
90. Mintzberg H (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning (Free Press, New York).
91. Montanari JR (1979) Strategic choice: A theoretical analysis. J. Management Stud. 16:202-221.
92. Nahm AY, Vonderembse MA, Koufteros XA (2003) The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance. J. Oper. Management 21:281-306.
93. Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus. Rev. 96-104.
94. Norman DA (1988) The Design of Everyday Things (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
95. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).
96. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11:404-428.
97. Pennings JM (1992) Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 267-309.
98. Perrow C (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 32:194-208.
99. Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).
100. Pheysey DC, Payne RL, Pugh DS (1971) Influence of structure at organizational and group levels. Admin. Sci. Quart. 16:61-73.
101. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommded remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88:879-903.
102. Prahalad CK, Doz Y (1987) The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision (Free Press, New York).
103. Pugh DS, Hickson DJ (1976) Organizational Structure in Its Context: The Aston Program I (Saxton House, Farnborough, Hants, UK).
104. Pugh DS, Hickson DJ, Hinings CR (1968) Dimensions of organizational structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. 18:462-476.
105. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).
106. Raelin JA (1985) The basis for the professional's resistance to managerial control. Human Resource Management 24:147-175.
107. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20:685-695.
108. Rousseau DM (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1-37.
109. Scott WR (1998) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
110. Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Currency Doubleday, New York).
111. Shenhar AJ (2001) One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Sci. 47:394-414.
112. Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renascence of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44:838-857.
113. Silince JA (2005) A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence. Acad. Management Rev. 30:608-621.
114. Srivastava A, Bartol KM, Locke EA (2006) Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Acad. Management J. 49:1239-1251.
115. Stewart GL (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. J. Management 32:29-55.
116. Stone-Romero EF, Rosopa PJ (2008) The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organ. Res. Methods 11:326-352.
117. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. Shafritz JM, Ott JS, eds. Classics of Organization Theory (Harcourt Brace & Company, Orlando, FL), 287-301.
118. Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. 38:8-30.
119. Van de Ven AH, Leung R, Bechara JP, Sun K (2012) Changing organizational designs and performance frontiers. Organ. Sci. 23:1055-1076.
120. Vickery S, Droege C, Germain R (1999) The relationship between product customization and organizational structure. J. Oper. Management 17:377-391.
121. Walton EJ (2005) The persistence of bureaucracy: A meta-analysis of Weber's model of bureaucratic control. Organ. Stud. 26:569-600.
122. Weber M (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations (Free Press, New York).
123. Wong S-S (2004) Distal and local group learning: Performance tradeoffs and tensions. Organ. Sci. 15:645-656.
124. Yan A, Louis MR (1999) The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations 52:25-47.
125. Zellmer-Bruhn M, Gibson C (2006) Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Management J. 49:501-518.