Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams

Organization Science

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 115-131

  O'Leary, Michael Boyer ^a   Mortensen, Mark ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Configuration; Geographic dispersion; Geographically dispersed teams; Imbalance; Isolation; Team; Virtual teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953794085     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0434     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Allen, T. J. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Armstrong, D. J., P. Cole. 2002. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. P. Hinds, S. Kiesler, eds. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 167-212.
3. Aron, A., E. N. Aron, D. Smollan. 1992. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych.63(4) 596-612.
4. Arrow, H., J. E. McGrath, J. L. Berdahl. 2001. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
5. Ashforth, B. E., S. A. Johnson. 2001. Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. M. A. Hogg, D. J. Terry, eds. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, 31-48.
6. Ashforth, B. E., F. Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad.Management Rev.14(1) 20-39.
7. Axtell, C. M., S. J. Fleck, N. Turner. 2004. Virtual teams: Collaborating across distance. Internat.Rev.Indust.Organ.Psych.19 205-248.
8. Baba, M. L., J. Gluesing, H. Ratner, K. H. Wagner. 2004. The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. J.Organ.Behav.25(5) 547-587.
9. Bhappu, A. D., M. Zellmer-Bruhn, V. Anand. 2001. The effects of demographic diversity and virtual work environments on knowledge processing in teams. M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, S. Beyerlein, eds. Advances in the Interdisciplinary Study of Work Teams. 149-165.
10. Boh, W. F., Y. Ren, S. Kiesler, R. Bussjaeger. 2007. Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organizations. Organ. Sci. 18(4) 595-612.
11. Bos, N., N. S. Shami, J. S. Olson, A. Cheshin, N. Nan. 2004. Ingroup/out-group effects in distributed teams: An experimental simulation. Proc.2004 ACM Conf.Comput.Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, Chicago, 429-436.
12. Brandon, D. P., A. B. Hollingshead. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ.Sci.15(6) 633-644.
13. Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc.Psych.Bull.17(5) 475-482.
14. Brewer, M. B. 1995. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. S. E. Jackson, M. N. Ruderman, eds. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 47-68.
15. Brewer, M. B. 2001. Social psychology of intergroup relations. N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 7728-7733.
16. Brewer, M. B., R. Brown. 1998. Intergroup relations. D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology. McGraw Hill, Boston, 554-594.
17. Brewer, M. B., A. S. Harasty. 1996. Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. E. T. Higgins, R. M. Sorrentino, eds. The Interpersonal Context. Guilford, New York, 347-370.
18. Brewer, M. B., R. M. Kramer. 1986. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J.Personality Soc.Psych.50 543-549.
19. Brown, R., G. Wade. 1987. Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on inter-group attitudes and task performance. Eur.J.Soc.Psych.17(2) 131-142.
20. Campbell, D. T. 1958. Common fate, similarity and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Sci. 3(1) 14-25.
21. Clark, H. H., S. E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley, eds. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 1st ed. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 127-149.
22. Cohen, L. L., J. K. Swim. 1995. The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality Soc.Psych.Bull.21(9) 876-884.
23. Cooper, C. D., N. B. Kurland. 2002. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J.Organ.Behav.23(4) 511-532.
24. Coser, L. A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, New York.
25. Cota, A. A., K. L. Dion. 1986. Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. J.Personality Soc.Psych.50 770-776.
26. Cramton, C. D. 2001. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ.Sci.12 346-371.
27. Cramton, C. D. 2002. Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organ.Dynam.30(4) 356-368.
28. Cramton, C. D., P. J. Hinds. 2005. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? B. M. Staw, R. M. Kramer, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 231-263.
29. Cummings, J. N. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3) 352-364.
30. Cummings, J. N. 2005. Team configuration data provided via personal communication with the authors. January 4.
31. DeSanctis, G., P. Monge. 1999. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ.Sci. 10(6) 693-703.
32. Ellemers, N., H. van den Heuvel, D. de Gilder, A. Maass, A. Bonvini. 2004. The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British J.Soc.Psych. 43 315-338.
33. Espinosa, J. A., E. Carmel. 2003. The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 8(4) 249-266.
34. Espinosa, J. A., C. Pickering. 2006. The effect of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 8(4) 249-266.
35. Espinosa, J. A., J. N. Cummings, J. M. Wilson, B. M. Pearce. 2003. Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. J.Management Inform.Systems 19(4) 157-191.
36. Espinosa, J. A., S. A. Slaughter, R. E. Kraut, J. D. Herbsleb. 2007. Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ.Sci.18(4) 613-630.
37. Fiol, C., E. O'Connor. 2005. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ.Sci. 16 19-32.
38. Fiske, S. T., S. E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
39. Fussell, S. R., R. M. Krauss. 1992. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. J.Personality Soc.Psych.62(3) 378-391.
40. Gibson, C. B., J. Gibbs. 2006. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin.Sci.Quart.51(3) 451-495.
41. Griffith, T. L., J. E. Sawyer, M. A. Neale. 2003. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. 27(2) 265-288.
42. Grinter, R. E., J. D. Herbsleb, D. E. Perry. 1999. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc.Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work(GROUP '99), ACM, Phoenix, AZ, 306-315.
43. Hackman, J. R. 1990. Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
44. Hamilton, D. L., S. J. Sherman, B. Lickel. 1998. Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, C. A. Insko, eds. Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 47-74.
45. Hardin, A. M., M. A. Fuller, R. M. Davison. 2007. I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Res. 38(1) 130-155.
46. Harrison, D. D., K. J. Klein. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad.Management Rev.32(4) 1199-1228.
47. Heilman, M. E. 1980. The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organ.Behav.Human Performance 26 386-395.
48. Hertel, G., S. Geister, U. Konradt. 2005. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Rev. 15 69-95.
49. Hewstone, M. R. C. 1990. The " ultimate attribution error?" A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. Eur.J.Soc. Psych. 20 311-335.
50. Hinds, P. J., D. E. Bailey. 2003. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ.Sci.14(6) 615-632.
51. Hinds, P., S. Kiesler. 2002. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Hinds, P. J., M. Mortensen. 2005. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3) 290-307.
53. Hoegl, M., L. Proserpio. 2004. Team member proximity and team-work in innovative projects. Res.Policy 33 1153-1165.
54. Hogg, M. A. 2001. Social categorization and group behavior. M. A. Hogg, R. S. Tindale, eds. Group Processes. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA, 56-85.
55. Hogg, M. A., D. J. Terry. 2000. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad.Management Rev. 25(1) 121-140.
56. Hogg, M. A., J. C. Turner. 1985. Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. Eur.J.Soc.Psych. 15(1) 51-66.
57. Hogg, M. A., J. C. Turner. 1987. Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British J.Soc. Psych. 26 325-340.
58. Hollingshead, A. B. 2001. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J.Personality Soc.Psych. 81 1080-1089.
59. Hornsey, M. J., M. A. Hogg. 2000. Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality Soc.Psych. Rev. 4(2) 143-156.
60. House, R., D. M. Rousseau, M. Thomas-Hunt. 1995. The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Res.Organ.Behav.17 71-114.
61. Jarvenpaa, S. L., D. E. Leidner. 1999. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ.Sci.10(6) 791-815.
62. Jehn, K. A. 1994. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat.J.Conflict Management 5 223-238.
63. Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin.Sci.Quart.40(2) 256-282.
64. Jehn, K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin.Sci.Quart.42(3) 530-557.
65. Jehn, K. A., E. A. Mannix. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad.Management J.44(2) 238-251.
66. Kanter, R. M. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, New York.
67. Kanter, R. M. 1977b. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer.J. Sociol. 82(5) 965-990.
68. Kiesler, S., J. N. Cummings. 2002. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. P. J. Hinds, S. Kielser, eds. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 57-82.
69. King, J. L., R. L. Frost. 2002. Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. P. Hinds, S. Kiesler, eds. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 3-26.
70. Kirkman, B. L., J. E. Mathieu. 2005. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. J.Management 31(5) 700-718.
71. Klein, K. J., S. W. J. Kozlowski. 2000. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ.Res.Methods 3(3) 211-236.
72. Kramer, R. M., M. B. Brewer. 1984. Effects of group identity on resource utilization in a simulated common dilemma. J.Personality Soc.Psych.46 1044-1057.
73. Kraut, R. E., S. R. Fussell, S. E. Brennan, J. Siegel. 2002. Understanding the effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. P. J. Hinds, S. Kiesler, eds. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 137-162.
74. Krebs, S. A., E. V. Hobman, P. Bordia. 2006. Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity. Small Group Res. 37(6) 721-741.
75. Latane, B., K. D. Williams, S. G. Harkins. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J.Personality Soc.Psych.37 822-832.
76. Lau, D. C., J. K. Murnighan. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad.Management Rev.23(2) 325-340.
77. Lawler, E. E. 1992. Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice process theory. Amer.Sociol.Rev.57 327-339.
78. Lee, C. S., M. B. Watson-Manheim, A. Ramaprasad. 2007. Exploring the relationship between communication risk perception and communication portfolio. IEEE Trans.Professional Comm. 50(2) 130-146.
79. Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J.Appl.Psych.88(4) 587-604.
80. Liang, D. W., R. L. Moreland, L. Argote. 1995. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality Soc.Psych.Bull.21 384-393.
81. Loyd, D. L., J. White, M. Kern. 2008. Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. K. W. Phillips, E. Mannix, M. A. Neale, eds. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. JAI Press, Amsterdam, 75-92.
82. Malone, T. W., K. Crowston. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput.Surveys 26(1) 87-119.
83. Mannix, E. A. 1993. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organ. Behav.Human Decision Processes 55 1-22.
84. Martins, L. L., L. L. Gilson, M. T. Maynard. 2004. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J.Management 30(6) 805-835.
85. Massey, A. P., M. M. Montoya-Weiss, Y. T. Hung. 2003. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. J.Management Inform.Systems 19 129-155.
86. Menon, T., K. W. Phillips. 2008. Getting even vs. being the odd one out: Conflict and cohesion in even-and odd-sized groups. Working paper, University of Chicago GSB, Chicago.
87. Moore, D. A., T. R. Kurtzberg, L. L. Thompson, M. W. Morris. 1999. Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organ. Behav.Human Decision Processes 77(1) 22-43.
88. Moreland, R. L., L. Myaskovsky. 2000. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ.Behav.Human Decision Processes 82 117-133.
89. Moreland, R. L., L. Argote, R. Krishnan. 1996. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. A. M. Brower, ed. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 57-84.
90. Mortensen, M., P. J. Hinds. 2001. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat.J.Conflict Management 12(3) 212-238.
91. Mullen, B., L. Hu. 1989. Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl.Soc.Psych.10 233-252.
92. Nelson, L. J., Miller. 1995. The distinctiveness effect in social categorization: You are what makes you unusual. Psych.Sci.6 246-249.
93. Nonaka, I., H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.
94. O'Leary, M. B., J. N. Cummings. 2007. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. 32(3) 433-452.
95. O'Leary, M. B., W. J. Orlikowski, J. Yates. 2002. Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson's Bay company, 1670-1826. P. Hinds, S. Kiesler, eds. Distributed Work. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 27-54.
96. Olson, G. M., J. S. Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction 15(1) 139-179.
97. Pena, J., J. B. Walther, J. T. Hancock. 2007. Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated groups. Comm.Res.34(3) 313-331.
98. Pettigrew, T. F. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev.Psych. 49 65-85.
99. Phillips, K. W., D. L. Loyd. 2006. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav.Human Decision Processes 99(2) 143-160.
100. Polzer, J. T., B. Crisp, S. L. Jarvenpaa, J. W. Kim. 2006. Extending the faultline concept to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad.Management J. 49(4) 679-692.
101. Powell, A., G. Piccoli, B. Ives. 2004. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The DATA BASE Adv.Inform.Systems 35 6-39.
102. Raab, K. J., B. Ambos. 2008. Isolation and separation in teams: An analysis of configurations and their impact on knowledge flows. Paper Presented at the 28th Annual SMS Conf., Cologne, Germany.
103. Richman, A., K. Noble, A. Johnson. 2002. When the Workplace Is Many Places: The Extent and Nature of Off-Site Work Today. WFD Consulting, Watertown, MA.
104. Rutkowski, A.-F. o., C. Saunders, D. Vogel, M. van Genuchten. 2007. " Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?" Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small Group Res. 38(1) 98-129.
105. Saunders, C. S., C. van Slyke, D. R. Vogel. 2004. My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Acad.Management Executive 19-31.
106. Schopler, J., C. A. Insko. 1992. The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone, eds. European Review of Social Psychology. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 121-151.
107. Sell, J., M. J. Lovaglia, E. A. Mannix, C. D. Samuelson, R. K. Wilson. 2004. Investigating conflict, power, and status within and among groups. Small Group Res. 35(1) 44-72.
108. Sherif, M., O. J. Harvey, B. J. White, W. R. Hood, C. W. Sherif. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation.The Robbers Cave Experiment. Institute of Group Relations, Norman, OK.
109. Sherman, S. J., D. L. Hamilton, A. C. Lewis. 1999. Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, eds. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 80-110.
110. Simon, B. 1992. The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. Eur.Rev.Soc.Psych. 3 1-30.
111. Staples, D. S., J. Webster. 2008. Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Inform.Systems J.18 617-640.
112. Stroh, L. K., J. M. Brett, A. H. Reilly. 1994. A decade of change: Managers' attachment to their organizations and their jobs. Human Resource Management 33 531-548.
113. Tajfel, H. 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
114. Tajfel, H., J. C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. S. Worchel, ed. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, 7-24.
115. Tajfel, H., A. Wilkes. 1963. Classification and quantitative judgement. British J.Psych.54 104-114.
116. Taylor, S. E. 1981. A categorization approach to stereotyping. D. L. Hamilton, ed. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 83-114.
117. Taylor, S. E., S. T. Fiske, N. L. Etcoff, A. J. Ruderman. 1978. Categorical bases of person memory and stereotyping. J.Personality Soc.Psych.36 778-793.
118. Turner, J. C. 1984. Social identification and psychological group formation. H. Tajfel, ed. The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 518-538.
119. Valacich, J. S., C. Schwenk. 1995. Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organ.Behav.Human Decision Processes 63(2) 158-173.
120. Van den Bulte, C., R. K. Moenaert. 1998. The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11) S1-S18.
121. van Knippenberg, D., E. C. M. van Schie. 2000. Foci and correlates of organizational identification. J.Occupational Organ.Psych. 73 137-147.
122. Vega, G., L. Brennan. 2000. Isolation and technology: The human disconnect. J.Organ.Change Management 13(5) 468-481.
123. Wageman, R., F. M. Gordon. 2005. As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organ. Sci. 16(6) 687-700.
124. Watson-Manheim, M. B., F. Bélanger. 2007. Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quart. 31(2) 267-293.
125. Webster, J., D. S. Staples. 2006. Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. Res.Personnel and Human Resources Management 25 181-215.
126. Wegner, D. M. 1987. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. G. R. Goethals, ed. Theories of Group Behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York, 185-203.
127. Wilson, J. M., M. B. O'Leary, A. Metiu, Q. R. Jett. 2008. Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-butclose. Organ.Stud.29(7) 979-1002.
128. Zack, M. H. 1993. Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Inform.Systems Res.4(3) 207-239.