Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 971-986

  Marks, Michelle A ^a   Zaccaro, Stephen J ^b   Mathieu, John E ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MALE; MID-ATLANTIC REGION; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGY, INDUSTRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034346370     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665.
2. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
5. Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1991). Organizational performance and adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 805-826.
6. Brannick, M. T., Prince, A., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1992, September). Team coordination: Measuring an elusive construct. Paper presented at the meeting of the Human Factors Society. Atlanta, GA.
7. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
8. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429-452.
9. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). A framework for developing team performance measures in training. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 45-62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cheshire, S. (1993). Team warfare interactive simulation training: A testbed for the research of collective training strategies in synthetic environments. Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.
12. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Coovert, M. D., Craiger, J. P., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Innovations in modeling and simulating team performance: Implications for decision making. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 149-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1992). Can you study real teams in contrived settings? The value of small group research to understanding teams. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 101-124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
17. Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin. A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 245-287.
18. Fleishman, E. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 31-56). Norwood, NJ: ABLEX.
19. Ginnette, R. C. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 71-98). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Gladstein, D. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
21. Gully, S. M. (1994, April). Repeated measures multiple regression. Paper presented the meeting of the Society of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.
22. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23. Hackman, J. K., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
24. Hackman, J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness. (Tech. Rep. No. 2, Contract No. N00014-80-C-0555, NR 170-912): New Haven, CT: Yale University.
25. Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hall, J. K., Volpe, C. E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1992, August). Mitigating the effects of stress: A look at potential team training strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
27. Heffner, T. S. (1997). Training teams: The impact on shared mental models and team performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
28. Hill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking and sensegiving in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21, 1057-1074.
29. Hollenbeck, J. R., Colquitt, J. A., & Gully, S. M. (1998, April). Repeated measures regression: Decomposing variance in multilevel research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
30. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Sego, D. J. (1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3-23.
31. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
32. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Tuttle, D. B., & Sego, D. J. (1995). Team performance on monitoring tasks: An examination of decision errors in contexts requiring sustained attention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 685-696.
33. Klein, G. (1993). A script for the commander's intent statement. Fairborn, OH: Klein.
34. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
35. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., McHugh, P. P., Salas, E., & CannonBowers, J. A. (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 14, 253-305.
36. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
37. Kraiger, K., & Wenzel, L. H. (1997). Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models. In E. Salas, M. T. Brannick, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Lanzetta, J. T., & Roby, T. B. (1960). The relationship between certain group process variables and group problem solving efficiency. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 135-148.
39. Le Pine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decisionmaking teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
40. Marks, M. A., Burke, C. S., Parker, C. W., Higgins, J. M., Zaccaro, S. J., & Perez, R. S. (1997, April). Improving team effectiveness through team interaction training. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
41. Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1997, August). Team dynamics in hierarchical decision-making teams. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management. Boston, MA.
42. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
43. Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Heffner, T. S., & Goodwin, G. F. (1999, May). Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and expert comparisons. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Atlanta, GA.
44. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.
45. Minionis, D. (1994). Enhancing team performance in adverse conditions: The role of shared team mental models and team training on an interdependent task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. George Mason University.
46. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Venn Diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
47. Orasanu, J. M. (1990, September). Shared mental models and crew performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Human Factors Society. Orlando, FL.
48. Prince, A., Brannick, M. T., Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1997). The measurement of team process behaviors in the cockpit: Lessons learned. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 289-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Prince, C., Salas, E., & Franz, T. (1990). Aircrew coordination performance and skill development. Paper presented at the Team Training Conference, Orlando, FL.
50. Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296-1308.
51. Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363.
52. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1995). Concept maps as potential alternative assessments in science. Paper presented at the meeting of AERA. San Francisco, CA.
53. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: ABLEX.
54. Stout, R. J. (1994). Effects of planning on the shared understanding of team member information requirements and efficient communication strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.
55. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1994). The role of shared mental models in developing shared situational awareness. In R. D. Gilson, D. J. Garland, & J. M. Quince (Eds.), Situational awareness in complex environments. Dayton Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
56. Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Fowlkes, J. E. (1997). Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 169-182.
57. Sundstrom, E., de Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
58. Tannenbaum, S., Beard, R. L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/ organizational psychology (pp. 117-153). New York: Elsevier.
59. Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Vance, R. J. (1995). Generalization of employee involvement training to the job setting: Individual and situational effects. Personnel Psychology, 48, 607-632.
60. Weaver, J. L., Bowers, C. A., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1995). Networked simulations: New paradigms for team performance research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 12-24.
61. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
62. Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. A. (1999). Leader roles in organizational teams. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Creating contexts for high performance (pp. 95-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63. Zaccaro, S. J., Parker, C. W., Marks, M. A., Burke, C. S., Higgins, J. M., & Perez, R. S. (1997, April). The influence of team efficacy beliefs on team communication and performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.