Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance

Management Science

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1534-1544

  Waller, Mary J ^a   Gupta, Naina ^b   Giambatista, Robert C ^c  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Group dynamics; Mental models; Nuclear power; Shared cognition; Teams

Indexed keywords

GROUP DYNAMICS; MENTAL MODELS; SHARED COGNITION; TEAMS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 9944230559     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0210     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ancona, D. G., D. F. Caldwell. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37 634-666.
2. Argote, L., M. Turner, M. Fichman. 1989. To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 43 58-74.
3. Blickensderfer, E., J. A. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas. 1997. Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. Beyerlein, Johnson, Beyerlein, eds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 249-279.
4. Brown, S. L., K. M. Eisenhardt. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42 1-34.
5. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., E. Salas, S. Converse. 1993. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. N. J. Castellan, Jr., ed. Individual and Group Decision Making. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., S. I. Tannenbaum, E. Salas, C. E. Volpe. 1995. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. R. Guzzo, E. Salas, and associates, eds. Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. Wiley, 333-380.
7. Conte, J. M., F. J. Landy, J. E. Mathieu. 1995. Time urgency: Conceptual and construct development. J. Appl. Psych. 80 178-185.
8. Endsley, M. R., D. J. Garland. 2000. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Feldman, R. S. 1992. Application of Nonverbal Behavioral Theories and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Friedman, M., R. Rosenman. 1974. Type A Behavior and Your Heart. Knopf, New York.
11. Foushee, H. C. 1984. Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. Amer. Psych. 39 886-893.
12. Gersick, C.J.G. 1989. Marking time: Predictable transition in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32 274-309.
13. Greenberg, J. 1976. The role of seating position in group interaction: A review, with applications for group trainers. Group Organ. Stud. 3 310-327.
14. Helmreich, R. L., H. C. Foushee. 1993. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. E. Wiener, B. Kanki, R. Helmreich, eds. Cockpit Resource Management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 3-45.
15. Hollenbeck, J. R., D. R. Ilgen, D. B. Turtle, D. J. Sego. 1995. Team performance on monitoring tasks: An examination of decision errors in contexts requiring sustained attention. J. Appl. Psych. 60 685-696.
16. Huey, B. M., C. D. Wickens. 1993. Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
17. Kanki, B., M. Palmer. 1993. Communication and CRM. E. Wiener, B. Kanki, R. Helmreich, eds. Cockpit Resource Management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 99-136.
18. Kantowitz, B. H., P. A. Casper. 1988. Human workload in aviation. E. Wiener, D. Nagel, eds. Human Factors in Aviation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 157-187.
19. Kawano, R., M. Fujiie, H. Ujita, R. Kubota, S. Yoshimura, T. Ohtsuka. 1991. Plant operators' behaviour in emergency situations by using training simulators. Y. Queinnec, F. Daniellou, eds. Designing for Everyone. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K.
20. Larson, J. R., P. G. Foster-Fishman, T. M. Franz. 1998. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24 482-495.
21. Lim, S., K. Murnighan. 1994. Phases, deadlines, and the bargaining process. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 58 153-171.
22. Mathieu, J., T. Heffner, G. Goodwin, E. Salas, J. Cannon-Bowers. 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85 273-283.
23. Mohammed, S., B. C. Dumville. 2001. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. J. Organ. Behavior 22 89-106.
24. Okhuysen, G. A. 2001. Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups. Acad. Management J. 44 794-808.
25. Orasanu, J. M. 1993. Decision-making in the cockpit. E. Wiener, B. Kanki, R. Helmreich, eds. Cockpit Resource Management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 137-172.
26. Pepitone, D. D., T. King, M. Murphy. 1988. The role of flight planning in aircrew decision performance. Proc. SAE Aerospace Tech. Conf. Exposition, Society of Automotive Engineers technical paper series #881517, Warrendale, PA.
27. Prince, C., E. Salas. 2000. Team situation awareness, errors, and crew resource management: Research integration for training guidance. M. R. Endsley, D. J. Garland, eds. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 325-347.
28. Rasker, P., W. Post, J. Schraagen. 2000. Effects of two types of intrateam feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams. Ergonomics 43 1167-1189.
29. Roberts, K. H. 1993. New Challenges to Understanding Organizations. Macmillan, New York.
30. Rouse, W. B. 1979. Approaches to mental workload. N. Moray, ed. Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement. Plenum Press, New York, 255-262.
31. Rouse, W. B., N. M. Morris. 1986. On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psych. Bull. 100 349-363.
32. Rouse, W. B., J. A. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas. 1992. The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics 22 1296-1308.
33. Slocombe, T., A. Bluedorn. 1999. Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. J. Organ. Behavior 20 75-99.
34. Stanton, N. 1996. Human Factors in Nuclear Safety. Taylor & Francis, London, U.K.
35. Staw, B., L. Sandelands, J. Dutton. 1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26 501-524.
36. Steiner, I. D. 1979. Group Process and Productivity. Academic Press, New York.
37. Stout, R. J., J. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas, D. Milanovich. 1999. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors 41 61-71.
38. Takano, K., K. Sasou, S. Yoshimura. 1997. Structure of operator's mental models in coping with anomalies occurring in nuclear power plants. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 47 767-789.
39. Urban, J. M., C. A. Bowers, J. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas. 1995. The importance of team architecture in understanding team processes. Beyerlein, Johnson, eds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, Vol. 2. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, 205-228.
40. Waller, M. J. 1999. The timing of adaptive group responses to non-routine problems. Acad. Management J. 42 127-137.
41. Waller, M. J., K. A. Jehn. 2000. Multiple system interfaces and resource conflict: Human and technological group coordination and performance. T. Griffith, ed. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Vol. 3. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, 115-131.
42. Waller, M. J., R. C. Giambatista, M. Zellmer-Bruhn. 1999. The effects of individual time urgency on group polychronicity. J. Managerial Psych. 14 244-256.
43. Waller, M. J., M. Zellmer-Bruhn, R. C. Giambatista. 2002. Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Acad. Management J. 45 1046-1055.
44. Weick, K. E. 1993. The vulnerable system: An analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. K. Roberts, ed. New Challanges to Understanding Organizations. Macmillan, New York, 173-198.
45. Weick, K. E., K. H. Roberts. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38 357-381.
46. Weick, K. E., K. M. Sutcliffe. 2001. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA.