Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness?

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 521-531

  Gilson, Lucy L ^a   Mathieu, John E ^a   Shalley, Christina E ^b   Ruddy, Thomas M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944451472     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407916     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Amabile, T. M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bowen, D., & Schneider, B. 1988. Service marketing and management: Implications for organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 10: 43-80. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
5. Cortina, J. M. 1993. Interaction, nonlinearity and multicolinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19: 915-922.
6. Crosby, P. B. 1989. Let's talk quality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. 1994. Management theory and total quality: Improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19: 392-418.
8. Drazin, R., Glynn, M., & Kazanjian, R. 1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 24: 286-307.
9. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94-118.
10. Ford, C. M. 1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1112-1143.
11. Gilson, L. L., Mathieu, J. Er, & Ruddy, T. M. 2003. Empowerment and team effectiveness: Empirical tests of a work redesign intervention and an integrated model of team effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle.
12. Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. 2004. A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams' engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30: 453-470.
13. Gilson, L. L., Shalley, C. E., & Blum, T. C. 2001. Team and organizational attitudes as a lens and mirror impacting customer satisfaction: An empirical test in self-managed teams. Journal of Quality Management, 6: 235-256.
14. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. 1975. Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review & proposed integration. In L. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: 45-99. New York: Academic Press.
15. Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. 1997. An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50: 553-585.
16. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.
17. Kahn, W. A. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 692-724.
18. Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. 2000. Creativity and technological learning: The roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17: 273-298.
19. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58-74.
20. Kubey, R., Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Experience sampling method applications to communication research questions. Journal of Communication, 46(2): 99-120.
21. Leenders, R., van Engelen, J., & Kratzer, J. 2003. Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20: 69-92.
22. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitations in organizational learning. Organization Science, 21: 71-87.
23. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. 2001. A temporally based framework & taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 356-376.
24. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Olian, J. D., & Rynes, S. L. 1991. Making total quality work: Aligning organizational processes, performance measures, and stakeholders. Human Resource Management, 30: 303-333.
26. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89-106.
27. Roberts, K. H. 1990. Some characteristics of high reliability organizations. Organization Science, 1(2): 160-177.
28. Runco, M. A. 1995. The creativity and job satisfaction of artists in organizations. Empirical Studies of Art, 13(1): 39-45.
29. Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. 1985. Employee and customer perceptions of service banks: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 423-433.
30. Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. 2000. Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 215-224.
31. Shank, J. K., Niblock, E. G., & Sandalls, W. T. 1973. Balance "creativity" and "practicality" in formal planning. Harvard Business Review, 51(1): 97-94.
32. Stein, M. I. 1975. Stimulating creativity. New York: Academic Press.
33. Stokols, D., Clitheroe, C., & Zmundzinas, M. 2002. Qualities of the work environment that promote perceived support for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14: 137-147.
34. Sundstrom, E. 1999. Supporting work team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Sutton, B. I. 2002. The weird rules of creativity. Harvard Business Review, 80(September): 94-103.
36. Sutton, B. I., & Rafaeli, A. 1988. Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 461-487.
37. Taylor, F. W. 1911. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
38. Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. 1997. Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31: 27-41.
39. Torrance, E. P. 1988. The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological views: 43-75. Cambridge, England: University Press.
40. Unsworth, K. 2001. Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26: 289-297.
41. Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. 1986. Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11: 71-87.
42. Vogus, T., & Welbourne, T. 2003. Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 877-903.
43. Wageman, R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-180.
44. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18: 293-332.