Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 1134-1150

  De Jong, Bart A ^a   Dirks, Kurt T ^b   Gillespie, Nicole ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Performance; Teams; Trust

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIATION; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; META ANALYSIS; SKILL; TRUST; COOPERATION; GROUP PROCESS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRUST;

EID: 84964412325     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/apl0000110     Document Type: Article

References (183)

1. Afshartous, D., & Preston, R. A. (2010). Confidence intervals for dependent data: Equating non-overlap with statistical significance. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54, 2296-2305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.04.011
2. Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42, 1105-1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001
3. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects. Information & Management, 44, 646-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001
4. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Lynn, G., & Dogan, D. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of team sensemaking capability in product development projects. R & D. Management, 42, 473-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9310.2012.00696.x
5. Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G., Keskin, H., & Dogan, D. (2014). Team learning in IT implementation projects: Antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.007
6. Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decisionmaking teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00524-1
7. Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496403256011
8. Austin, P. C., & Hux, J. E. (2002). A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36, 194-195. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1067/mva.2002.125015
9. Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 332-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x
10. Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1155-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.008
11. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
12. Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological Methods, 10, 389-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.389
13. Berson, Y., Da'as, R., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes? Personnel Psychology, 68, 79-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12071
14. Bierly, P. E., III, Stark, E. M., & Kessler, E. H. (2009). The moderating effects of virtuality on the antecedents and outcome of NPD team trust. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 551-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00680.x
15. Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M., De Jong, B. A., & Van de Bunt, G. G. (2008). Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 19-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 09585190701763800
16. Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M., Sleebos, E., & De Gilder, D. (2009, August 7-11). Triple trust and team performance: Disentangling effects of trust in co-team members, managers, and senior management. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
17. Bjornstad, A. L., Fostervold, K. I., & Ulleberg, P. (2011). Effects of cultural diversity on trust and its consequences for team processes and outcomes in ad hoc distributed teams. Scandinavian Journal of Organizational Psychology, 3, 3-16.
18. Blatt, R. (2008). Developing relational capital in team-based new ventures. University of Michigan: Unpublished dissertation.
19. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-level theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Boies, K., Fiset, J., & Gill, H. (2015). Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 1080-1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.007
21. Boies, K., Lvina, E., & Martens, M. L. (2010). Shared leadership and team performance in a business strategy simulation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 195-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000021
22. Bradley, J., White, B. J., & Mennecke, B. E. (2003). Teams and tasks: A temporal framework for the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance. Small Group Research, 34, 353-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496403034003004
23. Brahm, T., & Kunze, F. (2012). The role of trust climate in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 595-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941211252446
24. Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006
25. Bresnahan, C. G. (2008). Attachment style as a predictor of group conflict, post-conflict relationship repair, trust and leadership style. University of Southern California: Unpublished dissertation.
26. Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (forthcoming). Does Trust Matter More in Virtual Teams? A Meta-Analysis of Trust and Team Effectiveness Considering Virtuality and Documentation as Moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology.
27. Carmeli, A., Tishler, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2012). CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10, 31-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127011434797
28. Carter, M. Z., & Mossholder, K. W. (2015). Are we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1349-1363. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/a0038798
29. Celani, A., & Tasa, K. (2010). Putting the collective in collective efficacy: The influence of psychological collectivism on group cognition and performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Montreal, CA.
30. Chang, J. W., Sy, T., & Choi, J. N. (2012). Team emotional intelligence and performance: Interactive dynamics between leaders and members. Small Group Research, 43, 75-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1046496411415692
31. Chen, C. C., Wu, J., Yang, S. C., & Tsou, S. C. (2008). Importance of diversified leadership roles in improving team effectiveness in a virtual collaboration learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 304-321.
32. Chen, M. H., & Wang, M. C. (2008). Social networks and a new venture's innovative capability: The role of trust within entrepreneurial teams.R and D. Management, 38, 253-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00515.x
33. Cheung, S. Y., Gong, Y., Wang, M., Zhou, L., & Shi, J. (2012). Cognitive and affective crossfire: Joint effects of functional diversity and affectbased trust on knowledge sharing and innovation in teams. Paper presented at the Asia Academy of Management Conference.
34. Chung, Y., & Jackson, S. E. (2013). The internal and external networks of knowledge-intensive teams: The role of task routineness. Journal of Management, 39, 442-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0149206310394186
35. Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W. L., Gavin, M. B., & Broberg, J. C. (2012). Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 37, 752-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601112464266
36. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 014920639702300303
37. Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., Jr., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900506
38. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909-927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
39. Connelly, C. E., & Turel, O. (2011). Emotional authenticity in virtual teams: Antecedents and consequences for team performance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Montréal, Québec.
40. Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Cortina, J. M. (2003). Apples and oranges (and pears, oh my!): The search for moderators in meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 415-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428103257358
42. Costa, A. C. (2000). A matter of trust: Effects on the performance and effectiveness of teams in organizations. Ridderkerk, The Netherlands: Ridderprint.
43. Costa, A. C., Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M., & De Jong, B. A. (2009). The role of social capital on trust development and dynamics: Implications for cooperation, monitoring and team performance. Social Sciences Information Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 48, 199-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018409102408
44. Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams, the relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 225-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 13594320143000654
45. Courtright, S. H., Thurgood, G. R., Stewart, G. L., & Pierotti, A. J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1825-1846. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000027
46. Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/ 1866-5888/a000075
47. Cronin, M. A. (2005). Respect and trust in teams: The relational basis for proper team functioning. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Honolulu, HI.
48. Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 761-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275511
49. Cumming, G. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 205-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.3471
50. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
51. Cursȩu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2010). Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 66-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017104
52. Dai, Y., & Chok, J. I. (2014). Unlocking the effects of transactive memory system on performance: The mediating roles of EO. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
53. Dayan, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2010). The impact of structural and contextual factors on trust formation in product development teams. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 691-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.01.001
54. Dayan, M., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Colak, M. (2009). Managerial trust in new product development projects: Its antecedents and consequences. R & D. Management, 39, 21-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00538.x
55. DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
56. De Jong, B. A., Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2014). Stronger than the sum of its parts? The performance implications of peer control combinations in teams. Organization Science, 25, 1703-1721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0926
57. De Jong, B. A., & Dirks, K. T. (2012). Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: Implications of asymmetry and dissensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 391-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0026483
58. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649
59. De Jong, B. A., Kroon, D., & Schilke, O. (forthcoming). The future of organizational trust research: A synthesis of scholarly recommendations and recent developments. In P. Van Lange, B. Rockenbach, & T. Yamagishi (Eds.), Trust in social dilemmas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Dekker, D. M. (2008). Global virtual teams: Enhancing effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven: Universiteitsdrukkerij Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
61. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000602
62. Devine, D. J., & Philips, J. L. (2001). Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32, 507-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200501
63. Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35, 557-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 00483480610682299
64. Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445
65. Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004-1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.1004
66. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.12.4.450.10640
67. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
68. Donati, S., & Zappala, S. (2013, May 23-25). Types of trust and team performance in inter-organizational teams. Paper presented at the EAWOP conference, Munster, Germany.
69. Drescher, M. A., Korsgaard, M. A., Welpe, I. M., Picot, A., & Wigand, R. T. (2014). The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 771-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036474
70. Druskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. (2006). The impact of emergent leader's emotionally competent behavior on team trust, communication, engagement, and effectiveness. In W. J. Zerbe, N. M. Ashkanasy, & C. E. J. Hartel (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 25-55). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1746-9791(06)02002-5
71. Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 435-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30040637
72. Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust across organizational contexts: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239-273). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
73. Evans, J. M., Hendron, M. G., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2015). Withholding the ace: The individual-and unit-level performance effects of self-reported and perceived knowledge hoarding. Organization Science, 26, 494-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0945
74. Ferguson, A. J., & Peterson, R. S. (2015). Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1012-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000007
75. Ferrin, D. L., Bligh, M. C., & Kohles, J. C. (2008). It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 161-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.012
76. Fulmer, C. A. (2012). Getting on the same p.: How leader build trust consensus in teams and its consequences. University of Maryland: Unpublished dissertation.
77. Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38, 1167-1230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206312439327
78. Fulmer, C. A., Tsai, M. H., & Chawla, N. (2015). Making or breaking team creativity: Trust in teams and member relational orientation. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Vancouver, CA.
79. Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006). Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 37, 459-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1046496406292337
80. Gilson, L. L., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the impact of team diversity on performance in project teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
81. Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Lee, D. R., & Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 827-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0177
82. Greer, L. L., & Caruso, H. M. (2007). Are high power teams really high performers? The roles of trust and status congruency in high power team performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management 2007 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
83. Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., & Thatcher, S. (2005). The effect of trust on conflict and performance in groups split by demographic faultlines. Paper presented at the 3rd EIASM Workshop on Trust within and between Organisations, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
84. Groesbeck, R. L. (2001). An empirical study on group stewardship and learning: Implications for work group effectiveness. Blacksburg, VA: Unpublished dissertation.
85. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
86. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
87. Harvey, D. L. (2010). A team process and emergent states approach to understanding team conflict and outcomes. Pennsylvania: Unpublished dissertation.
88. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
89. Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., & Tjosvold, D. (2009). Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 41-65. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/job.540
90. Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000228
91. Hollenbeck, J. R., Beersma, B., & Schouten, M. E. (2012). Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. The Academy of Management Review, 37, 82-106.
92. Hu, J. (2012). A team-level social exchange model: The antecedents and consequences of leader-team exchange. University of Illinois at Chicago: Unpublished dissertation.
93. Huang, C. C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29, 786-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003
94. Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50, 553-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00703.x
95. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15, 250-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ isre.1040.0028
96. Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 3069453
97. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 531-546.
98. Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20, 240-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383
99. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 187-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-7
100. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31, 783-808.
101. Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2004). Time pressure and team performance: An attention focus integration. In S. Blount (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 6, pp. 185-212). Stanford, CA: JAI Press.
102. Kepes, S., Banks, G. C., McDaniel, M., & Whetzel, D. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 624-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452760
103. Khan, M. S., Breitenecker, R. J., Gustafsson, V., & Schwarz, E. J. (2015). Innovative entrepreneurial teams: The give and take of trust and conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 558-573. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/caim.12152
104. Kiffin-Petersen, S. A. (2004). Trust: A neglected variable in team effectiveness research. Journal of Management & Organization, 10, 38-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2004.10.1.38
105. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). Enhancing the transfer of computer-assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 706-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.706
106. Kong, D. T., Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2014). Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1235-1255. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0461
107. Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (2004). Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
108. Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159588
109. Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 885-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
110. Lau, D. C., & Liden, R. C. (2008). Antecedents of coworker trust: Leaders' blessings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1130-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1130
111. Lee, P., Gillespie, N., Mann, L., & Wearing, A. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41, 473-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1350507610362036
112. Lee, S. M., Koopman, J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Lanaj, K., & Wang, L. (2015). The Team Descriptive Index (TDI): A multidimensional scaling approach for team description. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1, 91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amd.2013.0001
113. Leslie, L. M. (2007). Putting differences in context: Incorporating the role of status and cooperation into work unit ethnic composition research. University of Maryland, College Park: Unpublished dissertation.
114. Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., & Lee, S. (2008). An examination of the relationship among structure, trust, and conflict management styles in virtual teams. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21, 77-93. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/piq.20016
115. Lvina, E. (2011). Political skill in the team context: Team political skill composition and team effectiveness. Concordia University: Unpublished dissertation.
116. MacCurtain, S., Flood, P. C., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2010). The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 219-232. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00564.x
117. Mach, M., & Baruch, Y. (2015). Team performance in cross cultural project teams: The moderated mediation role of consensus, heterogeneity, faultlines and trust. Cross Cultural Management, 22, 464-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CCM-10-2014-0114
118. Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 771-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317909X473903
119. Mach, M., & Lvina, E. (2015). When trust in the leader matters: The moderated-mediation model of team performance and trust. University of Barcelona working paper.
120. Mahony, D. M., Korsgaard, M. A., & Pitariu, A. (2012). Group trust, task conflict and performance-antecedents and consequences of trust as an emergent group property. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
121. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
122. Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust for management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928
123. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256727
124. McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Introduction to the Special Issue on Trust in an Organizational Context. Organization Science, 14, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.1.12812
125. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Dechurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
126. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002
127. Moshier, S., & Foti, R. (2012). Team trust's role in the development of collective leadership. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
128. Muethel, M., Siebdrat, F., & Hoegl, M. (2012). When do we really need interpersonal trust in globally dispersed new product development teams? R & D. Management, 42, 31-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00667.x
129. Naquin, C. E., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2009). Team negotiation and perceptions of trustworthiness: The whole versus the sum of the parts. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13, 133-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013879
130. Ng, J. L., Ayoko, O. B., & Kifle, T. (2011). Cross-level modeling of values, conflict, and trust. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
131. Ning, A., Liao, H., Tangirala, S., & Firth, B. M. (2014). Differential effects of promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors on team productivity and safety performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
132. Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.155
133. Olson, B. J., Bao, Y., & Parayitam, S. (2007). Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of World Business, 42, 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.11.007
134. Ortiz de Guinea, A., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49, 301-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003
135. Orwin, R. G., & Vevea, J. L. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 177-203). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
136. Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., & Yammarino, F. J. (2011). Team virtues and performance: an examination of transparency, behavioral integrity, and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 201-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7
137. Papenhausen, C. (2006). Half full or half empty: The effects of top managers' dispositional optimism on strategic decision-making and firm performance. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7, 103-115.
138. Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. S. (2007). The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive-and affectbased trust in strategic decision-making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 42-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 10444060710759318
139. Paterson, T. A., Harms, P. D., Steel, P., & Crede, M. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23, 66-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321
140. Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
141. Pitariu, A., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2011). Monitoring in teams: A selfregulation perspective. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
142. Pitts, V. E. (2010). Towards a better understanding of virtual team effectiveness: An integration of trust. Fort Collins, CO: Unpublished dissertation.
143. Politis, J. D. (2003). The connection between trust and knowledge management: What are its implications for team performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 13673270310505386
144. Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 361-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb022787
145. Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory: Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36, 746-771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1046496405281776
146. Rau, D. (2008). Top management team social processes and changes in organizational strategy. Journal of Business and Management, 14, 25-42.
147. Raver, J. L., Ehrhart, M. G., & Chong Lim, B. (2013). Difficult team members: Implications for trust, conflict, effectiveness, and leadership. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Lake Buena Vista (Orlando), FL.
148. Rispens, S., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. (2007). It could be worse: A study on the alleviating role of trust and connectedness in intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18, 325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10444060710833450
149. Robert, L. P. (2012). Trust but verify?: Unraveling the relationship between trust and behavior controls in virtual teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
150. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
151. Sanchez, R. J., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Schmidtke, J. M., & Bradley, J. A. (2009). It's just business: Affective and cognitive trust in virtual teams. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
152. Saunders, C. S., & Ahuja, M. K. (2006). Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research, 37, 662-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1046496406294323
153. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022625
154. Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55, 182-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/ 000313001317097960
155. Schippers, M. C. (2003). Reflexivity in teams. Doctoral dissertation, Ridderkerk, The Netherlands: Ridderprint.
156. Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2005). Reflexiviteit van teams: Ontwikkeling van een instrument. Gedrag en Organisatie, 18, 83-102.
157. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
158. Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2014). Software for the Hunter-Schmidt metaanalysis methods. Version 2.0 (p. 52242). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organizations.
159. Schneider, T. R., Dowling, P., & Payton, G. M. (2009). Experimental evaluation of collaborating teams. Wright State University, Dayton OH working paper.
160. Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20, 267-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
161. Seppänen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Sundqvist, S. (2007). Measuring interorganizational trust: A critical review of the empirical research in 1990-2003. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 249-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003
162. Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2010). Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000017
163. Spreitzer, G. M., Noble, D. S., Mishra, A. K., & Cooke, W. N. (1999). Predicting process improvement team performance in an automotive firm: Explicating the roles of trust and empowerment. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Groups in context (Vol. 2, pp. 71-92). Stanford, CA: JAI Press.
164. Staples, S. S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18, 617-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x
165. Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792
166. Stewart, K. J., & Gosain, S. (2006). The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30, 291-314.
167. Sundstrom, E. (1999). Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
168. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120
169. Talaulicar, T., Grundei, J., & Werder, A. (2005). Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 519-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.02.001
170. Todorova, G., & Weingart, L. R. (2010). Experience, trust, and conflict: How they facilitate or inhibit idea building in cross-functional innovation teams. Carnegie Mellon University working paper.
171. Tost, L. P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don't listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.obhdp.2011.10.001
172. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
173. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 2393703
174. Webber, S. S. (2008a). Blending service provider-client project teams to achieve client trust: Implications for project team trust, cohesion, and performance. Project Management Journal, 39, 72-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20043
175. Webber, S. S. (2008b). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams. Small Group Research, 39, 746-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1046496408323569
176. Wildman, J. L., Thayer, A. L., Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Mathieu, J. E., & Rayne, S. R. (2012). Task types and team-level attributes: Synthesis of team classification literature. Human Resource Development Review, 11, 97-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534484311417561
177. Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60, 127-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x
178. Wilson, D. (2009). Systematic Coding. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 159-176). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
179. Wilson, J. M., Straus, G. S., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 16-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
180. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393957
181. Zheng, Y. (2012). Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 577-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.001
182. Zornoza, A., Orengo, V., & Peñarroja, V. (2009). Relational capital in virtual teams: The role played by trust. Social Sciences Information Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 48, 257-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018409102414
183. Zou, G. Y. (2007). Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods, 12, 399-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.12.4.399