Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects

Information and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 646-656

  Akgün, Ali E ^a   Keskin, Halit ^a   Byrne, John ^b   Imamoglu, Salih Z ^a  

^a GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Group potency; Product development; Project management; Software development; Team potency

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; EMPOWERMENT OF PERSONNEL; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

GROUP POTENCY; IMPLICATIONS; TEAM POTENCY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34848901646     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adler T.R., Leonard J.G., and Nordgren R.K. Improving risk management: moving from risk elimination to risk avoidance. Information and Software Technology 41 (1999) 29-34
2. Akgün A.E., and Lynn G.S. New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market: an extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management 5 (2002) 117-129
3. Andersen P.H., and Kumar R. Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: A conceptual model for buyer-seller dyads. Industrial Marketing Management 35 (2006) 522-535
4. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 411-423
5. Bagozzi R., Yi Y., and Phillips L.W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1991) 421-458
6. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action (1986), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
7. Bouffard-Bouchard T. Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. Journal of Social Psychology 130 (1990) 353-363
8. Campion M.A., Medsker J.G., and Higgs A. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 46 (1993) 823-850
9. W.W. Chin, Pls-graph User's Guide Version 3.0. C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston Houston, TX, 2001.
10. Cooper R.G., and Kleinschmidt E.J. Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 16 (1987) 215-223
11. DeMarco T., and Listen T. Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams (1987), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
12. Drasgow F., and Kanfer R. Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (1985) 662-680
13. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981) 39-51
14. Gallivan J. The influence of software developers' creative style on their attitudes to and assimilation of a software process innovation. Information & Management 40 (2003) 443-465
15. Gevers J.M.P., Van Eerde W., and Rutte C.G. Time pressure, potency, and progress in project groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 10 (2001) 205-221
16. Ghiselli E.E., Campbell J.P., and Zedeck S. Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences (1981), Freeman, San Francisco, CA
17. Gist M.E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review 12 (1987) 472-485
18. Gladstein D.L. Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1984) 499-517
19. Griffin A., and Page A.L. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (1993) 291-308
20. Gully S.M., Incalcaterra K.A., Joshi A., and Beaubien J.M. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 819-832
21. Guzzo R.A., Yost P.R., Campbell R.J., and Shea G.P. Potency in groups: articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology 32 (1993) 87-106
22. Heng C., Tan B.C.Y., and Wei K. De-escalation of commitment in software projects: Who matters? What matters?. Information & Management 41 (2003) 99-110
23. Hertel G., Niedner S., and Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 32 (2003) 1159-1177
24. Hurley R., and Hult G.T.M. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing 62 (1998) 42-54
25. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Hwang G., Huang J., and Hung S. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Information & Management 41 (2004) 279-288
26. Jung D.I., and Sosik J.J. Group potency and collective efficacy: examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Group and Organization Management 28 (2003) 366-391
27. Kessler E.H., and Chakrabarti A.K. Speeding up the phase of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (1999) 231-247
28. Kirkman B.L., and Rosen B. Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics 28 (2000) 48-65
29. Larson C.E., and LaFasto F.M.J. Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. 5th ed. (1989), Sage Publications Inc., USA
30. Linberg K.R. Software developer perceptions about software project failure: a case study. Journal of Systems and Software 49 (1999) 177-192
31. Lindell M.K., and Whitney D.J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research design. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 114-121
32. Lindsley D.H., Brass D.J., and Thomas J.B. Efficacy-performance spirals: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review 20 (1995) 645-678
33. Little B.L., and Madigan R.M. Motivation in work teams: a qualitative and quantitative exploration of the construct of collective efficacy. Small Group Research 28 (1997) 517-534
34. Lynn G.S. Innovation Audit (2001), Stevens Institute of Technology
35. Mann C.C. Why software is so bad. Technology Reviewes 105 (2002) 33-38
36. Manz C.C., and Sims H.P. Superleadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics 19 (1991) 18-35
37. Shea G.P., and Guzzo R.A. Group effectiveness: what really matters?. Sloan Management Review 28 (1987) 25-31
38. Spink K.S. Collective efficacy in the sport setting. International Journal of Sport Psychology 21 (1990) 380-395
39. Spreitzer G.M. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 39 (1996) 483-504
40. Thamhain H.J., and Wilemon L. Criteria for controlling projects according to plan. Project Management Journal 17 (1986) 75-81
41. Werner J.M., and Lester S.W. Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams. Human Resource Development Quarterly 12 (2001) 385-402
42. Wood R., and Bandura A. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1989) 407-415
43. Yang H., and Tang J. Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective. Information & Management 41 (2004) 335-349