Team Virtues and Performance: An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 201-216

  Palanski, Michael E ^a   Kahai, Surinder S ^b   Yammarino, Francis J ^b  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrity; Performance; Teams; Transparency; Trust; Virtues

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952709810     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Audi, R. & Murphy, P. E.: 2006, The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 3-21.
2. Baker, D. P., Day, R. & Salas, E.: 2006, Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organization. Health Services Research, 41, 1576-1598.
3. Balkin, J. M.: 1999, How mass media simulate political transparency. Cultural Values, 3, 393-413.
4. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R.: 1995, The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling, personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285-309.
5. Bliese, P. D.: 2000, Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Bushman, R. M. and A. J. Smith: 2003, Transparency, Financial Accounting Information, and Corporate Governance. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=795547.
7. Cameron, K., Bright, D. & Caza, A.: 2004, Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766-790.
8. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A.: 1979, Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Caza, A., Barker, B. A. & Cameron, K.: 2004, Ethics and ethos: The buffering and amplifying effects of ethical behavior and virtuousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 169-178.
10. Chan, D.: 1998, Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
11. Chin, W. W.: 1998, Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, vii-xvi.
12. Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R.: 1999, Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Rick Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307-341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Chun, R.: 2005, Ethical character and virtue of organizations: An empirical assessment and strategic implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 269-284.
14. Colquitt, J. A.,: 2001, On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
15. Currall, S. C., & Inkpen, A. C.: 2002, A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 479-495.
16. Dabbish, L., & Kraut, R.: 2008, Awareness displays and social motivation for coordinating communication. Information Systems Research, 19, 221-238.
17. Dansereau, F., Alutto, J. A., & Yammarino, F. J.: 1984, Theory testing in organizational behavior: The varient approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Work Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring and Effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
19. Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C.: 2006, Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenships and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 622-635.
20. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L.: 2002, Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
21. Eggert, A. and S. Helm: 2003, 'Exploring the Impact of Relationship Transparency on Business Relationships: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Purchasing Managers in Germany', Industrial Marketing Management32, 101-108.
22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.: 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
23. Gully, S. M.; Incalcaterra, K. A.; Joshi, A.; Beaubien, J. M.: 2002) A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832.
24. Guzzo, R. A. & Dickson, M. W.: 1996, Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
25. Hofmann, D. A. & Jones, L. M.: 2005, Leadership, collective personality, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 509-522.
26. Howell, J. M. & Shea, C. M.: 2006, Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31, 180-211.
27. James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G.: 1993, rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
28. Kernan, M. C. & Hanges, P. J.: 2002, Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 916-928.
29. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J.: 1994, Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195-229.
30. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J.: 2000, A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y.: 2007, Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 59-87.
32. MacIntyre, A.: 1984) After virtue. (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
33. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.: 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
34. Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B.: 2005, Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874-888.
35. Mott, P. E.: 1972, The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
36. Murphy, P. E., Laczniak, G. R., & Wood, G.: 2007, An ethical basis for relationship marketing: a virtue ethics perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 37-57.
37. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J.: 2007, Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25, 171-184.
38. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J.: 2009, Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 405-420.
39. Peters, L. & Karren, R. J.: 2009, An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479-504.
40. Ringle, C. M., S. Wende and A. Will: 2005, Smart PLS 2. 0. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. http://www. smartpls. de.
41. Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C.: 2002, Leadership and ethics in work groups: A longitudinal assessment. Group & Organization Management, 27, 272-293.
42. Simons, T. L.: 2002, Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18-35.
43. Simons, T. L., Friedman, R., Liu. L. A., & McLean-Parks, J.: 2007, Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and "trickle down" among black and non-black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 650-665.
44. Solomon, R. C.: 2003, Victim of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 43-62.
45. Sosik, J., Kahai, S., & Piovoso, M.: 2009, Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using the partial least squares data analytic technique in group and organization research. Group & Organization Management, 34, 5-36.
46. Strahan, R., & Carrese Gerbasi, K.: 1972, Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
47. Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vandenberg, R. J.: 2003, Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-926.
48. Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F.: 2005, Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 879-919.