The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 361-376

  Porter, Thomas W ^a   Lilly, Bryan S ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030375511     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022787     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 533-552.
3. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
4. Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
5. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-343.
6. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.
7. Bales, R. F., Cohen, S. P., & Williamson, S. A. (1979). SYMLOG. New York: Holt, Rheinhart & Winston.
8. Bass, B. M. (1983). Organizational decision making. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
9. Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper and Row.
10. Bollen, K. A. (1995). Structural equation models that are nonlinear in latent variables: A least-squares estimation. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 223-252). Washington, DC: American Sociological Society.
11. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
13. Deutsch, M. (1969). Conflicts: Productive and destructive, Journal of Social Issues, 25, 7-41.
14. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
15. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 121-173.
16. Guzzo, R. A., Wagner, D. B., Maguire, E., Herr, B., & Hawley, C. (1986). Implicit theories and the evaluation of group process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 279-295.
17. Hackman, R. J. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Hackman, R. J., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (8th ed., pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
19. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
20. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21. Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
22. Kramer, R. M. (1990). The effects of resource scarcity on group conflict and cooperation. Advances in Group Processes, 7, 151-177.
23. Katzenbach J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
24. Leana, C. R. (1985). A partial test of Janis' groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior of defective decision making. Journal of Management, 11, 5-17.
25. McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt.
26. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
27. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57, 81-101.
28. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Market ing Research, 29, 314-329.
29. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
30. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
31. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Page, A. L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 273-290.
33. Philip, H., & Dunphy, D. (1959). Developmental trends in small groups. Sociometry, 22, 162-174.
34. Ping, R. A., Jr. (1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 336-347.
35. Saavedra, R. P., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
36. Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 1-54). Chicago: St. Clair.
37. Sessa, V. I. (1996). Using perspective taking to manage conflict and affect in teams. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research, 32, 101-115.
38. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
39. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
40. Wall, V. D., & Nolan, L. (1986). Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and conflict in task-oriented groups. Human Relations, 39, 1033-1052.