A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance

Journal of Management

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-55

  Stewart, Greg L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Groups; Performance; Team design; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 31744439854     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206305277792     Document Type: Review

References (174)

1. Adler, P. S., & Cole, R. E. 1993. Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Management Review, 34(3): 85-94.
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1988. Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group and Organization Studies, 13: 468-494.
3. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.
4. Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Rothstein, M. G. 1995. The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29: 432-442.
5. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107-124.
6. Bare, A. C. 1978. Staffing and training: Neglected supervisory functions related to group performance. Personnel Psychology, 31: 107-117.
7. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. 1991. The big-five personality dimensions and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
8. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 377-391.
9. Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. 1997. Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 62-78.
10. Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 2000. To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 802-836.
11. Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.
12. Bass, B. M. 1997. Does the transactional-transformational paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 22: 130-142.
13. Bass, B. M. 1999. Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8: 9-32.
14. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 207-218.
15. Batt, R., & Applebaum, E. 1995. Worker participation in diverse settings: Does the form affect the outcome, and if so, who benefits? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33: 353-378.
16. Beekun, R. I. 1989. Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: Antidote or fad? Human Relations, 47: 877-897.
17. Bettenhausen, K. L. 1991. Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17: 345-381.
18. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. 1999. Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52: 561-589.
19. Bonacich, P. 1987. Communication networks and collective action. Social Networks, 9: 389-396.
20. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. 2003. Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 554-571.
21. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. 2000. When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31: 305-327.
22. Brewer, N., Wilson, C., & Beck, K. 1994. Supervisory behaviour and team performance amongst police patrol sergeants. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67: 69-78.
23. Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. 2002. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 875-893.
24. Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
25. Burpitt, W. J., & Bigoness, W. J. 1997. Leadership and innovation among teams: The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research, 28: 414-423.
26. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 821-850.
27. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
28. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. 2001. Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 161-177.
29. Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 533-545.
30. Chan, D. 1998. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of comparison models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 234-246.
31. Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. 2001. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 956-974.
32. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
33. Cohen, S. G., & Ledford, G. E. 1994. The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47: 13-43.
34. Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. 1996. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49: 643-676.
35. Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. 2002. Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55: 83-109.
36. Darley, J. G., Gross, N., & Martin, W. C. 1952. Studies of group behavior: Factors associated with the productivity of groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36: 396-403.
37. David, F. R., Pearce, J. A., & Randolp, W. A. 1989. Linking technology and structure to enhance group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 233-241.
38. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. 2001. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 309-328.
39. De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1191-1201.
40. Devine, D. J. 2002. A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 291-310.
41. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. 1999. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30: 678-711.
42. Dobbins, G. H., Lane, I. M., & Steiner, D. D. 1988. A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioral research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9: 281-286.
43. Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., & Salas, E. 1987. Personality and group performance. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes and intergroup relations, vol. 14: 91-112. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. 2000. Leaming versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31: 328-353.
45. Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. 2003. Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 435-457.
46. Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. 1997. Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 275-295.
47. Eden, D. 1990. Pygmalion without interpersonal contrast effects: Whole groups gain from raising manager expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 394-398.
48. Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
49. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. 2002. Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 565-573.
50. Emery, F. L., & Trist, E. L. 1969. Socio-technical systems. In F. L. Emery (Ed.), Systems thinking: 281-296. London: Penguin.
51. Fiedler, F. E. 1970. Leadership experience and leader performance - Another hypothesis shot to hell. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5: 1-14.
52. Fiedler, F. E., O'Brien, G. E., & Ilgen, D. R. 1969. The effect of leadership style upon the performance and adjustment of volunteer teams operating in stressful foreign environment. Human Relations, 22: 503-514.
53. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. 1987. The validity of the Job Characteristics Model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40: 287-322.
54. Fry, L. W., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. 1984. Technology, structure, and workgroup effectiveness: A test of a contingency model. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 221-246.
55. Gatewood, R. D., & Feild, H. S. 2000. Human resource selection (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
56. George, J. M. 1995. Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25: 778-794.
57. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. 1990. Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 75: 698-709.
58. Gist, M. E., Locke, E. A., & Taylor, M. S. 1987. Organizational behavior: Group structure, process, and effectiveness. Journal of Management, 13: 237-257.
59. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
60. Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner, J. A., III. 1985. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 462-481.
61. Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Argote, L. 1986. Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. In P.S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups: 1-33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 47: 307-338. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
63. Hackman, J. R. 1987. The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1980. Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
65. Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. 1993. Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 844-863.
66. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. 2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029-1045.
67. Hays, R. T., Jacobs, J. W., Prince, C., & Salas, E. 1992. Flight simulator training effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Military Psychology, 4: 63-74.
68. Hecht, T. D., Allen, N. J., Klammer, J. D., & Kelly, E. C. 2002. Group beliefs, ability, and performance: The potency of group potency. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 143-152.
69. Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. 1992. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38: 757-777.
70. Hill, G. W. 1982. Group versus individual performance: Are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91: 517-539.
71. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Hedlund, J. 1998. Extending the multilevel theory of team decision making: Effects of feedback and experience in hierarchical teams. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 269-282.
72. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. 1995. The multi-level theory of team decision-making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 292-316.
73. Hopfe, M. W. 1970. Leadership style and effectiveness of department chairmen in business administration. Academy of Management Journal, 13: 301-310.
74. House, R. J. 1971. A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 321-338.
75. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. 1984. Validity and utility of alternative predictors ofjob performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96: 72-98.
76. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. 1990. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77. Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. 1997. An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50: 553-585.
78. Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. 1970. Leader influence and performance. Personnel Psychology, 23: 539-549.
79. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. 1995. Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations: 204-261. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. James, L. R. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 219-229.
81. Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. 1997. Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50: 877-904.
82. Jelm, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
83. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. A. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 238-251.
84. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. 2003. The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 246-255.
85. Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 81-104.
86. Keller, R. T. 1992. Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18: 489-501.
87. Keller, R. T. 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 547-555.
88. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58-74.
89. Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. 2001. Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 54: 645-667.
90. Kolb, J. A. 1992. Leadership of creative teams. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26: 1-9.
91. Komaki, J. L., Desselles, M. L., & Bowman, E. D. 1989. Definitely not a breeze: Extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 522-529.
92. Konar-Goldband, E., Rice, R. W., & Monkarsh, W. 1979. Time-phased interrelationships of group atmosphere, group performance, and leader style. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64: 401-409.
93. Kopelman, R. E. 1986. Managing productivity in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
94. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60-84.
95. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. 2003. Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 12: 333-375. New York: John Wiley.
96. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3-90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
97. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Stevens, C. K. 2001. Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1083-1095.
98. Landis, R. S. 2001. A note on the stability of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 446-450.
99. Langfried, C. W. 1998. Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Research, 29: 124-143.
100. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. 1967. Organization and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
101. Leavitt, H. J. 1975. Suppose we took groups seriously... In E. L. Cass & G. G. Zimmer (Eds.), Men and work in society: A report on the symposium held on the occasion ofthe 50th anniversary of the original Hawthorne studies: 67-77. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
102. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. 1997. Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 803-811.
103. Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. 2002. The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 352-368.
104. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. 1990. Progress in small group research. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 41: 585-634. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
105. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Bradway, L. K. 1997. Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance. Human Relations, 50: 169-181.
106. Lodahl, T. M., & Porter, L. W. 1961. Psychometric score patterns, social characteristics, and productivity of small industrial work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45: 73-79.
107. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 779-793.
108. Magjuka, R. J., & Baldwin, T. T. 1991. Team-based employee involvement programs: Effects of design and administration. Personnel Psychology, 44: 793-812.
109. Man, D. C., & Lam, S. K. 2003. The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 979-1001.
110. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. 1987. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 106-128.
111. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. 1991. Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4): 18-35.
112. Manz, C. C., & Stewart, G. L. 1997. Attaining flexible stability by integrating total quality management and socio-technical systems theory. Organization Science, 8: 59-70.
113. Markham, S. E., Dansereau, F., & Alutto, J. A. 1982. Group size and absenteeism rates: A longitudinal analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 25: 921-927.
114. Mayo, M., Pastor, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. 1996. The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 7: 265-284.
115. McGee, J. E., Dowling, M. J., & Megginson, W. L. 1995. Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 565-580.
116. McGrath, J. E. 1984. Group interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
117. McGrath, J. E., & Kravitz, D. A. 1982. Group research. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 33: 195-230. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
118. Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. 1992. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 9-37.
119. Mohammed, S., Mathieu, J. E., & Bartlett, A. L. 2002. Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team- and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 795-814.
120. Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. 1998. Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11: 145-165.
121. Mullen, B., Symons, C., Hu, L., & Salas, E. 1989. Group size, leadership behavior, and subordinate satisfaction. Journal of General Psychology, 116: 155-170.
122. Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. 1999. Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 376-389.
123. O'Connell, M. S., Doverspike, D., & Cober, A. B. 2002. Leadership and semiautonomous work team performance. Group & Organization Management, 27: 50-65.
124. Ones, D. Z., & Viswesvaran, C. 1996. Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17: 609-626.
125. Parker, T. C. 1963. Relationships among measures of supervisory behavior, group behavior, and situational characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 16: 319-334.
126. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. 2002. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transaction, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6: 172-197.
127. Pearce, J. A., & Ravlin, E. C. 1987. The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 40: 751-782.
128. Pearson, C. A. L. 1992. Autonomous workgroups: An evaluation at an industrial site. Human Relations, 45: 1992.
129. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1-28.
130. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Ahearne, M. 1997. Moderating effects of goal acceptance on the relationship between group cohesiveness and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 974-983.
131. Ross, S. M., & Offermann, L. R. 1997. Transformational leaders: Measurement of personality attributes and work group performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23: 1078-1086.
132. Rothstein, H. R. 1990. Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 322-327.
133. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 61-72.
134. Sackett, P. R., Harris, M. M., & Orr, J. M. 1986. On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte-Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 302-310.
135. Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. 1999. The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30: 309-329.
136. Salgado, J. F. 1997. The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 30-43.
137. Schminke, M., Wells, D., Peyrefitte, J., & Sebora, T. C. 2002. Leadership and ethics in work groups. Group & Organization Management, 27: 272-293.
138. Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., & Sipe, W. P. 2000. Personnel selection and psychology: Multilevel considerations. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 91-156. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
139. Schneier, C. E. 1978. The contingency model of leadership: An extension to emergent leadership and leader's sex. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21: 220-239.
140. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. 1998. Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors'appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 387-409.
141. Shaw, M. E. 1981. Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
142. Siebold, G. L., & Lindsay, T. J. 1999. The relation between demographic descriptors and soldier-perceived cohesion and motivation. Military Psychology, 11: 109-128.
143. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-673.
144. Slusher, A., Van Dyke, J., & Rose, G. 1972. Technical competence of group leaders, managerial role, and productivity in engineering design groups. Academy of Management Journal, 15: 197-204.
145. Smith, K. G., Smith K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims H. P, O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412-438.
146. Spreitzer, G. M. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1442-1465.
147. Spreitzer, G. M., Cohen, S. G., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. 1999. Developing effective self-managing work teams in service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 24: 340-366.
148. Stewart, G. L. 1999. Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance: Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 959-968.
149. Stewart, G. L. 2003. Toward an understanding of the multilevel role of personality in teams. In M. R. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations: 183-204. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
150. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. 2000. Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 135-148.
151. Student, K. R. 1968. Supervisory influence and work-group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52: 188-194.
152. Sundstrom, E., DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. 1990. Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45: 120-133.
153. Taggar, S. 2002. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 315-330.
154. Tesluk, P. E., & Mathieu, J. E. 1999. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 200-217.
155. Thompson, J. P. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
156. Tziner, A., & Eden, D. 1985. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 85-93.
157. Tziner, A., & Vardi, Y. 1983. Ability as a moderator between cohesiveness and tank crews performance. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 4: 137-143.
158. Uhl-Bien, M., & Graen, G. B. 1998. Individual self-management: Analysis of professionals' self-managing activities in functional and cross-functional work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 340-350.
159. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. 2003. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29: 729-751.
160. Wageman, R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145-180.
161. Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. 1984. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 74-92.
162. Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. 2001. Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 134-143.
163. Wall, V. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R., & Clegg, C. W. 1986. Outcomes of autonomous workgroups: A long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 280-304.
164. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. 1993. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 590-602.
165. Watson, W., Michaelsen, L. K., & Sharp, W. 1991. Member competence, group interaction and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 803-809.
166. Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. 1999. The role of human capital, motivation, and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 577-595.
167. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.
168. West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. 1996. Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 680-693.
169. Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. 1993. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 996-1025.
170. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 20: 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
171. Williams, M. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Huber, V. 1992. Effects of group-level and individual-level variation in leader behaviours on subordinate attitudes and performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65: 115-129.
172. Yetton, P. W., & Bottger, P. C. 1982. Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of best-member strategy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29: 307-321.
173. Zohar, D. 2000. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 587-596.
174. Zohar, D. 2002. The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 75-92.