Future directions in sensory and consumer science: Four perspectives and audience voting

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 56, Issue , 2017, Pages 301-309

  Jaeger, S R ^a   Hort, J ^b   Porcherot, C ^c   Ares, G ^d   Pecore, S ^e   MacFie, H J H ^f  

^a THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c Analysis and Perception Department   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^e General Mills Inc and P D Consulting LLC   (United States)

^f Hal MacFie Training Services   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer; Pangborn 2015 conference; Research; Sensory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961831990     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M., Roessler, E.B., Principles of sensory evaluation of food. 1965, Academic Press, New York.
2. Antúnez, L., Oliveira, D., Vidal, L., Ares, G., Næs, T., Varela, P., Influence of wholistic/analytic cognitive style on results from projective mapping. Poster presentation at the 11th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 23–27 August 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
3. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B.,.. Castura, J.C., Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Research International 78 (2015), 148–158.
4. Ares, G., Mawad, F., Giménez, A., Maiche, A., Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 28–37.
5. Bajec, M.R., Pickering, G.J., Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiology & Behavior 95:4 (2008), 581–590.
6. Bangcuyo, R.G., Smith, K.J., Zumach, J.L., Pierce, A.M., Guttman, G.A., Simons, C.T., The use of immersive technologies to improve consumer testing: The role of ecological validity, context and engagement in evaluating coffee. Food Quality and Preference 41 (2015), 84–95.
7. Bartoshuk, L.M., Duffy, V.B., Miller, I.J., PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy psychophysics and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior 56 (1994), 1165–1171.
8. Bell, R., Meiselman, H.L., Pierson, B.J., Reeve, W.G., Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability, and selection of foods. Appetite 22 (1994), 11–24.
9. Bellisle, F., Dalix, A.M., Cognitive restraint can be offset by distraction, leading to increased meal intake in women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74:2 (2001), 197–200.
10. Biosciences KTN/TSB/FDF, A pre-competitive vision for the UK's food and drink industries. Top 10 pre-competitive areas where research is needed, 2013 < https://www.fdf.org.uk/events/Pre-Comp-Food-Booklet-Final.pdf> Accessed 18.02.16.
11. Blakeslee, A.F., Genetics of sensory thresholds taste for phenylthiocarbamide. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 18 (1932), 120–130.
12. Bobowski, N., Rendahl, A., Vickers, Z., Preference for salt in a food may be alterable without a low sodium diet. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 40–45.
13. Bouckley, B., Gene genie: Coke CEO predicts personalised beverages using genomics. 2013 < http://www.beveragedaily.com/Markets/Gene-genie-Coke-CTO-predicts-personalized-beverages-using-genomics> Accessed 18.02.16.
14. Bourguet, C., Pêcher, C., Bardel, M., Navarro, S., Mougin, D., The use of an ethological approach to evaluate consumers’ appreciation of luxury facial skincare and discriminate between products: A preliminary study. Food Quality and Preference 50 (2016), 7–14.
15. Calo, C., Padiglia, A., Zonza, A., Corrias, L., Contu, P., Tepper, B.J., et al. Polymorphism in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype. Physiology & Behavior 104:5 (2011), 1065–1071.
16. Canetti, L., Bachar, E., Berry, E.M., Food and emotion. Behavioural Processes 60:2 (2002), 157–164.
17. Clark, R.A., Multimodal flavour perception: The impact of sweetness, bitterness, alcohol content and carbonation on flavour perception. Ph.D. thesis, 2011, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
18. Cohen, D.A., Farley, T.A., Eating as an automatic behavior. Preventing Chronic Disease, 5(1), 2008 < http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/jan/07_0046.htm> Accessed 18.02.16.
19. Cruz, A., Green, B.G., Thermal stimulation of taste. Nature 403:6772 (2000), 889–892.
20. de Castro, J.M., Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions. Physiology & Behavior 56:3 (1994), 445–455.
21. Di Monaco, R., Su, C., Masi, P., Cavella, S., Temporal Dominance of Sensations: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 38 (2014), 104–112.
22. Dias, A.G., El-Sohemy, A., Genetic variation in the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) and salt taste perception in humans. Faseb Journal, 26, 2012.
23. Dinh, H.Q., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F., Chang, S., Kobayashi, A., Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 13-17 March 1999, Houston, Texas, USA, 1999.
24. Driscoll, K.A., Perez, M., Cukrowicz, K.C., Butler, M., Joiner, T.E., Associations of phenylthiocarbamide tasting to alcohol problems and family history of alcoholism differ by gender. Psychiatry Research 143:1 (2006), 21–27.
25. Duffy, V.B., Variation in oral sensation: implications for diet and health. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 23:2 (2007), 171–177.
26. Duffy, V.B., Bartoshuk, L.M., Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 100:6 (2000), 647–655.
27. Duffy, V.B., Davidson, A.C., Kidd, J.R., Kidd, K.K., Speed, W.C., Pakstis, A.J.,.. Bartoshuk, L.M., Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research 28:11 (2004), 1629–1637.
28. Edwards, J.S.A., Meiselman, H.L., Edwards, A., Lesher, L., The influence of eating location on the acceptability of identically prepared foods. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003), 647–652.
29. Eldeghaidy, S., Marciani, L., McGlone, F., Hollowood, T., Hort, J., Head, K.,.. Francis, S.T., The cortical response to the oral perception of fat emulsions and the effect of taster status. Journal of Neurophysiology 105:5 (2011), 2572–2581.
30. Ennis, J.M., Guiding the switch from triangle testing to tetrad testing. Journal of Sensory Studies 27 (2012), 223–231.
31. Ennis, J.M., Jesionka, V., The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited. Journal of Sensory Studies 26 (2011), 371–382.
32. Epstein, S., This I have learned from over 40 years of personality research. Journal of Personality 65 (1997), 3–32.
33. Epstein, S., Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. Millon, T., Lerner, M.J., (eds.) Comprehensive handbook of psychology Personality and social psychology, Vol. 5, 2003, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 159–184.
34. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., Heiser, H., Individual differences in intuitive – Experiential and analytical – Rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2 (1996), 390–405.
35. Essick, G.K., Chopra, A., Guest, S., McGlone, F., Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiology & Behavior 80:2–3 (2003), 289–302.
36. EyeQuestion® software, https://eyequestion.nl.
37. Feeney, E.L., Hayes, J.E., Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6. Physiology & Behavior 128 (2014), 148–154.
38. Frederick, S., Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2005), 25–42.
39. Giacalone, D., & Jaeger, S. R. (in press). Better the devil you know? How product familiarity affects usage versatility of foods and beverages. Journal of Economic Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.02.005, available online: 20 Feb 2016.
40. Glanvill, E.V., Kaplan, A.R., Food preference and sensitivity of taste for bitter compounds. Nature 205:4974 (1965), 851–853.
41. Green, B.G., George, P., ’Thermal taste’ predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor. Chemical Senses 29:7 (2004), 617–628.
42. Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., The effect of menu labels associated with affect, tradition and patriotism on sales. Food Quality and Preference 23:1 (2012), 86–88.
43. Guttman, G.A., Bangcuyo, R.G., Zumach, J.L., Smith, K.J., Pierce, A.M., Simons, C.T., Perplexed by context: The use of immersive technologies to study the impact of extrinsic contextual cues on the perception and liking of foods. Oral presentation at the 11th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 23–27 August 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
44. Hayes, J.E., Bartoshuk, L.M., Kidd, J.R., Duffy, V.B., Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chemical Senses 33:3 (2008), 255–265.
45. Hayes, J.E., Duffy, V.B., Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: Sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation. Chemical Senses 32:3 (2007), 225–236.
46. Hayes, J.E., Feeney, E.L., Allen, A.L., Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?. Food Quality and Preference 30:2 (2013), 202–216.
47. Hein, K.A., Hamid, N., Jaeger, S.R., Delahunty, C.M., Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages. Food Quality and Preference 26 (2012), 35–44.
48. Herman, C.P., The social facilitation of eating: A review. Appetite 86 (2015), 61–73.
49. Hersleth, M., Ueland, O., Allain, H., Næs, T., Consumer acceptance of cheese, influence of different testing conditions. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005), 103–110.
50. Ishii, R., O'Mahony, M., Rousseau, B., Triangle and tetrad protocols: Small sensory differences, resampling and consumer relevance. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 49–55.
51. Jaeger, S.R., Non-sensory factors in sensory science research. Food Quality and Preference 17:1–2 (2006), 132–144.
52. Jaeger, S.R., Sensory and consumer science anno 2014. What's next? Keynote presentation at 6th EuroSense conference, 7–10 September 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014.
53. Jaeger, S.R., McRae, J.F., Bava, C.M., Beresford, M.K., Hunter, D., Jia, Y.,.. Newcomb, R.D., A mendelian trait for olfactory sensitivity affects odor experience and food selection. Current Biology 23:16 (2013), 1601–1605.
54. Jaeger, S.R., Rose, J.M., Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice: A case study. Food Quality and Preference 19:6 (2008), 539–564.
55. Jaeger, S.R., Wakeling, I.N., MacFie, H.J.H., Behavioural extensions to preference mapping: The role of synthesis. Food Quality and Preference 11 (2000), 349–359.
56. Kahneman, D., Maps of bounder rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93 (2003), 1449–1475.
57. Kahneman, D., Thinking, fast and slow. 2011, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
58. Keskitalo, K., Knaapila, A., Kallela, M., Palotie, A., Wessman, M., Sammalisto, S.,.. Perola, M., Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 86:1 (2007), 55–63.
59. Keskitalo, K., Silventoinen, K., Tuorila, H., Perola, M., Pietilaeinen, K.H., Rissanen, A., et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to food use patterns of young adult twins. Physiology & Behavior 93:1–2 (2008), 235–242.
60. Kim, M.A., Dessirier, J.M., van Hout, D., Lee, H.S., Consumer context-specific sensory acceptance tests: Effects of a cognitive warm-up on affective product discrimination. Food Quality and Preference 41 (2015), 163–171.
61. King, S.C., Meiselman, H.L., Hottenstein, A.W., Work, T.M., Cronk, V., The effects of contextual variables on food acceptability: A confirmatory study. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007), 58–65.
62. King, S.C., Weber, A.J., Meiselman, H.L., Lv, N., The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004), 645–653.
63. Knaapila, A., Hwang, L.D., Lysenko, A., Duke, F.F., Fesi, B., Khoshnevisan, A.,.. Reed, D.R., Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins. Chemical Senses 37:9 (2012), 869–881.
64. Knaapila, A., Tuorila, H., Silventoinen, K., Wright, M.J., Kyvik, K.O., Keskitalo, K.,.. Perola, M., Environmental effects exceed genetic effects on perceived intensity and pleasantness of several odors: A three-population twin study. Behavior Genetics 38:5 (2008), 484–492.
65. Knaapila, A., Zhu, G., Medland, S.E., Wysocki, C.J., Montgomery, G.W., Martin, N.G.,.. Reed, D.R., A genome-wide study on the perception of the odorants androstenone and galaxolide. Chemical Senses 37:6 (2012), 541–552.
66. Köster, E.P., The psychology of food choice: Some often encountered fallacies. Food Quality and Preference 14 (2003), 359–373.
67. Köster, E.P., Diversity in the determinants of food choice. A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 20:2 (2009), 70–82.
68. Köster, E.P., Mojet, J., From mood to food and from food to mood: A psychological perspective on the measurement of food-related emotions in consumer research. Food Research International 76 (2015), 180–191.
69. Labbe, D., Schlich, P., Pineau, N., Gilbert, F., Martin, N., Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 20:3 (2009), 216–221.
70. Lanier, S.A., Hayes, J.E., Duffy, V.B., Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiology & Behavior 83:5 (2005), 821–831.
71. Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H., Sensory evaluation of food. Principles and practices. 2nd edition, 2010, Springer, New York.
72. Libotte, E., Siegrist, M., Bucher, T., The influence of plate size on meal composition. Literature review and experiment. Appetite 82 (2014), 91–96.
73. McCarron, A., Tierney, K.J., The effect of auditory stimulation on the consumption of soft drinks. Appetite 13:2 (1989), 155–159.
74. McRae, J.F., Mainland, J.D., Jaeger, S.R., Adipietro, K.A., Matsunami, H., Newcomb, R.D., et al. Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the “Grassy” smelling odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol. Chemical Senses 37:7 (2012), 585–593.
75. Macht, M., Characteristics of Eating in Anger, Fear, Sadness and Joy. Appetite 33:1 (1999), 129–139.
76. Macht, M., Simons, G., Emotions and eating in everyday life. Appetite 35:1 (2000), 65–71.
77. Martens, M., A philosophy for sensory science. Food Quality and Preference 10:4–5 (1999), 233–244.
78. Mawad, F., Trías, M., Giménez, A., Maiche, A., Ares, G., Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. Food Research International 74 (2015), 1–9.
79. Meillon, S., Viala, D., Medel, M., Urbano, C., Guillot, G., Schlich, P., Impact of partial alcohol reduction in Syrah wine on perceived complexity and temporality of sensations and link with preference. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 732–740.
80. Meiselman, H., The contextual basis of food acceptance, food choice and food intake: the food, the situation and the individual. Meiselman, H.L., MacFie, H.J.H., (eds.) Food choice, acceptance and consumption, 1996, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 239–263.
81. Meiselman, H.L., The future in sensory/consumer research: ……evolving to a better science. Food Quality and Preference 27 (2013), 208–214.
82. Meiselman, H.L., A review of the current state of emotion research in product development. Food Research International 76:2 (2015), 192–199.
83. Meiselman, H.L., Johnson, J.L., Reeve, W., Reeve, W., Crouch, J.E., Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite 35:3 (2000), 231–237.
84. Melis, M., Atzori, E., Cabras, S., Zonza, A., Calo, C., Muroni, P.,.. Barbarossa, I.T., The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a mechanistic link between PROP tasting and fungiform taste papilla density and maintenance. PLoS One, 8(9), 2013, e74151.
85. Miller, I.J., Reedy, F.E., Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiology & Behavior 47:6 (1990), 1213–1219.
86. Newman, L., Haryono, R., Keast, R., Functionality of FATTY ACID CHEMORECEPTION: A POTENTIAL FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBESITY?. Nutrients 5:4 (2013), 1287–1300.
87. Padiglia, A., Zonza, A., Atzori, E., Chillotti, C., Calo, C., Tepper, B.J., et al. Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 92:3 (2010), 539–545.
88. Pagès, J., Bertrand, C., Ali, Husson F., Lê, S., Sensory analysis comparison of eight biscuit by French and Pakistani panels. Journal of Sensory Studies 22:6 (2007), 665–686.
89. Pecore, S., Hooge, S., Uy, C., Flavor complexity: relevance to consumer acceptability. Poster presentation, 6th European Conference on Sensory and Consumer Research, 7–10 September 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014.
90. Pecore, S., Stoer, N., Hooge, S., Holschuh, N., Hulting, F., Case, F., Degree of difference testing: A new approach incorporating control lot variability. Food Quality and Preference 17 (2006), 552–555.
91. Petit, C., Sieffermann, J.M., Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence?. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007), 161–172.
92. Pickering, G.J., Moyes, A., Bajec, M.R., Decourville, N., Thermal taster status associates with oral sensations elicited by wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 16:2 (2010), 361–367.
93. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Alcaide, J., Roura, E., Spence, C., Is it the plate or is it the food? Assessing the influence of the color (black or white) and shape of the plate on the perception of the food placed on it. Food Quality and Preference 24:1 (2012), 205–208.
94. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Harrar, V., Alcaide, J., Spence, C., Does the weight of the dish influence our perception of food?. Food Quality and Preference 22:8 (2011), 753–756.
95. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Jaeger, S.R., The impact of the means of context evocation on consumers’ emotion associations towards eating occasion. Food Quality and Preference 37 (2014), 61–70.
96. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Jaeger, S.R., What makes meals memorable?. Oral presentation at the 11th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, 23–27 August 2015, 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1–2.
97. Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Spence, C., Sensory expectations based on product-extrinsic food cues: An interdisciplinary review of the empirical evidence and theoretical accounts. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 165–179.
98. Pliner, P., Bell, R., Hirsch, E.S., Kinchla, M., Meal duration mediates the effect of “social facilitation” on eating in humans. Appetite 46:2 (2006), 189–198.
99. Porcherot, C., Petit, E., Giboreau, A., Gaudreau, N., Cayeux, I., Measurement of self-reported affective feelings when an aperitif is consumed in an ecological setting. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 277–284.
100. Porcherot, C., Delplanque, S., Ischer, M., De Marles, A., Cayeux, I., Applying immersive virtual reality to the study of emotions elicited by scents. What is the value of a virtual experimental setting? 11th Pangborn sensory science symposium, 23–27 August 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
101. Pouyet, V., Cuvelier, G., Benattar, L., Giboreau, A., Influence of flavour enhancement on food liking and consumption in older adults with poor, moderate or high cognitive status. Food Quality and Preference 44 (2015), 119–129.
102. Quartier, K., Vanrie, J., van Cleempoel, K., As real as it gets: What role does lighting have on consumer's perception of atmosphere, emotions and behaviour?. Journal of Environmental Psychology 39 (2014), 32–39.
103. Sáenz-Navajas, M.P., Ballester, J., Peyron, D., Valentin, D., Extrinsic attributes responsible for red wine quality perception: A cross-cultural study between France and Spain. Food Quality and Preference 35 (2014), 70–85.
104. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Sohn, M., de Bellis, E., Martin, N., Hertwig, R., A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice. Appetite 71 (2013), 242–251.
105. Schutz, H.G., Jaeger, S.R., Innovation in sensory practice and education: an interview with Howard Schutz. Jaeger, S.R., MacFie, H., (eds.) Consumer-driven innovation in food and personal care products, 2010, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 120–132.
106. Sester, C., Deroy, O., Sutan, A., Galia, F., Desmarchelier, J.F., Valentin, D., et al. “Having a drink in a bar”: An immersive approach to explore the effects of context on drink choice. Food Quality and Preference 28:1 (2013), 23–31.
107. Son, J.-S., Do, V.D., Kim, K.O., Cho, M.S., Suwonsichon, T., Valentin, D., Understanding the effect of culture on food representations using word associations: The case of “rice” and “good rice”. Food Quality and Preference 31 (2014), 38–48.
108. Stroebele, N., De Castro, J.M.D., Listening to music while eating is related to increases in people's food intake and meal duration. Methods 47 (2006), 285–289.
109. Thomas, A., Visalli, M., Cordelle, S., Schlich, P., Temporal drivers of liking. Food Quality and Preference 40 (2015), 365–375.
110. Tornwall, O., Dinnella, C., Keskitalo-Vuokko, K., Silventoinen, K., Perola, M., Monteleone, E.,.. Tuorila, H., Astringency perception and heritability among young finnish twins. Chemosensory Perception 4:4 (2011), 134–144.
111. Tornwall, O., Silventoinen, K., Kaprio, J., Tuorila, H., Why do some like it hot? Genetic and environmental contributions to the pleasantness of oral pungency. Physiology & Behavior 107:3 (2012), 381–389.
112. Tornwall, O., Silventoinen, K., Keskitalo-Vuokko, K., Perola, M., Kaprio, J., Tuorila, H., Genetic contribution to sour taste preference. Appetite 58:2 (2012), 687–694.
113. Tuorila, H., From sensory evaluation to sensory and consumer research of food: An autobiographical perspective. Food Quality and Preference 40(Part B) (2015), 255–262.
114. Tuorila, H., Monteleone, E., Sensory food science in the changing society: Opportunities, needs, and challenges. Trends in Food Science & Technology 20:2 (2009), 54–62.
115. van Herpen, E., van Trijp, H.C.M., Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints. Appetite 557 (2011), 148–160.
116. van't Riet, J., Sijtsema, S.J., Dagevos, H., de Bruijin, G.J., The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research. Appetite 57 (2011), 585–596.
117. Vidal, L., Ares, G., Machín, L., Jaeger, S.R., Using Twitter data for food-related consumer research: A case study on “what people say when tweeting about different eating situations”. Food Quality and Preference 45 (2015), 58–69.
118. Wansink, B., Van Ittersum, K., Painter, J.E., Ice cream illusions: bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 31 (2006), 240–243.
119. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., Karp, S.A., A manual for the embedded figures tests. 1971, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
120. Yang, Q., Individual variation across prop and thermal taste phenotypes. Ph.D. thesis, 2015, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
121. Yang, Q., Hollowood, T., Hort, J., Phenotypic variation in oronasal perception and the relative effects of PROP and Thermal Taster Status. Food Quality and Preference 38 (2014), 83–91.
122. Young, T.A., Pecore, S., Stoer, N., Hulting, F., Holschuh, N., Case, F., Incorporating test and control product variability in degree of difference tests. Food Quality and Preference 19 (2008), 734–736.
123. Zuniga, J.R., Davis, S.H., Englehardt, R.A., Miller, I.J., Schiffman, S.S., Phillips, C., Taste performance on the anterior human tongue varies with fungiform taste bud density. Chemical Senses 18:5 (1993), 449–460.