The impact of the means of context evocation on consumers' emotion associations towards eating occasions

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 37, Issue , 2014, Pages 61-70

  Piqueras Fiszman, Betina ^a   Jaeger, Sara R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Appropriateness; Consumer research; Consumption context; Emotion responses; Meals; Methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901367053     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ariely D. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions 2008, Harper Collins, New York.
2. Aust F., Diedenhofen B., Ullrich S., Musch J. Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods 2013, 45:527-535.
3. Bateson J.E., Hui M.K. The ecological validity of photographic slides and videotapes in simulating the service setting. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19:271-281.
4. Bone P.F., Ellen P.S. The generation and consequences of communication-evoked imagery. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19:93-104.
5. Cardello A.V., Meiselman H.L., Schutz H.G., Craig C., Given Z., Lesher L.L., et al. Measuring emotional responses to foods and food names using questionnaires. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:243-250.
6. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G. Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation. Food Quality and Preference 1996, 7:239-249.
7. Cardello A.V., Schutz H., Snow C., Lesher L. Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:201-216.
8. Desmet P.M.A., Schifferstein H.N.J. Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite 2008, 50:290-301.
9. Drummond S., Crombie N., Kirk T. A critique of the effects of snacking on body weight status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996, 50:779-783.
10. Garitta L., Hough G., Chaves A. Sensory analysis of broccoli over time: Consumer defined critical attributes and evaluation of digital photographs in comparison to real product appearance. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 29:48-52.
11. Gordon R. An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. British Journal of Psychology 1949, 39:156-167.
12. Guthrie C.A., Rapoport L., Wardle J. Young children's food preferences: A comparison of three modalities of food stimuli. Appetite 2000, 35:73-77.
13. Hartwell H.J., Edwards J.S., Brown L. The relationship between emotions and food consumption (macronutrient) in a foodservice college setting-a preliminary study. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 2013, 64:261-268.
14. Hein K.A., Hamid N., Jaeger S.R., Delahunty C.M. Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:410-416.
15. Hein K.A., Hamid N., Jaeger S.R., Delahunty C.M. Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:35-44.
16. Hersleth, M., Monteleone, E., Segtnan, A., & Næs, T. (2012). Consumers' acceptance and probability of buying dry cured ham in two different meal contexts - effects of intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes. Oral presentation at the 5th European conference on sensory and consumer research, 9-12 September 2012. Bern, Switzerland.
17. Jack F.R., Piggott J.R., Paterson A. Use and appropriateness in cheese choice, and an evaluation of attributes influencing appropriateness. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:281-290.
18. Jaeger S.R. Uncovering cultural differences in choice behaviour between Samoan and New Zealand consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:405-417.
19. Jaeger S.R., Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G. Emotion questionnaires: A consumer-centric perspective. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:229-241.
20. Jaeger S.R., Hedderley D., MacFie H.J.H. Methodological issues in conjoint analysis: A case study. European Journal of Marketing 2001, 35:1217-1237.
21. Jaeger S.R., Rose J.M. Stated choice experimentation, contextual influences and food choice. A case study. Food quality and preference 2008, 19:539-564.
22. King S.C., Meiselman H.L. Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:168-177.
23. Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Consistency of liking and appropriateness ratings and their relation to consumption in a product test of ice cream. Appetite 1995, 25:189-198.
24. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
25. Lusk, K. A. (2010). Studies to improve consumer hedonic measures: A comparison of hedonic measurement techniques and the development of a method to evoke consumption contexts in a laboratory test setting (Thesis submitted for the degree of doctor of philosophy at the University of Otago). Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
26. MacInnis D.J. Constructs and measures of individual differences in imagery processing: A review. Advances in Consumer Research 1987, 14:88-92.
27. MacInnis D.J., Price L.L. The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research 1987, 13:473-491.
28. Marks D.F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology 1973, 64:17-24.
29. McGill A.L., Punam A.P. The effect of vivid attributes on the evaluation of alternatives: The role of differential attention and cognitive elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16:188-196.
30. Meiselman H.L. The future in sensory/consumer research: Evolving to a better science. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:208-214.
31. Phillips D.M. How Does It Make Me Feel?. Journal of Food Products Marketing 2000, 6:15-33.
32. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Jaeger S.R. The impact of evoked consumption contexts and appropriateness on emotion responses. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 32C:277-288.
33. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Jaeger S.R. Emotion responses under evoked consumption contexts: A focus on the consumers' frequency of product consumption and the stability of responses. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 35:24-31.
34. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Spence C. The influence of the color of the cup on consumers' perception of a hot beverage. Journal of Sensory Studies 2012, 27:324-331.
35. Richins M.L. Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research 1997, 24:127-146.
36. Schifferstein H.N.J. From salad to bowl: The role of sensory analysis in product experience research. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1059-1067.
37. Schutz H.G., Jaeger S.R. Innovation in sensory practice and education: An interview with Howard Schutz. Consumer-driven innovation in food and personal care products 2010, 120-131. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge. S.R. Jaeger, H.J.H. MacFie (Eds.).
38. Schutz H.G. Appropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance. Measurement of food preferences 1994, 25-50. Blackie Academic, London. H.J.H. MacFie, D.M.H. Thomson (Eds.).
39. Schutz H.G. Beyond preference: Appropriateness as a measure of contextual acceptance of food. Food acceptability 1988, 115-134. Elsevier, New York. D.M.H. Thomson (Ed.).
40. Sheehan P. A shortened form of Betts' questionnaire upon mental imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1967, 23:386-389.
41. Smith R.A., Houston M.J., Childers T.L. Verbal vs. visual processing modes: An empirical test of the cyclical processing hypothesis. Advances in consumer research 1984, Vol. 11:75-80. Association for Consumer Research, MI.
42. Spears, N., & Yazdanparast, A. (in press). Revealing obstacles to the consumer imagination. Journal of Consumer Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.01.003.
43. Spence C., Harrar V., Piqueras-Fiszman B. Assessing the impact of the tableware and other contextual variables on multisensory flavor perception. Flavour 2012, 1:7.
44. Wadhera D., Capaldi E.D. Categorization of foods as "snack" and "meal" by college students. Appetite 2012, 58:882-888.
45. Wansink B., Payne C.R., Shimizu M. "Is this a meal or snack?" Situational cues that drive perceptions. Appetite 2010, 54:214-216.
46. Westcott T.B., Rosenstock E. Reliability of two measures of imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976, 2:245-252.
47. Yuille J.C., Catchpole M.J. The role of imagery in models of cognition. Journal of Mental Imagery 1977, 1:171-180.