The future in sensory/consumer research: Evolving to a better science

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 208-214

  Meiselman, Herbert L ^a  

^a Herb Meiselman Training and Consulting Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Context; Global; Health; Liking; Representative; Subjects; Wellness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881553026     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Barylko-Pikielna, N., Matuszewska, I., Jeruszka, M., Kozlowska, K., Brzozowska, A., & Roszkowski, W. (2004). Discriminability and appropriateness of category scaling versus ranking methods to study sensory preferences in elderly. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 167-175.
2. Boelsma, E., Brink, E. J., Stafleu, A., & Hendricks, H. J. J. (2010). Measures of postprandial wellness after single intake of two protein-carbohydrate meals. Appetite, 54, 456-464.
3. Brug, J., de Vet, E., de Nooijer, J., & Verplanken, B. (2006). Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention, and habits. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 38, 73-81.
4. Cardello, A. V., & Jaeger, S. R. (2010). Hedonic measurement: new methods for direct and indirect scaling. In S. R. Jaeger & H. MacFie (Eds.), Consumer-driven innovation in food and personal care products (pp. 135-174). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing (ISBN 1 84569 567 4).
5. Cardello, A. V., & Schutz, H. G. (1996). Food appropriateness measures as an adjunct to consumer preference/acceptability evaluation. Food Quality and Preference, 7, 239-249.
6. Cardello, A. V., Schutz, H. G., Snow, C., & Lesher, L. (2000). Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 201-216.
7. Cardello, A.V., Meiselman, H.L., Schutz, H., Craig, C., Given, Z., & Lesher, L.L. (2012). Measuring Emotional Responses to Foods and Food Names Using Questionnaires. Food Quality and Preference.
8. Chollet, S., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (2005). Do trained assessors generalize their knowledge to new stimuli? Food Quality and Preference, 16, 13-23.
9. Citrin, A. V., Stem, D. E., Jr., Spangenberg, E. R., & Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input: An internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business Research, 56, 915-922.
10. Decker, R., & Trusov, M. (2010). Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 293-307.
11. Degeratu, A. M., Rangaswamy, A., & Wu, J. (2000). Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 55-78.
12. Delahunty, C. (2004). Workshop summary: How do age-related changes in sensory physiology influence food liking and food in take? Food Quality and Preference, 15, 907-911.
13. Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well being is essential to wellbeing. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
14. Dovey, T. M., Staples, P. A., Gibson, E. L., & Halford, J. C. G. (2008). Food neophobia and 'picky/fussy' eating in children: A review. Appetite, 50, 181-193.
15. Ferdenzi, C., Schirmer, A., Roberts, S. R., Delplanque, S., Porcherot, C., Cayeux, I., et al. (2011). Affective Dimensions of Odor Perception: A Comparison Between Swiss, British, and Singaporean Populations. Emotion, 11, 1168-1181.
16. Filippidis, F. T., Tzavara, Ch., Dimitrakaki, C., & Tountas, Y. (2011). Compliance with a healthy lifestyle in a representative sample of the Greek population: Preliminary results of the Hellas Health I study. Public Health, 125, 436-441.
17. Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and day length across diverse cultures. Science, 333(6051), 1878-1881.
18. Guerrero, L., Claret, A., Verbeke, W., Enderli, G., Zakowska-Biemans, S., Vanhonacker, F., et al. (2010). Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 225-233.
19. Hein, K. A., Jaeger, S. R., Carr, B. T., & Delahunty, C. M. (2008). Comparison of five common acceptance and preference methods. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 651-661.
20. Hein, K. A., Hamid, N., Jaeger, S. R., & Delahunty, C. M. (2012). Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages. Food Quality and Preference, 26, 35-44.
21. Henriques, A., King, S. C., & Meiselman, H. L. (2009). Consumer segmentation based on food neophobia and its application to product development. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 83-91.
22. Hollebeek, L., Jaeger, S. R., Brodie, R. J., & Balemi, A. (2007). The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 1033-1049.
23. Hough, G., Calle, M. L., Serrat, C., & Curia, A. (2007). Number of consumers necessary for shelf life estimations based on survival analysis statistics. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 771-775.
24. Hirsch, E., Kramer, M., & Meiselman, H. L. (2005). Effects of food attributes and feeding environment on acceptance, consumption and body weight: Lessons learned in a twenty year program of military ration research. Appetite, 44(1), 33-45.
25. Kallio, M. K., Seppo Väinö, Pellervo Koskinen, & Prättälä, R. S. (2008). Functional disabilities do not prevent the elderly in Finland from eating regular meals. Appetite, 51, 97-103.
26. Köster, E. P. (2009). Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 70-82.
27. Lawless, H. T., Popper, R., & Kroll, B. J. (2010). A comparison of the labeled magnitude (LAM) scale, an 11-point category scale and the traditional 9-point hedonic scale. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 4-12.
28. Libertino, L. M., Osornio, M. M. L., & Hough, G. (2011). Number of consumers necessary for survival analysis estimations based on each consumer evaluating a single sample. Food Quality and Preference, 22, 24-30.
29. Lyly, M., Roininen, K., Honkapää, K., Poutanen, K., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2007). Factors influencing consumers' willingness to use beverages and ready-to-eat frozen soups containing oat b-glucan in Finland, France and Sweden. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 242-255.
30. Meiselman, H. L. (2008). Experiencing products within a physical and social context. In Schifferstein, H. N. J. & Hekkert, P. (Eds.), Product Experience (pp. 559-580). Oxford: Elsevier.
31. Monteleone, E. (2010). Sensory food science: New trends, approaches and methods. Presented at 4th Eurosense Meeting. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
32. Moskowitz, H. R., Silcher, M., Beckley, J., Minkus-McKenna, D., & Mascuch, T. (2005). Sensory benefits, emotions and usage patterns for olives: Using Internet-based conjoint analysis and segmentation to understand patterns of response. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 369-382.
33. Onwezen, M. C., & Bartels, J. (2011). Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation. Appetite, 57, 50-58.
34. Popper, R., & Kroll, J. J. (2007). Consumer testing of food products using children. In H. J. H. MacFie (Ed.), Consumer-led Product Development (pp. 383-406). Cambridge: Woodhead.
35. Porcherot, C., Delplanque, S., Planchais, A., Gaudreau, N., Accolla, R., & Cayeux, I. (2012). Influence of food odorant names on the verbal measurement of emotions. Food Quality and Preference, 23, 125-133.
36. Roininen, K., Arvola, A., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2006). Exploring consumers' perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 20-30.
37. Roth, M., Schumacher, J., & Brähler, E. (2005). Sensation seeking in the community: Sex, age and sociodemographic comparisons on a representative German population sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1261-1271.
38. Schutz, H. G., & Kamenetsky, J. (1958). Response set in measurement of food preference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42(3), 175-177.
39. Sester, C., Valentin, D., Porcherot, C., Deroy, O., Cayeux, I., & Dacremont, C. (2012). Investigating the link between affective states, environment and drink-choices: Exploratory studies in immersive environments. Food Quality and Preference.
40. Tetrault, M. A., & Kleine, R. E. (1990). Ritual, ritualized behavior, and habit: Refinement and extensions of the consumption ritual construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 31-38.
41. Thomson, D. (2008). Liking Isn't Enough! Third European Conference on Sensory & Consumer Research, A Sense of Innovation, Hamburg, Germany.
42. Tuuri, G., Zanovec, M., Silverman, L., Geaghan, J., Solmon, M., Holston, D., et al. (2009). "Smart Bodies"school wellness program increased children's knowledge of healthy nutrition practices and self-efficacy to consume fruit and vegetables. Appetite, 52, 445-451.
43. Urala, N., & Lahteenmaki, L. (2004). Attitudes behind consumers willingness to use functional foods. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 793-803.
44. van Strien, T., Herman, C. P., & Verheijden, M. W. (2009). Eating style, overeating, and overweight in a representative Dutch sample. Does external eating play a role? Appetite, 52, 380-387.
45. Varela, A. P., Salvador, A., Hough, G., & Fiszman, S. (2011). Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA_, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Quality and Preference, 22, 463-473.
46. Verbecke, W. (2006). Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Quality and Preference, 17, 126-131.
47. Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 639-656.
48. Varela, A. P., Salvador, A., Hough, G., & Fiszman, S. (2011). Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA_, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Quality and Preference, 22, 463-473.
49. Verbecke, W. (2006). Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Quality and Preference, 17, 126-131.
50. Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 639-656.
51. Wangcharoen, W., Ngarmsak, T., & Wilkinson, B. H. (2005). Snack product consumer surveys: large versus small samples. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 511-516.
52. Worch, T., Lê, S., & Punter, P. (2010). How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 309-318.