Temporal dominance of sensations: A review

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 104-112

  Di Monaco, Rossella ^a   Su, Chengcheng ^a   Masi, Paolo ^a   Cavella, Silvana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; FOOD TECHNOLOGY;

PRODUCT INFORMATION; SINGLE POINT;

TEXTURES;

EID: 84904399199     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.04.007     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Albert A., Salvador A., Schlich P., Fiszman S. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sensory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:111-118.
2. Barron D., Pineau N., Matthey-Doret W., Ali S., Sudre J., Germain J.C., et al. Impact of crema on the aroma release and the in-mouth sensory perception of espresso coffee. Food & Function 2012, 3(9):893-986.
3. Bruzzone F., Ares G., Giménez A. Temporal aspects of yoghurt texture perception. International Dairy Journal 2013, 29:124-134.
4. Cliff M., Heymann H. Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation - a review. Food Research International 1993, 26(5):375-385.
5. Déléris I., Saint-Eve A., Guo Y., Lieben P., Cypriani M.L., Jacquet N., et al. Impact of swallowing on the dynamics of aroma release and perception during the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Chemistry Senses 2011, 36:701-713.
6. Di Monaco, R., Volpe, S., Su, C. C., Masi, P., & Cavella, S. Effects of storage conditions and different cooking procedures on dominant attribute of polenta stick (in preparation).
7. Dijksterhuis Time-intensity methodology: review and preview. Proceedings, COST96 Meeting: Interaction of food matrix with small ligands influencing flavour and texture, Dijion, France, Nov. 20, 1995 1996.
8. Dinnella C., Masi C., Naes T., Monteleone E. A new approach in TDS data analysis: a case study on sweetened coffee. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30(1):33-46.
9. Dinnella C., Masi C., Zoboli G., Monteleone E. Sensory functionality of extra-virgin olive oil in vegetable foods assessed by temporal dominance of sensations and descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:141-150.
10. Duizer L.M., Bloom K., Findlay C.J. Dual-attribute time-intensity measurement of sweetness and peppermint perception of chewing-gum. Journal of Food Science 1996, 61(3):636-638.
11. Duizer L.M., Bloom K., Findlay C.J. Dual-attribute time-intensity sensory evaluation: a new method for temporal measurement of sensory perceptions. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8(4):261-269.
12. Goupil de Bouille A., Pineau N., Meyners M., Martin N., Schlich P. How do panelists use the list of attributes during a temporal dominance of sensations experiment?. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23-26, 2010 2010, 179-186. Academy School, Afragola (Na).
13. Halpern B.P. More than meets the tongue: temporal characteristic of taste intensity and quality. Sensory science theory and applications in foods 1991, 95. Dekker, New York. H.T. Lawless, B.P. Klein (Eds.).
14. Hutchings S.C., Foster K.D., Grigor J.M.V., Bronlund J.E., Morgenstern M.P. Temporal dominance of sensations: a comparison between younger and older subjects for the perception of food texture. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:106-115.
15. Jack F.R., Piggott J.R., Paterson A. Analysis of textural changes in hard cheese during mastication by progressive profiling. Journal of Food Science 1994, 59:539-543.
16. Labbe D., Schlich P., Pineau N., Gilbert F., Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: a comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:216-221.
17. Laguna L., Varela P., Salvador A., Fiszman S. A new sensory tool to analyse the oral trajectory of biscuits with different fat and fibre contents. Food Research International 2013, 51:544-553.
18. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices 2010, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
19. Le Révérend F.M., Hidrio C., Fernandes A., Aubry V. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations and time intensity results. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:174-178.
20. Lenfant F., Loret C., Pineau N., Hartmann C., Martin N. Perception of food oral breakdown: the concept of sensory trajectory. Appetite 2009, 53:659-667.
21. de Loubens C., Panouillé M., Saint-Eve A., Déléris I., Tréléa I.C., Souchon I. Mechanistic model of invitro salt release from model dairy gels based on standardized breakdown test simulating mastication. Journal of Food Engineering 2011, 105:161-168.
22. Meillon S., Urbano C., Schlich P. Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:490-499.
23. Meillon S., Viala D., Medel M., Urbano C., Guillot G., Schlich P. Impact of partial alcohol reduction in Syrah wine on perceived complexity and temporality of sensations and link with preference. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:732-740.
24. Methven L., Rahelu K., Economou N., Kinneavy L., Ladbrooke-Davis L., Kennedy O.B., et al. The effect of consumption volume on profile and liking of oral nutritional supplements of varied sweetness: sequential profiling and boredom tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:948-955.
25. Meyners M. On the design, analysis and interpretation of temporal dominance of sensations data. Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Statistical Methods for the Food Industry (AgroStat); Benevento, Italy, February 23-26, 2010 2010, 45-53. Academy School, Afragola (Na).
26. Meyners M. Panel and panelist agreement for product comparisons in studies of temporal dominance of sensations. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:365-370.
27. Meyners M., Pineau N. Statistical inference for temporal dominance of sensations data using randomization tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:805-814.
28. Ng M., Lawlor J.B., Chandra S., Chaya C., Hewson L., Hort J. Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25:121-134.
29. Paulsen M.T., Næs T., Ueland Ø., Rukke E.O., Hersleth M. Preference mapping of salmon-sauce combinations: the influence of temporal properties. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 27:120-127.
30. Piggott J.R. Understanding flavour quality: difficult or impossible?. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:167-171.
31. Piggott J.R. Dynamism in flavour science and sensory methodology. Food Research International 2000, 33:191-197.
32. Pineau N., Cordelle S., Schlich P. Temporal dominance of sensations: a new technique to record several sensory attributes simultaneously over time. Abstract book of 5th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Boston, MA, USA, July 20-24, 2003, P121 2003.
33. Pineau N., Goupil de Bouille A., Lepage M., Lenfant F., Schlich P., Martin N., et al. Temporal dominance of sensations: what is a good attribute list?. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:159-165.
34. Pineau N., Lenfant F., Hartmann C., Martin N. Temporal dominance of sensation: some statistical improvements on TDS curves. 10eme journées européennes Agro-industrie et méthodes statistiques. 22-25 January 2008, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium 2008.
35. Pineau N., Neville T., Lepage M. Panel performance tool for temporal dominance of sensations studies. Abstract book of 9th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Toronto, Canada 2011.
36. Pineau N., Schlich P., Cordelle S., Mathonniere C., Issanchou S., Imbert A., et al. Temporal dominance of Sensations: construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:450-455.
37. Saint-Eve A., Déléris I., Panouillé M., Dakowski F., Cordelle S., Schlich P., et al. How texture influences aroma and taste perception over time in candies. Chemosensory Perception 2011, 4:32-41.
38. Sokolowsky M., Fischer U. Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 2012, 732:46-52.
39. Su C. Application of temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) to the study of a coffee based frozen cream 2013, (Master thesis in Food Innovation and Product Design), University of Naples, Federico II.
40. Sudre J., Pineau N., Loret C., Martin N. Comparison of methods to monitor liking of food during consumption. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:179-189.
41. Teillet E., Schlich P., Urbano C., Cordelle S., Guichard E. Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:967-976.
42. Varela P., Pintor A., Fiszman S. How hydrocolloids affect the temporal oral perception of ice cream. Food Hydrocolloids 2014, 36:220-228.
43. Vàzquez-Araùjo L., Parker D., Woods E. Comparison of temporal-sensory methods for beer flavor evaluation. Journal of Sensory Studies 2013, 28:387-395.