Sensory analysis comparison of eight biscuits by French and Pakistani panels

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 665-686

  Pagès, Jérôme ^a   Bertrand, Cecile ^a   Ali, Rashida ^b   Husson, François ^a   Lê, Sébastien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749070455     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00130.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. BLANCHER, G., CHOLLET, S. LÊ, S. 2006. HMFA as a tool to compare French and Vietnamese sensory points of view. Sensometrics 2006, August 2-4, Campus As, As, Norway.
2. BOUGAULT, V., FOLLET, C., AMANAT, A., PELZ, C., STREIF, S. BEYTS, P. 2005. Comparison of the relative effect of panel-to-panel variation and country-to-country variation in sensory descriptive analysis of rums. Cross-cultural preference mapping of rum and cola in the UK and USA. Diageo, UK. J Reckner Associates/Institute for Sensory Research, USA. Sensory Dimensions, UK. http://www.sparksdesigns.co.uk/workingfiles/bluezulu/pangborn/papers/ 041Bougault.pdf (accessed August 14, 2007).
3. ESCOFIER, B. PAGÈS, J. 1998. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: Objectifs, méthodes et interpretation, Dunod, Paris, France.
4. MACFIE, H.J., BRATCHELL, N., GREENHOFF, K. VALLIS, L.V. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall test. J. Sensory Studies 4, 129 148.
5. PAGÈS, J. HUSSON, F. 2001. Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles: Methodology and results. Food Qual. Prefer. 12, 297 309.
6. SENSOMINER. 2005. A package for sensory data analysis. http://sensominer.free.fr (accessed August 14, 2007).
7. SPAD REL. 5.6. 2004. Système pour l'analyse des données, SPAD Groupe Test & Go, Paris, France. http://eng.spad.eu (accessed August 14, 2007).