Exploring associations between taste perception, oral anatomy and polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase (gustin) gene CA6

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 128, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-154

  Feeney, Emma L ^a   Hayes, John E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bitter perception; Carbonic anhydrase; Fungiform papillae; Polymorphisms; Salt perception

Indexed keywords

CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE; DNA; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; CARBONIC ANHYDRASE VI;

ADULT; ALLELE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE BUD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CARBONIC ANHYDRASES; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; TASTE; TASTE BUDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894431484     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Fox A.L. Six in ten "tasteblind" to bitter chemical. Sci Newsl 1931, 9:249.
2. Blakeslee A.F. Genetics of sensory thresholds: taste for phenyl thio carbamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1932, 18:120-130.
3. Barnicot N.A., Harris H., Kalmus H. Taste thresholds of further eighteen compounds and their correlation with P.T.C thresholds. Ann Eugen 1951, 16:119-128.
4. Boyd W.C. Taste reactions to antithyroid substances. Science 1950, 112:153.
5. Traka M., Mithen R. Glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and human health. Phytochem Rev 2009, 8:269-282.
6. Dinehart M.E., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Lanier S.L., Duffy V.B. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 2006, 87:304-313.
7. Basson M.D., Bartoshuk L.M., Dichello S.Z., Panzini L., Weiffenbach J.M. Association between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and colonic neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 2005, 50:483-489.
8. Drewnowski A., Gomez-Carneros C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 2000, 72:1424-1435.
9. Kim U.-K., Jorgenson E., Coon H., Leppert M., Risch N. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 2003, 299:1221-1225.
10. Bufe B., Breslin P.A.S., Kuhn C., Reed D.R., Tharp C.D., Slack J.P., et al. The Molecular Basis of Individual Differences in Phenylthiocarbamide and Propylthiouracil Bitterness Perception. Curr Biol 2005, 15:322-327.
11. Duffy V.B., Davidson A.C., Kidd J.R., Kidd K.K., Speed W.C. Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004, 28:1629-1637.
12. Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Kidd J.R., Duffy V.B. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 2008, 33:255-265.
13. Colares-Bento F.C.J., Souza V.C., Toledo J.O., Moraes C.F., Alho C.S., Lima R.M., et al. Implication of the G145C polymorphism (rs713598) of the TAS2r38 gene on food consumption by Brazilian older women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2012, 54:e13-e18.
14. Padiglia A., Zonza A., Atzori E., Chillotti C., Calo C., Tepper B.J., et al. Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2010, 92:539-545.
15. Tepper B.J. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation: the role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annu Rev Nutr 2008, 28:367-388.
16. Timpson N.J., Christensen M., Lawlor D.A., Gaunt T.R., Day I.N. TAS2R38 (phenylthiocarbamide) haplotypes, coronary heart disease traits, and eating behavior in the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 81:1005-1011.
17. O'Brien S.A., Feeney E.L., Scannell A.G.M., Markey A., Gibney E.R. Bitter Taste Perception and Dietary Intake Patterns in Irish Children. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 2013, 6:43-58.
18. Kim U.-K., Wooding S., Ricci D., Jorde L.B., Drayna D. Worldwide haplotype diversity and coding sequence variation at human bitter taste receptor loci. Hum Mutat 2005, 26:199-204.
19. Duffy V.B., Peterson J.M., Bartoshuk L.M. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake. Physiol Behav 2004, 82:435-445.
20. Drayna D., Coon H., Kim U.-K., Elsner T., Cromer K. Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p. Hum Genet 2003, 112:567-572.
21. Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation Chemical Senses 2007, 32:225-236.
22. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Miller I.J. PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 1994, 56:1165-1171.
23. Delwiche J.F., Buletic Z., Breslin P.A. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiol Behav 2001, 74:329-337.
24. Zhang G., Zhang H., Wang X., Zhan Y., Deng S., Qin Y. The relationship between fungiform papillae density and detection threshold for sucrose in the young males. Chem Senses 2009, 34:93-99.
25. Garneau N.L., Derr T. Statistical Analysis of Factors Previously Described as Significant in the Ability to Taste Propylthiouracil Yields Roles for Age, Sex, and TAS2R38 Haplotype, but not Fungiform Papillae Density. AChems XXXV 2013, 235.
26. Bajec M., Pickering G. Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiol Behav 2008, 95:581-590.
27. Bartoshuk L.M. Sweetness: history, preference and genetic variability. Food Technol 1991, 45:108-113.
28. Lawless H. A comparison of different methods used to assess sensitivity to the taste of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC). Chem Senses 1980, 5:247-256.
29. Blakeslee A.F., Salmon T.N. Genetics of sensory thresholds: individual taste reactions for different substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1935, 21:84-90.
30. Reddy B.M., Rao D.C. Phenylthiocarbamide taste sensitivity revisited: complete sorting test supports residual family resemblance. Genet Epidemiol 1989, 6:413-421.
31. Olson J., Boehnke M., Neiswanger K., Roche A., Siervogel R. Alternative genetic models for the inheritance of the phenylthiocarbamide taste deficiency. Genet Epidemiol 1989, 6:423-434.
32. Guo S.W., Reed D.R. The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. Ann Hum Biol 2001, 28:111-142.
33. Hayes J.E., Keast R.S.J. Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?. Physiol Behav 2011, 104:1072-1074.
34. Tepper B.J., Christensen C.M., Cao J. Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 2001, 73:571-577.
35. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Lucchina L.A., Prutkin J., Fast K. PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998, 855:793-796.
36. Ko C.W., Hoffman H.J., Lucchina L.A., Snyder D.J., Weiffenbach J.M., Bartoshuk L.M. Differential perceptions of intensity for the four basic taste qualities in PROP supertasters versus nontasters. Chem Senses 2000, 25:639-640.
37. Hayes J.E., Sullivan B.S., Duffy V.B. Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking. Physiol Behav 2010, 100:369-380.
38. Delwiche J.F., Buletic Z., Breslin P.A.S. Covariation in individuals' sensitivities to bitter compounds: evidence supporting multiple receptor/transduction mechanisms. Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:761-776.
39. Porubcan A.R., Vickers Z.M. Characterizing milk aftertaste: the effects of salivation rate, PROP taster status, or small changes in acidity, fat, or sucrose on acceptability of milk to milk dislikers. Food Qual Prefer 2005, 16:608-620.
40. Lanier S.A., Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 2005, 83:821-831.
41. Prescott J., Swain-Campbell N. Responses to Repeated Oral Irritation by Capsaicin, Cinnamaldehyde and Ethanol in PROP Tasters and Non-tasters. Chem Senses 2000, 25:239-246.
42. Delwiche J.F., Buletic Z., Breslin P.A. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiol Behav 2001, 74:329-337.
43. Hayes J.E., Pickering G.J. Wine Expertise Predicts Taste Phenotype 2012, 63:80-84.
44. Zhao L., Kirkmeyer S.V., Tepper B.J. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiol Behav 2003, 78:625-633.
45. Smutzer G., Desai H., Coldwell S.E., Griffith J.W. Validation of Edible Taste Strips for Assessing PROP Taste Perception. Chem Senses 2013, 38:529-539.
46. Feeney E., O' Brien S., Markey A., Scannell A., Gibney E. Genetic variation in taste perception - does it have a role in healthy eating?. Proc Nutr Soc 2011, 70:135-143.
47. Snyder D.J., Fast K., Bartoshuk L.M. Valid comparisons of suprathreshold sensations. J Conscious Stud 2004, 11:96-112.
48. Green B.G., Shaffer G.S., Gilmore M.M. Derivation and Evaluation of a Semantic Scale of Oral Sensation Magnitude with Apparent Ratio Properties. Chem Senses 1993, 18:683-702.
49. Drewnowski A., Henderson S.A., Shore A.B. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes. Chem Senses 1997, 22:27-37.
50. Drewnowski A., Henderson S.A., Barratt-Fornell A. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures. Physiol Behav 1998, 63:771-777.
51. Tepper B.J., Nurse R.J. Fat Perception is Related to PROP Taster Status. Physiol Behav 1997, 61:949-954.
52. Yackinous C.A., Guinard J.X. Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction. Physiol Behav 2001, 72:427-437.
53. Lim J., Urban L., Green B.G. Measures of Individual Differences in Taste and Creaminess Perception. Chem Senses 2008, 33:493-501.
54. Calò C., Padiglia A., Zonza A., Corrias L., Contu P., Tepper B.J., et al. Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype. Physiol Behav 2011, 104:1065-1071.
55. Peres R.C., Camargo G., Mofatto L.S., Cortellazzi K.L., Santos M.C., Nobre-dos-Santos M., et al. Association of polymorphisms in the carbonic anhydrase 6 gene with salivary buffer capacity, dental plaque pH, and caries index in children aged 7-9years. Pharmacogenomics J 2010, 10:114-119.
56. Allen A.L., McGeary J.E., Knopik V.S., Hayes J.E. Bitterness of the Non-nutritive Sweetener Acesulfame Potassium Varies With Polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chem Senses 2013, 38:379-389.
57. Hayes J.E., Allen A.L., Bennett S.M. Direct comparison of the generalized visual analog scale (gVAS) and general labeled magnitude scale (gLMS). Food Qual Prefer 2013, 28:36-44.
58. Yamaguchi S. Synergistic taste effect of monosodium glutamate and disodium 5'-inosinate. J Food Sci 1967, 32:473-478.
59. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Reed D., Williams A. Supertasting, earaches and head injury: genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds Neurosci. Biobehav Rev 1996, 20:79-87.
60. Bae J.-W., Kim U.-K., Oh S.-k, Rhyu M.R., Shin S.H., Ye M.-K. The Relationship between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of the Carbonic Anhydrase 6 Gene and Phenylthiocarbamide Taste Sensitivity, Taste Disorder. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012, 55:155-160.
61. Yackinous C.A., Guinard J.X. Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women. Appetite 2002, 38:201-209.
62. Prutkin J., Duffy V., Etter L., Fast K., Gardner E., Lucchina L., et al. Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 2000, 69:161-173.
63. Essick G.K., Chopra A., Guest S., McGlone F. Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiol Behav 2003, 80:289-302.
64. Heinzerling C.I., Stieger M., Bult J.H.F., Smit G. Individually Modified Saliva Delivery Changes the Perceived Intensity of Saltiness and Sourness. Chemosens Percept 2011, 4:145-153.
65. Pedersen A.M., Bardow A., Jensen S.B., Nauntofte B. Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, swallowing and digestion. Oral Dis 2002, 8:117-129.
66. Humphrey S.P., Williamson R.T. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent 2001, 85:162-169.
67. Barbarossa I.T., Carta G., Murru E., Melis M., Zonza A., Vacca C., et al. Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with endocannabinoid plasma levels in normal-weight individuals. Nutrition 2013, 29:531-536.