Recent findings and technological advances in phosphoproteomics for cells and tissues

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 469-487

  Von Stechow, Louise ^a   Francavilla, Chiara ^a   Olsen, Jesper V ^a  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

Author keywords

bioinformatics analyses; mass spectrometry; phospho enrichment strategies; phosphoproteomics; quantitative phosphoproteomics

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; TRYPSIN; PROTEOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL LINE; CELL STRUCTURE; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIGESTION; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; LYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TISSUE STRUCTURE; TISSUES; WHOLE CELL; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84942412144     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2015.1078730     Document Type: Review

References (140)

1. Olsen JV, Mann M. Status of Large-scale Analysis of Post-Translational Modifications by Mass Spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteom 2013; 12 (12): 3444-52
2. Solari FA, DellAica M, Sickmann A, Zahedi RP. Why phosphoproteomics is still a challenge. Mol Biosyst 2015; 11 (6): 1487-93
3. Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, et al. A probability-based approach for high-Throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24 (10): 1285-92
4. Olsen JV, Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101 (37): 13417-22
5. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006; 127 (3): 635-48
6. Syka JE, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, et al. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101 (26): 9528-33
7. Olsen JV, Macek B, Lange O, et al. Higher-energy C-Trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nat Methods 2007; 4 (9): 709-12
8. Nagaraj N, DSouza RC, Cox J, et al. Feasibility of large-scale phosphoproteomics with higher energy collisional dissociation fragmentation. J Proteome Res 2010; 9 (12): 6786-94
9. Engholm-Keller K, Larsen MR. Technologies and challenges in large-scale phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 2013; 13 (6): 910-31
10. Jedrychowski MP, Huttlin EL, Haas W, et al. Evaluation of HCD-And CID-Type fragmentation within their respective detection platforms for murine phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011; 10 (12): M111 009910
11. Zhou H, Low TY, Hennrich ML, et al. Enhancing the identification of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase substrates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011; 10 (10): M110 006452
12. Marx H, Lemeer S, Schliep JE, et al. A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31 (6): 557-64
13. de Graaf EL, Giansanti P, Altelaar AF, Heck AJ. Single-step enrichment by Ti4+-IMAC and label-free quantitation enables in-depth monitoring of phosphorylation dynamics with high reproducibility and temporal resolution. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (9): 2426-34
14. Bridon G, Bonneil E, Muratore-Schroeder T, et al. Improvement of phosphoproteome analyses using FAIMS and decision tree fragmentation. application to the insulin signaling pathway in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. J Proteome Res 2012; 11 (2): 927-40
15. Brunner AM, Lossl P, Liu F, et al. Benchmarking multiple fragmentation methods on an orbitrap fusion for top-down phospho-proteoform characterization. Anal Chem 2015; 87 (8): 4152-8
16. Frese CK, Zhou H, Taus T, et al. Unambiguous phosphosite localization using electron-Transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD). J Proteome Res 2013; 12 (3): 1520-5
17. Venne K, Bonneil E, Eng K, Thibault P. Improvement in peptide detection for proteomics analyses using nanoLC-MS and high-field asymmetry waveform ion mobility mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2005; 77 (7): 2176-86
18. Saba J, Bonneil E, Pomies C, et al. Enhanced Sensitivity in Proteomics Experiments Using FAIMS Coupled with a Hybrid Linear Ion Trap/Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. J Proteome Res 2009; 8 (7): 3355-66
19. Helm D, Vissers JP, Hughes CJ, et al. Ion mobility tandem mass spectrometry enhances performance of bottom-up proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (12): 3709-15
20. Creese AJ, Smart J, Cooper HJ. Large-scale analysis of peptide sequence variants: The case for high field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem 2013; 85: 4836-43
21. Huttlin EL, Jedrychowski MP, Elias JE, et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell 2010; 143 (7): 1174-89
22. Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci signal 2010; 3 (104): ra3
23. Sharma K, DSouza RC, Tyanova S, et al. Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-based signaling. Cell reports 2014; 8 (5): 1583-94
24. Tran JC, Zamdborg L, Ahlf DR, et al. Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics. Nature 2011; 480 (7376): 254-8
25. Mann M, Hendrickson RC, Pandey A. Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70: 437-73
26. Switzar L, Giera M, Niessen WM. Protein digestion: an overview of the available techniques and recent developments. J Proteome Res 2013; 12 (3): 1067-77
27. Olsen JV, Ong SE, Mann M. Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-Terminal to arginine and lysine residues. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004; 3 (6): 608-14
28. Gilmore JM, Kettenbach AN, Gerber SA. Increasing phosphoproteomic coverage through sequential digestion by complementary proteases. Anal Bioanal Chem 2012; 402 (2): 711-20
29. Dickhut C, Feldmann I, Lambert J, Zahedi RP. Impact of digestion conditions on phosphoproteomics. J Proteome Res 2014; 13 (6): 2761-70
30. Hamady M, Cheung TH, Tufo H, Knight R. Does protein structure influence trypsin miscleavage? Using structural properties to predict the behavior of related proteins. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2005; 24 (3): 58-66
31. Giansanti P, Aye TT, van den Toorn H, et al. An Augmented Multiple-Protease-Based Human Phosphopeptide Atlas. Cell reports 2015; 11 (11): 1834-43
32. Beltran L, Cutillas PR. Advances in phosphopeptide enrichment techniques for phosphoproteomics. Amino Acids 2012; 43 (3): 1009-24
33. Hunter T, Sefton BM. Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77 (3): 1311-15
34. Boersema PJ, Foong LY, Ding VM, et al. In-depth qualitative and quantitative profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation using a combination of phosphopeptide immunoaffinity purification and stable isotope dimethyl labeling. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9 (1): 84-99
35. Engholm-Keller K, Birck P, Storling J, et al. TiSH-A robust and sensitive global phosphoproteomics strategy employing a combination of TiO2, SIMAC, and HILIC. J Proteomics 2012; 75 (18): 5749-61
36. Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR. SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008; 7 (4): 661-71
37. Batth TS, Francavilla C, Olsen JV. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics. J Proteome Res 2014; 13 (12): 6176-86
38. Engholm-Keller K, Hansen TA, Palmisano G, Larsen MR. Multidimensional strategy for sensitive phosphoproteomics incorporating protein prefractionation combined with SIMAC, HILIC, and TiO(2) chromatography applied to proximal EGF signaling. J Proteome Res 2011; 10 (12): 5383-97
39. Yu Z, Han G, Sun S, et al. Preparation of monodisperse immobilized Ti(4+) affinity chromatography microspheres for specific enrichment of phosphopeptides. Anal Chim Acta 2009; 636 (1): 34-41
40. Zhou H, Ye M, Dong J, et al. Specific phosphopeptide enrichment with immobilized titanium ion affinity chromatography adsorbent for phosphoproteome analysis. J Proteome Res 2008; 7 (9): 3957-67
41. Zhou H, Ye M, Dong J, et al. Robust phosphoproteome enrichment using monodisperse microsphere-based immobilized titanium (IV) ion affinity chromatography. Nat Protoc 2013; 8 (3): 461-80
42. Ruprecht B, Koch H, Medard G, et al. Comprehensive and reproducible phosphopeptide enrichment using iron immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (Fe-IMAC) columns. Mol Cell Proteomics 2015; 14 (1): 205-15
43. Iliuk AB, Martin VA, Alicie BM, et al. In-depth analyses of kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphoproteomes based on metal ion-functionalized soluble nanopolymers. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9 (10): 2162-72
44. Searleman AC, Iliuk AB, Collier TS, et al. Tissue phosphoproteomics with PolyMAC identifies potential therapeutic targets in a transgenic mouse model of HER2 positive breast cancer. Electrophoresis 2014; 35 (24): 3463-9
45. Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Koike T. Advances in Phos-Tag-based methodologies for separation and detection of the phosphoproteome. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1854 (6): 601-8
46. Rainer M, Bonn GK. Enrichment of phosphorylated peptides and proteins by selective precipitation methods. Bioanalysis 2015; 7 (2): 243-52
47. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007; 316 (5828): 1160-6
48. Machida K, Khenkhar M, Nollau P. Deciphering phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks in cancer by SH2 profiling. Genes Cancer 2012; 3 (5-6): 353-61
49. Galan JA, Geraghty KM, Lavoie G, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies the tumor suppressor PDCD4 as a RSK substrate negatively regulated by 14-3-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111 (29): E2918-27
50. Loroch S, Zahedi RP, Sickmann A. Highly sensitive phosphoproteomics by tailoring solid-phase extraction to electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Anal Chem 2015; 87 (3): 1596-604
51. Lundby A, Secher A, Lage K, et al. Quantitative maps of protein phosphorylation sites across 14 different rat organs and tissues. Nat commun 2012; 3: 876
52. Rigbolt KT, Prokhorova TA, Akimov V, et al. System-wide temporal characterization of the proteome and phosphoproteome of human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Sci signal 2011; 4 (164): rs3
53. Kettenbach AN, Gerber SA. Rapid and reproducible single-stage phosphopeptide enrichment of complex peptide mixtures: application to general and phosphotyrosine-specific phosphoproteomics experiments. Anal Chem 2011; 83 (20): 7635-44
54. Masuda T, Sugiyama N, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. Microscale phosphoproteome analysis of 10,000 cells from human cancer cell lines. Anal Chem 2011; 83 (20): 7698-703
55. Lundby A, Lage K, Weinert BT, et al. Proteomic analysis of lysine acetylation sites in rat tissues reveals organ specificity and subcellular patterns. Cell reports 2012; 2 (2): 419-31
56. Liu NQ, Braakman RB, Stingl C, et al. Proteomics pipeline for biomarker discovery of laser capture microdissected breast cancer tissue. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2012; 17 (2): 155-64
57. Casado P, Bilanges B, Rajeeve V, et al. Environmental stress affects the activity of metabolic and growth factor signaling networks and induces autophagy markers in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (3): 836-48
58. Kanshin E, Tyers M, Thibault P. Sample collection method bias effects in quantitative phosphoproteomics. J Proteome Res 2015; 14 (7): 2998-3004
59. Mertins P, Yang F, Liu T, et al. Ischemia in tumors induces early and sustained phosphorylation changes in stress kinase pathways but does not affect global protein levels. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (7): 1690-704
60. Gajadhar AS, Johnson H, Slebos RJ, et al. Phosphotyrosine signaling analysis in human tumors is confounded by systemic ischemia-driven artifacts and intra-specimen heterogeneity. Cancer Res 2015; 75 (7): 1495-503
61. Boren M. Sample preservation through heat stabilization of proteins: principles and examples. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1295: 21-32
62. Wakabayashi M, Yoshihara H, Masuda T, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections mounted on microscope slides. J Proteome Res 2014; 13 (2): 915-24
63. Zhai B, Villen J, Beausoleil SA, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Proteome Res 2008; 7 (4): 1675-82
64. Lundby A, Andersen MN, Steffensen AB, et al. In vivo phosphoproteomics analysis reveals the cardiac targets of beta-Adrenergic receptor signaling. Sci signal 2013; 6 (278): rs11
65. Monetti M, Nagaraj N, Sharma K, Mann M. Large-scale phosphosite quantification in tissues by a spike-in SILAC method. Nat Methods 2011; 8 (8): 655-8
66. Weigand S, Herting F, Maisel D, et al. Global quantitative phosphoproteome analysis of human tumor xenografts treated with a CD44 antagonist. Cancer Res 2012; 72 (17): 4329-39
67. Corradini E, Vallur R, Raaijmakers LM, et al. Alterations in the cerebellar (Phospho)proteome of a cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent protein kinase knockout mouse. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (8): 2004-16
68. Narumi R, Murakami T, Kuga T, et al. A strategy for large-scale phosphoproteomics and SRM-based validation of human breast cancer tissue samples. J Proteome Res 2012; 11 (11): 5311-22
69. Dephoure N, Gygi SP. Hyperplexing: a method for higher-order multiplexed quantitative proteomics provides a map of the dynamic response to rapamycin in yeast. Sci.Signal 2012; 5 (217): rs2
70. Everley RA, Kunz RC, McAllister FE, Gygi SP. Increasing throughput in targeted proteomics assays: 54-plex quantitation in a single mass spectrometry run. Anal.Chem 2013; 85 (11): 5340-6
71. Francavilla C, Rigbolt KT, Emdal KB, et al. Functional proteomics defines the molecular switch underlying FGF receptor trafficking and cellular outputs. Mol Cell 2013; 51 (6): 707-22
72. Pan C, Olsen JV, Daub H, Mann M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009; 8 (12): 2796-808
73. Bennetzen MV, Larsen DH, Bunkenborg J, et al. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9 (6): 1314-23
74. Beli P, Lukashchuk N, Wagner SA, et al. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012; 46 (2): 212-25
75. Bensimon A, Schmidt A, Ziv Y, et al. ATM-dependent and-independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage. Sci signal 2010; 3 (151): rs3
76. Pines A, Kelstrup CD, Vrouwe MG, et al. Global Phosphoproteome Profiling Reveals Unanticipated Networks Responsive to Cisplatin Treatment of Embryonic Stem Cells. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31 (24): 4964-77
77. Mertins P, Udeshi ND, Clauser KR, et al. iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012; 11 (6): M111-014423
78. Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (9): 2513-26
79. Wu R, Haas W, Dephoure N, et al. A large-scale method to measure absolute protein phosphorylation stoichiometries. Nat Methods 2011; 8 (8): 677-83
80. Tsai CF, Wang YT, Yen HY, et al. Large-scale determination of absolute phosphorylation stoichiometries in human cells by motif-Targeting quantitative proteomics. Nat comm 2015; 6: 6622
81. Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, et al. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 (12): 6940-5
82. Curran TG, Zhang Y, Ma DJ, et al. MARQUIS: a multiplex method for absolute quantification of peptides and posttranslational modifications. Nat comm 2015; 6: 5924
83. Steen H, Mann M. The ABCs (and XYZs) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5 (9): 699-711
84. Beltrao P, Bork P, Krogan NJ, van Noort V. Evolution and functional cross-Talk of protein post-Translational modifications. Mol Syst Biol 2013; 9: 714
85. Ubersax JA, Ferrell Jr. JE.Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8 (7): 530-41
86. Zheng Y, Zhang C, Croucher DR, et al. Temporal regulation of EGF signalling networks by the scaffold protein Shc1. Nature 2013; 499 (7457): 166-71
87. Yu Y, Yoon SO, Poulogiannis G, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies Grb10 as an mTORC1 substrate that negatively regulates insulin signaling. Science 2011; 332 (6035): 1322-6
88. Hsu PP, Kang SA, Rameseder J, et al. The mTOR-regulated phosphoproteome reveals a mechanism of mTORC1-mediated inhibition of growth factor signaling. Science 2011; 332 (6035): 1317-22
89. Emdal KB, Pedersen AK, Bekker-Jensen DB, et al. Temporal proteomics of NGF-TrkA signaling identifies an inhibitory role for the E3 ligase Cbl-b in neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Sci. Signal 2015; 8 (374): ra40
90. Terfve C, Saez-Rodriguez J. Modeling signaling networks using high-Throughput phospho-proteomics. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 736: 19-57
91. Kanshin E, Bergeron-Sandoval LP, Isik SS, et al. A cell-signaling network temporally resolves specific versus promiscuous phosphorylation. Cell reports 2015; 10 (7): 1202-14
92. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25 (1): 25-9
93. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28 (1): 27-30
94. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, et al. DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: W169-75
95. Breuer K, Foroushani AK, Laird MR, et al. InnateDB: systems biology of innate immunity and beyond-recent updates and continuing curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D1228-33
96. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D808-15
97. Kerrien S, Aranda B, Breuza L, et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D841-6
98. Licata L, Briganti L, Peluso D, et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: D857-61
99. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13 (11): 2498-504
100. Klammer M, Godl K, Tebbe A, Schaab C. Identifying differentially regulated subnetworks from phosphoproteomic data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 351
101. Casado P, Rodriguez-Prados JC, Cosulich SC, et al. Kinase-substrate enrichment analysis provides insights into the heterogeneity of signaling pathway activation in leukemia cells. Sci signal 2013; 6 (268): rs6
102. Vaga S, Bernardo-Faura M, Cokelaer T, et al. Phosphoproteomic analyses reveal novel cross-modulation mechanisms between two signaling pathways in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2014; 10: 767
103. Landry CR, Levy ED, Michnick SW. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet 2009; 25 (5): 193-7
104. Beltrao P, Trinidad JC, Fiedler D, et al. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol 2009; 7 (6): e1000134
105. Beltrao P, Albanese V, Kenner LR, et al. Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell 2012; 150 (2): 413-25
106. Hunter T. The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond. Mol Cell 2007; 28 (5): 730-8
107. Swaney DL, Beltrao P, Starita L, et al. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-Talk in protein degradation. Nat Methods 2013; 10 (7): 676-82
108. Tan CS, Bader GD. Phosphorylation sites of higher stoichiometry are more conserved. Nat Methods 2012; 9 (4): 317
109. Weinert BT, Wagner SA, Horn H, et al. Proteome-wide mapping of the Drosophila acetylome demonstrates a high degree of conservation of lysine acetylation. Sci signal 2011; 4 (183): ra48
110. Weinert BT, Iesmantavicius V, Moustafa T, et al. Acetylation dynamics and stoichiometry in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Syst Biol 2014; 10: 716
111. Tan CS, Bodenmiller B, Pasculescu A, et al. Comparative analysis reveals conserved protein phosphorylation networks implicated in multiple diseases. Sci signal 2009; 2 (81): ra39
112. Wang T, Kettenbach AN, Gerber SA, Bailey-Kellogg C. MMFPh: a maximal motif finder for phosphoproteomics datasets. Bioinformatics 2012; 28 (12): 1562-70
113. Garraway LA, Lander ES. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell 2013; 153 (1): 17-37
114. Cohen P. Protein kinases-The major drug targets of the twenty-first century? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002; 1 (4): 309-15
115. Cohen P, Alessi DR. Kinase drug discovery-whats next in the field? ACS Chem Biol 2013; 8 (1): 96-104
116. Dinkel H, Chica C, Via A, et al. Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites-update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 36: D261-7
117. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Pasculescu A, et al. NetworKIN: a resource for exploring cellular phosphorylation networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: D695-9
118. Schwartz D, Gygi SP. An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23 (11): 1391-8
119. Colaert N, Helsens K, Martens L, et al. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat Methods 2009; 6 (11): 786-7
120. Wagner MJ, Stacey MM, Liu BA, Pawson T. Molecular mechanisms of SH2-And PTB-domain-containing proteins in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5 (12): a008987
121. Bodenmiller B, Wanka S, Kraft C, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci signal 2010; 3 (153): rs4
122. Tagliabracci VS, Wiley SE, Guo X, et al. A Single Kinase Generates the Majority of the Secreted Phosphoproteome. Cell 2015; 161 (7): 1619-32
123. Holt LJ, Tuch BB, Villen J, et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 2009; 325 (5948): 1682-6
124. Lourido S, Jeschke GR, Turk BE, Sibley LD. Exploiting the unique ATP-binding pocket of toxoplasma calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 to identify its substrates. ACS Chem Biol 2013; 8 (6): 1155-62
125. Becher I, Savitski MM, Savitski MF, et al. Affinity profiling of the cellular kinome for the nucleotide cofactors ATP, ADP, and GTP. ACS Chem Biol 2013; 8 (3): 599-607
126. van de Waterbeemd M, Lossl P, Gautier V, et al. Simultaneous assessment of kinetic, site-specific, and structural aspects of enzymatic protein phosphorylation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2014; 53 (36): 9660-4
127. Kubota K, Anjum R, Yu Y, et al. Sensitive multiplexed analysis of kinase activities and activity-based kinase identification. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27 (10): 933-40
128. Yu Y, Anjum R, Kubota K, et al. A site-specific, multiplexed kinase activity assay using stable-isotope dilution and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106 (28): 11606-11
129. Xue L, Geahlen RL, Tao WA. Identification of direct tyrosine kinase substrates based on protein kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013; 12 (10): 2969-80
130. Xue L, Wang P, Cao P, et al. Identification of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) direct substrates using stable isotope labeled kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (11): 3199-210
131. Kettenbach AN, Wang T, Faherty BK, et al. Rapid determination of multiple linear kinase substrate motifs by mass spectrometry. Chem Biol 2012; 19 (5): 608-18
132. Soufi B, Soares NC, Ravikumar V, Macek B. Proteomics reveals evidence of cross-Talk between protein modifications in bacteria: focus on acetylation and phosphorylation. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012; 15 (3): 357-63
133. Ruthenburg AJ, Li H, Patel DJ, Allis CD. Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8 (12): 983-94
134. Brooks CL, Gu W. Ubiquitination, phosphorylation and acetylation: the molecular basis for p53 regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003; 15 (2): 164-71
135. Mertins P, Qiao JW, Patel J, et al. Integrated proteomic analysis of post-Translational modifications by serial enrichment. Nat Methods 2013; 10 (7): 634-7
136. Iesmantavicius V, Weinert BT, Choudhary C. Convergence of ubiquitylation and phosphorylation signaling in rapamycin-Treated yeast cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014; 13 (8): 1979-92
137. Van Roey K, Dinkel H, Weatheritt RJ, et al. The switches.ELM resource: a compendium of conditional regulatory interaction interfaces. Sci Signal 2013; 6 (269): rs7
138. Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 2014; 509 (7502): 575-81
139. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 2014; 509 (7502): 582-7
140. Parker BL, Yang G, Humphrey SJ, et al. Targeted phosphoproteomics of insulin signaling using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Sci Signal 2015; 8 (380): rs6