A large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library for mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 557-564

  Marx, Harald ^a   Lemeer, Simone ^a   Schliep, Jan Erik ^a   Matheron, Lucrece ^b,c   Mohammed, Shabaz ^b,c,f   Cox, Jürgen ^d   Mann, Matthias ^d   Heck, Albert J R ^b,c   Kuster, Bernhard ^a,e  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS PROTEOMICS CENTRE   (Netherlands)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^e Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISION-INDUCED DISSOCIATION; ELECTRON-TRANSFER DISSOCIATION; EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT; FRAGMENTATION PATTERNS; PEPTIDE IDENTIFICATION; PHOSPHORYLATION SITES; REVERSED-PHASE COLUMNS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUES;

DISSOCIATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PHOSPHORYLATION; SEARCH ENGINES;

PEPTIDES;

PEPTIDE; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BEAM TYPE COLLISION INDUCED DISSOCIATION; BINDING SITE; COLLISIONALLY ACTIVATED DISSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON TRANSFER DISSOCIATION; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PEPTIDES; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84879654317     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2585     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Chen, Y., Kwon, S.W., Kim, S.C. & Zhao, Y. Integrated approach for manual evaluation of peptides identified by searching protein sequence databases with tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 4, 998-1005 (2005).
2. Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Xing, G. & Zhao, Y. Mascot-derived false positive peptide identifications revealed by manual analysis of tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 8, 3141-3147 (2009).
3. Keller, A. et al. Experimental protein mixture for validating tandem mass spectral analysis. OMICS 6, 207-212 (2002).
4. Rudnick, P.A., Wang, Y., Evans, E., Lee, C.S. & Balgley, B.M. Large scale analysis of MASCOT results using a Mass Accuracy-based THreshold (MATH) effectively improves data interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 4, 1353-1360 (2005).
5. Klimek, J. et al. The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved Peptide and protein identification software tools. J. Proteome Res. 7, 96-103 (2008).
6. Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125-131 (2007).
7. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Vitek, O. & Aebersold, R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 787-797 (2007).
8. Mallick, P. & Kuster, B. Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 695-709 (2010).
9. Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207-214 (2007).
10. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383-5392 (2002).
11. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646-4658 (2003).
12. Shteynberg, D. et al. iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M111.007690 (2011).
13. Bohrer, B.C. et al. Combinatorial libraries of synthetic peptides as a model for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 82, 6559-6568 (2010).
14. Beausoleil, S.A., Villen, J., Gerber, S.A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S.P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1285-1292 (2006).
15. Bailey, C.M. et al. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J. Proteome Res. 8, 1965-1971 (2009).
16. Lemeer, S. et al. Phosphorylation site localization in peptides by MALDI MS/MS and the Mascot Delta Score. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402, 249-260 (2012).
17. Savitski, M.M. et al. Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M110.003830 (2011).
18. Taus, T. et al. Universal and confident phosphorylation site localization using phosphoRS. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5354-5362 (2011).
19. Daub, H. et al. Kinase-selective enrichment enables quantitative phosphoproteomics of the kinome across the cell cycle. Mol. Cell 31, 438-448 (2008).
20. Olsen, J.V. et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648 (2006).
21. Olsen, J.V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra3 (2010).
22. Oppermann, F.S. et al. Large-scale proteomics analysis of the human kinome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1751-1764 (2009).
23. Rikova, K. et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 131, 1190-1203 (2007).
24. Steen, H., Jebanathirajah, J.A., Rush, J., Morrice, N. & Kirschner, M.W. Phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry: myths, facts, and the consequences for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 172-181 (2006).
25. Krokhin, O.V. Sequence-specific retention calculator. Algorithm for peptide retention prediction in ion-pair RP-HPLC: application to 300- and 100-A pore size C18 sorbents. Anal. Chem. 78, 7785-7795 (2006).
26. Jedrychowski, M.P. et al. Evaluation of HCD- and CID-type fragmentation within their respective detection platforms for murine phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M111.009910 (2011).
27. Nagaraj, N., D'Souza, R.C., Cox, J., Olsen, J.V. & Mann, M. Feasibility of large-scale phosphoproteomics with higher energy collisional dissociation fragmentation. J. Proteome Res. 9, 6786-6794 (2010).
28. Swaney, D.L., McAlister, G.C. & Coon, J.J. Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods 5, 959-964 (2008).
29. Swaney, D.L., Wenger, C.D., Thomson, J.A. & Coon, J.J. Human embryonic stem cell phosphoproteome revealed by electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 995-1000 (2009).
30. Boersema, P.J., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A.J. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Mass. Spectrom. 44, 861-878 (2009).
31. Frese, C.K. et al. Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos. J. Proteome Res. 10, 2377-2388 (2011).
32. Zhou, H. et al. Enhancing the identification of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase substrates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M110.006452 (2011).
33. Kapp, E.A. et al. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Proteomics 5, 3475-3490 (2005).
34. Frank, A.M. et al. Spectral archives: extending spectral libraries to analyze both identified and unidentified spectra. Nat. Methods 8, 587-591 (2011).
35. Huang, Y. et al. A data-mining scheme for identifying peptide structural motifs responsible for different MS/MS fragmentation intensity patterns. J. Proteome Res. 7, 70-79 (2008).
36. Lemeer, S. & Heck, A.J. The phosphoproteomics data explosion. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 414-420 (2009).
37. Baker, P.R., Trinidad, J.C. & Chalkley, R.J. Modification site localization scoring integrated into a search engine. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M111.008078 (2011).
38. Chalkley, R.J. & Clauser, K.R. Modification site localization scoring: strategies and performance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 3-14 (2012).
39. Kelstrup, C.D., Hekmat, O., Francavilla, C. & Olsen, J.V. Pinpointing phosphorylation sites: quantitative filtering and a novel site-specific x-ion fragment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 2937-2948 (2011).
40. Krokhin, O.V. & Spicer, V. Peptide retention standards and hydrophobicity indexes in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of peptides. Anal. Chem. 81, 9522-9530 (2009).
41. Conrads, T.P., Anderson, G.A., Veenstra, T.D., Pasa-Tolic, L. & Smith, R.D. Utility of accurate mass tags for proteome-wide protein identification. Anal. Chem. 72, 3349-3354 (2000).
42. Moruz, L. et al. Chromatographic retention time prediction for posttranslationally modified peptides. Proteomics 12, 1151-1159 (2012).
43. Moruz, L., Tomazela, D. & Kall, L. Training, selection, and robust calibration of retention time models for targeted proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5209-5216 (2010).
44. Geromanos, S.J. et al. The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS. Proteomics 9, 1683-1695 (2009).
45. Hoaglund-Hyzer, C.S., Li, J. & Clemmer, D.E. Mobility labeling for parallel CID of ion mixtures. Anal. Chem. 72, 2737-2740 (2000).
46. Thingholm, T.E., Jensen, O.N. & Larsen, M.R. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 9, 1451-1468 (2009).
47. Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R.F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132 (1982).
48. Zhou, H. et al. Robust phosphoproteome enrichment using monodisperse microsphere-based immobilized titanium (IV) ion affinity chromatography. Nat. Protoc. 8, 461-480 (2013).