Technologies and challenges in large-scale phosphoproteomics

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 910-931

  Engholm Keller, Kasper ^a,b,c   Larsen, Martin R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Enrichment; Fractionation; Mass spectrometry; Phosphoproteomics; Protein phosphorylation; Technology

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; ISOPROTEIN; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRYPSIN;

APOPTOSIS; BIOSTATISTICS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DERIVATIZATION; HUMAN; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, AFFINITY; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84874964821     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200484     Document Type: Review

References (165)

1. Cozzone, A. J., Protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1988, 42, 97-125.
2. Manning, G., Plowman, G. D., Hunter, T., Sudarsanam, S., Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 514-520.
3. Johnson, L. N., Barford, D., The Effects of phosphorylation on the structure and function of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1993, 22, 199-232.
4. Hunter, T., Signaling-2000 and beyond. Cell 2000, 100, 113-127.
5. Hunter, T., Sefton, B. M., Transforming gene product of Rous sarcoma virus phosphorylates tyrosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 1311-1315.
6. Olsen, J. V., Blagoev, B., Gnad, F., Macek, B. etal., Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127, 635-648.
7. Barford, D., Molecular mechanisms of the protein serine/threonine phosphatases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996, 21, 407-412.
8. Zhang, Z. Y., Protein tyrosine phosphatases: structure and function, substrate specificity, and inhibitor development. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 209-234.
9. MacKintosh, C., in: Hardie, G. D. (Ed.), Protein Phosphorylation: A Practical Approach, IRL Press, New York, NY 1993, p. 328.
10. Thingholm, T. E., Larsen, M. R., Ingrell, C. R., Kassem, M. etal., TiO(2)-based phosphoproteomic analysis of the plasma membrane and the effects of phosphatase inhibitor treatment. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3304-3313.
11. Laub, M. T., Goulian, M., Specificity in two-component signal transduction pathways. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007, 41, 121-145.
12. Elsholz, A. K., Turgay, K., Michalik, S., Hessling, B. etal., Global impact of protein arginine phosphorylation on the physiology of Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7451-7456.
13. Fuhrmann, J., Schmidt, A., Spiess, S., Lehner, A. etal., McsB is a protein arginine kinase that phosphorylates and inhibits the heat-shock regulator CtsR. Science (New York, NY) 2009, 324, 1323-1327.
14. Tarrant, M. K., Cole, P. A., The chemical biology of protein phosphorylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 797-825.
15. Pawson, T., Nash, P., Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1027-1047.
16. Pitcher, J. A., Freedman, N. J., Lefkowitz, R. J., G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 653-692.
17. Schlessinger, J., Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2000, 103, 211-225.
18. Keshet, Y., Seger, R., The MAP kinase signaling cascades: a system of hundreds of components regulates a diverse array of physiological functions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 661, 3-38.
19. Jordan, J. D., Landau, E. M., Iyengar, R., Signaling networks: the origins of cellular multitasking. Cell 2000, 103, 193-200.
20. Annan, R. S., Carr, S. A., Phosphopeptide analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3413-3421.
21. Lehmann, W. D., Kruger, R., Salek, M., Hung, C. W. etal., Neutral loss-based phosphopeptide recognition: a collection of caveats. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2866-2873.
22. Covey, T., Shushan, B., Bonner, R., Schröder, W. etal., in: Jörnvall, H. (Ed.), Methods in Protein Sequence Analysis, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland 1991, pp. 249-256.
23. Beausoleil, S. A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J. E. etal., Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12130-12135.
24. Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., Schwartz, J. C., Hunt, D. F. etal., A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 3590-3598.
25. Villen, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Gygi, S. P., Evaluation of the utility of neutral-loss-dependent MS3 strategies in large-scale phosphorylation analysis. Proteomics 2008, 8, 4444-4452.
26. Ulintz, P. J., Yocum, A. K., Bodenmiller, B., Aebersold, R. etal., Comparison of MS(2)-only, MSA, and MS(2)/MS(3) methodologies for phosphopeptide identification. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 887-899.
27. Nakayasu, E. S., Gaynor, M. R., Sobreira, T. J., Ross, J. A. etal., Phosphoproteomic analysis of the human pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi at the epimastigote stage. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3489-3506.
28. Timm, W., Ozlu, N., Steen, J. J., Steen, H., Effect of high-accuracy precursor masses on phosphopeptide identification from MS3 spectra. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3977-3980.
29. Olsen, J. V., Schwartz, J. C., Griep-Raming, J., Nielsen, M. L. etal., A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2759-2769.
30. Jedrychowski, M. P., Huttlin, E. L., Haas, W., Sowa, M. E. etal., Evaluation of HCD- and CID-type fragmentation within their respective detection platforms for murine phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M111 009910.
31. Frese, C. K., Altelaar, A. F., Hennrich, M. L., Nolting, D. etal., Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2377-2388.
32. Nagaraj, N., D'Souza, R. C., Cox, J., Olsen, J. V. etal., Feasibility of large-scale phosphoproteomics with higher energy collisional dissociation fragmentation. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6786-6794.
33. Phanstiel, D. H., Brumbaugh, J., Wenger, C. D., Tian, S. etal., Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 821-827.
34. Syka, J. E. P., Coon, J. J., Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J. etal., Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9528-9533.
35. Good, D. M., Wirtala, M., McAlister, G. C., Coon, J. J., Performance characteristics of electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1942-1951.
36. Larsen, M. R., Sorensen, G. L., Fey, S. J., Larsen, P. M. etal., Phospho-proteomics: evaluation of the use of enzymatic de-phosphorylation and differential mass spectrometric peptide mass mapping for site specific phosphorylation assignment in proteins separated by gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2001, 1, 223-238.
37. Olsen, J. V., Vermeulen, M., Santamaria, A., Kumar, C. etal., Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra3.
38. Dephoure, N., Zhou, C., Villen, J., Beausoleil, S. A. etal., A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10762-10767.
39. Tan, C. S., Pasculescu, A., Lim, W. A., Pawson, T. etal., Positive selection of tyrosine loss in metazoan evolution. Science (New York, NY) 2009, 325, 1686-1688.
40. Knight, Z. A., Schilling, B., Row, R. H., Kenski, D. M. etal., Phosphospecific proteolysis for mapping sites of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1047-1054.
41. Oda, Y., Nagasu, T., Chait, B. T., Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 379-382.
42. Wells, L., Vosseller, K., Cole, R. N., Cronshaw, J. M. etal., Mapping sites of O-GlcNAc modification using affinity tags for serine and threonine post-translational modifications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 791-804.
43. Li, W., Backlund, P. S., Boykins, R. A., Wang, G. etal., Susceptibility of the hydroxyl groups in serine and threonine to beta-elimination/Michael addition under commonly used moderately high-temperature conditions. Anal. Biochem. 2003, 323, 94-102.
44. Zhou, H. L., Watts, J. D., Aebersold, R., A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 375-378.
45. Tao, W. A., Wollscheid, B., O'Brien, R., Eng, J. K. etal., Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a dendrimer conjugation chemistry and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 591-598.
46. Bodenmiller, B., Mueller, L. N., Mueller, M., Domon, B. etal., Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 231-237.
47. Andersson, L., Porath, J., Isolation of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal (Fe3+) affinity chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 1986, 154, 250-254.
48. Neville, D. C., Rozanas, C. R., Price, E. M., Gruis, D. B. etal., Evidence for phosphorylation of serine 753 in CFTR using a novel metal-ion affinity resin and matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 2436-2445.
49. Posewitz, M. C., Tempst, P., Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2883-2892.
50. Jensen, S. S., Larsen, M. R., Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 3635-3645.
51. Ficarro, S. B., McCleland, M. L., Stukenberg, P. T., Burke, D. J. etal., Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 301-305.
52. Xu, C. F., Lu, Y., Ma, J., Mohammadi, M. etal., Identification of phosphopeptides by MALDI Q-TOF MS in positive and negative ion modes after methyl esterification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 809-818.
53. He, T., Alving, K., Feild, B., Norton, J. etal., Quantitation of phosphopeptides using affinity chromatography and stable isotope labeling. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 363-373.
54. Gruhler, A., Olsen, J. V., Mohammed, S., Mortensen, P. etal., Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 310-327.
55. Villen, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Gerber, S. A., Gygi, S. P., Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1488-1493.
56. McNulty, D. E., Annan, R. S., Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 971-980.
57. Trinidad, J. C., Specht, C. G., Thalhammer, A., Schoepfer, R. etal., Comprehensive identification of phosphorylation sites in postsynaptic density preparations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 914-922.
58. Kuroda, I., Shintani, Y., Motokawa, M., Abe, S. et al., Phosphopeptide-selective column-switching RP-HPLC with a titania precolumn. Anal. Sci. 2004, 20, 1313-1319.
59. Pinkse, M. W. H., Uitto, P. M., Hilhorst, M. J., Ooms, B. etal., Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 3935-3943.
60. Sano, A., Nakamura, H., Chemo-affinity of titania for the column-switching HPLC analysis of phosphopeptides. Anal. Sci. 2004, 20, 565-566.
61. Larsen, M. R., Thingholm, T. E., Jensen, O. N., Roepstorff, P. etal., Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 873-886.
62. 2 from aqueous solutions: an in situ internal reflection infrared spectroscopic study. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2916-2921.
63. Dobson, K. D., McQuillan, A. J., In situ infrared spectroscopic analysis of the adsorption of aromatic carboxylic acids to TiO2, ZrO2, Al2O3, and Ta2O5 from aqueous solutions. Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2000, 56, 557-565.
64. Sugiyama, N., Masuda, T., Shinoda, K., Nakamura, A. etal., Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxy acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LC-MS/MS in proteomics applications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1103-1109.
65. Wilson-Grady, J. T., Villen, J., Gygi, S. P., Phosphoproteome analysis of fission yeast. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1088-1097.
66. Delcourt, N., Thouvenot, E., Chanrion, B., Galeotti, N. etal., PACAP type I receptor transactivation is essential for IGF-1 receptor signalling and antiapoptotic activity in neurons. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 1542-1551.
67. Molina, H., Horn, D. M., Tang, N., Mathivanan, S. etal., Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2199-2204.
68. Baker, C. L., Kettenbach, A. N., Loros, J. J., Gerber, S. A. etal, Quantitative proteomics reveals a dynamic interactome and phase-specific phosphorylation in the Neurospora circadian clock. Mol. Cell 2009, 34, 354-363.
69. Engholm-Keller, K., Birck, P., Storling, J., Pociot, F. etal., TiSH-a robust and sensitive global phosphoproteomics strategy employing a combination of TiO(2), SIMAC, and HILIC. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 5749-5761.
70. Palmisano, G., Parker, B. L., Engholm-Keller, K., Lendal, S. E. etal., A novel method for the simultaneous enrichment, identification and quantification of phosphopeptides and sialylated glycopeptides applied to a temporal profile of mouse brain development. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, 1191-1202.
71. Engholm-Keller, K., Hansen, T. A., Palmisano, G., Larsen, M. R., Multidimensional strategy for sensitive phosphoproteomics incorporating protein prefractionation combined with SIMAC, HILIC, and TiO(2) chromatography applied to proximal EGF signaling. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5383-5397.
72. Lemeer, S., Pinkse, M. W., Mohammed, S., van Breukelen, B. etal., Online automated in vivo zebrafish phosphoproteomics: from large-scale analysis down to a single embryo. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1555-1564.
73. 2-reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography phosphochip coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 824-832.
74. Van Hoof, D., Munoz, J., Braam, S. R., Pinkse, M. W. etal., Phosphorylation dynamics during early differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell 2009, 5, 214-226.
75. Thingholm, T. E., Jensen, O. N., Robinson, P. J., Larsen, M. R., SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 661-671.
76. Pan, J., Naumann-Busch, B., Wang, L., Specht, M. etal., Protein phosphorylation is a key event of flagellar disassembly revealed by analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins during flagellar shortening in Chlamydomonas. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3830-3839.
77. Verano-Braga, T., Schwammle, V., Sylvester, M., Passos-Silva, D. G. etal., Time-resolved quantitative phosphoproteomics: new insights into angiotensin-(1-7) signaling networks in human endothelial cells. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 3370-3381.
78. Gronborg, M., Kristiansen, T. Z., Stensballe, A., Andersen, J. S. etal., A mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach for identification of serine/threonine-phosphorylated proteins by enrichment with phospho-specific antibodies - Identification of a novel protein, Frigg, as a protein kinase A substrate. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 517-527.
79. Ibarrola, N., Kalume, D. E., Gronborg, M., Iwahori, A. etal., A proteomic approach for quantitation of phosphorylation using stable isotope labeling in cell culture. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6043-6049.
80. Blagoev, B., Ong, S. E., Kratchmarova, I., Mann, M., Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1139-1145.
81. Rush, J., Moritz, A., Lee, K. A., Guo, A. etal., Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 94-101.
82. Zhang, Y., Wolf-Yadlin, A., Ross, P. L., Pappin, D. J. etal., Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1240-1250.
83. Schmelzle, K., Kane, S., Gridley, S., Lienhard, G. E. etal., Temporal dynamics of tyrosine phosphorylation in insulin signaling. Diabetes 2006, 55, 2171-2179.
84. Boersema, P. J., Foong, L. Y., Ding, V. M., Lemeer, S. etal., In-depth qualitative and quantitative profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation using a combination of phosphopeptide immunoaffinity purification and stable isotope dimethyl labeling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 84-99.
85. Doucette, A. A., Tran, J. C., Wall, M. J., Fitzsimmons, S., Intact proteome fractionation strategies compatible with mass spectrometry. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2011, 8, 787-800.
86. Manadas, B., Mendes, V. M., English, J., Dunn, M. J., Peptide fractionation in proteomics approaches. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7, 655-663.
87. Stensballe, A., Andersen, S., Jensen, O. N., Characterization of phosphoproteins from electrophoretic gels by nanoscale Fe(III) affinity chromatography with off-line mass spectrometry analysis. Proteomics 2001, 1, 207-222.
88. Beranova-Giorgianni, S., Zhao, Y., Desiderio, D. M., Giorgianni, F., Phosphoproteomic analysis of the human pituitary. Pituitary 2006, 9, 109-120.
89. Nuhse, T. S., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N., Peck, S. C., Large-scale analysis of in vivo phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2003, 2, 1234-1243.
90. Alpert, A. J., Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 62-76.
91. Wisniewski, J. R., Nagaraj, N., Zougman, A., Gnad, F. etal., Brain phosphoproteome obtained by a FASP-based method reveals plasma membrane protein topology. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 3280-3289.
92. Song, C., Ye, M., Han, G., Jiang, X. etal., Reversed-phase-reversed-phase liquid chromatography approach with high orthogonality for multidimensional separation of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 53-56.
93. Masuda, T., Sugiyama, N., Tomita, M., Ishihama, Y., Microscale phosphoproteome analysis of 10, 000 cells from human cancer cell lines. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 7698-7703.
94. Di Palma, S., Boersema, P. J., Heck, A. J., Mohammed, S., Zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (ZIC-HILIC and ZIC-cHILIC) provide high resolution separation and increase sensitivity in proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 3440-3447.
95. Ficarro, S. B., Zhang, Y., Carrasco-Alfonso, M. J., Garg, B. etal., Online nanoflow multidimensional fractionation for high efficiency phosphopeptide analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, O111 011064.
96. Spackman, D. H., Stein, W. H., Moore, S., Automatic recording apparatus for use in the chromatography of amino acids. Anal. Chem. 1958, 30, 1190-1206.
97. Waterborg, J. H., Matthews, H. R., The Lowry method for protein quantitation. Methods Mol. Biol. 1994, 32, 1-4.
98. Palmisano, G., Thingholm, T. E., Strategies for quantitation of phosphoproteomic data. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7, 439-456.
99. Michalski, A., Cox, J., Mann, M., More than 100, 000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1785-1793.
100. Nairn, J., Krell, T., Coggins, J. R., Pitt, A. R. etal., The use of mass spectrometry to examine the formation and hydrolysis of the phosphorylated form of phosphoglycerate mutase. FEBS Lett. 1995, 359, 192-194.
101. Napper, S., Kindrachuk, J., Olson, D. J., Ambrose, S. J. etal., Selective extraction and characterization of a histidine-phosphorylated peptide using immobilized copper(II) ion affinity chromatography and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1741-1747.
102. Kleinnijenhuis, A. J., Kjeldsen, F., Kallipolitis, B., Haselmann, K. F. etal., Analysis of histidine phosphorylation using tandem MS and ion-electron reactions. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 7450-7456.
103. Lapek, J. D., Jr., Tombline, G., Friedman, A. E., Mass spectrometry detection of histidine phosphorylation on NM23-H1. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 751-755.
104. Larsen, M. R., Graham, M. E., Robinson, P. J., Roepstorff, P., Improved detection of hydrophilic phosphopeptides using graphite powder microcolumns and mass spectrometry-evidence for in vivo doubly phosphorylated dynamin I and dynamin III. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 456-465.
105. Gauci, S., Helbig, A. O., Slijper, M., Krijgsveld, J. etal., Lys-N and trypsin cover complementary parts of the phosphoproteome in a refined SCX-based approach. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 4493-4501.
106. Swaney, D. L., Wenger, C. D., Coon, J. J., Value of using multiple proteases for large-scale mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1323-1329.
107. Tran, B. Q., Hernandez, C., Waridel, P., Potts, A. etal., Addressing trypsin bias in large scale (phospho)proteome analysis by size exclusion chromatography and secondary digestion of large post-trypsin peptides. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 800-811.
108. Wisniewski, J. R., Mann, M., Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 2631-2637.
109. Bian, Y., Ye, M., Song, C., Cheng, K. etal., Improve the coverage for the analysis of phosphoproteome of HeLa cells by a tandem digestion approach. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 2828-2837.
110. Gilmore, J. M., Kettenbach, A. N., Gerber, S. A., Increasing phosphoproteomic coverage through sequential digestion by complementary proteases. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 402, 711-720.
111. Elias, J. E., Haas, W., Faherty, B. K., Gygi, S. P., Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 667-675.
112. Yost, R. A., Enke, C. G., Selected ion fragmentation with a tandem quadrupole mass-spectrometer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2274-2275.
113. Anderson, L., Hunter, C. L., Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 573-588.
114. Gallien, S., Duriez, E., Domon, B., Selected reaction monitoring applied to proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 46, 298-312.
115. Wolf-Yadlin, A., Hautaniemi, S., Lauffenburger, D. A., White, F. M., Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5860-5865.
116. Gunning, P. W., Protein Isoforms and Isozymes, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ 2001.
117. Nilsen, T. W., Graveley, B. R., Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature 2010, 463, 457-463.
118. Chan, L. S., Hansra, G., Robinson, P. J., Graham, M. E., Differential phosphorylation of dynamin I isoforms in subcellular compartments demonstrates the hidden complexity of phosphoproteomes. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 4028-4037.
119. Siuti, N., Kelleher, N. L., Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 817-821.
120. Armirotti, A., Damonte, G., Achievements and perspectives of top-down proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10, 3566-3576.
121. Tran, J. C., Zamdborg, L., Ahlf, D. R., Lee, J. E. etal., Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics. Nature 2011, 480, 254-258.
122. White, F. M., The potential cost of high-throughput proteomics. Sci. Signal 2011, 4, pe8.
123. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
124. Moore, R. E., Young, M. K., Lee, T. D., Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2002, 13, 378-386.
125. Hu, Q. Z., Noll, R. J., Li, H. Y., Makarov, A. etal., The Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 40, 430-443.
126. Scigelova, M., Makarov, A., Orbitrap mass analyzer-overview and applications in proteomics. Proteomics 2006, 6, 16-21.
127. Cox, J., Mann, M., MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367-1372.
128. Choudhary, C., Olsen, J. V., Brandts, C., Cox, J. etal., Mislocalized activation of oncogenic RTKs switches downstream signaling outcomes. Mol. Cell 2009, 36, 326-339.
129. Gnad, F., de Godoy, L. M., Cox, J., Neuhauser, N. etal., High-accuracy identification and bioinformatic analysis of in vivo protein phosphorylation sites in yeast. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4642-4652.
130. Cooper, B., The problem with Peptide presumption and low mascot scoring. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1432-1435.
131. Shen, Y., Tolic, N., Hixson, K. K., Purvine, S. O. etal., Proteome-wide identification of proteins and their modifications with decreased ambiguities and improved false discovery rates using unique sequence tags. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1871-1882.
132. Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., Heck, A. J., Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 44, 861-878.
133. Hermjakob, H., The HUPO proteomics standards initiative-overcoming the fragmentation of proteomics data. Proteomics 2006, 6(Suppl 2), 34-38.
134. Olsen, J. V., Mann, M., Effective representation and storage of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data sets for the scientific community. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, pe7.
135. Kremer, A., Schneider, R., Terstappen, G. C., A bioinformatics perspective on proteomics: data storage, analysis, and integration. Biosci. Rep. 2005, 25, 95-106.
136. Pan, C., Olsen, J. V., Daub, H., Mann, M., Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2796-2808.
137. Wu, C. J., Chen, Y. W., Tai, J. H., Chen, S. H., Quantitative phosphoproteomics studies using stable isotope dimethyl labeling coupled with IMAC-HILIC-nanoLC-MS/MS for estrogen-induced transcriptional regulation. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1088-1097.
138. Lemeer, S., Jopling, C., Gouw, J., Mohammed, S. etal., Comparative phosphoproteomics of zebrafish Fyn/Yes morpholino knockdown embryos. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 2176-2187.
139. Ting, L., Cowley, M. J., Hoon, S. L., Guilhaus, M. etal., Normalization and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data generated by metabolic labeling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2227-2242.
140. Smyth, G. K., Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 3, 1544-6115.
141. Margolin, A. A., Ong, S. E., Schenone, M., Gould, R. etal., Empirical Bayes analysis of quantitative proteomics experiments. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7454.
142. Carvalho, P. C., Fischer, J. S., Perales, J., Yates, J. R. etal., Analyzing marginal cases in differential shotgun proteomics. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 275-276.
143. Shen, C., Li, L., Chen, J. Y., A statistical framework to discover true associations from multiprotein complex pull-down proteomics data sets. Proteins 2006, 64, 436-443.
144. Gillet, L. C., Navarro, P., Tate, S., Rost, H. etal., Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, O111 016717.
145. Peterson, A. C., Russell, J. D., Bailey, D. J., Westphall, M. S. etal., Parallel reaction monitoring for high resolution and high mass accuracy quantitative, targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, 1475-1488.
146. Venable, J. D., Dong, M. Q., Wohlschlegel, J., Dillin, A. etal., Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat. Methods 2004, 1, 39-45.
147. Geromanos, S. J., Vissers, J. P., Silva, J. C., Dorschel, C. A. etal., The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1683-1695.
148. Weisbrod, C. R., Eng, J. K., Hoopmann, M. R., Baker, T. etal., Accurate peptide fragment mass analysis: multiplexed peptide identification and quantification. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 1621-1632.
149. Panchaud, A., Scherl, A., Shaffer, S. A., von Haller, P. D. etal., Precursor acquisition independent from ion count: how to dive deeper into the proteomics ocean. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 6481-6488.
150. Cantin, G. T., Venable, J. D., Cociorva, D., Yates, J. R., III, Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of the tumor necrosis factor pathway. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 127-134.
151. Rinschen, M. M., Yu, M. J., Wang, G., Boja, E. S. etal., Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals vasopressin V2-receptor-dependent signaling pathways in renal collecting duct cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 3882-3887.
152. Zhang, G., Spellman, D. S., Skolnik, E. Y., Neubert, T. A., Quantitative phosphotyrosine proteomics of EphB2 signaling by stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 581-588.
153. Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R. A., The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57-70.
154. Pan, C., Kumar, C., Bohl, S., Klingmueller, U. etal., Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 443-450.
155. Lee, J., Kotliarova, S., Kotliarov, Y., Li, A. etal., Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 391-403.
156. Malik, R., Dulla, K., Nigg, E. A., Korner, R., From proteome lists to biological impact-tools and strategies for the analysis of large MS data sets. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1270-1283.
157. Linding, R., Jensen, L. J., Pasculescu, A., Olhovsky, M. etal., NetworKIN: a resource for exploring cellular phosphorylation networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D695-D699.
158. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D. etal., Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25-29.
159. Apweiler, R., Attwood, T. K., Bairoch, A., Bateman, A. etal., The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 37-40.
160. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., Okuno, Y. etal., The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D277-D280.
161. Cao, L., Yu, K., Banh, C., Nguyen, V. etal., Quantitative time-resolved phosphoproteomic analysis of mast cell signaling. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5864-5876.
162. Ogata, H., Goto, S., Sato, K., Fujibuchi, W. etal., KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 29-34.
163. von Mering, C., Jensen, L. J., Snel, B., Hooper, S. D. etal., STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D433-D437.
164. Aranda, B., Achuthan, P., Alam-Faruque, Y., Armean, I. etal., The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D525-D531.
165. Keshava Prasad, T. S., Goel, R., Kandasamy, K., Keerthikumar, S. etal., Human protein reference database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D767-D772.