Yeast Systems Biology: Towards a Systems Understanding of Regulation of Eukaryotic Networks in Complex Diseases and Biotechnology

Handbook of Systems Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 343-365

  Castrillo, Juan I ^a   Pir, Pinar ^a   Oliver, Stephen G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882928957     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385944-0.00018-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (307)

1. Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409:860-921.
2. Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001, 291:1304-1351.
3. Alberts B. Lessons from genomics. Science 2011, 331:511.
4. Heard E., Tishkoff S., Todd J.A., Vidal M., Wagner G.P., Wang J., et al. Ten years of genetics and genomics: what have we achieved and where are we heading?. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:723-733.
5. Gonzaga-Jauregui C., Lupski J.R., Gibbs R.A. Human genome sequencing in health and disease. Annu Rev Med 2012, 63:35-61.
6. Marshall E. Human genome 10th anniversary. Waiting for the revolution. Science 2011, 331:526-529.
7. Vidal M., Cusick M.E., Barabási A.L. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011, 144:986-998.
8. Hayden E.C. Human genome at ten: life is complicated. Nature 2010, 464:664-667.
9. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 2010, 467:1061-1073. PubMed PMID: 20981092 http://www.1000genomes.org/.
10. Mills RE, Walter K, Stewart C. et al., 1000 Genomes Project. Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 2011;470(7332):59-65.
11. Bordbar A., Palsson B.O. Using the reconstructed genome-scale human metabolic network to study physiology and pathology. J Intern Med 2012, 271:131-141.
12. Stobbe M.D., Houten S.M., Jansen G.A., et al. Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:165.
13. Barabási A.L., Gulbahce N., Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011, 12:56-68.
14. Liu, Y. Y., Slotine, J. J., Barabási, A. L. (2011). Liu et al. reply to: Müller, F. J., Schuppert, A. (2011) Few inputs can reprogram biological networks. Nature 478, E4; discussion E4-E5.
15. Alberts B. A grand challenge in biology. Science 2011, 333:1200.
16. Castrillo J.I., Oliver S.G. Yeast systems biology: the challenge of eukaryotic complexity. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:3-28. PubMed PMID: 21863478.
17. Castrillo JI, Oliver SG, editors. Yeast Systems Biology. Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 759. (MiMB Series. Editor-in-chief. Prof John M. Walker). New York: Humana Press, Springer; 2011.
18. Darwin C., Wallace A.R. On the Tendency of Species to Form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection. J of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology 1858, 3:46-50.
19. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life 1859, John Murray, London. first ed.
20. Nurse P., Hayles J. The cell in an era of systems biology. Cell 2011, 144:850-854.
21. Travis J. Mysteries of the cell. Science 2011, 334:1046.
22. Dobzhansky T. Biology, molecular and organismic. Am Zool 1964, 4:443-452.
23. Pearson H. Genetics: what is a gene?. Nature 2006, 441:398-401.
24. Pennisi E. Genomics. DNA study forces rethink of what it means to be a gene. Science 2007, 316:1556-1557. PubMed PMID: 17569836.
25. Pang C.P., Baum L., Lam D.S. Hunting for disease genes in multi-functional diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000, 38:819-825.
26. DeFrancesco L. Life technologies promises $1,000 genome. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:126. PubMed PMID: 22318022.
27. Casals F., Idaghdour Y., Hussin J., et al. Next-generation sequencing approaches for genetic mapping of complex diseases. J Neuroimmunol 2012, 248(1-2):10-22.
28. Ku C.S., Cooper D.N., Polychronakos C., et al. Exome sequencing: dual role as a discovery and diagnostic tool. Ann Neurol 2012, 71:5-14. PubMed PMID: 22275248.
29. Calvo S.E., Compton A.G., Hershman S.G., et al. Molecular diagnosis of infantile mitochondrial disease with targeted next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med 2012, 4. 118ra10.
30. Choi M., Scholl U.I., Ji W., et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:19096-19101. PubMed PMID: 19861545.
31. Davies K. Hugh Rienhoff's voyage round his daughter's DNA 2010, Bio-IT World Sept-Oct 2010. http://www.bio-itworld.com/BioIT_Article.aspx%3Fid%3D101664.
32. Maher B. Personal genomics: his daughter's DNA. Nature 2007, 449:773-776.
33. Mayer A.N., Dimmock D.P., Arca M.J., et al. A timely arrival for genomic medicine. Genet Med 2011, 13:195-196.
34. Worthey E.A., Mayer A.N., Syverson G.D., et al. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease. Genet Med 2011, 13:255-262.
35. Auffray C., Caulfield T., Khoury M.J., et al. Looking back at genomic medicine in 2011. Genome Med 2012, 4(1):9.
36. Gilissen C., Hoischen A., Brunner H.G., et al. Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2012, 20:490-497.
37. Li M.X., Gui H.S., Kwan J.S., et al. A comprehensive framework for prioritizing variants in exome sequencing studies of Mendelian diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(7):e53.
38. Puffenberger E.G., Jinks R.N., Sougnez C. Genetic mapping and exome sequencing identify variants associated with five novel diseases. PLoS One 2012, 7:e28936.
39. Monico C.G., Milliner D.S. Genetic determinants of urolithiasis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011, 8:151-162.
40. Ahmed N., Dawson M., Smith C., et al. Biology of Disease 2006, Garland Science. Taylor and Francis group, New York.
41. Amberger J., Bocchini C., Hamosh A. A new face and new challenges for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®). Hum Mutat 2011, 32:564-567.
42. Mungall C.J., Gkoutos G.V., Smith C.L., et al. Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol 2010, 11:R2.
43. van Triest H.J., Chen D., Ji X., et al. PhenOMIM: An OMIM-based secondary database purported for phenotypic comparison. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011, 2011:3589-3592.
44. Washington N.L., Haendel M.A., Mungall C.J., et al. Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e1000247.
45. st century systems biology. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583:3891-3894.
46. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295:1662-1664.
47. Nurse P. The great ideas of biology. Clin Med 2003, 3:560-568.
48. Arkin A.P., Schaffer D.V. Network news: innovations in 21st century systems biology. Cell 2011, 144:844-849.
49. Kruger R.P. Systems biology. Cell 2011, 144(827):829.
50. Walhout A.J.M., Aebersold R., Meyer T., et al. Systems biology: what's the next challenge?. Cell 2011, 144(6):837-838.
51. Villoslada P., Baranzini S. Data integration and systems biology approaches for biomarker discovery: challenges and opportunities for multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2012, 2012 Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print].
52. Castrillo J.I., Oliver S.G. Metabolomics and systems biology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental Systems for Basic and Applied Research. Fungal Genomics 2006, vol. XIII:3-18. Berlin: Springer. K. Karl Esser (Ed.).
53. Castrillo J.I., Zeef L.A., Hoyle D.C., et al. Growth control of the eukaryote cell: a systems biology study in yeast. J Biol 2007, 6:4.
54. Klitgord N., Segrè D. The importance of compartmentalization in metabolic flux models: yeast as an ecosystem of organelles. Genome Inform. 2010, 22:41-55.
55. Castrillo J.I., Oliver S.G. Metabolic control in the eukaryotic cell, a systems biology perspective. Yeast Gene Analysis 2007, vol. 36:527-554. Academic Press, London. second ed. I. Stansfield, M.J.R. Stark (Eds.).
56. Alberts B., Johnson A., Lewis J., Raff M., Roberts K., Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2008, Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, New York. 5th edn.
57. Crick F.H. On protein synthesis. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1958, 12:138-163.
58. Crick F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 1970, 227:561-563.
59. Antunes L.C., Davies J.E., Finlay B.B. Chemical signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. F1000 Biol Rep 2011, 3:4.
60. Kohlstedt M., Becker J., Wittmann C. Metabolic fluxes and beyond-systems biology understanding and engineering of microbial metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 88:1065-1075.
61. Castrillo J.I., Oliver S.G. Yeast as a touchstone in post-genomic research: strategies for integrative analysis in functional genomics. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2004, 37:93-106.
62. Rose A.H., Harrison J.S. The Yeasts 1987-1995, vols. 1-6. Academic Press, London, UK.
63. Sherman F. An introduction to the genetics and molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine 1997, 302-325. VCH Publisher Weinheim, Germany. vol. 6. R.A. Meyers (Ed.).
64. Sherman F. Getting started with yeast. Modified from Methods Enzymol 2006, 350:3-41. http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/labs/Sherman-Lab/publications/pdfs/Getting -Started-With-Yeast.pdf.
65. Lehninger A.L. Biochemistry 1975, Worth Publishers, New York. second ed.
66. Fell D.A. Understanding the Control of Metabolism 1997, Portland Press, London.
67. Feldmann H. Yeast: Molecular and Cell Biology 2010, Wiley-VCH.
68. Stansfield I., Stark M.J. Yeast Gene Analysis 2007, Academic Press, London. second ed.
69. Goffeau A., Barrell B.G., Bussey H., et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996, 274(546):563-567.
70. Ramanathan A., Schreiber S.L. Multilevel regulation of growth rate in yeast revealed using systems biology. J Biol 2007, 6:3.
71. Kell D.B., Oliver S.G. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. Bioessays 2004, 26:99-105.
72. Cohen J., Medley G. Stop Working and Start Thinking 2005, Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, New York. second ed.
73. Teitelman R. On the genome, the markets and data. The Deal Economy 2012. The Deal Pipeline 2012, http://www.thedeal.com/thedealeconomy/on-the-genome-the-markets-and-data .php.
74. Balaji S., et al. Comprehensive analysis of combinatorial regulation using the transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. J Mol Biol 2006, 360:213-227.
75. Luscombe N.M., et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004, 431:308-312.
76. Davies J. Regulation, necessity, and the misinterpretation of knockouts. Bioessays 2009, 31:826-830.
77. DeLuna A., Springer M., Kirschner M.W., Kishony R. Need-based up-regulation of protein levels in response to deletion of their duplicate genes. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000347.
78. Gout J.F., Kahn D., Duret L. Paramecium post-genomics consortium. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000944.
79. Pronk J.T. Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:2095-2100.
80. Ferenci T. Regulation by nutrient limitation. Curr Opin Microbiol 1999, 2(2):208-213.
81. Fiechter A., Kappeli 0, Meussdorfer F. Batch and continuous culture. The Yeasts 1987, vol. 2:99-129. Academic Press, London. A. Rose, J.S. Harrison (Eds.).
82. Fiechter A. Continuous cultivation of yeasts. Methods Cell Biol 1975, 11:97-130.
83. Kubitschek H.E. Introduction to Research with Continuous Cultures. Prentice hall biological techniques series 1970, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
84. Hayes A., et al. Hybridization array technology coupled with chemostat culture: tools to interrogate gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods 2002, 26:281-290.
85. Weusthuis R.A., et al. Chemostat cultivation as a tool for studies on sugar transport in yeasts. Microbiol Rev 1994, 58:616-630.
86. Gresham D., et al. The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000303.
87. Käppeli O. Regulation of carbon metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and related yeasts. Adv Microb Physiol 1986, 28:181-209.
88. Käppeli O., Gschwend-Petrik M., Fiechter A. Transient responses of Saccharomyces uvarum to a change of the growth-limiting nutrient in continuous culture. J Gen Microbiol 1985, 131:47-52.
89. Petrik M., Käppeli O., Fiechter A. An expanded concept for the glucose effect in the yeast Saccharomyces uvarum: involvement of short- and long-term regulation. J Gen Microbiol 1983, 129:43-49.
90. van den Brink J., Daran-Lapujade P., Pronk J.T. de Winde JH. New insights into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation switch: dynamic transcriptional response to anaerobicity and glucose-excess. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:100.
91. Rintala E., Jouhten P., Toivari M., Wiebe M.G., Maaheimo H., Penttilä M., et al. Transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to shift from respiratory and respirofermentative to fully fermentative metabolism. OMICS 2011, 15:461-476. (7-8).
92. Bull A.T. The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 37:993-1021. PubMed PMID: 20835748.
93. Dikicioglu D., et al. How yeast re-programmes its transcriptional profile in response to different nutrient impulses. BMC Syst Biol. 2011, 5:148.
94. Winder C.L. Lanthaler K. The use of continuous culture in systems biology investigations. Methods Enzymol 2011, 500:261-275.
95. Jameson D., Verma M., Westerhoof H.V. Methods Enzymol 2011, 500. Academic Press, London.
96. Almaas E. Biological impacts and context of network theory. J Exp Biol 2007, 210(Pt 9):1548-1558.
97. Emmert-Streib F., Dehmer M. Networks for systems biology: conceptual connection of data and function. IET Syst Biol 2011, 5(3):185-207.
98. Kim H., Hu W., et al. Unraveling condition specific gene transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:165.
99. Kim T.Y., Kim H.U., et al. Data integration and analysis of biological networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010, 21:78-84.
100. Liu Y.Y., Slotine J.J., Barabási A.L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 2011, 473:167-173.
101. Cagney, G, Emili, A, editors. Network Biology. Methods and Applications. Methods in Molecular Biology (MiMB Series. Editor-in-chief. Prof. John M. Walker). vol. 781. New York: Humana Press, Springer; 2011. ISBN 978-1-61779-275-5.
102. Lee J.M., Gianchandani E.P., et al. Dynamic analysis of integrated signaling, metabolic, and regulatory networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(5):e1000086.
103. Ideker T., Thorsson V., et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 2001, 292(5518):929-934.
104. Ideker T., Thorsson V., et al. Testing for differentially-expressed genes by maximum-likelihood analysis of microarray data. J Comput Biol 2000, 7(6):805-817.
105. Irizarry R.A., Hobbs B., et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003, 4(2):249-264.
106. Wold, et al. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1987, 2:37-52.
107. Datta S. Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(4):459-466.
108. Gutteridge A., Pir P., et al. Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: a systems biology study in yeast. BMC Biol 2010, 8(1):68.
109. Rutherford A. Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: a GLM Approach 2001, Sage Publ, London.
110. De Sousa Abreu R., Penalva L.O., et al. Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels. Mol Biosyst 2009, 5(12):1512-1526.
111. Griffin T.J., Gygi S.P., et al. Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002, 1(4):323-333.
112. Reich M., Liefeld T., et al. Genepattern 2.0. Nat Genet 2006, 38(5):500-501.
113. Maere S., Heymans K., et al. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(16):3448-3449.
114. Hughes T.R., Marton M.J., et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 2000, 102(1):109-126.
115. Brown J.A., Sherlock G., et al. Global analysis of gene function in yeast by quantitative phenotypic profiling. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2. 2006 0001.
116. Pir P., Kirdar B., et al. Integrative investigation of metabolic and transcriptomic data. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:203.
117. Pir P., et al. The genetic control of growth rate: a systems biology study in yeast. BMC Syst Biol 2012, 6:4.
118. Boer V.M., Crutchfield C.A., et al. Growth-limiting intracellular metabolites in yeast growing under diverse nutrient limitations. Mol Biol Cell 2010, 21(1):198-211.
119. Brauer M.J., Huttenhower C., et al. Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19(1):352-367.
120. Canelas A.B., Harrison N., et al. Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains. Nat Commun 2010, 1:145.
121. Hecker M., Lambeck S., et al. Gene regulatory network inference: data integration in dynamic models - a review. Biosystems 2009, 96(1):86-103.
122. Cooke E.J., Savage R.S., et al. Computational approaches to the integration of gene expression, ChIP-chip and sequence data in the inference of gene regulatory networks. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20(7):863-868.
123. De Smet R., Marchal K. Advantages and limitations of current network inference methods. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010, 8(10):717-729.
124. Geurts P., Irrthum A., et al. Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology. Mol Biosyst 2009, 5(12):1593-1605.
125. Horak C.E., Snyder M. ChIP-chip: a genomic approach for identifying transcription factor binding sites. Methods Enzymol 2002, 350:469-483.
126. Jothi R., Cuddapah S., et al. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(16):5221-5231.
127. Huttenhower C., Mutungu K.T., et al. Detailing regulatory networks through large scale data integration. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(24):3267-3274.
128. Joshi A., Van de Peer Y., et al. Structural and functional organization of RNA regulons in the post-transcriptional regulatory network of yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:9108-9117.
129. Bonneau R. Learning biological networks: from modules to dynamics. Nat Chem Biol 2008, 4(11):658-664.
130. Karlebach G., Shamir R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9(10):770-780.
131. Han J.D., et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004, 430:88-93.
132. Tanay A., Sharan R., et al. Revealing modularity and organization in the yeast molecular network by integrated analysis of highly heterogeneous genome wide data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101(9):2981-2986.
133. Segal E., Shapira M., et al. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet 2003, 34(2):166-176.
134. Tian W., Zhang L.V., et al. Combining guilt-by-association and guilt-by-profiling to predict Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene function. Genome Biol 2008, 9(Suppl. 1):S7.
135. Miller C., Schwalb B., et al. Dynamic transcriptome analysis measures rates of mRNA synthesis and decay in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:458.
136. Jothi R., Balaji S., et al. Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:294.
137. Youn A., Reiss D.J., et al. Learning transcriptional networks from the integration of ChIP-chip and expression data in a non-parametric model. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1879-1886.
138. Li C., Donizelli M., et al. BioModels Database: an enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:92.
139. Murphy K. Bayes Net toolbox for Matlab 2001, Computing science and statistics (pages not specified). http://code.google.com/p/bnt/.
140. Albert R. Bayesian computation with R 2009, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
141. Mussel C., Hopfensitz M., et al. BoolNet - an R package for generation, reconstruction and analysis of Boolean networks. Bioinformatics 2010, 26(10):1378-1380.
142. Myers C.L., Robson D., et al. Discovery of biological networks from diverse functional genomic data. Genome Biol 2005, 6(13):R114.
143. Qin J., Li M.J., et al. ChIP-Array: combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expression data to discover direct/indirect targets of a transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(Web Server issue):W430-W436.
144. Stark C., Breitkreutz B.J., et al. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(Database issue):D698-D704.
145. Reguly T., Breitkreutz A., et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol 2006, 5(4):11.
146. Michaut M., Baryshnikova A., et al. Protein complexes are central in the yeast genetic landscape. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7(2):e1001092.
147. Collins S.R., Kemmeren P., et al. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6(3):439-450.
148. Gentleman R., Huber W. Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data. Genome Biol 2007, 8(10):112.
149. Hakes L., Pinney J.W., et al. Protein-protein interaction networks and biology-what's the connection?. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26(1):69-72.
150. Przulj N. Protein-protein interactions: making sense of networks via graph-theoretic modeling. Bioessays 2011, 33(2):115-123.
151. Sharan R., Ideker T. Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24(4):427-433.
152. Browne F., Zheng H., Wang H., Azuaje F. From Experimental Approaches to Computational Techniques: A Review on the Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions. Advances in Artificial Intelligence 2010, Volume 2010, Article ID 924529, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/924529.
153. Ge H., Liu Z., et al. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 2001, 29(4):482-486.
154. Liu Y., Zhao H. A computational approach for ordering signal transduction pathway components from genomics and proteomics Data. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:158.
155. Han K., Ju B.H., et al. WebInterViewer: visualizing and analyzing molecular interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Web Server issue):W89-W95.
156. Lee K., Chuang H.Y., et al. Protein networks markedly improve prediction of subcellular localization in multiple eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(20):e136.
157. Scott M.S., Calafell S.J., et al. Refining protein subcellular localization. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1(6):e66.
158. Cho Y.R., Shi L., et al. A probabilistic framework to predict protein function from interaction data integrated with semantic knowledge. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:382.
159. Zhao X.M., Wang Y., et al. Gene function prediction using labeled and unlabeled data. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:57.
160. Maraziotis I.A., Dimitrakopoulou K., et al. Growing functional modules from a seed protein via integration of protein interaction and gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:408.
161. Wang Y.C., Chen B.S. Integrated cellular network of transcription regulations and protein-protein interactions. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:20.
162. Stark C., Su T.C., et al. PhosphoGRID: a database of experimentally verified in vivo protein phosphorylation sites from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Database (Oxford) 2010, 2010: bap026.
163. Ptacek J., Devgan G., et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005, 438(7068):679-684.
164. Yachie N., Saito R., et al. Integrative features of the yeast phosphoproteome and protein-protein interaction map. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1001064.
165. Tong A.H., Evangelista M., et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 2001, 294(5550):2364-2368.
166. Schuldiner M., Collins S.R., et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 2005, 123(3):507-519.
167. Decourty L., Saveanu C., et al. Linking functionally related genes by sensitive and quantitative characterization of genetic interaction profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105(15):5821-5826.
168. Linden R.O., Eronen V.P., et al. Quantitative maps of genetic interactions in yeast - comparative evaluation and integrative analysis. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:45.
169. Park C.Y., Hess D.C., et al. Simultaneous genome-wide inference of physical, genetic, regulatory, and functional pathway components. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6(11):e1001009.
170. Aho T., Almusa H., et al. Reconstruction and validation of RefRec: a global model for the yeast molecular interaction network. PLoS One 2010, 5(5):e10662.
171. Nookaew I., et al. Genome-scale metabolic models of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:445-463.
172. Schwartz J.M., Gaugain C. Genome-scale integrative data analysis and modeling of dynamic processes in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:427-443. PubMed PMID: 21863501.
173. Bruggeman F.J., Westerhoff H.V. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol 2007, 15(1):45-50.
174. Chou I.C., Voit E.O. Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. Math Biosci 2009, 219(2):57-83.
175. Klipp E. Modelling dynamic processes in yeast. Yeast 2007, 24(11):943-959.
176. Costa R.S., Machado D., Rocha I., Ferreira E.C. Critical perspective on the consequences of the limited availability of kinetic data in metabolic dynamic modelling. IET Syst Biol 2011, 5(3):157-163.
177. Feist A.M., Herrgard M.J., et al. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009, 7(2):129-143.
178. Forster J., Famili I., et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 2003, 13(2):244-253.
179. Lee J.M., Gianchandani E.P., et al. Flux balance analysis in the era of metabolomics. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7(2):140-150.
180. Varma A., Palsson B.O. Metabolic flux balancing: basic concepts, scientific and practical use. Bio/Technology 1994, 12:994-998.
181. Orth J.D., Thiele I., et al. What is flux balance analysis?. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28(3):245-248.
182. Reed J.L., Senger R.S., et al. Computational approaches in metabolic engineering. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010, 2010:207414.
183. Hucka M., Finney A., et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(4):524-531.
184. Li J., Min R., et al. Exploiting the determinants of stochastic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genome-wide prediction of expression noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(23):10472-10477.
185. Becker S.A., Feist A.M., et al. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA toolbox. Nat Protoc 2007, 2(3):727-738.
186. Keating S.M., Bornstein B.J., et al. SBMLToolbox: an SBML toolbox for MATLAB users. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(10):1275-1277.
187. Cvijovic M., Olivares-Hernandez R., et al. BioMet Toolbox: genome-wide analysis of metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Web Server issue):W144-W149.
188. Mendes P., Hoops S., et al. Computational modeling of biochemical networks using COPASI. Methods Mol Biol 2009, 500:17-59.
189. Famili I., Forster J., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(23):13134-13139.
190. McGary K.L., Lee I., et al. Broad network-based predictability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene loss-of-function phenotypes. Genome Biol 2007, 8(12):R258.
191. Snitkin E.S., Dudley A.M., et al. Model-driven analysis of experimentally determined growth phenotypes for 465 yeast gene deletion mutants under 16 different conditions. Genome Biol 2008, 9(9):R140.
192. Cakir T., Patil K.R., et al. Integration of metabolome data with metabolic networks reveals reporter reactions. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2:50.
193. Daran-Lapujade P., Jansen M.L., et al. Role of transcriptional regulation in controlling fluxes in central carbon metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A chemostat culture study. J Biol Chem 2004, 279(10):9125-9138.
194. Fazio A., Jewett M.C., et al. Transcription factor control of growth rate dependent genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a threefactor design. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:341.
195. Patil K.R., Nielsen J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102(8):2685-2689.
196. Mintz-Oron S., Aharoni A., et al. 'Network-based prediction of metabolic enzymes' subcellular localization. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(12):i247-252.
197. Becker S.A., Price N.D., et al. Metabolite coupling in genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:111.
198. Burgard A.P., Nikolaev E.V., et al. Flux coupling analysis of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions. Genome Res 2004, 14:301-312.
199. Ruppin E., Papin J.A., et al. Metabolic reconstruction, constraint-based analysis and game theory to probe genome-scale metabolic networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010, 21(4):502-510.
200. Yamada T., Bork P. Evolution of biomolecular networks: lessons from metabolic and protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10(11):791-803.
201. Vargas F.A., Pizarro F., et al. Expanding a dynamic flux balance model of yeast fermentation to genome-scale. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5(1):75.
202. Oberhardt M.A., Palsson B.O., et al. Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:320.
203. Osterlund T., Nookaew I., Nielsen J. Fifteen years of large scale metabolic modeling of yeast: developments and impacts. Biotechnol Adv 2012, 30(5):979-988.
204. King R.D., Rowland J., et al. The automation of science. Science 2009, 324:85-89.
205. Whelan K., et al. Representation, simulation, and hypothesis generation in graph and logical models of biological networks. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:465-482. PubMed PMID: 21863503.
206. Bailey J.E. Complex biology with no parameters. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19(6):503-504.
207. Durek P., Walther D. The integrated analysis of metabolic and protein interaction networks reveals novel molecular organizing principles. BMC Syst Biol 2008, 2:100.
208. Goel A., Li S.S., Wilkins M.R. Four-dimensional visualisation and analysis of protein-protein interaction networks. Proteomics 2011, 11:2672-2682.
209. Li S.S., Xu K., Wilkins M.R. Visualization and analysis of the complexome network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:4744-4756.
210. Isserlin R., El-Badrawi R.A., et al. The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database in PSI-MI 2.5. Database (Oxford) 2011, 2011: baq037. Print 2011.
211. Koh J.L., Ding H., et al. DRYGIN: a database of quantitative genetic interaction networks in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Database issue):D502-507.
212. Salwinski L., Miller C.S., et al. The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Database issue):D449-D451.
213. Kamburov A., Pentchev K., et al. ConsensusPathDB: toward a more complete picture of cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(Database issue):D712-D717.
214. Bruckner S., Huffner F., et al. TORQUE: topology-free querying of protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Web Server issue):W106-108.
215. Reimand J., Tooming L., et al. GraphWeb: mining heterogeneous biological networks for gene modules with functional significance. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(Web Server issue):W452-459.
216. Szklarczyk D., Franceschini A., et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(Database issue):D561-568.
217. Smoot M.E., Ono K., et al. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(3):431-432.
218. Audenaert P., Van Parys T., et al. CyClus3D: a Cytoscape plugin for clustering network motifs in integrated networks. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(11):1587-1588.
219. Kelley B.P., Yuan B., et al. PathBLAST: a tool for alignment of protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Web Server issue):W83-88.
220. Kalaev M., Smoot M., et al. NetworkBLAST: comparative analysis of protein networks. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:594-596.
221. Brohee S., Faust K., et al. NeAT: a toolbox for the analysis of biological networks, clusters, classes and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(Web Server issue):W444-451.
222. Breitkreutz B.J., Stark C., et al. Osprey: a network visualization system. Genome Biol 2003, 4(3):R22.
223. Hu Z., Hung J.H., et al. VisANT 3.5: multi-scale network visualization, analysis and inference based on the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Web Server issue):W115-121.
224. Kozhenkov S., Dubinina Y., et al. BiologicalNetworks 2.0 - an integrative view of genome biology data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:610.
225. Medina I., Carbonell J., et al. Babelomics: an integrative platform for the analysis of transcriptomics, proteomics and genomic data with advanced functional profiling. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Web Server issue):W210-213.
226. Kohler J., Baumbach J., et al. Graph-based analysis and visualization of experimental results with ONDEX. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(11):1383-1390.
227. Chen C.C., et al. PPISearch: a web server for searching homologous protein-protein interactions across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Web Server issue):W369-W375.
228. Bader G.D., Cary M.P., et al. Pathguide: a pathway resource list. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database issue):D504-506.
229. Degenhardt J., Haubrock M., et al. DEEP-a tool for differential expression effector prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35(Web Server issue):W619-624.
230. Hayes A., Castrillo J.I., Oliver S.G., Brass A., Zeef L.A.H Transcript analysis: a microarray approach. Yeast Gene Analysis 2007, vol. 36:189-219. Academic Press, London. second ed. Stansfield, M.J.R. Stark (Eds.).
231. Waern K., Nagalakshmi U., Snyder M. RNA sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:125-132.
232. Picotti P., Bodenmiller B., Mueller L.N., Domon B., Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 2009, 138(4):795-806.
233. Rees J., Lilley K. Enabling technologies for yeast proteome analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:149-178.
234. Barrenas F., Chavali S., Holme P., et al. Network properties of complex human disease genes identified through genome-wide association studies. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8090.
235. Kim Y.A., et al. Identifying causal genes and dysregulated pathways in complex diseases. PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7:e1001095.
236. Schäfer S.A., Machicao F., Fritsche A., et al. New type 2 diabetes risk genes provide new insights in insulin secretion mechanisms. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011, 93(Suppl. 1):S9-S24.
237. Friend S.H. The need for precompetitive integrative bionetwork disease model building. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010, 87:536-539.
238. Cho I., Blaser M.J. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:260-270. PubMed PMID: 22411464.
239. Suhre K., Shin S.Y., Petersen A.K., et al. Human metabolic individuality in biomedical and pharmaceutical research. Nature 2011, 477:54-60.
240. Wang X., Wei X., Thijssen B., et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of protein networks provides insight into human genetic disease. Nat Biotechnol 2012, 30:159-164.
241. Ulitsky I., Krishnamurthy A., Karp R.M., et al. DEGAS: de novo discovery of dysregulated pathways in human diseases. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13367.
242. Agarwal S., Deane C.M., Porter M.A., et al. Revisiting date and party hubs: novel approaches to role assignment in protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000817.
243. Chen R., et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 2012, 148:1293-1307.
244. Wang K., Lee I., Carlson G., et al. Systems biology and the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers. Dis Markers 2010, 28:199-207.
245. Kryndushkin D., Shewmaker F. Modeling ALS and FTLD proteinopathies in yeast: an efficient approach for studying protein aggregation and toxicity. Prion 2011, 5(4):250-257.
246. Bashan A., Bartsch R.P., Kantelhardt J.W., et al. Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function. Nat Commun 2012, 3:702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1705.
247. Alon U. An Introduction to Systems Biology. Design Principles of Biological Circuits. Chapman & Hall/CRC mathematical and computational and biology series 2007, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
248. Lan Y., Mezić I. On the architecture of cell regulation networks. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:37. PubMed PMID: 21362203.
249. Pelet S., Rudolf F., Nadal-Ribelles M., et al. Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal gene expression. Science 2011, 332:732-735.
250. Ferrell J.E. Simple rules for complex processes: new lessons from the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol Cell 2011, 43:497-500.
251. Lee C., Raffaghello L., Brandhorst S., et al. Fasting cycles retard growth of tumors and sensitize a range of cancer cell types to chemotherapy. Sci Transl Med 2012, 4. 124ra27.
252. Chowdhury R., Yeoh K.K., Tian Y.M., et al. The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12:463-469. PubMed PMID: 21460794.
253. McCarthy N. Metabolism: unmasking an oncometabolite. Nat Rev Cancer 2012, 12:229.
254. Xu W., Yang H., Liu Y., et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 2011, 19:17-30.
255. Mayfield J.A., Davies M.W., Dimster-Denk D., et al. Surrogate genetics and metabolic profiling for characterization of human disease alleles. Genetics 2012, 190(4):1309-1323.
256. Munkacsi A.B., Chen F.W., Brinkman M.A., et al. An 'exacerbate-reverse' strategy in yeast identifies histone deacetylase inhibition as a correction for cholesterol and sphingolipid transport defects in human Niemann-Pick type C disease. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:23842-23851.
257. Johnson B.S., McCaffery J.M., Lindquist S., et al. A yeast TDP-43 proteinopathy model: exploring the molecular determinants of TDP-43 aggregation and cellular toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:6439-6444.
258. Treusch S., Hamamichi S., Goodman J.L., et al. Functional links between Aβ toxicity, endocytic trafficking, and Alzheimer's disease risk factors in yeast. Science 2011, 334:1241-1245.
259. Kumita J.R., Johnson R.J., Alcocer M.J., et al. Impact of the native-state stability of human lysozyme variants on protein secretion by Pichia pastoris. FEBS J 2006, 273:711-720.
260. Gruson D., Bodovitz S. Rapid emergence of multimarker strategies in laboratory medicine. Biomarkers 2010, 15:289-296.
261. Jorgensen P., Tyers M., Warner J.R. Forging the factory: ribosome synthesis and growth control in budding yeast. Cell Growth. Control of Cell Size 2004, 329-370. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. M.N. Hall, M. Raff, G. Thomas (Eds.).
262. Przytycka T.M., Andrews J. Systems-biology dissection of eukaryotic cell growth. BMC Biol 2010, 8:62.
263. Li X.C., Schimenti J.C., Tye B.K. Aneuploidy and improved growth are coincident but not causal in a yeast cancer model. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e1000161.
264. Bell S.L., Chiang A.N., Brodsky J.L. Expression of a malarial Hsp70 improves defects in chaperone-dependent activities in ssa1 mutant yeast. PLoS One 2009, 6:e20047.
265. Bilsland E., Pir P., Gutteridge A., et al. Functional expression of parasite drug targets and their human orthologs in yeast. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5:e1320.
266. Breitenbach M., Jazwinski S.M., Laun P, editors. Aging Research in Yeast. Subcellular Biochemistry 2012, vol. 57. Springer, New York, p. 365.
267. Bharadwaj P., Martins R., Macreadie I. Yeast as a model for studying Alzheimer's disease. FEMS Yeast Res 2010, 10:961-969.
268. Lindquist S. Using yeast to understand protein folding diseases: an interview with Susan Lindquist by Kristin Kain. Dis Model Mech 2008, 1:17-19.
269. De Vos A., Anandhakumar J., Van den Brande J., et al. Yeast as a model system to study tau biology. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2011, (2011), Article ID 428970.
270. Mason R.P., Giorgini F. Modeling Huntington disease in yeast: perspectives and future directions. Prion 2011, 5(4):269-276.
271. McGurk L., Bonini N.M. Cell biology. Yeast informs Alzheimer's disease. Science 2011, 334:1212-1213.
272. Ocampo A., Barrientos A. Developing yeast models of human neurodegenerative disorders. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 793:113-127.
273. Zhang N., Bilsland E. Contributions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to understanding mammalian gene function and therapy. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:501-523.
274. Couthouis J., Hart M.P., Shorter J., et al. A yeast functional screen predicts new candidate ALS disease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:20881-20890.
275. Couplan E., Aiyar R.S., Kucharczyk R., et al. A yeast-based assay identifies drugs active against human mitochondrial disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108:11989-11994.
276. Tardiff D.F., Tucci M.L., Caldwell K.A., et al. Different 8-hydroxyquinolines protect models of TDP-43 protein, α-synuclein, and polyglutamine proteotoxicity through distinct mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287:4107-4120.
277. Neef D.W., Turski M.L., Thiele D.J. Modulation of heat shock transcription factor 1 as a therapeutic target for small molecule intervention in neurodegenerative disease. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000291.
278. Park S.K., Pegan S.D., Mesecar A.D., et al. Development and validation of a yeast high-throughput screen for inhibitors of Aβ oligomerization. Dis Model Mech 2011, 4:822-831.
279. Bharucha N., Kumar A. Yeast genomics and drug target identification. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2007, 10:618-634.
280. Andrusiak K., Piotrowski J.S., Boone C. Chemical-genomic profiling: systematic analysis of the cellular targets of bioactive molecules. Bioorg Med Chem 2012, 20:1952-1960.
281. Proctor M., Urbanus M.L., Fung E.L., et al. The automated cell: compound and environment screening system (ACCESS) for chemogenomic screening. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:239-269.
282. De Jong B., Siewers V., Nielsen J. Systems biology of yeast: enabling technology for development of cell factories for production of advanced biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23(4):624-630.
283. Mattanovich D., Branduardi P., Dato L., et al. Recombinant protein production in yeasts. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 824:329-358.
284. Soh K.C., Miskovic L., Hatzimanikatis V. From network models to network responses: integration of thermodynamic and kinetic properties of yeast genome-scale metabolic networks. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:129-143.
285. Kim I.K., Roldão A., Siewers V., et al. A systems-level approach for metabolic engineering of yeast cell factories. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12:228-248.
286. Nielsen J., Pronk J.T. Metabolic engineering, synthetic biology and systems biology. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:103.
287. Da Vinci L. Trattato della pittura. Parte prima/23. Carabba Editore. Manuscript compiled from the originals by F. Melzi. 1540. Leonardo Digital Edition (LDE VU) page 14v. F. Fiorani digital project 1947, University of Virginia. http://www.treatiseonpainting.org/exist/leonardo/pages/vu/0034#chap_top.
288. Oliver S.G. Yeast as a navigational aid in genome analysis. Microbiology 1997, 143:1483-1487.
289. Oliver S.G. Functional genomics: lessons from yeast. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002, 357:17-23.
290. Winzeler E.A., Shoemaker D.D., Astromoff A., et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999, 285:901-906.
291. Giaever G., Chu A.M., Ni L., et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391.
292. MacLellan W.R., Wang Y., Lusis A.J. Systems-based approaches to cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012, 9:172-184.
293. Sperling S.R. Systems biology approaches to heart development and congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 2011, 91:269-278.
294. Antony P.M., Diederich N.J., Balling R. Parkinson's disease mouse models in translational research. Mamm Genome 2011, 22:401-419.
295. Cox B., Kotlyar M., Evangelou A.I., et al. Comparative systems biology of human and mouse as a tool to guide the modeling of human placental pathology. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:279.
296. Mori M.A., Liu M., Bezy O., et al. A systems biology approach identifies inflammatory abnormalities between mouse strains prior to development of metabolic disease. Diabetes 2010, 59:2960-2971.
297. O'Callaghan P.M., James D.C. Systems biotechnology of mammalian cell factories. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomics. 2008, 7:95-110.
298. Stuart L.M., Boulais J., Charriere G.M., et al. A systems biology analysis of the Drosophila phagosome. Nature 2007, 445:95-101.
299. Yu D., Corbett B., Yan Y., et al. Early cerebrovascular inflammation in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 2012, 2012 Mar 20. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 22440674.
300. Goto J.J., Tanzi R.E. The role of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP1) in Alzheimer's A beta generation: development of a cell-based model system. J Mol Neurosci. 2002, 19:37-41.
301. Joyner M.J., Pedersen B.K. Ten questions about systems biology. J Physiol 2011, 589:1017-1030.
302. Antony P.M., Balling R., Vlassis N. From systems biology to systems biomedicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23(4):604-608.
303. Clermont G., Auffray C., Moreau Y., et al. Bridging the gap between systems biology and medicine. Genome Med 2009, 1:88. PubMed PMID: 19754960.
304. McDonald J.F. Integrated cancer systems biology: current progress and future promise. Future Oncol. 2011, 7:599-601.
305. Sansom C., Mendes M., Coveney P. Modelling health and disease. Ingenia 2011, 47:27-32.
306. Viceconti M., Clapworthy G., Van Sint Jan S. The virtual physiological human - a european initiative for in silico human modelling. J Physiol Sci. 2008, 58:441-446.
307. Sansom C., Mendes M., Coveney P. Modelling the virtual physiological human. BioTechnologia. J Biotech, Comput Biol and Bionanotechnol 2011, 92(3):225-229.