Integrated cellular network of transcription regulations and protein-protein interactions

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wang, Yu Chao ^a   Chen, Bor Sen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

PROTEOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 77951162860     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-20     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Joyce AR, Palsson BO. The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:198-210. 10.1038/nrm1857, 16496022.
2. Ideker T, Bafna V, Lemberger T. Integrating scientific cultures. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:105. 10.1038/msb4100145, 1865587, 17437030.
3. Chen HC, Lee HC, Lin TY, Li WH, Chen BS. Quantitative characterization of the transcriptional regulatory network in the yeast cell cycle. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1914-1927. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth178, 15044243.
4. Workman CT, Mak HC, McCuine S, Tagne JB, Agarwal M, Ozier O, Begley TJ, Samson LD, Ideker T. A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science 2006, 312:1054-1059. 10.1126/science.1122088, 2811083, 16709784.
5. Xing B, Laan MJ. A causal inference approach for constructing transcriptional regulatory networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:4007-4013. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti648, 16131521.
6. Veber P, Guziolowski C, Le Borgne M, Radulescu O, Siegel A. Inferring the role of transcription factors in regulatory networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:228. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-228, 2422845, 18460200.
7. Draghici S, Khatri P, Tarca AL, Amin K, Done A, Voichita C, Georgescu C, Romero R. A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res 2007, 17:1537-1545. 10.1101/gr.6202607, 1987343, 17785539.
8. Visvanathan M, Breit M, Pfeifer B, Baumgartner C, Modre-Osprian R, Tilg B. Systematic analysis of signaling pathways using an integrative environment. Methods Inf Med 2007, 46:386-391.
9. Kuepfer L, Peter M, Sauer U, Stelling J. Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:1001-1006. 10.1038/nbt1330, 17846631.
10. Yeger-Lotem E, Margalit H. Detection of regulatory circuits by integrating the cellular networks of protein-protein interactions and transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:6053-6061. 10.1093/nar/gkg787, 219468, 14530453.
11. Yeger-Lotem E, Sattath S, Kashtan N, Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Pinter RY, Alon U, Margalit H. Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:5934-5939. 10.1073/pnas.0306752101, 395901, 15079056.
12. Mazurie A, Bottani S, Vergassola M. An evolutionary and functional assessment of regulatory network motifs. Genome Biol 2005, 6:R35. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r35, 1088963, 15833122.
13. Ourfali O, Shlomi T, Ideker T, Ruppin E, Sharan R. SPINE: a framework for signaling-regulatory pathway inference from cause-effect experiments. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:i359-366. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm170, 17646318.
14. Sprinzak D, Elowitz MB. Reconstruction of genetic circuits. Nature 2005, 438:443-448. 10.1038/nature04335, 16306982.
15. Feist AM, Herrgard MJ, Thiele I, Reed JL, Palsson BO. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009, 7:129-143.
16. Chang YH, Wang YC, Chen BS. Identification of transcription factor cooperativity via stochastic system model. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2276-2282. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl380, 16844711.
17. Bansal M, Gatta GD, di Bernardo D. Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:815-822. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl003, 16418235.
18. Bansal M, Belcastro V, Ambesi-Impiombato A, di Bernardo D. How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3. 1828749, 17299415.
19. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:4241-4257. 15070, 11102521.
20. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, Hannett NM, Tagne JB, Reynolds DB, Yoo J, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004, 431:99-104. 10.1038/nature02800, 15343339.
21. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, Hester ET, Jia Y, Juvik G, Roe T, Schroeder M, et al. SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucl Acids Res 1998, 26:73-79. 10.1093/nar/26.1.73, 147204, 9399804.
22. Teixeira MC, Monteiro P, Jain P, Tenreiro S, Fernandes AR, Mira NP, Alenquer M, Freitas AT, Oliveira AL, Sa-Correia I. The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:D446-451. 10.1093/nar/gkj013, 1347376, 16381908.
23. Stark C, Breitkreutz B-J, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucl Acids Res 2006, 34:D535-539. 10.1093/nar/gkj109, 1347471, 16381927.
24. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000, 25:25-29. 10.1038/75556, 10802651.
25. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
26. Johansson R. System modeling and identification 1993, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
27. Mendenhall W, Sincich T. Statistics for engineering and the sciences 1995, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 4.
28. Hohmann S, Mager WH. Yeast stress responses 2003, Berlin; New York: Springer.
29. Wu WS, Li WH, Chen BS. Identifying regulatory targets of cell cycle transcription factors using gene expression and ChIP-chip data. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:188. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-188, 1906835, 17559637.
30. Alon U. An introduction to systems biology: design principles of biological circuits 2007, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
31. Chen KC, Wang TY, Tseng HH, Huang CY, Kao CY. A stochastic differential equation model for quantifying transcriptional regulatory network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2883-2890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti415, 15802287.
32. Wu WS, Li WH, Chen BS. Reconstructing a network of stress-response regulators via dynamic system modeling of gene regulation. Gene Regulation and Systems Biology 2008, 2:53-62. 2733084, 19787074.
33. de Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol 2002, 9:67-103. 10.1089/10665270252833208, 11911796.
34. Tegner J, Yeung MK, Hasty J, Collins JJ. Reverse engineering gene networks: integrating genetic perturbations with dynamical modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:5944-5949. 10.1073/pnas.0933416100, 156306, 12730377.
35. Roberts CJ, Nelson B, Marton MJ, Stoughton R, Meyer MR, Bennett HA, He YD, Dai H, Walker WL, Hughes TR, et al. Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 2000, 287:873-880. 10.1126/science.287.5454.873, 10657304.
36. Steffen M, Petti A, Aach J, D'Haeseleer P, Church G. Automated modelling of signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2002, 3:34. 10.1186/1471-2105-3-34, 137599, 12413400.
37. Hersen P, McClean MN, Mahadevan L, Ramanathan S. Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:7165-7170. 10.1073/pnas.0710770105, 2386076,2386076, 18480263.
38. Maeda T, Takekawa M, Saito H. Activation of yeast PBS2 MAPKK by MAPKKKs or by binding of an SH3-containing osmosensor. Science 1995, 269:554-558. 10.1126/science.7624781, 7624781.
39. Posas F, Wurgler-Murphy SM, Maeda T, Witten EA, Thai TC, Saito H. Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 "two-component" osmosensor. Cell 1996, 86:865-875. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80162-2, 8808622.
40. Posas F, Saito H. Activation of the yeast SSK2 MAP kinase kinase kinase by the SSK1 two-component response regulator. EMBO J 1998, 17:1385-1394. 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1385, 1170486, 9482735.
41. Maeda T, Wurgler-Murphy SM, Saito H. A two-component system that regulates an osmosensing MAP kinase cascade in yeast. Nature 1994, 369:242-245. 10.1038/369242a0, 8183345.
42. Brewster JL, de Valoir T, Dwyer ND, Winter E, Gustin MC. An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in yeast. Science 1993, 259:1760-1763. 10.1126/science.7681220, 7681220.
43. Reiser V, Salah SM, Ammerer G. Polarized localization of yeast Pbs2 depends on osmostress, the membrane protein Sho1 and Cdc42. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2:620-627. 10.1038/35023568, 10980703.
44. Raitt DC, Posas F, Saito H. Yeast Cdc42 GTPase and Ste20 PAK-like kinase regulate Sho1-dependent activation of the Hog1 MAPK pathway. EMBO J 2000, 19:4623-4631. 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4623, 302074, 10970855.
45. Posas F, Witten EA, Saito H. Requirement of STE50 for osmostress-induced activation of the STE11 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 1998, 18:5788-5796. 109165, 9742096.
46. O'Rourke SM, Herskowitz I. A third osmosensing branch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the Msb2 protein and functions in parallel with the Sho1 branch. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:4739-4749. 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4739-4749.2002, 133928, 12052881.
47. Tatebayashi K, Tanaka K, Yang HY, Yamamoto K, Matsushita Y, Tomida T, Imai M, Saito H. Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway. EMBO J 2007, 26:3521-3533. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601796, 1949007, 17627274.
48. Reiser V, Ruis H, Ammerer G. Kinase activity-dependent nuclear export opposes stress-induced nuclear accumulation and retention of Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 1999, 10:1147-1161. 25242, 10198063.
49. Ferrigno P, Posas F, Koepp D, Saito H, Silver PA. Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin beta homologs NMD5 and XPO1. EMBO J 1998, 17:5606-5614. 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5606, 1170889, 9755161.
50. Teige M, Scheikl E, Reiser V, Ruis H, Ammerer G. Rck2, a member of the calmodulin-protein kinase family, links protein synthesis to high osmolarity MAP kinase signaling in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:5625-5630. 10.1073/pnas.091610798, 33263, 11344302.
51. Mattison CP, Ota IM. Two protein tyrosine phosphatases, Ptp2 and Ptp3, modulate the subcellular localization of the Hog1 MAP kinase in yeast. Genes Dev 2000, 14:1229-1235. 316617, 10817757.
52. Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G, Zhu H, Zhu X, Fasolo J, Guo H, Jona G, Breitkreutz A, Sopko R, et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005, 438:679-684. 10.1038/nature04187, 16319894.
53. Young C, Mapes J, Hanneman J, Al-Zarban S, Ota I. Role of Ptc2 type 2C Ser/Thr phosphatase in yeast high-osmolarity glycerol pathway inactivation. Eukaryot Cell 2002, 1:1032-1040. 10.1128/EC.1.6.1032-1040.2002, 138758, 12477803.
54. Warmka J, Hanneman J, Lee J, Amin D, Ota I. Ptc1, a type 2C Ser/Thr phosphatase, inactivates the HOG pathway by dephosphorylating the mitogen-activated protein kinase Hog1. Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:51-60. 10.1128/MCB.21.1.51-60.2001, 86567, 11113180.
55. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:101-113. 10.1038/nrg1272, 14735121.
56. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42. 10.1038/35075138, 11333967.
57. Chen BS, Yang SK, Lan CY, Chuang YJ. A systems biology approach to construct the gene regulatory network of systemic inflammation via microarray and databases mining. BMC Med Genomics 2008, 1:46. 10.1186/1755-8794-1-46, 2567339, 18823570.
58. Yang XX, Maurer KC, Molanus M, Mager WH, Siderius M, Vies SM. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is required for high osmotic stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6:195-204. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00026.x, 16487343.
59. Pearl LH. Hsp90 and Cdc37 -- a chaperone cancer conspiracy. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005, 15:55-61. 10.1016/j.gde.2004.12.011, 15661534.
60. Varela J, Praekelt U, Meacock P, Planta R, Mager W. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HSP12 gene is activated by the high-osmolarity glycerol pathway and negatively regulated by protein kinase A. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:6232-6245. 230875, 7565776.
61. Karreman RJ, Dague E, Gaboriaud F, Quiles F, Duval JF, Lindsey GG. The stress response protein Hsp12p increases the flexibility of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1774:131-137.
62. Schuller C, Brewster JL, Alexander MR, Gustin MC, Ruis H. The HOG pathway controls osmotic regulation of transcription via the stress response element (STRE) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTT1 gene. EMBO J 1994, 13:4382-4389. 395365, 7523111.
63. Marchler G, Schuller C, Adam G, Ruis H. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAS element controlled by protein kinase A activates transcription in response to a variety of stress conditions. EMBO J 1993, 12:1997-2003. 413422, 8387917.
64. Chen BS, Li CW. Analysing microarray data in drug discovery using systems biology. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2007, 2:755-768.
65. Diderich JA, Schuurmans JM, Van Gaalen MC, Kruckeberg AL, Van Dam K. Functional analysis of the hexose transporter homologue HXT5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2001, 18:1515-1524. 10.1002/yea.779, 11748728.
66. Verwaal R, Paalman JW, Hogenkamp A, Verkleij AJ, Verrips CT, Boonstra J. HXT5 expression is determined by growth rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2002, 19:1029-1038. 10.1002/yea.895, 12210898.
67. Borkovich KA, Farrelly FW, Finkelstein DB, Taulien J, Lindquist S. hsp82 is an essential protein that is required in higher concentrations for growth of cells at higher temperatures. Mol Cell Biol 1989, 9:3919-3930. 362454, 2674684.
68. Picard D. Heat-shock protein 90, a chaperone for folding and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002, 59:1640-1648. 10.1007/PL00012491, 12475174.
69. Csete M, Doyle J. Bow ties, metabolism and disease. Trends Biotechnol 2004, 22:446-450. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.007, 15331224.
70. Li R, Brawley S. Improved survival under heat stress in intertidal embryos (Fucus spp.) simultaneously exposed to hypersalinity and the effect of parental thermal history. Marine Biology 2004, 144:205-213.
71. Xiong L, Ishitani M, Zhu JK. Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature, and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 1999, 119:205-212. 10.1104/pp.119.1.205, 32221, 9880362.
72. Zhang S, Jin G, Zhang XS, Chen L. Discovering functions and revealing mechanisms at molecular level from biological networks. Proteomics 2007, 7:2856-2869. 10.1002/pmic.200700095, 17703505.
73. Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, Pe'er D, Botstein D, Koller D, Friedman N. Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. NatGenet 2003, 34:166-176.
74. Cuccato G, Della Gatta G, di Bernardo D. Systems and Synthetic biology: tackling genetic networks and complex diseases. Heredity 2009, 102:527-532. 10.1038/hdy.2009.18, 19259117.
75. Chechik G, Oh E, Rando O, Weissman J, Regev A, Koller D. Activity motifs reveal principles of timing in transcriptional control of the yeast metabolic network. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1251-1259. 10.1038/nbt.1499, 2651818, 18953355.
76. Walhout AJ. Unraveling transcription regulatory networks by protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction mapping. Genome Res 2006, 16:1445-1454. 10.1101/gr.5321506, 17053092.
77. Zhu J, Zhang B, Smith EN, Drees B, Brem RB, Kruglyak L, Bumgarner RE, Schadt EE. Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks. Nat Genet 2008, 40:854-861. 10.1038/ng.167, 2573859, 18552845.
78. Bar-Joseph Z, Gerber G, Gifford DK, Jaakkola TS, Simon I. A new approach to analyzing gene expression time series data. Proceedings of the sixth annual international conference on Computational biology 2002, Washington, DC, USA: ACM.
79. Faires JD, Burden RL. Numerical methods 1998, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., 2.
80. de Boor C. A practical guide to splines Rev edn 2001, New York: Springer.
81. Coleman TF, Hulbert LA. A direct active set algorithm for large sparse quadratic programs with simple bounds. Mathematical Programming 1989, 45:373-406.
82. Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH. Practical optimization 1981, London; New York: Academic Press.
83. Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:117-124. 10.1038/nbt1270, 17187058.
84. Hocking RR. A Biometrics invited paper. The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 1976, 32:1-49.
85. Seber GAF, Lee AJ. Linear regression analysis 2003, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Interscience, 2.
86. Barsky A, Gardy JL, Hancock RE, Munzner T. Cerebral: a Cytoscape plugin for layout of and interaction with biological networks using subcellular localization annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1040-1042. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm057, 17309895.
87. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13:2498-2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303, 403769, 14597658.