Making the most of high-throughput protein-interaction data

Genome Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2007, Pages

  Gentleman, Robert ^a   Huber, Wolfgang ^b  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AFFINITY PURIFICATION FOLLOWED BY MASS SPECTROMETRY; ANALYTIC METHOD; DATA ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STOCHASTIC MODEL; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; YEAST; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 42949089155     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-112     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Ito T Chiba T Ozawa R Yoshida M Hattori M Sakaki Y A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:4569-4574. 31875 11283351 10.1073/pnas.061034498
2. Cagney G Uetz P Fields S Two-hybrid analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 26S proteasome. Physiol Genomics 2001, 7:27-34. 11595789
3. Tong AH Drees B Nardelli G Bader GD Brannetti B Castagnoli L Evangelista M Ferracuti S Nelson B Paoluzi S et al.: A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 2002, 295:321-324. 10.1126/ science.1064987 11743162
4. Hazbun TR Malmström L Anderson S Graczyk BJ Fox B Riffle M Sundin BA Aranda JD McDonald WH Chiu CH et al.: Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol Cell 2003, 12:1353-1365. 1752219 14690591 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00476-3
5. Zhao R Davey M Hsu YC Kaplanek P Tong A Parsons AB Krogan N Cagney G Mai D Greenblatt J et al. Navigating the chaperone network: An integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell 2005, 120:715-727. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.024 15766533
6. Uetz P Giot L Cagney G Mansfield TA Judson RS Knight JR Lockshon D Narayan V Srinivasan M Pochart P et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000, 403:623-627. 10.1038/35001009 10688190
7. Gavin AC Bösche M Krause R Grandi P Marzioch M Bauer A Schultz J Rick JM Michon AM Cruciat CM et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002, 415:141-147. 10.1038/415141a 11805826
8. Ho Y Gruhler A Heilbut A Bader GD Moore L Adams SL Millar A Taylor P Bennett K Boutilier K et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002, 415:180-183. 10.1038/415180a 11805837
9. Krogan NJ Peng WT Cagney G Robinson MD Haw R Zhong G Guo X Zhang X Canadien V Richards DP et al.: High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. Mol Cell 2004, 13:225-239. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00003-6 14759368
10. Gavin AC Aloy P Grandi P Krause R Boesche M Marzioch M Rau C Jensen LJ Bastuck S et al.: Dümpelfeld B Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006, 440:631-636. 10.1038/ nature04532 16429126
11. Krogan NJ Cagney G Yu H Zhong G Guo X Ignatchenko A Li J Pu S Datta N Tikuisis AP et al.: Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006, 440:637-643. 10.1038/nature04670 16554755
12. Giot L Bader JS Brouwer C Chaudhuri A Kuang B Li Y Hao YL Ooi CE Godwin B Vitols E et al.: A protein interactionmap of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2003, 302:1727-1736. 10.1126/science.1090289 14605208
13. Li S Armstrong CM Bertin N Ge H Milstein S Boxem M Vidalain PO Han JD Chesneau A Hao T et al.: A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 2004, 303:540-543. 1698949 14704431 10.1126/ science.1091403
14. Rual JF Venkatesan K Hao T Hirozane-Kishikawa T Dricot A Li N Berriz GF Gibbons FD Dreze M Ayivi-Guedehoussou N et al.: Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2005, 437:1173-1178. 10.1038/nature04209 16189514
15. Stelzl U Worm U Lalowski M Haenig C Brembeck FH Goehler H Stroedicke M Zenkner M Schoenherr A Koeppen S et al.: A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 2005, 122:957-968. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.029 16169070
16. Mrowka R Patzak A Herzel H Is there a bias in proteome research? Genome Res 2001, 11:1971-1973. 10.1101/gr.206701 11731485
17. Edwards AM Kus B Jansen R Greenbaum D Greenblatt J Gerstein M Bridging structural biology and genomics: Assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet 2002, 18:529-536. 10.1016/ S0168-9525(02)02763-4 12350343
18. von Mering C Krause R Snel B Cornell M Oliver SG Fields S Bork P Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417:399-403. 10.1038/nature750 12000970
19. Goll J Uetz P The elusive yeast interactome. Genome Biol 2006, 7:223. 1779532 16938899
20. Gagneur J David L Steinmetz LM Capturing cellular machines by systematic screens of protein complexes. Trends Microbiol 2006, 14:336-339. 10.1016/ j.tim.2006.06.002 16782340
21. Hart GT Ramani AK Marcotte EM How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol 2006, 7:120. 1794583 17147767 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-120
22. Jones S Thornton JM Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:13-20. 40170 8552589 10.1073/pnas.93.1.13
23. Fields S Song O A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 1989, 340:245-246. 10.1038/340245a0 2547163
24. Kumar A Snyder M Protein complexes take the bait. Nature 2002, 415:123-124. 10.1038/415123a 11805813
25. Uetz P Two-hybrid arrays. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002, 6:57-62. 10.1016/ S1367-5931(01)00288-5 11827824
26. Han JD Dupuy D Bertin N Cusick ME Vidal M Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23:839-844. 10.1038/nbt1116 16003372
27. Stumpf MPH Wiuf C Sampling properties of random graphs: The degree distribution. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2005, 72:036118. 16241526
28. Chiang T Scholtens D Sarkar D Gentleman R Huber W Coverage and error models or protein-protein interaction data by directed graph analysis. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R186. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r186 17845715
29. Gilchrist MA Salter LA Wagner A A statistical framework for combining and interpreting proteomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:689-700. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg469 15033876
30. Box GEP Draper NR Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces New York: Wiley 1987.
31. Aloy P Russell RB Structural systems biology: Modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:188-197. 10.1038/nrm1859 16496021
32. Kelsey JL Whittemore AS Evans AS Thompson WD Methods in observational epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics New York: Oxford University Press 1996.
33. Scholtens D Gentleman R Making sense of high-throughput protein-protein interaction data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:39. 16646819
34. Scholtens D Vidal M Gentleman R Local modeling of global interactome networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3548-3557. 10.1093/bioinformatics/ bti567 15998662
35. Collins SR Kemmeren P Zhao XC Greenblatt JF Spencer F Holstege FC Weissman JS Krogan NJ Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:439-450. 10.1074/mcp.M600381-MCP200 17200106
36. Mewes HW Frishman D Mayer KF Münsterkötter M Noubibou O Pagel P Rattei T Oesterheld M Ruepp A Stümpflen V MIPS: Analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database issue):D169-D172. 10.1093/nar/gkj148
37. Harris MA Clark J Ireland A Lomax J Ashburner M Foulger R Eilbeck K Lewis S Marshall B Mungall C et al.: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Database issue):D258-D261.
38. Poyatos JF Hurst LD How biologically relevant are interaction-based modules in protein networks? Genome Biol 2004, 5:R93. 545784 15535869 10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-r93
39. Aloy P Böttcher B Ceulemans H Leutwein C Mellwig C Fischer S Gavin AC Bork P Superti-Furga G Serrano L Russell RB Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 2004, 303:2026-2029. 10.1126/ science.1092645 15044803
40. Neduva V Russell RB Peptides mediating interaction networks: New leads at last. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2006, 17:465-471. 10.1016/ j.copbio.2006.08.002 16962311
41. Chen J Hsu W Lee ML Ng SK Increasing confidence of protein interactomes using network topological metrics. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1998-2004. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl335 16787971
42. Storey J A direct approach to false discovery rates. J R Stat Soc Ser B 2002, 64:479-498. 10.1111/1467-9868.00346