Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains

Nature Communications

Volumn 1, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Canelas, Andŕ B ^a   Harrison, Nicola ^b   Fazio, Alessandro ^c   Zhang, Jie ^d   Pitkänen, Juha Pekka ^e   Van Den Brink, Joost ^a   Bakker, Barbara M ^f   Bogner, Lara ^g   Bouwman, Jildau ^f   Castrillo, Juan I ^b   Cankorur, Ayca ^h   Chumnanpuen, Pramote ^d   Daran Lapujade, Pascale ^a   Dikicioglu, Duygu ^h   Van Eunen, Karen ^f   Ewald, Jennifer C ⁱ   Heijnen, Joseph J ^a   Kirdar, Betul ^h   Mattila, Ismo ^e   Mensonides, Femke I C ^f   Niebel, Anja ^g   Penttilä, Merja ^e   Pronk, Jack T ^a   Reuss, Matthias ^g   Salusjärvi, Laura ^e   Sauer, Uwe ⁱ   Sherman, David ^j   Siemann Herzberg, Martin ^g   Westerhoff, Hans ^f   De Winde, Johannes ^a   Petranovic, Dina ^d   Oliver, Stephen G ^b   Workman, Christopher T ^c   Zamboni, Nicola ⁱ   Nielsen, Jens ^d   more..

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^d CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^e VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^f VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^h BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

ⁱ ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^j UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOLOGY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGAL BIOMASS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GROWTH RATE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 79251556819     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1150     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ideker, T. et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292, 929-934 (2001).
2. Kitano, H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295, 1662-1664 (2002).
3. Brent, R. A partnership between biology and engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1211-1214 (2004).
4. Barrett, C. L., Kim, T. Y., Kim, H. U., Palsson, B. O. & Lee, S. Y. Systems biology as a foundation for genome-scale synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 488-492 (2006).
5. Bruggeman, F. J. & Westerhoff, H. V. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol. 15, 45-50 (2007).
6. Reguly, T. et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. 5, 11(2006).
7. Brazma, A. et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 29, 365-371 (2001).
8. Taylor, C. F. et al. The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 887-893 (2007).
9. Martens, L. et al. PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 5, 3537-3545 (2005).
10. van der Werf, M. J. et al. Standard reporting requirements for biological samples in metabolomics experiments: microbial and in vitro biology experiments. Metabolomics 3, 189-194 (2007).
11. Le Novere, N. et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1509-1515 (2005).
12. van Dijken, J. P. et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26, 706-714 (2000).
13. Winston, F., Dollard, C. & Ricupero-Hovasse, S. L. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast 11, 53-55 (1995).
14. Brachmann, C. B. et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14, 115-132 (1998).
15. Giaever, G. et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387-391 (2002).
16. Baganz, F. et al. Quantitative analysis of yeast gene function using competition experiments in continuous culture. Yeast 14, 1417-1427 (1998).
17. Oliver, S. G., Winson, M. K., Kell, D. B. & Baganz, F. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol. 16, 373-378 (1998).
18. Rautio, J. J. et al. Rapid and multiplexed transcript analysis of microbial cultures using capillary electophoresis-detectable oligonucleotide probe pools. J. Microbiol. Methods 65, 404-416 (2006).
19. van Eunen, K. et al. Measuring enzyme activities under standardized in vivolike conditions for systems biology. FEBS J. 277, 749-760 (2010).
20. van Hoek, P., van Dijken, J. P. & Pronk, J. T. Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26, 724-736 (2000).
21. Daran-Lapujade, P. et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15753-15758 (2007).
22. Postmus, J. et al. Quantitative analysis of the high temperature-induced glycolytic flux increase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals dominant metabolic regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23524-23532 (2008).
23. van den Brink, J. et al. Dynamics of glycolytic regulation during adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to fermentative metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5710-5723 (2008).
24. Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2685-2689 (2005).
25. Oliveira, A. P., Patil, K. R. & Nielsen, J. Architecture of transcriptional regulatory circuits is knitted over the topology of bio-molecular interaction networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 17(2008).
26. Schaaff, I., Heinisch, J. & Zimmermann, F. K. Overproduction of glycolytic enzymes in yeast. Yeast 5, 285-290 (1989).
27. Smits, H. P. et al. Simultaneous overexpression of enzymes of the lower part of glycolysis can enhance the fermentative capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16, 1325-1334 (2000).
28. von Stockar, U., Maskow, T., Liu, J., Marison, I. W. & Patino, R. Thermodynamics of microbial growth and metabolism: an analysis of the current situation. J. Biotechnol. 121, 517-533 (2006).
29. Otero, J. M. Industrial systems biology and metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PhD thesis, ISBN 978-91-7385-346-0) (Chalmers University of Technology, 2009).
30. Lange, H. C. et al. Improved rapid sampling for in vivo kinetics of intracellular metabolites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75, 406-415 (2001).
31. de Koning, W. & van Dam, K. A method for the determination of changes of glycolytic metabolites in yeast on a subsecond time scale using extraction at neutral pH. Anal. Biochem. 204, 118-123 (1992).
32. Canelas, A. B. et al. Quantitative evaluation of intracellular metabolite extraction techniques for yeast metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 81, 7379-7389 (2009).
33. Piper, M. D. et al. Reproducibility of oligonucleotide microarray transcriptome analyses. An interlaboratory comparison using chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 37001-37008 (2002).
34. Jansen, M. L. et al. Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. Microbiology 151, 1657-1669 (2005).