Reconstruction and validation of RefRec: A global model for the yeast molecular interaction network

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Aho, Tommi ^a   Almusa, Henrikki ^b,f   Matilainen, Jukka ^b,g   Larjo, Antti ^a   Ruusuvuori, Pekka ^a   Aho, Kaisa Leena ^a   Wilhelm, Thomas ^c   Lähdesmäki, Harri ^a,d   Beyer, Andreas ^e   Harju, Manu ^a   Chowdhury, Sharif ^a   Leinonen, Kalle ^a   Roos, Christophe ^a,b   Yli Harja, Olli ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b Medicel Ltd   (Finland)

^c INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^e DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^f Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland   (Finland)

^g Euformatics Ltd   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REFERENCE DATABASE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS; YEAST; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ESSENTIAL GENE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, ESSENTIAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77956291961     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010662     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Stein LD (2003) Integrating biological databases. Nat Rev Genet 4: 337-345.
2. Philippi S, Köhler J (2006) Addressing the problems with life-science databases for traditional uses and systems biology. Nat Rev Genet 7: 482-488.
3. Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P (2002) The Pathway Tools software. Bionformatics 18: S225-S232.
4. Overbeek R, Larsen N, Pusch GD, D'Souza M, Selkov E, Jr., et al. (2000) WIT: integrated system for high-throughput genome sequence analysis and metabolic reconstruction. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 123-125.
5. Sulakhe D, Rodriguez A, D'Souza M, Wilde M, Nefedova V, et al. (2005) Gnare: automated system for high-throughput genome analysis with grid computational backend. J Clin Monit Comput 19: 361-369.
6. Maltsev N, Glass E, Sulakhe D, Rodriguez A, Syed MH, et al. (2006) PUMA2-grid-based high-throughput analysis of genomes and metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D369-D372.
7. DeJongh M, Formsma K, Boillot P, Gould J, Rycenga M, et al. (2007) Toward the automated generation of genome-scale metabolic networks in the SEED. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 139.
8. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M (2007) KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W182-W185.
9. Kharchenko P, Vitkup D, Church GM (2004) Filling gaps in a metabolic network using expression information. Bioinformatics 20: i178-i185.
10. Chen L, Vitkup D (2006) Predicting genes for orphan metabolic activities using phylogenetic profiles. Genome Biol 7: R17.
11. Kharchenko P, Chen L, Freund Y, Vitkup D, Church GM (2006) Identifying metabolic enzymes with multiple types of association evidence. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 177.
12. Notebaart RA, van Enckevort FH, Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B (2006) Accelerating the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 296.
13. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, et al. (2008) The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D623-D631.
14. Breitling R, Vitkup D, Barrett MP (2008) New surveyor tools for charting microbial metabolic maps. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 156-161.
15. Förster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BØ, Nielsen J (2003) Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolic Network. Genome Res 13: 244-253.
16. Duarte NC, Herrga rd MJ, Palsson BØ (2004) Reconstruction and Validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a Fully Compartmentalized Genome-Scale Metabolic Model. Genome Res 14: 1298-1309.
17. Kuepfer L, Sauer U, Blank LM (2005) Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 15: 1421-1430.
18. Nookaew I, Jewett MC, Meechai A, Thammarongtham C, Laoteng K, et al. (2008) The genome-scale metabolic model iIN800 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its validation: a scaffold to query lipid metabolism. BMC Syst Biol 2: 71.
19. Herrgard MJ, Swainston N, Dobson P, Dunn WB, Arga KY, et al. (2008) A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1155-1160.
20. Hubbard TJP, Aken BL, Beal K, Ballester B, Caccamo M, et al. (2007) Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D610-D617.
21. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, et al. (1999) Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis. Science 285: 901-906.
22. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, et al. (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
23. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR (2007) NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D61-D65.
24. Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH (2007) UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics 23: 1282-1288.
25. Wilming LG, Gilbert JGR, Howe K, Trevanion S, Hubbard T, et al. (2008) The vertebrate genome annotation (Vega) database. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D753-D760.
26. Le Novere N, Bornstein B, Broicher A, Courtot M, Donizelli M, et al. (2006) BioModels Database: A Free, Centralized Database of Curated, Published, Quantitative Kinetic Models of Biochemical and Cellular Systems. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D689-D691.
27. Goto S, Nishioka T, Kanehisa M (1998) LIGAND: chemical database for enzyme reactions. Bioinformatics 14: 591-599.
28. Hashimoto K, Goto S, Kawano S, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Ueda N, et al. (2006) KEGG as a glycome informatics resource. Glycobiology 16: 63R-70R.
29. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, et al. (2006) From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D354-D357.
30. Weininger D (1988) SMILES, A Chemical Language and Information Systems. 1. Introduction of Methodology and Encoding Rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28: 31-36.
31. Stein SE, Heller SR, Tchekhovski D (2003) An Open Standard for Chemical Structure Representation - The IUPAC Chemical Identifier. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Chemical Information Conference. Nimes (France): Infonortics. pp 131-143.
32. Coles SJ, Day NE, Murray-Rust P, Rzepa HS, Zhang Y (2005) Enhancement of the chemical semantic web through the use of InChI identifiers. Org Biomol Chem 3: 1832-1834.
33. Burgard AP, Nikolaev EV, Schilling CH, Maranas CD (2004) Flux Coupling Analysis of Genome-Scale Metabolic Network Reconstructions. Genome Res 14: 301-312.
34. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25-29.
35. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, Xu H, Bader GD, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294: 2364-2368.
36. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, et al. (2004) Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network. Science 303: 774-775.
37. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, et al. (1996) Life with 6000 Genes. Science 274: 546-567.
38. Allen J, Davey HM, Broadhurst D, Heald JK, Rowland JJ, et al. (2003) Highthroughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics using metabolic footprinting. Nat Biotech 21: 692-696.
39. Hart T, Ramani A, Marcotte E (2006) How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol 7: 120.
40. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle JC, et al. (2003) The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): A medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19: 524-531.
41. Finney A, Hucka M (2003) Systems Biology Markup Language: Level 2 and Beyond. Biochem Soc Trans 31: 1472-1473.
42. Le Novere N, Finney A, Hucka M, Bhalla U, Campagne F, et al. (2005) Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nat Biotechnol 23: 1509-1515.
43. Bairoch A (2000) The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 304-305.
44. Lemke N, Heredia F, Barcellos CK, dos Reis AN, Mombach JCM (2004) Essentiality and damage in metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 20: 115-119.
45. Aho T, Wilhelm T, Beyer A, Schuster S, Yli-Harja O (2006) Finding infeasible reactions in metabolic networks: comparison of methods. In Proceedings of the 4th TICSP Workshop on Computational Systems Biology. Tampere (Finland): TICSP Series. pp 23-26.
46. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (2002) Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press. 626 p.
47. Noble WS (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nat Biotechnol 24: 1565-1567.
48. The UniProt Consortium (2008) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 36: D190-D195.
49. Kerrien S, Alam-Faruque Y, Aranda B, Bancarz I, Bridge A, et al. (2007) IntAct - Open Source Resource for Molecular Interaction Data. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D561-D565.
50. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, et al. (2009) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D5-15.
51. Degtyarenko K, de Matos P, Ennis M, Hastings J, Zbinden M, et al. (2008) ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D344-350.