Structural protein descriptors in 1-dimension and their sequence-based predictions

Current Protein and Peptide Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 470-489

  Kurgan, Lukasz ^a   Disfani, Fatemeh Miri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

B factor; Contact number; Protein disorder; Protein structure; Protein structure prediction; Residue depth; Residue wise contact order; Secondary structure; Solvent accessibility; Structural descriptors; Torsion angles; Transmembrane helices

Indexed keywords

STRUCTURAL PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 80052204561     PISSN: 13892037     EISSN: 18755550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920311796957711     Document Type: Article

References (182)

1. Kinjo, A.; Nishikawa, K. Recoverable one-dimensional encoding of three-dimensional protein structures. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(10), 2167-2170.
2. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y. ANGLOR: a composite machine-learning algorithm for protein backbone torsion angle prediction. PLoS One 2008, 3(10), e3400.
3. Faraggi, E.; Yang, E., Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y. Predicting continuous local structure and the effect of its substitution for secondary structure in fragment-free protein structure prediction Structure, 2009, 17(11), 1515-1527.
4. Benkert, P.; Tosatto, S.C.; Schomburg, D. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins, 2008, 71(1), 261-277.
5. Yu, C.; Joachims, T.; Elber, R.; Pillardy, J. Support vector training of protein alignment models. J. Comput.Biol., 2008, 15(7), 867-880.
6. Gao, J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, H.; Shen, S.; Ruan, J.; Kurgan, L. Accurate prediction of protein folding rates from sequence and sequence-derived residue flexibility and solvent accessibility. Proteins, 2010, 78(9), 2114-2130.
7. Fischer, J.D.; Mayer, C.E.; Söding, J. Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(5), 613-620.
8. Kurgan, L.; Mizianty, M. Sequence-based protein crystallization propensity prediction for structural genomics: review and comparative analysis. Nat. Sci., 2009, 1(2), 93-106.
9. Slabinski, L.; Jaroszewski, L.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Rychlewski, L.; Wilson, I.A.; Lesley, S.A.; Godzik, A. The challenge of protein structure determination--lessons from structural genomics. Protein Sci., 2007, 16(11), 2472-2482.
10. nd ed.; Bourne, P.E.; Ed.; Wiley, 2009; pp 679-714.
11. Xia, J.; Wang, S.L.; Lei, Y.K. Computational methods for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. Protein Pept. Lett., 2010, 17(9), 1069-1078.
12. Ding, X.; Pan, X.Y.; Xu, C.; Shen, H.B. Computational prediction of DNA-protein interactions: a review. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des., 2010, 6(3), 197-206.
13. Wang, L.; Huang, C.; Yang, M.Q.; Yang, J.Y. BindN+ for accurate prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residues from protein sequence features. BMC Syst. Biol., 2010, 4(Suppl 1), S3.
14. Zhang, T.; Zhang, H.; Chen, K.; Ruan, J.; Shen, S.; Kurgan, L. Analysis and prediction of RNA-binding residues using sequence, evolutionary conservation, and predicted secondary structure and solvent accessibility. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2010, 11(7), 609-628.
15. Sankararaman, S.; Sha, F.; Kirsch, J.F.; Jordan, M.I.; Sjölander, K. Active site prediction using evolutionary and structural information. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(5), 617-624.
16. Zhang, T.; Zhang, H.; Chen, K.; Shen, S.; Ruan, J.; Kurgan, L. Accurate sequence-based prediction of catalytic residues. Bioin-formatics, 2008, 24(20), 2329-2338.
17. Hiss, J.; Schneider, G. Architecture, function and prediction of long signal peptides. Brief Bioinform., 2009, 10(5), 569-578.
18. Pirovano, W.; Heringa, J. Protein secondary structure prediction. Methods Mol. Biol., 2010, 609, 327-348.
19. Rost, B. Prediction in 1D: secondary structure, membrane helices, and accessibility. Methods Biochem. Anal., 2003, 44, 559-587.
20. Rost, B. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol., 2001, 134(2-3), 204-218.
21. Peng, Z.-L.; Kurgan L. Comprehensive comparative assessment of in-silico predictors of disordered regions. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2011. [In press].
22. He, B.; Wang, K.; Liu, Y.; Xue, B.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: an overview. Cell Res., 2009, 19(8), 929-949.
23. Kuznetsov, I. Simplified computational methods for the analysis of protein flexibility. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2009, 10(6), 607-613.
24. Chou, K.C.; Shen, H.B. Review: recent advances in developing web-servers for predicting protein attributes. Nat. Sci., 2009, 2, 63-69.
25. Koch, O.; Klebe, G. Turns revisited: a uniform and comprehensive classification of normal, open, and reverse turn families minimizing unassigned random chain portions. Proteins, 2009, 74(2), 353-367.
26. Meissner, M.; Koch, O.; Klebe, G.; Schneider, G. Prediction of turn types in protein structure by machine-learning classifiers. Proteins, 2009, 74(2), 344-352.
27. Zheng, C.; Kurgan, L. Prediction of beta-turns at over 80% accuracy based on an ensemble of predicted secondary structures and multiple alignments. BMC Bioinform., 2008, 9, 430.
28. Hu, X.; Li, Q. Using support vector machine to predict beta- and gamma-turns in proteins. J. Comput. Chem., 2008, 29(12), 1867-1875.
29. Wang, Y.; Xue, Z.D.; Shi, X.H.; Xu, J. Prediction of pi-turns in Proteins using PSI-BLAST profiles and secondary structure information. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2006, 347(3), 574-580.
30. Freeman, T.J.; Wimley, W.C. A highly accurate statistical approach for the prediction of transmembrane {beta}-barrels. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(16), 1965-1974.
31. Chou, K.; Carlacci, L.; Maggiora, GM. Conformational and geometrical properties of idealized beta-barrels in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 213(2), 315-326.
32. Gruber, M.; Söding, J.; Lupas, AN. Comparative analysis of coiled-coil prediction methods. J. Struct. Biol., 2006, 155(2), 140-145.
33. Lupas, A. Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci., 1996, 21(10), 375-382.
34. Zimmermann, O.; Hansmann, U.H. LOCUSTRA: accurate prediction of local protein structure using a two-layer support vector machine approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2008, 48(9), 1903-1908.
35. Hamelryck, T. An amino acid has two sides: a new 2D measure provides a different view of solvent exposure. Proteins, 2005, 59(1), 38-48.
36. Song, J.; Tan, H.; Takemoto, K.; Akutsu, T. HSEpred: predict half-sphere exposure from protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(13), 1489-1497.
37. Bartoli, L.; Capriotti, E.; Fariselli, P.; Martelli, P.L.; Casadio, R. The pros and cons of predicting protein contact maps. Methods Mol. Biol., 2008, 413, 199-217.
38. Dosztányi, Z.; Meszaros, B.; Simon, I. Bioinformatical approaches to characterize intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins. Brief Bioinform., 2010, 11(2), 225-243.
39. Midic, U.; Oldfield, C.J.; Dunker, A.K.; Obradovic, Z.; Uversky, V.N. Unfoldomics of human genetic diseases: illustrative examples of ordered and intrinsically disordered members of the human dis-easome. Protein Pept. Lett., 2009, 16(12), 1533-1547.
40. Levitt, M.; Greer, J. Automatic identification of secondary structure in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1977, 114(2), 181-239.
41. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 1983, 22(12), 2577-2637.
42. Richards, F.; Kundrot, C.E. Identification of structural motifs from protein coordinate data: secondary structure and first-level super-secondary structure. Proteins, 1988, 3(2), 71-84.
43. Sklenar, H.; Etchebest, C.; Lavery, R. Describing protein structure: a general algorithm yielding complete helicoidal parameters and a unique overall axis. Proteins, 1989, 6(1), 46-60.
44. Frishman, D.; Argos, P.; Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins, 1995, 23(4), 566-579.
45. Labesse, G.; Colloc'h, N.; Pothier, J.; Mornon, J.P. P-SEA: a new efficient assignment of secondary structure from C alpha trace of proteins. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 1997, 13(3), 291-295.
46. King, S.; Johnson, W.C. Assigning secondary structure from protein coordinate data. Proteins, 1999, 3(35), 313-320.
47. Fodje, M.; Al-Karadaghi, S. Occurrence, conformational features and amino acid propensities for the pi-helix. Protein Eng., 2002, 15(5), 353-358.
48. Martin, J.; Letellier, G.; Marin, A.; Taly, J.F.; de Brevern, A.G.; Gibrat, J.F. Protein secondary structure assignment revisited: a detailed analysis of different assignment methods. BMC Struct. Biol., 2005, 5, 17.
49. Nugent, T.; Jones, D.T. Predicting transmembrane helix packing arrangements using residue contacts and a force-directed algorithm. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2010, 6(3), e1000714.
50. Ikeda, M.; Arai, M.; Okuno, T.; Shimizu, T. TMPDB: a database of experimentally-characterized transmembrane topologies. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31(1), 406-409.
51. Ramachandran, G.N.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Sasisekharan, V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 1963, 7(1), 95-99.
52. Sims, G.E.; Choi, I.G.; Kim, S.H. Protein conformational space in higher order phi-Psi maps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102(3), 618-21.
53. Lee, B.; Richards, F.M. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol., 1971, 55(3), 379-400.
54. Richards, F. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 1977, 6, 151-176.
55. Adamczak, R.; Porollo, A.; Meller, J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins, 2004, 56(4), 753-767.
56. Chothia, C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1976, 105,(1), 1-12.
57. Ahmad, S.; Gromiha, M.M.; Sarai, A. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins, 2003, 50(4), 629-635.
58. Chakravarty, S.; Varadarajan, R. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure, 1999, 7(7), 723-732.
59. Pintar, A.; Carugo, O.; Pongor, S. Atom depth as a descriptor of the protein interior. Biophys. J., 2003, 84(4), 2553-2561.
60. Pintar, A.; Carugo, O.; Pongor, S. DPX: for the analysis of the protein core. Bioinform., 2003, 19(2), 313-314.
61. Varrazzo, D.; Bernini, A.; Spiga, O.; Ciutti, A.; Chiellini, S.V.; Bracci, L.; Niccolai, N. Three-dimensional computation of atom depth in complex molecular structures. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(12), 2856-2860.
62. Yuan, Z.; Wang, Z.X. Quantifying the relationship of protein burying depth and sequence. Proteins, 2008, 70(2), 509-516.
63. Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Chen, K.; Shen, S.; Ruan, J.; Kurgan, L. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure. BMC Bioinform., 2008, 9, 388.
64. Nishikawa, K.; Ooi, T. Prediction of the surface-interior diagram of globular Proteins, by an empirical method. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res., 1980, 16(1), 19-32.
65. Nishikawa, K.; Ooi, T. Radial locations of amino acid residues in a globular protein: correlation with the sequence. J. Biochem., 1986, 100(4), 1043-1047.
66. Pollastri, G.; Baldi, P.; Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 2002, 47(2), 142-153.
67. Kinjo, A.; Horimoto, K.; Nishikawa, K. Predicting absolute contact numbers of native protein structure from amino acid sequence. Proteins, 2005, 58(1), 158-165.
68. Kinjo, A.; Nishikawa, K. Predicting secondary structures, contact numbers, and residue-wise contact orders of native protein structure from amino acid sequence using critical random network. Biophysics, 2005, 1, 67-74.
69. Plaxco, K.; Simons, K.T.; Baker, D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 277(4), 985-994.
70. Parthasarathy, S.; Murthy, M.R.N. Analysis of temperature factor distribution in high-resolution protein structures. Protein Sci., 1997, 6(12), 2561-2567.
71. Carugo, O.; Argos, P. Correlation between side chain mobility and conformation in protein structures. Protein Eng., 1997, 10(7), 777-787.
72. Schlessinger, A.; Rost, B. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins, 2005, 61(1), 115-126.
73. Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Chen, K.; Shen, S.; Ruan, J.; Kurgan, L. On the relation between residue flexibility and local solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 2009, 76(3), 617-636.
74. Vucetic, S.; Brown, CJ.; Dunker, AK.; Obradovic, Z. Flavors of protein disorder. Proteins, 2003, 52(4), 573-584.
75. Bracken, C.; Iakoucheva, L.M.; Romero, P.R.; Dunker, A.K. Combining prediction, computation and experiment for the characterization of protein disorder. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 2004, 14(5), 570-576.
76. Noivirt-Brik, O.; Prilusky, J.; Sussman, J.L. Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP8. Proteins, 2009, 77, 210-216.
77. Bordoli, L.; Kiefer, F.; Schwede, T. Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP7. Proteins, 2007, 69(Suppl 8), 129-136.
78. Sickmeier, M.; Hamilton, J.A.; LeGall, T.; Vacic, V.; Cortese, M.S.; Tantos, A.; Szabo, B.; Tompa, P.; Chen, J.; Uversky, V.N.; Obradovic, Z.; Dunker, A.K. DisProt: the database of disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35(Database issue), D786-D793.
79. Debye, P. Interferenz von Röntgenstrahlen und Wärmebewegung. Ann. Phys., 1913, 348(1), 49-92.
80. Pauling, L.; Corey, R.B.; Branson, H.R.; The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1951, 37(4), 205-211.
81. Pauling, L.; Corey, R.B.; The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1951, 37(5), 251-256.
82. Faraggi, E.; Xue, B.; Zhou, Y. Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real-value backbone torsion angles of proteins, by guided-learning through a two-layer neural network. Proteins, 2009, 74(4), 847-856.
83. Dor, O.; Zhou, Y. Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins, 2007, 68(1), 76-81.
84. Cuff, J.; Barton, G.J. Application of multiple sequence alignment profiles to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 2000, 40(3), 502-511.
85. Rost, B.; Sander, C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins, 1994, 20(3), 216-226.
86. Berman, H.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H.; Markley, J.L. The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35(Database issue), D301-3.
87. Anfinsen, C. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 1973, 181(96), 223-230.
88. Chen, C.; Kernytsky, A.; Rost, B. Transmembrane helix predictions revisited. Protein Sci., 2002, 11(12), 2774-2791.
89. Fleishman, S.; Ben-Tal, N. Progress in structure prediction of -helical membrane proteins. Curr.Opin. Struct. Biol., 2006, 16, 496-504
90. Dosztányi, Z.; Sándor, M.; Tompa, P.; Simon, I. Prediction of protein disorder at the domain level. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2007, 8(2), 161-171.
91. Bourhis, J.; Canard, B.; Longhi, S. Predicting protein disorder and induced folding: from theoretical principles to practical applications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2007, 8(2), 135-149.
92. Altschul, S.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215(3), 403-410.
93. Rost, B. PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. Methods Enzymol., 1996, 266, 525-539.
94. Rost, B.; Yachdav, G.; Liu, J. The PredictProtein Server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32(Web Server issue), W321-W326.
95. Jones, D. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 1999, 292(2), 195-202.
96. Bryson, K.; McGuffin, L.J.; Marsden, R.L.; Ward, J.J.; Sodhi, J.S.; Jones, DT. Protein structure prediction servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33(Web Server issue), W36-W38.
97. Cole, C.; Barber, J.D.; Barton, G.J. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36(Web Server issue), W197-W201.
98. Ouali, M.; King, R.D. Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci., 2000, 9(6), 1162-1176.
99. Pollastri, G.; Przybylski, D.; Rost, B.; Baldi, P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins, 2002, 47(2), 228-235.
100. Cheng, J.; Randall, A.Z.; Sweredoski, M.J.; Baldi, P. SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33(Web Server issue), W72-W76.
101. Kurowski, M.; Bujnicki, J.M. GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31(13), 3305-3307.
102. Karplus, K.; Karchin, R.; Draper, J.; Casper, J.; Mandel-Gutfreund, Y.; Diekhans, M.; Hughey, R. Combining local-structure, fold-recognition, and new fold methods for protein structure prediction. Proteins, 2003, 53(6), 491-496.
103. Karplus, K.; Katzman, S.; Shackleford, G.; Koeva, M.; Draper, J.; Barnes, B.; Soriano, M.; Hughey, R. SAM-T04: what is new in protein-structure prediction for CASP6. Proteins, 2005, 61(Suppl 7), 135-142.
104. Karplus, K.; SAM-T08, HMM-based protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37(Web Server issue), W492-W497.
105. Adamczak, R.; Porollo, A.; Meller, J. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 2005, 59(3), 467-475.
106. Lin, K.; Simossis, V.A.; Taylor, W.R.; Heringa, J. A simple and fast secondary structure prediction algorithm using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(2), 152-159.
107. Pollastri, G.; McLysaght, A. Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(8), 1719-1720.
108. Qin, S.; He, Y.; Pan, X.M. Predicting protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility with an improved multiple linear regression method. Proteins, 2005, 61(3), 473-480.
109. Karypis, G. YASSPP: better kernels and coding schemes lead to improvements in protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins, 2006, 64(3), 575-586.
110. Martin, J.; Gibrat, J.F.; Rodolphe, F. Analysis of an optimal hidden Markov model for secondary structure prediction. BMC Struct. Biol., 2006, 6, 25.
111. Montgomerie, S.; Sundararaj, S.; Gallin, W.J.; Wishart, D.S. Improving the accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction using structural alignment. BMC Bioinform., 2006, 7, 301.
112. Montgomerie, S.; Cruz, J.A.; Shrivastava, S.; Arndt, D.; Berjanskii, M.; Wishart, D.S. PROTEUS2: a web server for comprehensive protein structure prediction and structure-based annotation. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36(Web Server issue), W202-W209.
113. Pollastri, G.; Martin, A.J.M.; Mooney, C.; Vullo, A. Accurate prediction of protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility by consensus combiners of sequence and structure information. BMC Bioinform., 2007, 8, 201.
114. Dor, O.; Zhou, Y. Achieving 80% ten-fold cross-validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large-scale training. Proteins, 2007, 66(4), 838-845.
115. Won, K.; Hamelryck, T.; Prügel-Bennett, A.; Krogh, A. An evolutionary method for learning HMM structure: prediction of protein secondary structure. BMC Bioinform., 2007, 8, 357.
116. Kountouris, P.; Hirst, J.D. Prediction of backbone dihedral angles and protein secondary structure using support vector machines. BMC Bioinform., 2009, 10, 437.
117. Green, J.; Korenberg, M.J.; Aboul-Magd, M.O. PCI-SS: MISO dynamic nonlinear protein secondary structure prediction. BMC Bioinform., 2009, 10, 222.
118. Zhou, T.; Shu, N.; Hovmöller, S. A novel method for accurate one-dimensional protein structure prediction based on fragment matching. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(4), 470-477.
119. von Heijne, G. Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydropho-bicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 255(2), 487-494.
120. Claros, M.G.; von Heijnea, G. TopPred II: an improved software for membrane protein structure predictions. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994, 10(6), 685-686.
121. Jones, D.; Taylor, W.R. Thornton, JM.; A model recognition approach to the prediction of all-helical membrane protein structure and topology. Biochemistry, 1994, 33(10), 3038-3049.
122. Jones, D. Do transmembrane protein superfolds exist? FEBS Lett., 1998, 423(3), 281-285.
123. Jones, D. Improving the accuracy of transmembrane protein topology prediction using evolutionary information. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23(5), 538-544.
124. Rost, B.; Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R. Topology prediction for helical transmembrane Proteins, at 86% accuracy. Prot. Sci., 1996, 4(8), 521-533.
125. Tusnády, G.; Simon, I. Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: application to topology prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 283(2), 489-506.
126. Tusnády, G.; Simon, I. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(9), 849-850.
127. Sonnhammer, E.L.; von Heijne, G.; Krogh, A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 1998, 6, 175-182.
128. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 305(3), 567-580.
129. Kall, L.; Krogh, A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L. A combined transmem-brane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol., 2004, 338(5), 1027-1036.
130. Käll, L.; Krogh, A.; Sonnhammer, E.L. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35(Web Server issue), W429-W432.
131. Yuan, Z.; Mattick, J.S.; Teasdale, R.D. SVMtm: support vector machines to predict transmembrane segments. J. Comput. Chem., 2004, 25(5), 632-636.
132. Cao, B.; Porollo, A.; Adamczak, R.; Jarrell, M.; Meller, J. Enhanced recognition of protein transmembrane domains with prediction-based structural profiles. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(3), 303-309.
133. Ganapathiraju, M.; Jursa, C.J.; Karimi, H.A.; Klein-Seetharaman, J. TMpro web server and web service: transmembrane helix prediction through amino acid property analysis. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23(20), 2795-2796.
134. Osmanbeyoglu, H.; Wehner, J.A.; Carbonell, J.G.; Ganapathiraju, M.K. Active machine learning for transmembrane helix prediction. BMC Bioinform., 2010, 11(Suppl 1), S58.
135. Nugent, T.; Jones, D.T. Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinform., 2009, 10, 159.
136. Ahmed, R.; Rangwala, H.; Karypis, G. TOPTMH: topology predictor for transmembrane alpha-helices. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 2010, 8(1), 39-57.
137. Kuang, R, Leslie, C.S.; Yang, A.-S. Protein backbone angle prediction with machine learning approaches. Bioinformatics, 2004, 20(10), 1612-1621.
138. Xue, B.; Dor, O.; Faraggi, E.; Zhou, Y. Real-value prediction of backbone torsion angles. Proteins, 2008, 72(1), 427-433.
139. Holbrook, S.R.; Muskal, S.M.; Kim, S.-H. Predicting surface exposure of amino acids from protein sequence. Protein Eng., 1990, 3(8), 659-665.
140. Thompson, M.; Goldstein, R.A. Predicting solvent accessibility: higher accuracy using Bayesian statistics and optimized residue substitution classes. Proteins, 1996, 25(1), 38-47.
141. Pascarella, S.; De Persio, R.; Bossa, F.; Argos, P. Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments. Proteins, 1998, 32(2), 190-199.
142. Richardson, C.; Barlow, D.J. The bottom line for prediction of residue solvent accessibility. Protein Eng., 1999, 12(12), 1051-1054.
143. Carugo, O. Predicting residue solvent accessibility from protein sequence by considering the sequence environment. Protein Eng., 2000, 13(9), 607-609.
144. Ahmad, S.; Gromiha, M.M. NETASA: neural network based prediction of solvent accessibility. Bioinformatics, 2002, 18(6), 819-824.
145. Kim, H.; Park, H. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with support vector machines and long-range interaction 3D local descriptor. Proteins, 2004, 54(3), 557-562.
146. Yuan, Z.; Huang, B. Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression. Proteins, 2004, 57(3), 558-564.
147. Garg, A.; Kaur, H.; Raghava, G.P. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in Proteins, using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins, 2005, 61(2), 318-324.
148. Wang, J.-Y.; Lee, H.-M.; Ahmad, S. Prediction and evolutionary information analysis of Proteins, solvent accessibility using multiple linear regression. Proteins, 2005, 61, 481-491.
149. Nguyen, M.; Rajapakse, J.C. Two-stage support vector regression approach for predicting accessible surface areas of amino acids. Proteins, 2006, 63(3), 542-550.
150. Wang, J.; Lee, H.M.; Ahmad, S. SVM-Cabins: prediction of solvent accessibility using accumulation cutoff set and support vector machine. Proteins, 2007, 68(1), 82-91.
151. Chen, K.; Kurgan, M.; Kurgan, L. Sequence based prediction of relative solvent accessibility using two-stage support vector regression with confidence values. J. Biom. Sc. Eng., 2008, 1(1), 1-9.
152. Petersen, B.; Petersen, T.N.; Andersen, P.; Nielsen, M.; Lunde-gaard, C. A generic method for assignment of reliability scores applied to solvent accessibility predictions. BMC Struct. Biol., 2009, 9, 51.
153. Song, J.; Tan, H.; Mahmood, K.; Law, RH.; Buckle, AM.; Webb, GI.; Akutsu, T.; Whisstock, JC. Prodepth: predict residue depth by support vector regression approach from protein sequences only. PLoS One 2009, 4(9), e7072.
154. Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R.; RCNPRED: prediction of the residue coordination numbers in proteins. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(2), 202-204.
155. Pollastri, G.; Baldi, P.; Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R. Improved prediction of the number of residue contacts in Proteins, by recurrent neural networks. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(Suppl 1), S234-242.
156. Ishida, T.; Nakamura, S.; Shimizu, K. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction. Proteins, 2006, 64(4), 940-947.
157. Yuan, Z. Better prediction of protein contact number using a support vector regression analysis of amino acid sequence. BMC Bio-inform., 2005, 6, 248.
158. Kinjo, A.; Nishikawa, K. CRNPRED: highly accurate prediction of one-dimensional protein structures by large-scale critical random networks. BMC Bioinform., 2006, 7, 401.
159. Song, J.; Burrage, K. Predicting residue-wise contact orders in Proteins, by support vector regression. BMC Bioinform., 2006, 7, 425.
160. Rangwala, H.; Kauffman, C.; Karypis, G. svmPRAT: SVM-based protein residue annotation toolkit. BMC Bioinform., 2009, 10, 439.
161. Radivojac, P.; Obradovic, Z.; Smith, DK.; Zhu, G.; Vucetic, S.; Brown, CJ.; Lawson, JD.; Dunker, AK. Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder. Protein Sci., 2004, 13(1), 71-80.
162. Yuan, Z.; Bailey, T.L.; Teasdale, R.D. Prediction of protein B-factor profiles. Proteins, 2005, 4, 905-912.
163. Schlessinger, A.; Rost, B.; Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence Proteins 2005, 61(1):115-26.
164. Schlessinger, A.; Yachdav, G.; Rost, B. PROFbval: predict flexible and rigid residues in proteins. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(7), 891-893.
165. Chen, P.; Wang, B.; Wong, H.S.; Huang, D.S. Prediction of protein B-factors using multi-class bounded SVM. Protein Pept. Lett., 2007, 14(2), 185-190.
166. Pan, X.; Shen, H.B. Robust prediction of B-factor profile from sequence using two-stage SVR based on random forest feature selection. Protein Pept. Lett., 2009, 16(12), 1447-1454.
167. Cozzetto, D.; Kryshtafovych, A.; Fidelis, K.; Moult, J.; Rost, B.; Tramontano, A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins, 2009, 77(Suppl 9), 18-28.
168. Koh, I.; Eyrich, V.A.; Marti-Renom, M.A.; Przybylski, D.; Mad-husudhan, M.S.; Eswar, N.; Graña, O.; Pazos, F.; Valencia, A.; Sali, A.; Rost, B. EVA: Evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31(13), 3311-3315.
169. Eyrich, V.; Marti-Renom, M.A.; Przybylski, D.; Madhusudhan, MS.; Fiser, A.; Pazos, F.; Valencia, A.; Sali, A.; Rost, B. EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(12), 1242-1243.
170. Zemla, A.; Venclovas, C.; Fidelis, K.; Rost, B. A modified definition of SOV, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins, 1999, 34(2), 220-223.
171. Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Chen, K.; Kedarisetti, K.D.; Mizianty, M.J.; Bao, Q.; Stach, W.; Kurgan, L. Critical assessment of high-throughput standalone methods for secondary structure prediction. Brief Bioinform. 2011, doi: 10.1093/bib/bbq088 [Epub ahead of print].
172. Mizianty, M.; Stach, W.; Chen, K.; Kedarisetti, K.D.; Miri Disfani, F.; Kurgan, L. Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(18), i489-96.
173. Schlessinger, A.; Punta, M.; Yachdav, G.; Kajan, L.; Rost, B. Improved disorder prediction by combination of orthogonal approaches. PLoS One 2009, 4(2), e4433.
174. McGuffin, L.J. Intrinsic disorder prediction from the analysis of multiple protein fold recognition models. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24(16), 1798-1804.
175. Schlessinger, A.; Liu, J.F.; Rost, B. Natively unstructured loops differ from other loops. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2007, 3, 1335-1346.
176. Schlessinger, A.; Punta, M.; Rost, B. Natively unstructured regions in proteins, identified from contact predictions. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23, 2376-2384.
177. Dosztanyi, Z.; Csizmok, V.; Tompa, P.; Simon, I. IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically un-structured regions of Proteins, based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(16), 3433-3434.
178. Ward, J.; McGuffin, L.J.; Bryson, K.; Buxton, B.F.; Jones, D.T. The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bio-informatics, 2004, 20, 2138-2139.
179. Cheng, J.; Sweredoski, M.; Baldi, P. Accurate prediction of protein disordered regions by mining protein structure data. Data Mining Knowl. Disc. 2005, 11, 213-222.
180. Hecker, J.; Yang, J.; Cheng, J. Protein disorder prediction at multiple levels of sensitivity and specificity. BMC Genomics, 2008, 9(S1), S9.
181. Mizianty, M.; Zhang, T.; Xue, B.; Zhou, Y.; Dunker, A.K.; Uver-sky, V.N.; Kurgan, L. In-silico prediction of disorder content using hybrid sequence representation. BMC Bioinform., 2011, 12, 245.
182. Rose, G.D.; Dworkin, J.E. The hydrophobicity profile. Fasman, G.D., Ed.; Prediction of protein structure and the principles of protein conformation. Springer, 1989, pp. 625-634