Natively unstructured loops differ from other loops

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1335-1346

  Schlessinger, Avner ^a   Liu, Jinfeng ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING;

DISORDERED PROTEINS; FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXITY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION METHODS; SECONDARY STRUCTURES; SIMPLE++; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION; STRUCTURE DETERMINATION; WELL-ORDERED STRUCTURE;

PROTEINS;

PROTEOME;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUKARYOTE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENOMICS; PREDICTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRAINING; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EUKARYOTA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITES; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEOME; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 34547599318     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030140     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Lesk AM (2004) Introduction to protein architecture: The structural biology of proteins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 347 p.
2. Brändén C, Tooze J (1991) Introduction to protein structure. New York: Garland. 302 p.
3. Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2002) Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 54-60.
4. Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Friedrich P, Tompa P (2004) Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 338: 1015-1026.
5. Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 197-208.
6. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM, Uversky VN (2005) Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J 272: 5129-5148.
7. Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27: 527-533.
8. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z (2001) The protein trinity-linking function and disorder. Nat Biotechnol 19: 805-806.
9. Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2004) Unfolded proteins and protein folding studied by NMR. Chem Rev 104: 3607-3622.
10. Vucetic S, Obradovic Z, Vacic V, Radivojac P, Peng K, et al. (2005) DisProt: A database of protein disorder. Bioinformatics 21: 137-140.
11. Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS, Brown CJ, Uversky VN, et al. (2005) Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry 44: 1989-2000.
12. Oldfield CJ, Ulrich EL, Cheng Y, Dunker AK, Markley JL (2005) Addressing the intrinsic disorder bottleneck in structural proteomics. Proteins 59: 444-453.
13. Snyder DA, Chen Y, Denissova NG, Acton T, Aramini JM, et al. (2005) Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination. J Am Chem Soc 127: 16505-16511.
14. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL (2000) Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41: 415-427.
15. Prilusky J, Felder CE, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Rydberg EH, Man O, et al. (2005) FoldIndex: A simple tool to predict whether a given protein sequence is intrinsically unfolded. Bioinformatics 21: 3435-3438.
16. Linding R, Russell RB, Neduva V, Gibson TJ (2003) GlobPlot: Exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3701-3708.
17. Lise S, Jones DT (2005) Sequence patterns associated with disordered regions in proteins. Proteins 58: 144-150.
18. Zetina CR (2001) A conserved helix-unfolding motif in the naturally unfolded proteins. Proteins 44: 479-483.
19. Obradovic Z, Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, et al. (2003) Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins 53: 566-572.
20. Linding R, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Bork P, Gibson TJ, et al. (2003) Protein disorder prediction: Implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11: 1453-1459.
21. Jones DT, Ward JJ (2003) Prediction of disordered regions in proteins from position specific score matrices. Proteins 53: 573-578.
22. Yang ZR, Thomson R, McNeil P, Esnouf RM (2005) RONN: The bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the detection of natively disordered regions in proteins. Bioinformatics 21: 3369-3376.
23. Cheng J, Sweredoski MJ, Baldi P (2005) Accurate prediction of protein disordered regions by mining protein structure data. In: Maimon O, Rorkach L, editors. Data mining and knowledge discovery. New York: Springer. pp. 213-222.
24. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT (2004) Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 337: 635-645.
25. Melamud E, Moult J (2003) Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP5. Proteins 53 (Supplement 6): 561-565.
26. Jin Y, Dunbrack RL Jr (2005) Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP6. Proteins 61 (Supplement 7): 167-175.
27. Liu J, Tan H, Rost B (2002) Loopy proteins appear conserved in evolution. J Mol Biol 322: 53-64.
28. Gu J, Gribskov M, Bourne PE (2006) Wiggle-predicting functionally flexible regions from primary sequence. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e90.
29. Liu J, Rost B (2003) NORSp: Predictions of long regions without regular secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3833-3835.
30. Rost B (2005) How to use protein 1D structure predicted by PROFphd. In: Walker JE, editor. The proteomics protocols handbook. Totowa (New Jersey): Humana. pp. 875-901.
31. Rost B (2001) Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J Struct Biol 134: 204-218.
32. Rost B (1996) PHD: Predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile based neural networks. Methods Enzymol 266: 525-539.
33. Rost B (1998) Marrying structure and genomics. Structure 6: 259-263.
34. Montelione GT, Anderson S (1999) Structural genomics: Keystone for a human proteome project. Nat Struct Biol 6: 11-12.
35. Liu J, Hegyi H, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Rost B (2004) Automatic target selection for structural genomics on eukaryotes. Proteins 56: 188-200.
36. Wunderlich Z, Acton TB, Liu J, Kornhaber G, Everett J, et al. (2004) The protein target list of the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium. Proteins 56: 181-187.
37. Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
38. Fossen T, Wray V, Bruns K, Rachmat J, Henklein P, et al. (2005) Solution structure of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 p6 protein. J Biol Chem 280: 42515-42527.
39. Radivojac P, Obradovic Z, Smith DK, Zhu G, Vucetic S, et al. (2004) Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder. Protein Science 13: 71-80.
40. Garbuzynskiy SO, Lobanov MY, Galzitskaya OV (2004) To be folded or to be unfolded? Protein Sci 13: 2871-2877.
41. Dosztanyi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I (2005) The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 347: 827-839.
42. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Romero P, Garner EC, Brown CJ (2000) Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 11: 161-171.
43. Su CT, Chen CY, Ou YY (2006) Protein disorder prediction by condensed PSSM considering propensity for order or disorder. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 319.
44. Peng K, Radivojac P, Vucetic S, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z (2006) Lengthdependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 208.
45. Dosztanyi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I (2005) IUPred: Web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics 21: 3433-3434.
46. Vucetic S, Brown CJ, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z (2003) Flavors of protein disorder. Proteins 52: 573-584.
47. Goh CS, Lan N, Echols N, Douglas SM, Milburn D, et al. (2003) SPINE 2: A system for collaborative structural proteomics within a federated database framework. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 2833-2838.
48. Christendat D, Yee A, Dharamsi A, Kluger Y, Savchenko A, et al. (2000) Structural proteomics of an archaeon. Nat Struct Biol 7: 903-909.
49. Booth V, Koth CM, Edwards AM, Arrowsmith CH (2000) Structure of a conserved domain common to the transcription factors TFIIS, elongin A, and CRSP70. J Biol Chem 275: 31266-31268.
50. Syme CD, Blanch EW, Holt C, Jakes R, Goedert M, et al. (2002) A Raman optical activity study of rheomorphism in caseins, synucleins and tau. New insight into the structure and behaviour of natively unfolded proteins. Eur J Biochem 269: 148-156.
51. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405.
52. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, et al. (2004) SCOP database in 2004: Refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D226-D229.
53. Liu J, Rost B (2004) Sequence-based prediction of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 3522-3530.
54. Enari M, Sakahira H, Yokoyama H, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, et al. (1998) A caspase-activated DNase that degrades DNA during apoptosis, and its inhibitor ICAD. Nature 391: 43-50.
55. Zhou P, Lugovskoy AA, McCarty JS, Li P, Wagner G (2001) Solution structure of DFF40 and DFF45 N-terminal domain complex and mutual chaperone activity of DFF40 and DFF45. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 6051-6055.
56. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK (2005) Showing your ID: Intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 18: 343-384.
57. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F, Klitgord N, Cusick ME, et al. (2006) Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e100.
58. Ekman D, Light S, Bjorklund AK, Elofsson A (2006) What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genome Biol 7: R45.
59. Patil A, Nakamura H (2006) Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks. FEBS Lett 580: 2041-2045.
60. Tompa P (2005) The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins. FEBS Lett 579: 3346-3354.
61. Fink AL (2005) Natively unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 35-41.
62. Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, O'Connor TR, Sikes JG, et al. (2004) The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1037-1049.
63. Romero PR, Zaidi S, Fang YY, Uversky VN, Radivojac P, et al. (2006) Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 8390-8395.
64. Liu J, Perumal NB, Oldfield CJ, Su EW, Uversky VN, et al. (2006) Intrinsic disorder in transcription factors. Biochemistry 45: 6873-6888.
65. Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK (2002) Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J Mol Biol 323: 573-584.
66. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, et al. (2004) A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303: 540-543.
67. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C, Mudali S, Kerrien S, et al. (2004) IntAct: An open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D452-D455.
68. Sali A (1998) 100,000 protein structures for the biologist. Nat Struct Biol 5: 1029-1032.
69. Gaasterland T (1998) Structural genomics taking shape. Trends Genet 14: 135.
70. Redfern O, Grant A, Maibaum M, Orengo C (2005) Survey of current protein family databases and their application in comparative, structural and functional genomics. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 815: 97-107.
71. Liu J, Rost B (2004) CHOP proteins into structural domain-like fragments. Proteins 55: 678-688.
72. Liu J, Rost B (2004) CHOP: Parsing proteins into structural domains. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W569-W571.
73. Rost B (1994) Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins 20: 216-226.
74. Koh IYY, Eyrich VA, Marti-Renom MA, Przybylski D, Madhusudhan MS, et al. (2003) EVA: Evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3311-3315.
75. Eyrich V, Martí-Renom MA, Przybylski D, Fiser A, Pazos F, et al. (2001) EVA: Continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Bioinformatics 17: 1242-1243.
76. Rost B (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12: 85-94.
77. Sander C, Schneider R (1991) Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9: 56-68.
78. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaeffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-33402.
79. Przybylski D, Rost B (2002) Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 46: 195-205.
80. Nair R, Rost B (2005) Mimicking cellular sorting improves prediction of subcellular localization. J Mol Biol 348: 85-100.
81. Rost B, Sander C (1993) Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 232: 584-599.
82. Schlessinger A, Rost B (2005) Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins 61: 115-126.
83. Ofran Y, Rost B (2003) Predict protein-protein interaction sites from local sequence information. FEBS Lett 544: 236-239.
84. Schlessinger A, Yachdav G, Rost B (2006) PROFbval: Predict flexible and rigid residues in proteins. Bioinformatics 22: 891-893.
85. Petrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, et al. (2003) Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 53 (Supplement 6): 430-435.