Real-SPINE: An integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 76-81

  Dor, Ofer ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

10 fold cross validation; Neural networks; psi backbone dihedral angles; Residue solvent accessibility; Solvent accessible surface area

Indexed keywords

SOLVENT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOLVENTS;

EID: 34249914807     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21408     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003;50:629-635.
2. Yuan Z, Huang B. Prediction of protein accessible surface areas by support vector regression. Proteins 2004;57:558-564.
3. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 2004;56:753-767.
4. Garg A, Kaur H, Raghava G. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in proteins using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins 2005;61:318-324.
5. Wang J, Lee H, Ahmad S. Prediction and evolutionary information analysis of protein solvent accessibility using multiple linear regression. Proteins 2005;61:481-491.
6. Xu Z, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. QBES: predicting real values of solvent accessibility from sequences by efficient, constrained energy optimization. Proteins 2006;63:961-966.
7. Wood MJ, Hirst JD. Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles. Proteins 2005;59:476-481.
8. Wang G, Dunbrack RLJ. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1589-1591.
9. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
10. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acid Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
11. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
12. Meiler J, Muller M, Zeidler A, Schmaschke F. Generation and evaluation of dimension reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. J Mol Model 2001;7:360-369.
13. Dor O, Zhou Y. Achieving 80% accuracy for secondary-structure prediction by large-scale neural-network training. Proteins 2007;66:838-845.
14. Kim H, Park H. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with support vector machines and long-range interaction 3D local descriptor. Proteins 2004;54:557-562.
15. Nguyen M, Rajapakse J. Prediction of protein relative solvent accessibility with a two-stage svm approach. Proteins 2005;59:30-37.
16. Nguyen M, Rajapakse J. Two-stage support vector regression approach for predicting accessible surface areas of amino acids. Proteins 2006;63:542-550.
17. Cheng J, Baldi P. A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics 2006; in press.
18. Rost B. TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Third international conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology 1995; AAAI Press Menlo Park, CA USA. pp. 314-321.
19. Rost B, Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 1997;270:471-480.
20. Przybylski D, Rost B. Improving fold recognition without folds. J Mol Biol 2004;341:255-269.
21. Qiu J, Elber R. SSALN: an alignment algorithm using structure-dependent substitution matrices and gap penalties learned from structurally aligned protein pairs. Proteins 2006;62:881-891.