Accurate prediction of protein folding rates from sequence and sequence-derived residue flexibility and solvent accessibility

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2114-2130

  Gao, Jianzhao ^a   Zhang, Tuo ^a,b   Zhang, Hua ^c   Shen, Shiyi ^a   Ruan, Jishou ^a,d   Kurgan, Lukasz ^e  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Indiana University   (United States)

^c ZHEJIANG GONGSHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

B factor; Flexibility; Folding rate; Linear regression; Solvent accessible surface

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; SOLVENT; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; KINETICS; LINEAR MODELS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOLVENTS;

EID: 77953592974     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22727     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ivankov DN, Finkelstein AV. Prediction of protein, folding rates from the amino acid sequence-predicted secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8942-8944.
2. Ivankov DN, Bogatyreva NS, Lobanov MY, Galzitskaya OV. Coupling between properties of the protein shape and the rate of protein folding. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6476.
3. Fawzi. NL, Chubukov V, Clark LA, Brown S, Head-Gordon T. Influence of denatured and intermediate states of folding on protein aggregation. Protein Sci 2005; 14:993-1003. (Pubitemid 40389369)
4. Dyer RB. Ultrafest and downhill protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007; 17:38-47.
5. Zeeb M, Balbach J, Protein folding studied by real-time NMR spectroscopy. Methods 2004; 34:65-74. (Pubitemid 38993209)
6. Fabian H, Naumann D. Methods to study protein folding by stopped-flow FT-IR. Methods 2004; 34:28-40. (Pubitemid 38993206)
7. Zarrine-Afsar A, Davidson AR. The analysis of protein folding kinetic data produced in protein engineering experiments. Methods 2004; 34:41-50. (Pubitemid 38993207)
8. Maity H, Maity M., Krishna MM, Mayne L, Englander SW. Protein folding: the stepwise assembly of foldon units. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:4741-4746. (Pubitemid 40471524)
9. Xiao H, Hoerner JK, Eyles SJ, Dobo A, Voigtman. E, Mel'cuk AI, Kaltashov IA. Mapping protein energy landscapes with amide hydrogen exchange and mass spectrometry. I. A generalized model for a two-state protein and comparison with experiment. Protein Sci 2005; 14:543-557.
10. Maxwell KL, Wildes D, Zarrine-Afsar A, de Los Rios MA, Brown AG, Friel CT, Hedberg L, Horng JC, Bona D, Miller EJ, ValléeBélisle A, Main ER, Bemporad F, Qiu L, Teilum K, Vu ND, Edwards AM, Ruczinski I, Poulseu FM, Kragelund BB, Michnick SW, Chiti F, Bai Y, Hagen SJ, Serrano L, Oliveberg M, Raleigh DP, WittungStafshede P, Radford SE, Jackson SE, Sosnick TR, Marqusee S, Davidson AR, Plaxco KW. Protein folding: defining a "standard" set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two-state proteins. Protein Sci 2005; 14:602-616.
11. Bogatyreva NS, Osypov AA, Ivankov DN. KineticDB: a database of protein folding kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D342-D346.
12. Fulton KF, Bate MA, Faux NG, Mahmood K, Betts C, Buckle AM. Protein folding database (PFD 2.0): an online environment for the International Foldeomics Consortium Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D304-D307.
13. Galzitskaya OV, Garbuzynskiy SO, Ivankov DN, Finkelstein AV. Chain length is the main determinant of the folding rate for proteins with three-state folding kinetics. Proteins 2003; 51:162-166.
14. Gutin AM, Abkevich VI, Shakhnovich EI. Chain length scaling of protein folding time. Phys Rev Lett 1996; 77:5433-5436.
15. Galzitskaya OV, Ivankov DN, Finkelstein AV. Folding nuclei in proteins. FEBS Lett 2001; 489:113-118.
16. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998; 277:985-994.
17. Gromiha MM, Selvaraj S. Comparison between long-range interactions and contact order in determining the folding rate of two-state proteins: application of long-range order to folding rate prediction. J Mol Biol 2001; 310:27-32.
18. Harihar B, Selvaraj S. Refinement of the long-range order parameter in predicting folding rates of two-state proteins. Biopolymers 2009; 91:928-935.
19. Ivankov DN, Garbuzynskiy SO, Aim E, Plaxco KW, Baker D, Finkelstein AV. Contact order revisited: influence of protein size on the folding rate. Protein Sci 2003; 12:2057-2062.
20. Zhou H, Zhou. Y. Folding rate prediction using total contact distance. Biophys J 2002; 82:458-463.
21. Capriotti E, Casadio R. K-fold: a tool for the prediction of the protein folding kinetic order and rate. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:385-386.
22. Ouyang Z, Liang J. Predicting protein folding rates from geometric contact and amino acid sequence. Protein Sci 2008; 17:1256-1263.
23. Hagai T, Levy Y. Folding of elongated proteins: conventional or anomalous? J Am. Chem Soc 2008; 130:14253-14262.
24. Gromiha MM. Multiple contact network is a key determinant to protein folding rates. J Chem Inf Model 2009; 49:1130-1135.
25. Galzitskaya OV, Reifsnyder DC, Bogatyreva NS, Ivankov DN, Garbuzynskiy SO. More compact protein globules exhibit slower folding rates. Proteins 2008; 70:329-332.
26. Gong H, Isom DG, Srinivasan R, Rose GD. Local secondary structure content predicts folding rates for simple, two-state proteins. J Mol Biol 2003; 327:1149-1154.
27. Huang JT, Cheng JP, Chen H. Secondary structure length as a determinant of folding rate of proteins with two- and three-state kinetics. Proteins 2007; 67:12-17.
28. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983; 22:2577-2637.
29. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K. Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment. Drug Discov Today 2009; 14:386-393.
30. Bryson K, MeGuffin LJ, Marsden RL, Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, Jones DT. Protein structure prediction servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W36-W38.
31. Ptitsyn OB, Finkelstein AV. Theory of protein secondary structure and algorithm of its prediction. Biopolymers 1983; 22:15-25.
32. Ma BG, Guo JX, Zhang HY. Direct correlation between proteins' folding rates and their amino acid compositions: an ab initio folding rate prediction. Proteins 2006; 65:362-372.
33. Huang JT, Tian J. Amino acid sequence predicts folding rate for middle-size two-state proteins. Proteins 2006; 63:551-554.
34. Huang LT, Gromiha MM. Analysis and prediction of protein folding rates using quadratic response surface models. J Comput Chem 2008; 29:1675-1683.
35. Jiang Y, Iglinski P, Kurgan L. Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequences using hybrid sequence representation. J Comput Chem 2009; 30:772-783.
36. Montgomerie S, Sundararaj S, Gallin WJ, Wishart DS. Improving the accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction using structural alignment. BMC Bioinform 2006; 7:301.
37. Chou KC, Shen HB. FoldRate: a web-server for predicting protein folding rates from primary sequence. Open Bioinform J 2009; 3:31-50.
38. Shen HB, Song JN, Chou KC. Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequence by fusing multiple sequential features. J Biomed Sci Eng 2009; 2:136-143.
39. Gunasekaran K, Eyles SJ, Hagler AT, Gierasch LM. Keeping it in the family: folding studies of related proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001; 11:83-93.
40. Takahashi N, Onda M, Hayashi K, Yamasaki M, Mita T, Hirose M. Thermostability of refolded ovalbumin and S-ovalbumin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2005; 69:922-931.
41. Punta M, Rost B. Protein folding rates estimated from contact predictions. J Mol Biol 2005; 348:507-512.
42. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman. DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403-410.
43. Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J Mol Biol 2002; 324:105-121.
44. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics 2004; 20:477-486.
45. Adamczak R, Porollo A, Meller J. Accurate prediction of solvent accessibility using neural networks-based regression. Proteins 2004; 56:753-767.
46. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2002; 47:142-153.
47. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003; 50:629-635.
48. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Analysis and Prediction of DNA binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics 2004; 20:477-486.
49. Dor O, Zhou Y. Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins 2007; 68:76-81.
50. Zhang H, Zhang T, Chen K, Shen S, Ruan J, Kurgan L. On the relation between residue flexibility and local solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 2009; 76:617-636.
51. Radivojac P, Obradovic Z, Smith DK, Zhu G, Vucetic S, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Dunker AK, Protein flexibility and intrinsic disorder. Protein Sci 2004; 13:71-80.
52. Schlessinger A, Yachdav G, Rost B. PROFbval: predict flexible and rigid residues in proteins. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:891-893.
53. Schlessinger A, Rost B. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins 2005; 61:115-126.
54. Chan CH, Liang HK, Hsiao NW, Ko MT, Lyu PC, Hwang JK, Relationship between local structural entropy and protein thermostability. Proteins 2004; 57:684-691.
55. Bae E, Bannen RM, Phillips GN, Jr. Bioinformatic method for protein thermal stabilization by structural entropy optimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:9594-9597.
56. Pollastri G, Przybylski D, Rost B, Baldi P. Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 2002; 47:228-235.
57. Cheng J, Randall AZ, Sweredoski MJ, Baldi P. SCRATCH: a protein structure and. structural feature prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W72-W76.
58. Albrecht M, Tosatto SC, Lengauer T, Valle G. Simple consensus procedures are effective and sufficient in secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng 2003; 16:459-462.
59. Garg A, Kaur H, Raghava GP. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility in proteins using multiple sequence alignment and secondary structure. Proteins 2005; 61:318-324.
60. Song J, Burrage K, Yuan Z, Huber T. Prediction of cis/trans isomerization in proteins using PSI-BLAST profiles and secondary structure information, BMC Bioinform 2006; 7:124.
61. Eyrich VA, Martí-Renom MA, Przybylski D, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, Pazos F, Valencia A, Sali A, Rost B. EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Bioinformatics 2001; 17:1242-1243.
62. Rost B, Eyrich VA. EVA: large-scale analysis of secondary structure prediction. Proteins 2001; (Suppl 5):192-199.
63. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten Ian H. The WEKA Data Mining Software: an update. SIGKDD Explor 2009; 11:10-18.
64. Hall M, Smith L. Feature selection for machine learning: comparing a correlation-based filter approach to the wrapper. In: Proceedings of the FLAIRS Conference, Orlando, FL; 1999. pp 235-239.
65. Hall M. Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Proceedings of the Machine Learning Conference (ICML 2000), San Francisco, CA; 2000. pp 359-366.
66. Kohavi R, John GH. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 1997; 97:273-324.
67. Ouyang Z, Liang J. Predicting protein folding rates from geometric contact and amino acid sequence. Protein Sci 2008; 17:1256-1263.
68. Dinner AR, Sali A, Smith LJ, Dobson CM, Karplus M. Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:331-339.
69. Makarov DE, Plaxco KW. The topomer search model: a simple, quantitative theory of two-state protein folding kinetics. Protein Sci 2003; 12:17-26.
70. Wallin S, Chan HS. A critical assessment of the topomer search model of protein folding using a continuum explicit-chain model with extensive conformational sampling. Protein Sci. 2005; 14:1643-1660.
71. Pickett SD, Sternberg MJ. Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. J Mol Biol 1993; 231:825-839.
72. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 2000; 16:276-277.
73. Harte N, Silventoinen V, Quevillon E, Robinson S, Kallio K, Fustero X, Patel P, Jokinen P, Lopez R. European Bioinformatics Institute. Public web-based services from the European Bioinformatics Institute. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:W3-W9.
74. Punta M, Rost B. PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:2960-2968.
75. Struthers M, Ottesen JJ, Imperiali B. Design and NMR analyses of compact, independently folded BBA motifs. Fold Des 1998; 3:95-103. (Pubitemid 28166181)
76. Mezo AR, Cheng RP, Imperiali B. Oligomerization of uniquely folded mini-protein motifs: development of a homotrimeric betabetaalpha peptide. J Am Chem Soc 2001; 123:3885-3891.
77. DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. Palo Alto, CA: DeLano Scientific, Available at: http://www.pymol.org, 2002. Accessed December 2009.
78. Struthers MD, Cheng RP, Imperiali B. Economy in protein design-evolution of a metal-independent β β motif based on the zinc finger domains. J Am. Chem. Soc 1996; 118:3073-3081.
79. Snow CD, Nguyen H, Pande VS, Gruebele M, Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature 2002; 420:102-106.
80. Marino M, Banerjee M, Jonquières R, Cossart P, Ghosh P. GW domains of the Listeria monocytogenes invasion protein InlB are SH3like and mediate binding to host ligands. EMBO J 2002; 21: 5623-5634.