A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 220-223

  Zemla, Adam ^a,c   Venclovas, Česlovas ^a,d   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^b  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Poland)

^d VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NOMENCLATURE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY;

EID: 0033081846     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990201)34:2<220::AID-PROT7>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1994;235:13-26.
2. Thornton JM, Flores TP, Jones DT, Swindells MB. Prediction of progress at last. Nature 1991;354:105-106.
3. Defay T, Cohen F. Evaluation of current techniques for ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 1995;23:431-445.
4. Barton GJ. Protein secondary structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:372-376.
5. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993;232: 584-599.
6. Russell RB, Barton GJ. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 1993;234:951-957.
7. Colloc'h N, Etchebest C, Thoreau E, Henrissat B, Mornon J-P. Comparison of three algorithms for the assignment of secondary structure in proteins: The advantages of a consensus assignment. Protein Eng 1993;6:377-382.
8. Taylor WR, Thornton JM. Recognition of super-secondary structure in proteins. J Mol Biol 1984;173:487-514.
9. Schulz GE. A critical evaluation of methods for prediction of secondary structures. Ann Rev Biophys Chem 1988;17:1-21.
10. Biou V, Gibrat JF, Levin JM, Robson B, Garnier J. Secondary structure prediction: Combination of three different methods. Protein Eng 1988;2:185-191.
11. Cohen FE, Kuntz ID. Tertiary structure prediction. In: Fasman GD, editor. Prediction of protein structure and the principles of protein conformation. New York, London: Plenum; 1989. p. 647-705.
12. Benner SA. Predicting de novo the folded structure of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1992;2:402-412.
13. Sternberg MJE. Secondary structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1992;2:237-241.
14. Zhang X, Mesirov JP, Waltz DL. Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1992;225:1049-1063.
15. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R Progress in protein structure prediction? TIBS 1993;18:120-123.
16. Wang Z-X. Assessing the accuracy of secondary structure. Nat Struct Biol 1994;3:145-146.
17. Zhu Z-Y. A new approach to the evaluation of protein secondary structure predictions at the level of the elements of secondary structure. Protein Eng 1995;8:103-108.
18. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round II. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:2-6.
19. Kabsch W, Sander C. How good are predictions of protein secondary structure? FEBS Letters 1983;155:179-182.
20. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Reinhardt A, Fidelis K, Hubbard TJ. Numerical criteria for the evaluation of ab initio predictions of protein structure. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:140-150.