Real-value prediction of backbone torsion angles

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 427-433

  Xue, Bin ^a,b   Dor, Ofer ^c   Faraggi, Eshel ^a,b   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Dihedral angle; Secondary structure

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BACKBONE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLVENTS; TORSION, MECHANICAL;

EID: 44949201613     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21940     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ramachandran GN, Sasisekharan V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 1968;23:283-437.
2. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM, Kuznetsov DA. ICM: a new method for structure modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comp Chem 1994;15:488-506.
3. Rice LM, Brunger AT. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement. Proteins 1994;19:277-290.
4. Evans JS, Mathiowetz AM, Chan SI, Goddard WA, III. De novo prediction of polypeptide conformations using dihedral probability grid Monte Carlo methodology. Protein Sci 1995;4:1203-1216.
5. Rooman MJ, Kocher J-PA, Wodak SJ. Prediction of protein backbone conformation based on seven structure assignments: Influence of local interactions. J Mol Biol 1991;221:961-979.
6. Park BH, Levitt M. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1995;249:493-507.
7. de laCruz XF, Mahoney MW, Lee B. Discrete representations of the protein c., chain. Fold Des 1997;2:223-234.
8. Yang Y, Liu H. Genetic algorithms for protein conformation sampling and optimization in a discrete backbone dihedral angle space. J Comput Chem 2006;27:1593-1602.
9. Kang HS, Kurochkina NA, Lee B. Estimation and use of protein backbone angle probabilities. J Mol Biol 1993;229:448-460.
10. Bystroff C, Thorsson V, Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;301:173-190.
11. deBrevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 2000;41:271-287.
12. Karchin R, Cline M, Mandel-Gutfreund Y, Karplus K. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins 2003;51:504-514.
13. deBrevern AG, Benros C, Gautier R, Valadie H, Hazout S, Etchebest C. Local backbone structure prediction of proteins. In Silico Biol 2004;4:31.
14. Kuang R, Lesliei CS, Yang A-S. Protein backbone angle prediction with machine learning approaches. Bioinformatics 2004;20:1612-1621.
15. Mooney C, Vullo A, Pollastri G. Protein structural motif prediction in multidimensional φ-ψ space leads to improved secondary structure prediction. J Comput Biol 2006;13:1489-1502.
16. Zimmermann O, Hansmann UHE. Support vector machines for prediction of dihedral angle regions. Bioinformatics 2006;22:3009-3015.
17. Huang YM, Bystroff C. Improved pairwise alignments of proteins in the twilight zone using local structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2006;22:413-422.
18. Wood MJ, Hirst JD. Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles. Proteins 2005;59:476-481.
19. Dor O, Zhou Y. Real-SPINE: An integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins 2007;68:76-81.
20. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A. Real value prediction of solvent accessibility from amino acid sequence. Proteins 2003;50:629-635.
21. Chou PY, Fasman GD. Empirical predictions of protein conformation. Annu Rev Biochem 1978;47:251-276.
22. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. Maxsub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000;16:776-785.
23. Rychlewski L, Fischer D. LiveBench-8: the large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2005;14:240-245.
24. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005;58:321-328.
25. Liu S, Zhang C, Liang S, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins 2007;68:636-645.
26. Rose GD, Fleming PJ, Banavar JR, Maritan A. A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:16623-16633.
27. Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M. Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:9615-9620.
28. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
29. Dor O, Zhou Y. Achieving 80% ten-fold cross-validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large-scale training. Proteins 2007;66:838-845.