Active site prediction using evolutionary and structural information

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 617-624

  Sankararaman, Sriram ^a   Sha, Fei ^b   Kirsch, Jack F ^c   Jordan, Michael I ^a,c   Sjölander, Kimmen ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 77949602893     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq008     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aloy, P. et al. (2001) Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J. Mol. Biol., 311, 395-408.
2. Alterovitz, R. et al. (2009) Resboost: characterizing and predicting catalytic residues in enzymes. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 197.
3. Altschul, S. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
4. Apweiler, R. et al. (2004) UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D115-D119.
5. Bagley, S.C. and Altman, R.B. (1995) Characterizing the microenvironment surrounding protein sites. Protein Sci., 4, 622-635.
6. Baker, D. and Sali, A. (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science, 294, 93-96.
7. Bartlett, G.J. et al. (2002) Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J. Mol. Biol., 324, 105-121.
8. Bate, P. and Warwicker, J. (2004) Enzyme/non-enzyme discrimination and prediction of enzyme active site location using charge-based methods. J. Mol. Biol., 340, 263-276.
9. Berna, P.P. et al. (1997) Residue accessibility, hydrogen bonding, and molecular recognition: metal-chelate probing of active site histidines in chymotrypsins. Biochemistry, 36, 6896-6905.
10. Brady, G.P. and Stouten, P.F. (2000) Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 14, 383-401.
11. Capra, J.A. and Singh, M. (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics, 23, 1875-1882.
12. Casari, G. et al. (1995) A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol., 2, 171-178.
13. Chandonia, J.M. et al. (2004) The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res., 32(Database issue), D189-D192.
14. Davis, J. and Goadrich, M. (2006) The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In ICML'06: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, New York, pp. 233-240.
15. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 113.
16. Elcock, A.H. (2001) Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol., 312, 885-896.
17. Felsenstein, J. (1993) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
18. Fetrow, J. and Skolnick, J. (1998) Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. J. Mol. Biol., 281, 949-968.
19. Fischer, J.D. et al. (2008) Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics, 24, 613-620.
20. Frey, P. et al. (1994) A low-barrier hydrogen bond in the catalytic triad of serine proteases. Science, 264, 1927-1930.
21. George, R.A. et al. (2005) Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 12299-12304.
22. Greenshtein, E. and Ritov, Y. (2004) Persistence in high-dimensional predictor selection and the virtue of overparametrization. Bernoulli, 10, 971-988.
23. Gutteridge, A. et al. (2003) Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes. J. Mol. Biol., 330, 719-734.
24. Hastie, T. et al. (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer, New York.
25. Hedstrom, L. et al. (1992) Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: the role of surface loops. Science, 255, 1249-1253.
26. Hedstrom, L. (2002) Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev., 102, 4501-4524.
27. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
28. Hoggart, C.J. et al. (2008) Simultaneous analysis of all SNPs in genome-wide and resequencing association studies. PLoS Genet., 4, e1000130.
29. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley, New York.
30. Huang, B. and Schroeder, M. (2006) LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct. Biol., 6, 19.
31. Hubbard, S. and Thornton, J. (1993) A computer algorithm to calculate surface accessibility. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London.
32. Innis, C. et al. (2004) Prediction of functional sites in proteins using conserved functional group analysis. J. Mol. Biol., 337, 1053-1068.
33. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
34. Koh, K. et al. (2007) An interior-point method for large-scale L1-regularized logistic regression. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 8, 1519-1555.
35. Kraut, J. (1977) Serine proteases: structure and mechanism of catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 46, 331-358.
36. Krem, M.M. et al. (2002) Ser214 is crucial for substrate binding to serine proteases. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 40260-40264.
37. Landau, M. et al. (2005) ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 33(Web Server issue), W299-W302.
38. Landgraf, R. et al. (2001) Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 1487-1502.
39. Laurie, A.T. and Jackson, R.M. (2005) Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics, 21, 1908-1916.
40. Lichtarge, O. et al. (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol., 257, 342-358.
41. Lin, J. and Wong, S.K.M. (1990) A new directed divergence measure and its characterization. Int. J. Gen. Syst., 17, 73-81.
42. Mayrose, I. et al. (2004) Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21, 1781-1791.
43. McGrath, M.E. et al. (1992) Perturbing the polar environment of Asp102 in trypsin: consequences of replacing conserved Ser214. Biochemistry, 31, 3059-3064.
44. Mihalek, I. et al. (2004) A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. J. Mol. Biol., 336, 1265-1282.
45. Mooney, S.D. et al. (2005) Structural characterization of proteins using residue environments. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform., 61, 741-747.
46. Murzin, A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
47. Ondrechen, M.J. et al. (2001) THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 12473-12478.
48. Ota, M. et al. (2003) Prediction of catalytic residues in enzymes based on known tertiary structure, stability profile, and sequence conservation. J. Mol. Biol., 327, 1053-1064.
49. Panchenko, A.R. et al. (2004) Prediction of functional sites by analysis of sequence and structure conservation. Protein Sci., 13, 884-892.
50. Pazos, F. and Sternberg, M.J. (2004) Automated prediction of protein function and detection of functional sites from structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 14754-14759.
51. Peters, K.P. et al. (1996) The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. J. Mol. Biol., 256, 201-213.
52. Petrova, N. and Wu, C. (2006) Prediction of catalytic residues using support vector machine with selected protein sequence and structural properties. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 312.
53. Polgar, L. (2005) The catalytic triad of serine peptidases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 62, 2161-2172.
54. Porter, C.T. et al. (2004) The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res., 32(Database issue), D129-D133.
55. Richardson, J.S. et al. (1978) The beta bulge: a common small unit of nonrepetitive protein structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 75, 2574-2578.
56. Sankararaman, S. and Sjölander, K. (2008) INTREPID-INformation-theoretic TREe traversal for Protein functional site IDentification. Bioinformatics, 24, 2445-2452.
57. Segal, M. et al. (2003) Regression approaches for microarray data analysis. J. Comput. Biol., 10, 961-980.
58. Shevade, S. and Keerthi, S. (2003) A simple and efficient algorithm for gene selection using sparse logistic regression. Bioinformatics, 19, 2246-2253.
59. Tibshirani, R. (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Meth., 58, 267-288.
60. Tong, W. et al. (2008) Enhanced performance in prediction of protein active sites with THEMATICS and support vector machines. Protein Sci., 17, 333-341.
61. van de Geer, S.A. (2008) High-dimensional generalized linear models and the lasso. Ann. Stat., 36, 614-645.
62. Vàrallyay, E. et al. (1997) The role of disulfide bond C191-C220 in trypsin and chymotrypsin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 230, 592-596.
63. Youn, E. et al. (2007) Evaluation of features for catalytic residue prediction in novel folds. Protein Sci., 16, 216-226.
64. Zhao, P. and Yu, B. (2006) On model selection consistency of lasso. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 2541-2563.