Predicting Continuous Local Structure and the Effect of Its Substitution for Secondary Structure in Fragment-Free Protein Structure Prediction

Structure

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1515-1527

  Faraggi, Eshel ^a   Yang, Yuedong ^a   Zhang, Shesheng ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

PROTEINS

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REAL VALUE PREDICTION OF PROTEIN STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES BY INTEGRATED NEURAL NETWORK; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES BY INTEGRATED NEURAL NETWORK X; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES BY INTEGRATED NEURAL NETWORK XI; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; TORSION, MECHANICAL;

EID: 70350738241     PISSN: 09692126     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., and Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25 (1997) 3389-3402
2. Baum L.E., and Petrie T. Statistical inference for probablistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Ann. Math. Stat. 37 (1966) 1554-1563
3. Betancourt M.R. Efficient Monte Carlo trial moves for polypeptide simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 123 (2005) 174905
4. Boden M., Yuan Z., and Bailey T.L. Prediction of protein continuum secondary structure with probabilistic models based on NMR solved structures. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 68
5. Boomsma W., Mardia K.V., Taylor C.C., Ferkinghoff-Borg J., Krogh A., and Hamelryck T. A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008) 8932-8937
6. Bourhis J.M., Canard B., and Longhi S. Predicting protein disorder and induced folding: from theoretical principles to practical applications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 8 (2007) 135-149
7. Bradley P., Misura K.M.S., and Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309 (2005) 1868-1871
8. Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.E., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., and Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4 (1983) 187-217
9. Bystroff C., and Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J. Mol. Biol. 281 (1998) 565-577
10. Bystroff C., Thorsson V., and Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 301 (2000) 173-190
11. Cavalli A., Salvatella X., Dobson C.M., and Vendruscolo M. Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 9615-9620
12. Cheng J., Sweredoski M.J., and Baldi P. DOMpro: Protein domain prediction using profiles, secondary structure, relative solvent accessibility, and recursive neural networks. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 13 (2006) 1-10
13. Cornilescu G., Delaglio F., and Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13 (1999) 289-302
14. de Brevern A.G., Etchebest C., and Hazout S. Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41 (2000) 271-287
15. DeBartolo J., Colubri A., Jha A.K., Fitzgerald J.E., Freed K.F., and Sosnick T.R. Mimicking the folding pathway to improve homology-free protein structure prediction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009) 3734-3739
16. Dor O., and Zhou Y. Achieving 80% ten-fold cross-validated accuracy for secondary structure prediction by large-scale training. Proteins 66 (2007) 838-845
17. Dor O., and Zhou Y. Real-SPINE: an integrated system of neural networks for real-value prediction of protein structural properties. Proteins 68 (2007) 76-81
18. Doreleijers J.F., Mading S., Maziuk D., Sojourner K., Yin L., Zhu J., Markley J.L., and Ulrich E.L. BioMagResBank database with sets of experimental NMR constraints corresponding to the structures of over 1400 biomolecules deposited in the Protein Data Bank. J. Biomol. NMR 26 (2003) 139-146
19. Dosztanyi Z., Sandor M., Tompa P., and Simon I. Prediction of protein disorder at the domain level. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 8 (2007) 161-171
20. Eyrich V.A., Standley D.M., and Friesner R.A. Prediction of protein tertiary to low resolution: performance for a large and structurally diverse test set. J. Mol. Biol. 288 (1999) 725-742
21. Fain B., and Levitt M. Funnel sculpting for in silico assembly of secondary structure elements of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 10700-10705
22. Faraggi E., Xue B., and Zhou Y. Improving the accuracy of predicting real-value backbone torsion angles and residue solvent accessibility by guided learning through two-layer neural networks. Proteins 74 (2009) 847-856
23. Ferron F., Longhi S., Canard B., and Karlin D. A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. Proteins 65 (2006) 1-14
24. Fischer D., and Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5 (1996) 947-955
25. Gewehr J.E., and Zimmer R. SSEP-Domain: protein domain prediction by alignment of secondary structure elements and profiles. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 181-187
26. Gibrat J.F., Robson B., and Garnier J. Influence of the local amino acid sequence upon the zones of the torsional angles phi and psi adopted by residues in proteins. Biochemistry 30 (1991) 1578-1586
27. Godzik A., Jambon M., and Friedberg I. Computational protein function prediction: are we making progress?. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64 (2007) 2505-2511
28. Gong H., Fleming P.J., and Rose G.D. Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 16227-16232
29. Gong H., Shen Y., and Rose G.D. Building native protein conformation from NMR backbone chemical shifts using Monte Carlo fragment assembly. Protein Sci. 16 (2007) 1515-1521
30. Gross M. Proteins that convert from alpha helix to beta sheet: implications for folding and disease. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 1 (2000) 339-347
31. Hardin C., Eastwood M.P., Luthey-Schulten Z., and Wolynes P.G. Associative memory hamiltonians for structure prediction without homology: α-helical proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 14235-14240
32. Huang Y.M., and Bystroff C. Improved pairwise alignments of proteins in the twilight zone using local structure predictions. Bioinformatics 22 (2006) 413-422
33. Kang H.S., Kurochkina N.A., and Lee B. Estimation and use of protein backbone angle probabilities. J. Mol. Biol. 229 (1993) 448-460
34. Karchin R., Cline M., Mandel-Gutfreund Y., and Karplus K. Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: alphabets of backbone geometry. Proteins 51 (2003) 504-514
35. Kihara D. The effect of long-range interactions on the secondary structure formation of proteins. Protein Sci. 14 (2005) 1955-1963
36. Kortemme T., Morozov A., and Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326 (2003) 1239-1259
37. Kuang R., Lesliei C.S., and Yang A.-S. Protein backbone angle prediction with machine learning approaches. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) 1612-1621
38. Kuznetsov I.B. Ordered conformational change in the protein backbone: prediction of conformationally variable positions from sequence and low-resolution structural data. Proteins 72 (2008) 74-87
39. Lafferty, J., Mccallum, A., and Pereira, F. (2001). Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 282-289, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
40. Liu Y., Carbonell J., Weigele P., and Gopalakrishnan V. Protein fold recognition using segmentation conditional random fields (SCRFs). J. Comput. Biol. 13 (2006) 394-406
41. Lobley A., Swindells M.B., Orengo C.A., and Jones D.T. Inferring function using patterns of native disorder in proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3 (2007) e162
42. Lopez G., Rojas A., Tress M., and Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the casp7 function prediction category. Proteins 69 Supplement 8 (2007) 165-174
43. Meiler J., Muller M., Zeidler A., and Schmaschke F. Generation and evaluation of dimension reduced amino acid parameter representations by artificial neural networks. J. Mol. Model. 7 (2001) 360-369
44. Montalvao R.W., Cavalli A., Salvatella X., Blundell T.L., and Vendruscolo M. Structure determination of protein-protein complexes using NMR chemical shifts: case of an endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 15990-15996
45. Nanias M., Chinchio M., Pillardy J., Ripoll D., and Scheraga H. Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 1706-1710
46. Oliva B., Bates P.A., Querol E., Aviles F.X., and Sternberg M.J. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J. Mol. Biol. 266 (1997) 814-830
47. Ortiz A.R., Kolinski A., and Skolnick J. Native-like topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) 1020-1025
48. Ozkan S.B., Wu G.A., Chodera J.D., and Dill K.A. Protein folding by zipping and assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 (2007) 11987-11992
49. Park B., and Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258 (1996) 367-392
50. Press W., Teukolsky S., Vetterling W., and Flannery B. Numerical Recipes in C. Second Edition (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
51. Radivojac P., Iakoucheva L.M., Oldfield C.J., Obradovic Z., Uversky V.N., and Dunker A.K. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophysical J. 92 (2007) 1439-1456
52. Ramachandran G.N., and Sasisekharan V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 23 (1968) 283-438
53. Reva B.A., Finkelstein A.V., and Skolnick J. What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with an rmsd of 6 Å?. Fold. Des. 3 (1998) 141-147
54. Robustelli P., Cavalli A., and Vendruscolo M. Determination of protein structures in the solid state from NMR chemical shifts. Structure 16 (2008) 1764-1769
55. Rooman M.J., Kocher J.P., and Wodak S.J. Prediction of protein backbone conformation based on seven structure assignments. Influence of local interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 221 (1991) 961-979
56. Rost B. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134 (2001) 204-218
57. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., and Williams R.J. Learning representations by back propagating errors. Nature 323 (1986) 533-536
58. Schlessinger A., and Rost B. Protein flexibility and rigidity predicted from sequence. Proteins 61 (2005) 115-126
59. Shen Y., Lange O., Delaglio F., Rossi P., Aramini J.M., Liu G., Eletsky A., Wu Y., Singarapu K.K., Lemak A., et al. Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008) 4685-4690
60. Shen Y., Vernon R., Baker D., and Bax A. De novo protein structure generation from incomplete chemical shift assignments. J. Biomol. NMR 43 (2009) 63-78
61. Siew N., Elofsson A., Rychlewski L., and Fischer D. Maxsub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 16 (2000) 776-785
62. Simons K.T., Kooperberg C., Huang E., and Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulate annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268 (1997) 209-225
63. Sippl M.J. On the problem of comparing protein structures development and applications of a new method for the assessment of structural similarities of polypeptide conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 156 (1982) 359-388
64. Tress M., Cheng J., Baldi P., Joo K., Lee J., Seo J.-H., Lee J., Baker D., Chivian D., Kim D., and Ezkurdia I. Assessment of predictions submitted for the casp7 domain prediction category. Proteins 69 Supplement 8 (2007) 137-151
65. Wang G., and Dunbrack Jr. R.L. PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 1589-1591
66. Wishart D.S., Arndt D., Berjanskii M., Tang P., Zhou J., and Lin G. CS23D: a web server for rapid protein structure generation using NMR chemical shifts and sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 Suppl. S (2008) W496-W502
67. Wu S., and Zhang Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 72 (2008) 547-556
68. Xue B., Dor O., Faraggi E., and Zhou Y. Real-value prediction of backbone torsion angles. Proteins 72 (2008) 427-433
69. Yang Y., and Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 72 (2008) 793-803
70. Yang Y., and Zhou Y. Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely-related all-atom statistical energy functions. Protein Sci. 17 (2008) 1212-1219
71. Yang Z.R. Biological applications of support vector machines. Brief. Bioinform. 5 (2004) 328-338
72. Yoon S., and Welsh W.J. Rapid assessment of contact-dependent secondary structure propensity: Relevance to amyloidogenic sequences. Proteins 60 (2005) 110-117
73. Young M., Kirshenbaum K., Dill K.A., and Highsmith S. Predicting conformational switches in proteins. Protein Sci. 8 (1999) 1752-1764
74. Yuan Z., Bailey T.L., and Teasdale R.D. Prediction of protein B-factor profiles. Proteins 58 (2005) 905-912
75. Zhang W., Liu S., and Zhou Y. SP5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS ONE 6 (2008) e2325
76. Zhang Y., and Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57 (2004) 702-710
77. Zhang Y., and Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 7594-7599
78. Zhao F., Li S., Sterner B.W., and Xu J. Discriminative learning for protein conformation sampling. Proteins 73 (2008) 228-240
79. Zhou H., and Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 2714-2726
80. Zhou H., and Zhou Y. Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 55 (2004) 1005-1013
81. Zhou H., and Zhou Y. SPEM: improving multiple-sequence alignment with sequence profiles and predicted secondary structures. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 3615-3621
82. Zhou Y., Zhou H., Zhang C., and Liu S. What is a desirable statistical energy function for proteins and how can it be obtained?. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 46 (2006) 165-174
83. Zimmermann O., and Hansmann U.H.E. LOCUSTRA: Accurate prediction of local protein structure using a two-layer support vector machine approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008) 1903-1908