Atom depth as a descriptor of the protein interior

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 2553-2561

  Pintar, Alessandro ^a   Carugo, Oliviero ^a,b   Pongor, Sándor ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ATOM; CALCULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR SIZE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 0037382258     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75060-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blom, N., S. Gammeltoft, and S. Brunak. 1999. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 294:1351-1362.
2. Brown, N. G., C. Fowles, R. Sharma, and M. Akhtar. 1992. Mechanistic studies on rhodopsin kinase. Light-dependent phosphorylation of C-terminal peptides of rhodopsin. Eur. J. Biochem. 208:659-667.
3. Carugo, O., and S. Pongor. 2002. Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison. J. Mol. Biol. 315:887-898.
4. Casari, G., and M. J. Sippl. 1992. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. J. Mol. Biol. 224:725-732.
5. Chakravarty, S., and R. Varadarajan. 1999. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Struct. Fold. Des. 7:723-732.
6. Chothia, C. 1976. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 105:1-12.
7. Eisenberg, D., E. Schwarz, M. Komaromy, and R. Wall. 1984. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J. Mol. Biol. 179:125-142.
8. Fleming, P. J., and F. M. Richards. 2000. Protein packing: dependence on protein size, secondary structure and amino acid composition. J. Mol. Biol. 299:487-498.
9. Heidrich, K., A. Otto, J. Behlke, J. Rush, K. W. Wenzel, and T. Kriegel. 1997. Autophosphorylation-inactivation site of hexokinase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 36:1960-1964.
10. Hobohm, U., and C. Sander. 1994. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:522-524.
11. Holm, L., and C. Sander. 1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:123-138.
12. Holm, L., and C. Sander. 1996. Mapping the protein universe. Science. 273:595-603.
13. Hubbard, S. J., and J. M. Thornton. 1993. Naccess Version 2.1.1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London.
14. Jacobson, R. H., A. G. Ladurner, D. S. King, and R. Tjian. 2000. Structure and function of a human TAFII250 double bromodomain module. Science. 288:1422-1425.
15. Janin, J. 1979. Surface and inside volumes in globular proteins. Nature. 277:491-492.
16. Kabsch, W., and C. Sander. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:2577-2637.
17. Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157:105-132.
18. Lee, B., and F. M. Richards. 1971. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:379-400.
19. Lee, K. A., K. B. Craven, G. A. Niemi, and J. B. Hurley. 2002. Mass spectrometric analysis of the kinetics of in vivo rhodopsin phosphorylation. Protein Sci. 11:862-874.
20. Lippmann, C., C. Lindschau, E. Vijgenboom, W. Schroder, L. Bosch, and V. A. Erdmann. 1993. Prokaryotic elongation factor Tu is phosphorylated in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 268:601-607.
21. Mirny, L. A., and E. I. Shakhnovich. 1999. Universally conserved positions in protein folds: reading evolutionary signals about stability, folding kinetics and function. J. Mol. Biol. 291:177-196.
22. Orengo, C. A., J. E. Bray, D. W. Buchan, A. Harrison, D. Lee, F. M. Pearl, I. Sillitoe, A. E. Todd, and J. M. Thornton. 2002. The CATH protein family database: a resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes. Proteomics. 2:11-21.
23. Pattabiraman, N., K. B. Ward, and P. J. Fleming. 1995. Occluded molecular surface: analysis of protein packing. J. Mol. Recognit. 8:334-344.
24. Pedersen, T. G., B. W. Sigurskjold, K. V. Andersen, M. Kjaer, F. M. Poulsen, C. M. Dobson, and C. Redfield. 1991. A nuclear magnetic resonance study of the hydrogen-exchange behaviour of lysozyme in crystals and solution. J. Mol. Biol. 218:413-426.
25. Pintar, A., O. Carugo, and S. Pongor. 2002. CX, an algorithm that identifies protruding atoms in proteins. Bioinformatics. 18:980-984.
26. Pintar, A., O. Carugo, and S. Pongor. 2003. DPX: for the analysis of the protein core. Bioinformatics. 19:313-314.
27. Sweet, R. M., and D. Eisenberg. 1983. Correlation of sequence hydrophobicities measures similarity in three- dimensional protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 171:479-488.
28. Taylor, W. R., J. M. Thornton, and W. G. Turnell. 1983. An ellipsoidal approximation of protein shape. J. Mol. Graph. 1:30-38.
29. Wheelan, S. J., A. Marchler-Bauer, and S. H. Bryant. 2000. Domain size distributions can predict domain boundaries. Bioinformatics. 16:613-618.
30. Xu, D., and R. Nussinov. 1998. Favorable domain size in proteins. Fold. Des. 3:11-17.