Comparative modeling: The state of the art and protein drug target structure prediction

Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 532-547

  Liu, Tianyun ^a   Tang, Grace W ^b   Capriotti, Emidio ^b,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Comparative modeling; Drug design; Drug target; Homology; Protein structure prediction; Sequence alignment

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE A2A RECEPTOR; BETA 1 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR; BETA 2 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CXCR4; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; PROTEIN KINASE; RHODOPSIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG TARGETING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 79957979204     PISSN: 13862073     EISSN: 18755402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138620711795767811     Document Type: Article

References (206)

1. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A. M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J., 1986, 5(4), 823-826.
2. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A. M. The evolution of protein structures. Cold. Spring. Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 1987, 52, 399-405. (Pubitemid 18262349)
3. Bajaj, M.; Blundell, T. Evolution and the tertiary structure of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng., 1984, 13, 453-492.
4. Owen, R. Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the royal college of surgeons, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans: London, 1843.
5. Reeck, G. R.; de Haen, C.; Teller, D. C.; Doolittle, R. F.; Fitch, W. M.; Dickerson, R. E.; Chambon, P.; McLachlan, A. D.; Margoliash, E.; Jukes, T. H.; et al. "Homology" in proteins and nucleic acids: a terminology muddle and a way out of it. Cell, 1987, 50(5), 667.
6. Dill, K. A.; Ozkan, S. B.; Weikl, T. R.; Chodera, J. D.; Voelz, V. A. The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 2007, 17(3), 342-346. (Pubitemid 47021366)
7. Klepeis, J. L.; Wei, Y.; Hecht, M. H.; Floudas, C. A. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study. Proteins, 2005, 58(3), 560-570. (Pubitemid 40176029)
8. Muff, S.; Caflisch, A. Kinetic analysis of molecular dynamics simulations reveals changes in the denatured state and switch of folding pathways upon single-point mutation of a beta-sheet miniprotein. Proteins, 2008, 70(4), 1185-1195. (Pubitemid 351304079)
9. Rohl, C. A.; Strauss, C. E.; Misura, K. M.; Baker, D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol., 2004, 383, 66-93. (Pubitemid 38401787)
10. Zhang, Y. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins, 2007, 69 (Suppl 8), 108-117. (Pubitemid 350210118)
11. Berman, H.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H.; Markley, J. L. The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35 (Database issue), D301-303. (Pubitemid 46056219)
12. Andreeva, A.; Howorth, D.; Chandonia, J. M.; Brenner, S. E.; Hubbard, T. J.; Chothia, C.; Murzin, A. G. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36 (Database issue), D419-425. (Pubitemid 351149760)
13. Dessailly, B. H.; Nair, R.; Jaroszewski, L.; Fajardo, J. E.; Kouranov, A.; Lee, D.; Fiser, A.; Godzik, A.; Rost, B.; Orengo, C. PSI-2: structural genomics to cover protein domain family space. Structure, 2009, 17(6), 869-881.
14. Chandonia, J. M.; Brenner, S. E. The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science, 2006, 311(5759), 347-351. (Pubitemid 43132652)
15. Marsden, R. L.; Orengo, C. A. Target selection for structural genomics: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol., 2008, 426, 3-25.
16. Reeves, G. A.; Dallman, T. J.; Redfern, O. C.; Akpor, A.; Orengo, C. A. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. J. Mol. Biol., 2006, 360(3), 725-741. (Pubitemid 43996855)
17. Todd, A. E.; Orengo, C. A.; Thornton, J. M. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 307(4), 1113-1143. (Pubitemid 33029957)
18. Kryshtafovych, A.; Fidelis, K.; Moult, J. CASP8 results in context of previous experiments. Proteins. 2009, 77 (Suppl 9), 217-228.
19. Rost, B. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng., 1999, 12(2), 85-94. (Pubitemid 29103686)
20. Worth, C. L.; Gong, S.; Blundell, T. L. Structural and functional constraints in the evolution of protein families. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2009, 10(10), 709-720.
21. Holm, L.; Sander, C. The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 1996, 24(1), 206-209. (Pubitemid 26085767)
22. Sander, C.; Schneider, R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins, 1991, 9(1), 56-68.
23. Holm, L.; Sander, C. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res., 1998, 26(1), 316-319. (Pubitemid 28291549)
24. Cuff, A. L.; Sillitoe, I.; Lewis, T.; Redfern, O. C.; Garratt, R.; Thornton, J.; Orengo, C. A. The CATH classification revisited-architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37 (Database issue), D310-314.
25. Altschul, S. F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E. W.; Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215(3), 403-410.
26. Pearson, W. R. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol., 1990, 183, 63-98. (Pubitemid 20148813)
27. Altschul, S. F.; Madden, T. L.; Schaffer, A. A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 1997, 25(17), 3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
28. Capriotti, E.; Fariselli, P.; Rossi, I.; Casadio, R. A Shannon entropy-based filter detects high-quality profile-profile alignments in searches for remote homologues. Proteins, 2004, 54(2), 351-360. (Pubitemid 38084076)
29. Marti-Renom, M. A.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Sali, A. Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci., 2004, 13(4), 1071-1087. (Pubitemid 38429228)
30. Rychlewski, L.; Jaroszewski, L.; Li, W.; Godzik, A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci., 2000, 9(2), 232-241. (Pubitemid 30126996)
31. Sadreyev, R. I.; Baker, D.; Grishin, N. V. Profile-profile comparisons by COMPASS predict intricate homologies between protein families. Protein Sci., 2003, 12(10), 2262-2272. (Pubitemid 37163360)
32. Soding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(7), 951-960. (Pubitemid 40467915)
33. Karplus, K.; Barrett, C.; Hughey, R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics, 1998, 14(10), 846-856. (Pubitemid 29041540)
34. Eddy, S. R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics, 1998, 14(9), 755-763. (Pubitemid 28552108)
35. Fariselli, P.; Rossi, I.; Capriotti, E.; Casadio, R. The WWWH of remote homolog detection: the state of the art. Brief. Bioinform., 2007, 8(2), 78-87. (Pubitemid 47078651)
36. Larsson, P.; Wallner, B.; Lindahl, E.; Elofsson, A. Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling. Protein Sci., 2008, 17(6), 990-1002. (Pubitemid 351749205)
37. Needleman, S. B.; Wunsch, C. D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 1970, 48(3), 443-453.
38. Smith, T. F.; Waterman, M. S. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol., 1981, 147(1), 195-197.
39. Henikoff, S.; Henikoff, J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1992, 89(22), 10915-10919.
40. Dayhoff, M. O.; Schwartz, R.; Orcutt, B. C. In Atlas of protein sequence and structure; Nat. Biomed. Res. Found.; 1978, pp 345-358.
41. Jones, D. T.; Tress, M.; Bryson, K.; Hadley, C. Successful recognition of protein folds using threading methods biased by sequence similarity and predicted secondary structure. Proteins, 1999, Suppl 3, 104-111. (Pubitemid 29463521)
42. Marsden, R. L.; McGuffin, L. J.; Jones, D. T. Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure. Protein Sci., 2002, 11(12), 2814-2824. (Pubitemid 35365248)
43. Sutcliffe, M. J.; Haneef, I.; Carney, D.; Blundell, T. L. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: Three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng., 1987, 1(5), 377-384. (Pubitemid 18024012)
44. Levitt, M. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J. Mol. Biol., 1992, 226(2), 507-533.
45. Sali, A.; Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 234(3), 779-815. (Pubitemid 24007801)
46. Unger, R.; Harel, D.; Wherland, S.; Sussman, J. L. A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins, 1989, 5(4), 355-373.
47. de la Paz, P.; Sutton, B. J.; Darsley, M. J.; Rees, A. R. Modelling of the combining sites of three anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and of the complex between one of the antibodies and its epitope. EMBO J., 1986, 5(2), 415-425.
48. Jones, T. A.; Thirup, S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J., 1986, 5(4), 819-822.
49. Bruccoleri, R. E.; Karplus, M. Conformational sampling using hightemperature molecular dynamics. Biopolymers, 1990, 29(14), 1847-1862. (Pubitemid 20230128)
50. Bower, M. J.; Cohen, F. E.; Dunbrack, R. L., Jr. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1997, 267(5), 1268-1282. (Pubitemid 27192637)
51. Shih, H. H.; Brady, J.; Karplus, M. Structure of proteins with single-site mutations: a minimum perturbation approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1985, 82(6), 1697-1700. (Pubitemid 15079460)
52. Snow, M. E.; Amzel, L. M. Calculating three-dimensional changes in protein structure due to amino-acid substitutions: the variable region of immunoglobulins. Proteins, 1986, 1(3), 267-279.
53. Fan, H.; Mark, A. E. Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci., 2004, 13(1), 211-220. (Pubitemid 38021155)
54. Flohil, J. A.; Vriend, G.; Berendsen, H. J. Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: application to targets 47, 58, and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis. Proteins, 2002, 48(4), 593-604. (Pubitemid 34925447)
55. Linge, J. P.; Williams, M. A.; Spronk, C. A.; Bonvin, A. M.; Nilges, M. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins, 2003, 50(3), 496-506. (Pubitemid 36158461)
56. Nakajima, N.; Higo, J.; Kidera, A.; Nakamura, H. Free energy landscapes of peptides by enhanced conformational sampling. J. Mol. Biol., 2000, 296(1), 197-216.
57. Lee, M. R.; Tsai, J.; Baker, D.; Kollman, P. A. Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 313(2), 417-430. (Pubitemid 33587197)
58. Wallner, B.; Elofsson, A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci., 2005, 14(5), 1315-1327. (Pubitemid 40577811)
59. Laskowski, R. A.; Rullmannn, J. A.; MacArthur, M. W.; Kaptein, R.; Thornton, J. M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR, 1996, 8(4), 477-486. (Pubitemid 126706801)
60. Oldfield, T. J. SQUID: a program for the analysis and display of data from crystallography and molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph., 1992, 10(4), 247-252. (Pubitemid 23018970)
61. Vaguine, A. A.; Richelle, J.; Wodak, S. J. SFCHECK: a unified set of procedures for evaluating the quality of macromolecular structure-factor data and their agreement with the atomic model. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 1999, 55 (Pt 1), 191-205. (Pubitemid 29053816)
62. Chen, V. B.; Arendall, W. B., 3rd.; Headd, J. J.; Keedy, D. A.; Immormino, R. M.; Kapral, G. J.; Murray, L. W.; Richardson, J. S.; Richardson, D. C. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66 (Pt 1), 12-21.
63. Luthy, R.; Bowie, J. U.; Eisenberg, D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature, 1992, 356(6364), 83-85.
64. Melo, F.; Feytmans, E. Assessing protein structures with a nonlocal atomic interaction energy. J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 277(5), 1141-1152. (Pubitemid 28190852)
65. Sippl, M. J. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins, 1993, 17(4), 355-362. (Pubitemid 23358545)
66. Topham, C. M.; Srinivasan, N.; Thorpe, C. J.; Overington, J. P.; Kalsheker, N. A. Comparative modelling of major house dust mite allergen der p I: structure validation using an extended environmental amino acid propensity table. Protein Eng., 1994, 7(7), 869-894. (Pubitemid 24219958)
67. Finkelstein, A. V.; Badretdinov, A.; Gutin, A. M. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins, 1995, 23(2), 142-150.
68. Rooman, M. J.; Wodak, S. J. Are database-derived potentials valid for scoring both forward and inverted protein folding? Protein Eng., 1995, 8(9), 849-858. (Pubitemid 26002471)
69. Thomas, P. D.; Dill, K. A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J. Mol. Biol., 1996, 257(2), 457-469. (Pubitemid 26114046)
70. Capriotti, E.; Marti-Renom, M. A. In Computational Structural Biology: Methods and Applications; Schwede, Peitsch, Eds.; World Scientific Publishing Company, 2008; pp 89-109.
71. Benkert, P.; Tosatto, S. C.; Schomburg, D. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins, 2008, 71(1), 261-277. (Pubitemid 351358609)
72. Benkert, P.; Tosatto, S. C.; Schwede, T. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust. Proteins, 2009, 77 (Suppl 9), 173-180.
73. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., 3rd.; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem., 2005, 26(16), 1668-1688. (Pubitemid 43076180)
74. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem., 1983, 4(2), 187-217.
75. Jagielska, A.; Wroblewska, L.; Skolnick, J. Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105(24), 8268-8273. (Pubitemid 351904745)
76. Lazaridis, T.; Karplus, M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol., 1999, 288(3), 477-487. (Pubitemid 29221815)
77. McGuffin, L. J.; Jones, D. T. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19(7), 874-881. (Pubitemid 36582404)
78. Skolnick, J.; Kihara, D.; Zhang, Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR-3 threading algorithm. Proteins, 2004, 56(3), 502-518. (Pubitemid 38924963)
79. Sommer, I.; Zien, A.; von Ohsen, N.; Zimmer, R.; Lengauer, T. Confidence measures for protein fold recognition. Bioinformatics, 2002, 18(6), 802-812. (Pubitemid 34727640)
80. Marti-Renom, M. A.; Stuart, A. C.; Fiser, A.; Sanchez, R.; Melo, F.; Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 2000, 29, 291-325. (Pubitemid 30599596)
81. McGuffin, L. J.; Roche, D. B. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(2), 182-188.
82. Zhang, Y.; Skolnick, J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J. Comput. Chem., 2004, 25(6), 865-871.
83. Chakravarty, S.; Godbole, S.; Zhang, B.; Berger, S.; Sanchez, R. Systematic analysis of the effect of multiple templates on the accuracy of comparative models of protein structure. BMC Struct. Biol., 2008, 8, 31.
84. Fernandez-Fuentes, N.; Rai, B. K.; Madrid-Aliste, C. J.; Fajardo, J. E.; Fiser, A. Comparative protein structure modeling by combining multiple templates and optimizing sequence-to-structure alignments. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23(19), 2558-2565. (Pubitemid 350048358)
85. Venclovas, C.; Margelevicius, M. The use of automatic tools and human expertise in template-based modeling of CASP8 target proteins. Proteins, 2009, 77 Suppl 9, 81-88.
86. Cozzetto, D.; Kryshtafovych, A.; Fidelis, K.; Moult, J.; Rost, B.; Tramontano, A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins, 2009, 77 (Suppl 9), 18-28.
87. Cozzetto, D.; Kryshtafovych, A.; Tramontano, A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins, 2009, 77 (Suppl 9), 157-166.
88. Pieper, U.; Eswar, N.; Webb, B. M.; Eramian, D.; Kelly, L.; Barkan, D. T.; Carter, H.; Mankoo, P.; Karchin, R.; Marti-Renom, M. A.; Davis, F. P.; Sali, A. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37 (Database issue), D347-354.
89. Kiefer, F.; Arnold, K.; Kunzli, M.; Bordoli, L.; Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37 (Database issue), D387-392.
90. Arnold, K.; Kiefer, F.; Kopp, J.; Battey, J. N.; Podvinec, M.; Westbrook, J. D.; Berman, H. M.; Bordoli, L.; Schwede, T. The Protein Model Portal. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics, 2009, 10(1), 1-8.
91. Melo, F.; Devos, D.; Depiereux, E.; Feytmans, E. ANOLEA: a www server to assess protein structures. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 1997, 5, 187-190.
92. Wiederstein, M.; Sippl, M. J. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35 (Web Server issue), W407-410.
93. Kretsinger, R. H.; Barry, C. D. The predicted structure of the calcium-binding component of troponin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1975, 405(1), 40-52.
94. McLachlan, A. D. The double helix coiled coil structure of murein lipoprotein from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol., 1978, 121(4), 493-506. (Pubitemid 8365626)
95. Isaacs, N.; James, R.; Niall, H.; Bryant-Greenwood, G.; Dodson, G.; Evans, A.; North, A. C. Relaxin and its structural relationship to insulin. Nature, 1978, 271(5642), 278-281. (Pubitemid 8256560)
96. Sanchez, R.; Sali, A. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins, 1997, Suppl 1, 50-58. (Pubitemid 28090481)
97. Sanchez, R.; Sali, A. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95(23), 13597-13602. (Pubitemid 28523017)
98. Matsumoto, R.; Sali, A.; Ghildyal, N.; Karplus, M.; Stevens, R. L. Packaging of proteases and proteoglycans in the granules of mast cells and other hematopoietic cells. A cluster of histidines on mouse mast cell protease 7 regulates its binding to heparin serglycin proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem., 1995, 270(33), 19524-19531.
99. Xu, L. Z.; Sanchez, R.; Sali, A.; Heintz, N. Ligand specificity of brain lipid-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271(40), 24711-24719. (Pubitemid 26333215)
100. Sánchez, R.; Sali, A. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1997, 7(2), 206:214.
101. Ring, C. S.; Sun, E.; McKerrow, J. H.; Lee, G. K.; Rosenthal, P. J.; Kuntz, I. D.; Cohen, F. E. Structure-based inhibitor design by using protein models for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1993, 90(8), 3583-3587. (Pubitemid 23111411)
102. Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozymeantibody complex with 1.6 A accuracy. Nat. Struct. Biol., 1994, 1(4), 259-263.
103. Vakser, I. A. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins, 1997, Suppl 1, 226-230. (Pubitemid 28090504)
104. Giorgetti, A.; Raimondo, D.; Miele, A. E.; Tramontano, A. Evaluating the usefulness of protein structure models for molecular replacement. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21 (Suppl 2), ii72-76. (Pubitemid 41535431)
105. Raimondo, D.; Giorgetti, A.; Bosi, S.; Tramontano, A. Automatic procedure for using models of proteins in molecular replacement. Proteins, 2007, 66(3), 689-696. (Pubitemid 46106773)
106. Morea, V.; Tramontano, A.; Rustici, M.; Chothia, C.; Lesk, A. M. Antibody structure, prediction and redesign. Biophys. Chem., 1997, 68 (1-3), 9-16. (Pubitemid 28064649)
107. Donini, M.; Morea, V.; Desiderio, A.; Pashkoulov, D.; Villani, M. E.; Tramontano, A.; Benvenuto, E. Engineering stable cytoplasmic intrabodies with designed specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 2003, 330(2), 323-332. (Pubitemid 36773705)
108. Kim, S. J.; Park, Y.; Hong, H. J. Antibody engineering for the development of therapeutic antibodies. Mol. Cells, 2005, 20(1), 17-29.
109. Sanz, L.; Cuesta, A. M.; Compte, M.; Alvarez-Vallina, L. Antibody engineering: facing new challenges in cancer therapy. Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 2005, 26(6), 641-648. (Pubitemid 40806551)
110. Teillaud, J. L. Engineering of monoclonal antibodies and antibodybased fusion proteins: successes and challenges. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 2005, 5 (Suppl 1), S15-27.
111. Wang, H. W.; Cole, D.; Jiang, W. Z.; Jin, H. T.; Fu, N.; Chen, Z. L.; Jin, N. Y. Engineering and functional evaluation of a single-chain antibody against HIV-1 external glycoprotein gp120. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 2005, 141(1), 72-80. (Pubitemid 40904643)
112. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock. J. Mol. Recognit., 1996, 9(1), 1-5. (Pubitemid 126565462)
113. Ma, B.; Shatsky, M.; Wolfson, H. J.; Nussinov, R. Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations. Protein Sci., 2002, 11(2), 184-197. (Pubitemid 34075781)
114. Ooms, F. Molecular modeling and computer aided drug design. Examples of their applications in medicinal chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem., 2000, 7(2), 141-158. (Pubitemid 30396444)
115. Ragno, R.; Simeoni, S.; Castellano, S.; Vicidomini, C.; Mai, A.; Caroli, A.; Tramontano, A.; Bonaccini, C.; Trojer, P.; Bauer, I.; Brosch, G.; Sbardella, G. Small molecule inhibitors of histone arginine methyltransferases: homology modeling, molecular docking, binding mode analysis, and biological evaluations. J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50(6), 1241-1253. (Pubitemid 46496324)
116. Vangrevelinghe, E.; Zimmermann, K.; Schoepfer, J.; Portmann, R.; Fabbro, D.; Furet, P. Discovery of a potent and selective protein kinase CK2 inhibitor by high-throughput docking. J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46(13), 2656-2662. (Pubitemid 36702534)
117. Oprea, T. I.; Matter, H. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2004, 8(4), 349-358. (Pubitemid 38996798)
118. Grant, M. A. Protein structure prediction in structure-based ligand design and virtual screening. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen., 2009, 12(10), 940-960.
119. Corbeil, C. R.; Therrien, E.; Moitessie, N. Modeling Reality for Optimal Docking of Small Molecules to Biological Targets. Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, 2009, 5, 241-263.
120. Bissantz, C.; Bernard, P.; Hibert, M.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets? Proteins, 2003, 50(1), 5-25. (Pubitemid 36090604)
121. Diller, D. J.; Li, R. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46(22), 4638-4647. (Pubitemid 37271613)
122. Muegge, I.; Enyedy, I. J. Virtual screening for kinase targets. Curr. Med. Chem., 2004, 11(6), 693-707. (Pubitemid 38380044)
123. Rockey, W. M.; Elcock, A. H. Structure selection for protein kinase docking and virtual screening: homology models or crystal structures? Curr. Protein Pept. Sci., 2006, 7(5), 437-457. (Pubitemid 44524492)
124. White, S. H. The progress of membrane protein structure determination. Protein Sci., 2004, 13(7), 1948-1949. (Pubitemid 38822136)
125. Fredriksson, R.; Schioth, H. B. The repertoire of G-protein-coupled receptors in fully sequenced genomes. Mol. Pharmacol., 2005, 67(5), 1414-1425. (Pubitemid 40594140)
126. Attwood, T. K.; Findlay, J. B. Fingerprinting G-protein-coupled receptors. Protein Eng., 1994, 7(2), 195-203. (Pubitemid 24031210)
127. Millar, R. P.; Newton, C. L. The year in G protein-coupled receptor research. Mol. Endocrinol., 2010, 24(1), 261-274.
128. Schwalbe, H.; Wess, G. Dissecting G-protein-coupled receptors: structure, function, and ligand interaction. Chembiochem, 2002, 3(10), 915-919. (Pubitemid 35177745)
129. Ak, T.; Gulcin, I. Antioxidant and radical scavenging properties of curcumin. Chem Biol Interact., 2008, 174(1), 27-37.
130. Cherezov, V.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Hanson, M. A.; Rasmussen, S. G.; Thian, F. S.; Kobilka, T. S.; Choi, H. J.; Kuhn, P.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K.; Stevens, R. C. High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. Science, 2007, 318(5854), 1258-1265. (Pubitemid 350172884)
131. Scheerer, P.; Park, J. H.; Hildebrand, P. W.; Kim, Y. J.; Krauss, N.; Choe, H. W.; Hofmann, K. P.; Ernst, O. P. Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation. Nature, 2008, 455(7212), 497-502.
132. Wacker, D.; Fenalti, G.; Brown, M. A.; Katritch, V.; Abagyan, R.; Cherezov, V.; Stevens, R. C. Conserved binding mode of human beta2 adrenergic receptor inverse agonists and antagonist revealed by X-ray crystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132(33), 11443-11445.
133. Wu, B.; Chien, E. Y.; Mol, C. D.; Fenalti, G.; Liu, W.; Katritch, V.; Abagyan, R.; Brooun, A.; Wells, P.; Bi, F. C.; Hamel, D. J.; Kuhn, P.; Handel, T. M.; Cherezov, V.; Stevens, R. C. Structures of the CXCR4 chemokine GPCR with small-molecule and cyclic peptide antagonists. Science, 2010, 330(6007), 1066-1071.
134. Cherezov, V.; Abola, E.; Stevens, R. C. Recent progress in the structure determination of GPCRs, a membrane protein family with high potential as pharmaceutical targets. Methods Mol. Biol., 2010, 654, 141-168.
135. Becker, O. M.; Marantz, Y.; Shacham, S.; Inbal, B.; Heifetz, A.; Kalid, O.; Bar-Haim, S.; Warshaviak, D.; Fichman, M.; Noiman, S. G protein-coupled receptors: in silico drug discovery in 3D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101(31), 11304-11309. (Pubitemid 39038342)
136. ter Haar, E.; Koth, C. M.; Abdul-Manan, N.; Swenson, L.; Coll, J. T.; Lippke, J. A.; Lepre, C. A.; Garcia-Guzman, M.; Moore, J. M. Crystal structure of the ectodomain complex of the CGRP receptor, a class-B GPCR, reveals the site of drug antagonism. Structure, 2010, 18(9), 1083-1093.
137. Rasmussen, S. G.; Choi, H. J.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Kobilka, T. S.; Thian, F. S.; Edwards, P. C.; Burghammer, M.; Ratnala, V. R.; Sanishvili, R.; Fischetti, R. F.; Schertler, G. F.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K. Crystal structure of the human beta2 adrenergic G-proteincoupled receptor. Nature, 2007, 450(7168), 383-387. (Pubitemid 350126755)
138. Katritch, V.; Rueda, M.; Lam, P. C.; Yeager, M.; Abagyan, R. GPCR 3D homology models for ligand screening: lessons learned from blind predictions of adenosine A2a receptor complex. Proteins, 2010, 78(1), 197-211.
139. Radestock, S.; Weil, T.; Renner, S. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2008, 48(5), 1104-1117.
140. Michino, M.; Abola, E.; Brooks, C. L., 3rd.; Dixon, J. S.; Moult, J.; Stevens, R. C. Community-wide assessment of GPCR structure modelling and ligand docking: GPCR Dock 2008. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2009, 8(6), 455-463.
141. Warne, T.; Serrano-Vega, M. J.; Baker, J. G.; Moukhametzianov, R.; Edwards, P. C.; Henderson, R.; Leslie, A. G.; Tate, C. G.; Schertler, G. F. Structure of a beta1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature, 2008, 454(7203), 486-491.
142. Rasmussen, S. G.; Choi, H. J.; Fung, J. J.; Pardon, E.; Casarosa, P.; Chae, P. S.; Devree, B. T.; Rosenbaum, D. M.; Thian, F. S.; Kobilka, T. S.; Schnapp, A.; Konetzki, I.; Sunahara, R. K.; Gellman, S. H.; Pautsch, A.; Steyaert, J.; Weis, W. I.; Kobilka, B. K. Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the beta (2) adrenoceptor. Nature, 469(7329), 175-180.
143. Worth, C. L.; Kleinau, G.; Krause, G. Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models. PLoS One, 2009, 4(9), e7011.
144. Mobarec, J. C.; Sanchez, R.; Filizola, M. Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use? J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52(16), 5207-5216.
145. Yarnitzky, T.; Levit, A.; Niv, M. Y. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel., 2010, 13(3), 317-325.
146. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y. GPCRRD: G protein-coupled receptor spatial restraint database for 3D structure modeling and function annotation. Bioinformatics, 26(23), 3004-3005.
147. Adcock, I. M.; Chung, K. F.; Caramori, G.; Ito, K. Kinase inhibitors and airway inflammation. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2006, 533 (1-3), 118-132. (Pubitemid 43340009)
148. Basu, A. The potential of protein kinase C as a target for anticancer treatment. Pharmacol. Ther., 1993, 59(3), 257-280. (Pubitemid 23344431)
149. Bradshaw, D.; Hill, C. H.; Nixon, J. S.; Wilkinson, S. E. Therapeutic potential of protein kinase C inhibitors. Agents Actions, 1993, 38 (1-2), 135-147. (Pubitemid 23100909)
150. Leclerc, S.; Garnier, M.; Hoessel, R.; Marko, D.; Bibb, J. A.; Snyder, G. L.; Greengard, P.; Biernat, J.; Wu, Y. Z.; Mandelkow, E. M.; Eisenbrand, G.; Meijer, L. Indirubins inhibit glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and CDK5/p25, two protein kinases involved in abnormal tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease. A property common to most cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors? J. Biol. Chem., 2001, 276(1), 251-260. (Pubitemid 32050314)
151. Scheeff, E. D.; Bourne, P. E. Structural evolution of the protein kinase-like superfamily. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2005, 1(5), e49.
152. Manning, G.; Whyte, D. B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science, 2002, 298(5600), 1912-1934. (Pubitemid 35425239)
153. Kinnings, S. L.; Jackson, R. M. Binding site similarity analysis for the functional classification of the protein kinase family. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2009, 49(2), 318-329.
154. Mao, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X. Molecular determinants for ATP-binding in proteins: a data mining and quantum chemical analysis. J. Mol. Biol., 2004, 336(3), 787-807. (Pubitemid 38183029)
155. Traxler, P.; Furet, P. Strategies toward the design of novel and selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pharmacol. Ther., 1999, 82 (2-3), 195-206. (Pubitemid 29255915)
156. Kornev, A. P.; Haste, N. M.; Taylor, S. S.; Eyck, L. F. Surface comparison of active and inactive protein kinases identifies a conserved activation mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103(47), 17783-17788. (Pubitemid 44852237)
157. Thompson, E. E.; Kornev, A. P.; Kannan, N.; Kim, C.; Ten Eyck, L. F.; Taylor, S. S. Comparative surface geometry of the protein kinase family. Protein Sci., 2009, 18(10), 2016-2026.
158. Huse, M.; Kuriyan, J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell, 2002, 109(3), 275-282. (Pubitemid 34606870)
159. Kassack, M. U.; Hogger, P.; Gschwend, D. A.; Kameyama, K.; Haga, T.; Graul, R. C.; Sadee, W. Molecular modeling of G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2: docking and biochemical evaluation of inhibitors. AAPS PharmSci, 2000, 2(1), E2.
160. Sandberg, E. M.; Ma, X.; He, K.; Frank, S. J.; Ostrov, D. A.; Sayeski, P. P. Identification of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-hexabromocyclohexane as a small molecule inhibitor of jak2 tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation [correction of autophophorylation]. J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48(7), 2526-2533. (Pubitemid 40516442)
161. Jacobson, M.; Sali, A. In Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.; Elsevier Academic Press Inc: San Diego, CA., 2004; pp 259-276.
162. Brylinski, M.; Skolnick, J. Comprehensive structural and functional characterization of the human kinome by protein structure modeling and ligand virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2010, 50(10), 1839-1854.
163. Overington, J. ChEMBL. An interview with John Overington, team leader, chemogenomics at the European Bioinformatics Institute Outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL-EBI). Interview by Wendy A. Warr. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des, 2009, 23(4), 195-198.
164. UniProt Consortium. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res., 2010, 38 (Database issue), D142-148.
165. Finn, R. D.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Coggill, P.; Heger, A.; Pollington, J. E.; Gavin, O. L.; Gunasekaran, P.; Ceric, G.; Forslund, K.; Holm, L.;
166. Jaroszewski, L.; Rychlewski, L.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Godzik, A. FFAS03: a server for profile-profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33, W284-288. (Pubitemid 44529927)
167. Soding, J.; Biegert, A.; Lupas, A. N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33 (Web Server issue), W244-248. (Pubitemid 44529917)
168. Kelley, L. A.; Sternberg, M. J. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc., 2009, 4(3), 363-371.
169. Karplus, K. SAM-T08, HMM-based protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37 (Web Server issue), W492-497.
170. Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Y. SP5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS One, 2008, 3(6), e2325.
171. Jones, D. T. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 1999, 287(4), 797-815. (Pubitemid 29176514)
172. Thompson, J. D.; Higgins, D. G.; Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 1994, 22(22), 4673-4680. (Pubitemid 24354800)
173. Katoh, K.; Toh, H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief. Bioinform., 2008, 9(4), 286-298. (Pubitemid 351890825)
174. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32(5), 1792-1797. (Pubitemid 38832724)
175. Notredame, C.; Higgins, D. G.; Heringa, J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol., 2000, 302(1), 205-217.
176. Bates, P. A.; Kelley, L. A.; MacCallum, R. M.; Sternberg, M. J. Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins, 2001, Suppl 5, 39-46. (Pubitemid 34113166)
177. Roy, A.; Kucukural, A.; Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc., 2010, 5(4), 725-738.
178. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y. LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35(10), 3375-3382. (Pubitemid 47073600)
179. Eswar, N.; Webb, B.; Marti-Renom, M. A.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Eramian, D.; Shen, M. Y.; Pieper, U.; Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein. Sci., 2007, Chapter 2, Unit 2 9.
180. Eswar, N.; John, B.; Mirkovic, N.; Fiser, A.; Ilyin, V. A.; Pieper, U.; Stuart, A. C.; Marti-Renom, M. A.; Madhusudhan, M. S.; Yerkovich, B.; Sali, A. Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003, 31(13), 3375-3380. (Pubitemid 37442163)
181. Kim, D. E.; Chivian, D.; Baker, D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32 (Web Server issue), W526-531. (Pubitemid 38997389)
182. Arnold, K.; Bordoli, L.; Kopp, J.; Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(2), 195-201. (Pubitemid 43205406)
183. Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely related all-atom statistical energy functions. Protein Sci., 2008, 17(7), 1212-1219. (Pubitemid 351930918)
184. Tosatto, S. C. The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J. Comput. Biol., 2005, 12(10), 1316-1327. (Pubitemid 44743646)
185. Pugalenthi, G.; Shameer, K.; Srinivasan, N.; Sowdhamini, R. HARMONY: a server for the assessment of protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, 34, W231-234. (Pubitemid 44529769)
186. Laskowski, R. A.; MacArthur, M. W.; Moss, D. S.; Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. App. Crys., 1993, 28, 283-291.
187. Wallner, B.; Elofsson, A. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci., 2003, 12(5), 1073-1086. (Pubitemid 36505441)
188. Benkert, P.; Kunzli, M.; Schwede, T. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37 (Web Server issue), W510-514.
189. Eisenberg, D.; Luthy, R.; Bowie, J. U. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol., 1997, 277, 396-404.
190. Wishart, D. S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A. C.; Cheng, D.; Shrivastava, S.; Tzur, D.; Gautam, B.; Hassanali, M. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36 (Database issue), D901-906. (Pubitemid 351149842)
191. Gao, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Kang, L.; Luo, X.; Zhu, W.; Chen, K.; Wang, X.; Jiang, H. PDTD: a web-accessible protein database for drug target identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9, 104.
192. Li, Q.; Cheng, T.; Wang, Y.; Bryant, S. H. PubChem as a public resource for drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, 2010, 15 (23-24), 1052-1057.
193. Kellenberger, E.; Muller, P.; Schalon, C.; Bret, G.; Foata, N.; Rognan, D. sc-PDB: an annotated database of druggable binding sites from the Protein Data Bank. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2006, 46(2), 717-727.
194. Wass, M. N.; Kelley, L. A.; Sternberg, M. J. 3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 2010, 38, W469-473.
195. Huang, B. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction. OMICS, 2009, 13(4), 325-330.
196. Kalidas, Y.; Chandra, N. PocketDepth: a new depth based algorithm for identification of ligand binding sites in proteins. J. Struct. Biol., 2008, 161(1), 31-42. (Pubitemid 350298258)
197. Morris, G. M.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. Using AutoDock for ligandreceptor docking. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, 2008, Chapter 8, Unit 8 14.
198. Brylinski, M.; Skolnick, J. FINDSITE: a threading-based approach to ligand homology modeling. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2009, 5(6), e1000405.
199. Zhao, Y.; Sanner, M. F. FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors. Proteins, 2007, 68(3), 726-737. (Pubitemid 47068311)
200. Chang, D. T.; Oyang, Y. J.; Lin, J. H. MEDock: a web server for efficient prediction of ligand binding sites based on a novel optimization algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33, W233-238. (Pubitemid 44529915)
201. Schneidman-Duhovny, D.; Inbar, Y.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H. J. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005, 33, W363-367. (Pubitemid 44529944)
202. Grosdidier, A.; Zoete, V.; Michielin, O. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Proteins, 2007, 67(4), 1010-1025. (Pubitemid 46753948)
203. Meireles, L. M.; Domling, A. S.; Camacho, C. J. ANCHOR: a web server and database for analysis of protein-protein interaction binding pockets for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res., 2010, 38 (Web Server issue), W407-411.
204. Douguet, D. e-LEA3D: a computational-aided drug design web server. Nucleic Acids Res., 2010, 38, W615-621.
205. Liu, X.; Ouyang, S.; Yu, B.; Liu, Y.; Huang, K.; Gong, J.; Zheng, S.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Jiang, H. PharmMapper server: a web server for potential drug target identification using pharmacophore mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res., 2010, 38 Suppl, W609-614.
206. Dunkel, M.; Gunther, S.; Ahmed, J.; Wittig, B.; Preissner, R. SuperPred: drug classification and target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008, 36, W55-59.