Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 77, Issue SUPPL. 9, 2009, Pages 173-180

  Benkert, Pascal ^a,b   Tosatto, Silvio C E ^c   Schwede, Torsten ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

CASP8; Mean force potential; Model quality assessment; Protein structure homology modeling; QMEAN; Scoring function

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMICS; EIGHTH CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF TECHNIQUE FOR PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE MODEL ENERGY ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE MODEL ENERGY ANALYSIS CLUST; SCORING SYSTEM; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 74249088516     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22532     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001; 294: 93-96. (Pubitemid 32952955)
2. Schwede T, Sali A, Honig B, Levitt M, Berman HM, Jones D, Brenner SE, Burley SK, Das R, Dokholyan NV, Dunbrack RL, Fidelis K, Fiser A, Godzik A, Huang YJ, Humblet C, Jacobson MP, Joachimiak A, Krystek SR, Kortemme T, Kryshtafovych A, Montelione GT, Moult J, Murray D, Sanchez R, Sosnick TR, Standley DM, Stouch T, Vajda S, Vasquez M, Westbrook JD, Wilson IA. Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research. Structure 2009; 17: 151-159.
3. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Ceriani M, Tramontano A. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. Proteins 2007; 69 (Suppl 8): 175-183. (Pubitemid 350210125)
4. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins 2009; 77 (Suppl 9): 157-166.
5. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. Errors in protein structures. Nature 1996; 381: 272.
6. Laskowski RA, Macarthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993; 26: 283-291.
7. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 1992; 356: 83-85.
8. Chen H, Kihara D. Estimating quality of template-based protein models by alignment stability. Proteins 2008; 71: 1255-1274. (Pubitemid 351564051)
9. Tress ML, Jones D, Valencia A. Predicting reliable regions in protein alignments from sequence profiles. J Mol Biol 2003; 330: 705-718.
10. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Identification of correct regions in protein models using structural, alignment, and consensus information, Protein Sci 2006; 15: 900-913.
11. Dominy BN, Brooks CL. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 147-160. (Pubitemid 34063139)
12. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 1999; 288: 477-487. (Pubitemid 29221815)
13. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001; 44: 223-232. (Pubitemid 32702231)
14. Melo F, Feytmans E. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J Mol Biol 1998; 277: 1141-1152. (Pubitemid 28190852)
15. Shen M-Y, Sali A, Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 2507-2524. (Pubitemid 44771688)
16. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990; 213: 859-883.
17. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 2002; 11: 2714-2726. (Pubitemid 35191145)
18. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992; 358: 86-89.
19. Shortle D. Propensities, probabilities, and the Boltzmann hypothesis. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 1298-1302.
20. Tosatto SC, Battistutta R. TAP score: torsion angle propensity normalization applied to local protein structure evaluation. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 155. (Pubitemid 46851039)
21. Chothia C, Lesk AM. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 1986; 5: 823-826.
22. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential. Proteins 2008; 71: 1211-1218. (Pubitemid 351564047)
23. Paluszewski M, Karplus K. Model quality assessment using distance constraints from alignments. Proteins 2009; 75: 540-549.
24. Benkert P, Tosatto SCE, Schomburg D. QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 2008; 71: 261-277. (Pubitemid 351358609)
25. Eramian D, Shen M-Y, Devos D, Melo F, Sali A, Marti-Renom MA. A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 1653-1666.
26. Pettitt CS, Mcguffin LJ, Jones DT. Improving sequence-based fold recognition by using 3D model quality assessment. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3509-3515. (Pubitemid 41235994)
27. Qiu J, Sheffler W, Baker D, Noble WS. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression. Proteins 2008; 71: 1175-1182. (Pubitemid 351564044)
28. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Can correct protein models be identified? Protein Sci 2003; 12: 1073-1086.
29. Tosatto S. The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation. J Comput Biol 2005; 12: 1316-1327. (Pubitemid 44743646)
30. Benkert P, Schwede T, Tosatto SCE. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information. BMC Struct Biol 2009; 9: 35.
31. Fasnacht M, Zhu J, Honig B. Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 1557-1568. (Pubitemid 47195683)
32. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1015-1018. (Pubitemid 36675823)
33. Lundstrom J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001; 10: 2354-2362. (Pubitemid 32988651)
34. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 11158-11162. (Pubitemid 28450098)
35. Wang K, Fain B, Levitt M., Samudrala R. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct Biol 2004; 4: 8. (Pubitemid 39258970)
36. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Nad Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 7432-7437. (Pubitemid 34568708)
37. Mcguffin LJ. Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 345.
38. Wallner B, Elofsson A. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 2007; 69: 184-193. (Pubitemid 350210126)
39. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983; 22: 2577-2637.
40. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004; 57: 702-710. (Pubitemid 39626992)
41. Altschul. SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403-410. (Pubitemid 20364473)
42. Benkert P, Künzli M, Schwede T. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37: W510-W514.