Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes

Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure

Volumn 29, Issue , 2000, Pages 291-325

  Martí Renom, Marc A ^a   Stuart, Ashley C ^a   Fiser, András ^a   Sánchez, Roberto ^a   Melo, Francisco ^a   Šali, Andrej ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Fold assignment; Fully automated modeling; Homology modeling; Model evaluation; Protein structure prediction; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE STRUCTURE; GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS;

EID: 0033873929     PISSN: 10568700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291     Document Type: Review

References (213)

1. 1. Abola EE, Bernstein FC, Bryant SH, Koetzle TF, Weng J. 1987. Protein data bank. In Crystallographic Databases - Information, Content, Software Systems, Scientific Applications, ed. FH Allen, G Bergerhoff, R Sievers, pp. 107-132. Bonn/Cambridge/Chester. Data Commission Int. Union of Crystallography.
2. 2. Alexandrov NN, Nussinov R, Zimmer RM. 1995. Fast protein fold recognition via sequence to structure alignment and contact capacity potentials. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing '96, ed. L Hunter, TE Klein, pp. 53-72, Singapore: World Sci. Pub.
3. 3. Aloy P, Mas JM, Martí-Renom MA, Querol E, Avilés FX, Oliva B. 2000. Human a2 pro-carboxypeptidase model: secondary structure prediction as a powerful tool for homology modelling improvement. J. Computer-Aided Molec. Design. 14:83-92
4. 4. Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Gish W, Wootton JC. 1994. Issues in searching molecular sequence databases. Nat. Genet. 6:119-29
5. 5. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10
6. 6. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J Zhang, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-402
7. 7. Apostolico A, Giancarlo R. 1998. Sequence alignment in molecular biology. J. Comput. Biol 5:173-96
8. 8. Aszódi A, Taylor WR. 1996. Homology modelling by distance geometry. Folding Design 1:325-34
9. 9. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. 1999. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:49-54
10. 10. Bajorath J, Stenkamp R, Aruffo A. 1994. Knowledge-based model building of proteins: Concepts and examples. Protein Sci. 2:1798-810
11. 11. Barton GJ. 1998. Protein sequence alignment and database scanning. In Protein Structure Prediction: A Practical Approach, ed. MJE Sternberg. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
12. 12. Barton GJ, Sternberg MJE. 1987. A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences; confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 198:327-37
13. 13. Bassolino-Klimas D, Bruccoleri RE. 1992. Application of a directed conformational search for generating 3-D coordinates for protein structures from α-carbon coordinates. Proteins 14:465-74
14. 14. Baxevanis AD. 1998. Practical aspects of multiple sequence alignment. Methods Biochem. Anal 39:172-88
15. 15. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Rapp BA, Wheeler DL. 2000. Gen-Bank. Nucleic Acid Res. 28:15-18
16. 16. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. 1977. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535-42
17. 17. Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Sternberg MJE, Thornton JM. 1987. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature 326:347-52
18. 18. Boissel JP, Lee WR, Presnell SR, Cohen FE, Bunn HF. 1993. Erythropoietin structure-function relationships. Mutant proteins that test a model of tertiary structure. J. Biol. Chem. 268:15983-93
19. 19. Bower MJ, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL Jr. 1997. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1268-82
20. 20. Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253:164-70
21. 21. Brenner SE, Barken D, LevittM. 1999. The PRESAGE database for structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:251-53
22. 22. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ. 1998. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6073-78
23. 23. Briffeuil P, Baudoux G, Lambert C, Bolle X De, Vinals C, Feytmans E, Depiereux E. 1998. Comparative analysis of seven multiple protein sequence alignment servers: clues to enhance reliability of predictions. Bioinformatics 14:357-66
24. 24. Brocklehurst SM, Perham RN. 1993. Prediction of the three-dimensional structures of the biotinylated domain from yeast pyruvate carboxylase and of the lipolyated H-protein from the pea leaf glycine cleavage system: a new automated methods for the prediction of protein tertiary structure. Protein Sci. 2:626-39
25. 25. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. 1983. CHARMM: a program for macro-molecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4: 187-217
26. 26. Brower RC, Vasmatzis G, Silverman M, DeLisi C. 1993. Exhaustive conformational search and simulated annealing for models of lattice peptides. Biopolymers 33:329-34
27. 27. Browne WJ, North ACT, Phillips DC, Brew K, Vanaman TC, Hill RC. 1969. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine α-lactalbumin based on that of hen's egg-white lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 42:65-86
28. 28. Bruccoleri BR, Karplus M. 1990. Conformational sampling using high temperature molecular dynamics. Biopolymers 29:1847-62
29. 29. Bruccoleri RE. 1993. Application of systematic conformational search to protein modeling. Molec. Simulat. 10:151-74
30. 30. Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. 1987. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers 26:137-68
31. 31. Bryant SH, Amzel LM. 1987. Correctly folded proteins make twice as many hydrophobic contacts. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 29:46-52
32. 32. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. 1991. The frequency of ion-pair substructures in proteins is quantitatively related to electrostatic potential: a statistical model for nonbonded interactions. Proteins 9:108-19
33. 33. Carlacci L, Englander SW. 1996. Loop problem in proteins: developments on the Monte Carlo simulated annealing approach. Comp. Chem. 17:1002-12
34. 34. Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823-26
35. 35. Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1987. Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 196:901-17
36. 36. Chothia C, Lesk AM, Tramontano A, Levitt M, Smith-Gill SJ, Air G, Sheriff S, Padlan EA, Davies D, Tulip WR, Colman PM, Spinelli S, Alzari PM, Poljak RJ. 1989. Conformation of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 342:877-83
37. 37. Chung SY, Subbiah S. 1996. A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology. Structure 4:1123-27
38. 38. Claessens M, Cutsem EV, Lasters I, Wodak S. 1989. Modelling the polypeptide backbone with 'spare parts' from known protein structures. Protein Eng. 4:335-45
39. 39. Collura V, Higo J, Garnier J. 1993. Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing. Protein Sci. 2:1502-10
40. 40. Colovos C, Yeates TO. 1993. Verification of protein structures: patterns of non-bonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci. 2:1511-19
41. 41. Corpet F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881-90
42. 42. Cregut D, Liautard J-P, Chiche L. 1994. Homology modeling of annexin I: implicit solvation improves side-chain prediction and combination of evaluation criteria allows recognition of different types of conformational error. Protein Eng. 7:1333-44
43. 43. Dudek MJ, Ramnarayan K, Ponder JW. 1998. Protein structure prediction using a combination of sequence homology and global energy minimization: II. Energy functions. J. Comp. Chem. 19:548-73
44. 44. Dunbrack RL, Karplus M. 1993. Prediction of protein side-chain conformations from a backbone conformation dependent rotamer library. J. Mol. Biol. 230:543-71
45. 45. Evans JS, Mathiowetz AM, Chan SI, Goddard WA III. 1995. De novo prediction of polypeptide conformations using dihedral probability grid Monte Carlo methodology. Protein Sci. 4:1203-16
46. 46. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-91
47. 47. Fetrow JS, Godzik A, Skolnick J. 1998. Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm: identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/ thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity. J. Mol. Biol. 282:703-11
48. 48. Fidelis K, Stern PS, Bacon D, Moult J. 1994. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng. 7:953-60
49. 49. Filippis V De, Sander C, Vriend G. 1994. Predicting local structural changes that result from point mutations. Protein Eng. 7:1203-8
50. 50. Fine RM, Wang H, Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Levinthal C. 1986. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations. II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCP603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins 1:342-62
51. 51. Finkelstein AV, Reva BA. 1992. Search for the stable state of a short chain in a molecular field. Protein Eng. 5:617-24
52. 52. Fischer D, Barret C, Bryson K, Elofsson A, Godzik A, Jones D, Karplus KJ, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Pawowski K, Rost B, Rychlewski L, Sternberg MJE. 1999. CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins. Suppl. 3, pp. 209-17
53. 53. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. 1996. Fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5:947-55
54. 54. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. 1997. Assigning folds to the proteins encoded by the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Scei. USA 94:11929-34
55. 55. Fiser A, Do RKG, Šali A. 2000. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Submitted
56. 56. Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Šali A. 2000. Comparative protien structure modeling. In Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics, ed. M Watanabe, B Roux, A MacKerell, O Backer. New York: Marcel Dekker. In press
57. 57. Flockner H, Braxenthaler M, Lackner P, Jaritz M, Ortner M, Sippl MJ. 1995. Progress in fold recognition. Proteins 23:376-86
58. 58. Gerstein M, Levitt M. 1997. A structural census of the current population of protein sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:11911-16
59. 59. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1992. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J. Mol. Biol. 227:227-38
60. 60. Greer J. 1980. Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:3393-97
61. 61. Greer J. 1990. Comparative modelling methods: application to the family of the mammalian serine proteases. Proteins 7: 317-34
62. 62. Gregoret LM, Cohen FE. 1991. Effect of packing density on chain conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 219:109-22
63. 63. Gribskov M. 1994. Profile analysis. Meth. Mol Biol 25:247-66
64. 64. Guenther B, Onrust R, Šali A, O'Donnell M, Kuriyan J. 1997. Crystal structure of the δ′ subunit of the clamp-loader complex of E. coli DNA polymerase III. Cell 91:335-45
65. 65. Harbury PB, Tidor B, Kim PS. 1995. Repacking proteins cores with backbone freedom: Structure prediction for coiled coils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8408-12
66. 66. Havel TF, Snow ME. 1991. A new method for building protein conformations from sequence alignments with homologues of known structure. J. Mol Biol 217:1-7
67. 67. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. 1994. Protein family classification based on searching a database of blocks. Genomics 19:97-107
68. 68. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, Alford WJ, Pietrokovski S. 1995. Automated construction and graphical presentation of protein blocks from unaligned sequences. Gene 163:17-26
69. α trace: application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors. J. Mol Biol 218:183-94
70. 70. Holm L, Sander C. 1996. Mapping the protein universe. Science 273:595-602
71. 71. Holm L, Sander C. 1999. Protein folds and families: sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:244-47
72. 72. Hooft RWW, Sander C, Vriend G. 1996. Verification of protein structures: sidechain planarity. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 29: 714-16
73. 73. Hooft RWW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. 1996. Errors in protein structures. Nature 381:272
74. 74. Howell PL, Almo SC, Parsons MR, Hajdu J, Petsko GA. 1992. Structure determination of turkey egg-white lysozyme using Laue diffraction data. Acta Crystallogr. B 48:200-7
75. 75. Huang ES, Koehl P, Levitt M, Pappu RV, Ponder JW. 1998. Accuracy of side-chain prediction upon near-native protein backbones generated by ab initio folding methods. Proteins 33:204-17
76. 76. Hubbard TJP, Ailey B, Brenner SE, Murzin AG, Chothia C. 1999. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:254-56
77. 77. Huynen M, Doerks T, Eisenhaber F, Orengo C, Sunyaev S, Yuan Y, Bork P. 1998. Homology-based fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 280:323-26
78. 78. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Gibson DG, Higgins TJ. 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with CLUSTAL X. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:403-5
79. 79. Johnson MS, Overington JP. 1993. A structural basis for sequence comparisons: an evaluation of scoring methodologies. J. Mol. Biol. 233:716-38
80. 80. Johnson MS, Srinivasan N, Sowdhamini R, Blundell TL. 1994. Knowledge-based protein modelling. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29:1-68
81. 81. Jones DT. 1999. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287:797-815
82. 82. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358:86-89
83. 83. Jones DT. 1997. Progress in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:377-87
84. 84. Jones S, Thornton JM. 1997. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272:133-43
85. 85. Jones TH, Thirup S. 1986. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 5:819-22
86. 86. Jung S-H, Pastan I, Lee B. 1994. Design of interchain disulfide bonds in the framework region of the Fv fragment of the monoclonal antibody B3. Proteins 19:35-47
87. 87. Kick EK, Roe DC, Skillman AG, Liu G, Ewing TJ, Sun Y, Kuntz ID, Ellman JA. 1997. Structure-based design and combinatorial chemistry yield low nanomolar inhibitors of cathepsin D. Chem. Biol. 4:297-307
88. 88. Kidera A. 1995. Enhanced conformational sampling in Monte Carlo simulations of proteins: applications to a constrained peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9886-89
89. 89. Koehl P, Delarue M. 1994. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 239:249-75
90. 90. Koehl P, Delarue M. 1994. Polar and non-polar atomic environments in the protein core: implication for folding and binding. Proteins 20:264-78
91. 91. Koehl P, Delarue M. 1995. A self consistent mean field approach to simultaneous gap closure and side-chain positioning in protein homology modelling. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:163-70
92. 92. Koehl P, Levitt M. 1999. A brighter future for protein structure prediction. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:108-11
93. 93. Koretke KK, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. 1996. Self-consistently optimized statistical mechanical energy functions for sequence structure alignment. Protein Sci. 5:1043-59
94. 94. Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjolander K, Haussler D. 1994. Hidden Markov models in computational biology: applications to protein modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1501-31
95. 95. Lambert MH, Scheraga HA. 1989. Pattern recognition in the prediction of protein structure. I. Tripeptide conformational probabilities calculated from the amino acid sequence. J. Comp. Chem. 10:770-97
96. 96. Laskowski RA, McArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystalogr. 26:283-91
97. 97. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. 1998. Validation of protein models derived from experiment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:631-39
98. 98. Laskowski RA, Rullmann JAC, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. 1996. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8:477-86
99. 99. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. 1999. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288:477-87
100. 100. Lee C. 1995. Testing homology modeling on mutant proteins: predicting structural and thermodynamic effects in the Ala98 → Val mutants of T4 lysozyme. Folding Design 1:1-12
101. 101. Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1980. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: The structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J. Mol. Biol. 136:225-70
102. 102. Levitt M. 1992. Accurate modeling of protein conformation by automatic segment matching. J. Mol. Biol. 226:507-33
103. 103. Levitt M. 1997. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins (Suppl.) 1:92-104
104. 104. Levitt M, Gerstein M. 1998. A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5913-20
105. 105. Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. 1992. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356:83-85
106. 106. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL Jr., Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux M., Smith JC, Stole J, Watanabe M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102:3586-16
107. 107. Martin ACR, Cheetham JC, Rees AR. 1989. Modeling antibody hypervariable loops: a combined algorithm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9268-72
108. 108. Martin ACR, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. 1997. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins (Suppl.) 1:14-28
109. 109. Matsumoto R, Šali A, Ghildyal N, Karplus M, Stevens RL. 1995. Packaging of proteases and proteoglycans in the granules of mast cells and other hematopoietic cells. A cluster of histidines in mouse mast cell protease-7 regulates its binding to heparin serglycin proteoglycan. J. Biol. Chem. 270:19524-31
110. 110. Mattos C, Petsko GA, Karplus M. 1994. Analysis of two-residue turns in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238:733-47
111. 111. McGarrah DB, Judson RS. 1993. Analysis of the genetic algorithm method of molecular conformation determination. J. Comp. Chem. 14:1385-95
112. 112. McGregor MJ, Islam SA, Sternberg MJE. 1987. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. J. Mol Biol 198:295-310
113. 113. Melo F, Feytmans E. 1998. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1141-52
114. 114. Mezei M. 1998. Chameleon sequences in the PDB. Protein Eng. 11:411-14
115. 115. Miwa JM, Ibanez-Tallon I, Crabtree GW, Sánchez R, Šali A, Role LW, Heintz N. 1999. lynx1, an endogenous toxin-like modulator of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the mammalian CNS. Neuron 23:105-14
116. 116. Modi S, Paine MJ, Sutcliffe MJ, Lian L-Y, Primrose WU, Wolfe CR, Roberts GCK. 1996. A model for human cytochrome P450 2D6 based on homology modeling and NMR studies of substrate binding. Biochemistry 35:4540-50
117. 117. Montelione GT, Anderson S. 1999. Structural genomics: keystone for a human proteome project. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:11-12
118. 118. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. 1997. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round II. Proteins (Suppl.) 1:2-6
119. 119. Moult J, James MNG. 1986. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1:146-63
120. 120. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol Biol 48:443-53
121. 121. Oldfield TJ. 1992. Squid: a program for the analysis and display of data from crystallography and molecular dynamics. J. Mol Graphics 10:247-52
122. 122. Oliva B, Bates PA, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJE. 1997. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J. Mol Biol. 266:814-30
123. 123. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM. 1994. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372:631-34
124. 124. Orengo CA, Pearl FMG, Bray JE, Todd AE, Martin AC, Conte L. Lo, Thornton JM. 1999. The CATH database provides insights into protein structure/function relationship. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:275-79
125. 125. Park J, Karplus K, Barret C, Hughey R, Haussler D, Hubbard T, Chothia C. 1998. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J.Mol. Biol. 284:1201-10
126. 126. Pawlowski K, Bierzyński A, Godzik A. 1996. Structural diversity in a family of homologous proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 258:349-66
127. 127. Pearson WR. 1990. Rapid and sensitive comparison with FASTA and FASTP. Methods Enzymol. 183:63-98
128. 128. Pearson WR. 1995. Comparison of methods for searching protein sequence databases. Protein Sci. 4:1145-60
129. 129. Pearson WR. 1998. Empirical statistical estimates for sequence similarity searches. J. Mol. Biol. 276:71-84
130. 130. Peitsch MC. 1996. PROMOD and SWISS-MODEL - Internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modeling. Biochem. Soc. Trans 24:274-79
131. 131. Peitsch MC, Jongeneel CV. 1993. A 3-D model for the CD40 ligand predicts that it is a compact trimer similar to the tumor necrosis factors. Int. Immunol. 5:233-38
132. 132. Peitsch MC, Wilkins MR, Tonella L, Sánchez JC, Appel RD, Hochstrasser DF. 1997. Large-scale protein modelling and integration with the SWISS-PROT and SWISS-2DPAGE databases: the example of Escherichia coli. Electrophoresis 18:498-501
133. 133. PetrellaRJ, Lazardis T, Karplus M. 1998. Protein side chain conformer prediction: a test of the energy function. Folding Design 3:353-77
134. 134. Pontius J, Richelle J, Wodak SJ. 1996. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 264:121-36
135. 135. Rapp CS, Friesner RA. 1999. Prediction of loop geometries using a generalized Born model of solvation effect. Proteins 35:173-83
136. 136. Ring CS, Cohen FE. 1994. Conformational sampling of loop structures using genetic algorithm. Isr. J. Chem. 34:245-52
137. 137. Ring CS, Sun E, McKerrow JH, Lee GK, Rosenthal PJ, Kuntz ID, Cohen FE. 1993. Structure-based inhibitor design by using protein models for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3583-87
138. 138. Rosenbach D, Rosenfeld R. 1995. Simultaneous modeling of multiple loops in proteins. Protein Sci. 4:496-505
139. 139. Rost B. 1995. Topits: Threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. In The Third Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB), ed. C Rawlings, D Clark, R Altman, L Hunter, T Lengauer, S Wodak, pp. 314-21. Menlo Park, CA; AAAI Press
140. 140. Rost B. 1999. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12:85-94
141. 141. Rost B, Sander C. 1993. Prediction of protein structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232:584-99
142. 142. Rufino SD, Donate LE, Canard LHJ, Blundell TL. 1997. Predicting the conformational class of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: application to comparative modeling. J. Mol. Biol. 267:352-67
143. 143. Russell RB, Barton GJ. 1994. Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds. An analysis of side-chain to side-chain contacts secondary structure and accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 244:332-50
144. 144. Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. 1998. Fold and function predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. Folding Design 3:229-38
145. 145. Šali A. 1995. Modelling mutations and homologous proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 6:437-51
146. 146. Šali A. 1995. Protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Mol. Med. Today 1:270-77
147. 147. Šali A. 1998. 100,000 protein structures for the biologist. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5: 1029-32
148. 148. Šali A, Blundell TL. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779-815
149. 149. Šali A, Matsumoto R, McNeil HP, Karplus M, Stevens RL. 1993. Three-dimensional models of four mouse mast cell chymases. Identification of proteoglycan-binding regions and protease-specific antigenic epitopes. J. Biol. Chem. 268:9023-34
150. 150. Šali A, Overington JP. 1994. Derivation of rules for comparative protein modeling from a database of protein structure alignments. Protein Sci. 3:1582-96
151. 151. Šali A, Potterton L, Yuan F, Vlijmen H, Karplus M. 1995. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MOD-ELLER. Proteins 23:318-26
152. 152. Šali A, Sánchez R, Badretdinov AY, Fiser A, Melo F, Overington JP, Feyfant E, Martí-Renom MA. 1999. MODELLER, A Protein Structure Modeling Program, Release 5. URL http://guitar. rockefeller, edu/
153. 153. Samudrala R, Moult J. 1998. A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 279:287-302
154. 154. Sánchez R, Badretdinov A. Ya, Feyfant E, Šali A. 1997. Homology protein structure modeling. Trans. Am. Cryst. Assoc. 32:81-91
155. 155. Sánchez R, Šali A. 1997. Advances in comparative protein-structure modeling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:206-14
156. 156. Sánchez R, Šali A. 1997. Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins (Suppl.) 1:50-58
157. 157. Sánchez R, Šali A. 1998. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13597-602
158. 158. Sánchez R, Šali A. 1999. Comparative protein structure modeling in genomics. J. Comp. Phys. 151:388-401
159. 159. Sánchez R, Šali A. 1999. The MODBASE database of comparative protein structure models. Bioinformatics. In press
160. 160. Saqi MAS, Russell RB, Sternberg MJE. 1999. Misleading local sequence alignments: implications for comparative protein modelling. Protein Eng. 11:627-30
161. 161. Schiffer CA, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Stroud RM. 1990. Prediction of homologous protein structures based on conformational searches and energetics. Proteins 8:30-43
162. 162. Schrauber H, Eisenhaber F, Argos P. 1993. Rotamers: To be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 230:592-612
163. 163. Schuler GD. 1998. Sequence alignment and database searching. Meth. Biochem. Anal. 39:145-71
164. 2-glycoprotein I. Identification of the major phospholipid binding site. J. Immunol. 157:3744-51
165. 165. Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Fine RM, Wang H, Levinthal C. 1987. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ring-like structures. Biopolymers 26:2053-85
166. 166. Shepherd AJ, Gorse D, Thornton JM. 1999. Prediction of the location and type of β-turns in proteins using neural networks. Protein Sci. 8:1045-55
167. 167. Sibanda BL, Blundell TL, Thornton JM. 1989. Conformation of β-hairpins in protein structures: a systematic classification with applications to modelling by homology, electron deosity fitting and protein engineering. J. Mol. Biol. 206:759-77
168. 168. Sippl MJ. 1990. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 213:859-83
169. 169. Sippl MJ. 1993. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17:355-62
170. 170. Smith RF, Wiese BA, Wojzynski MK, Davison DB, Worley KC. 1996. Bcm search launcher-an integrated interface to molecular biology data base search and analysis services available on the world wide web. Genome Res. 6:454-62
171. 171. Smith TF. 1999. The art of matchmaking: sequence alignment methods and their structural implications. Structure 7:R7-R12
172. 172. Smith TF, Waterman MS. 1981. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147:195-97
173. 173. Smith TF, Conte L. Lo, Bienkowska J, Gaitatzes C, Rogers RGJ, Lathrop R. 1997. Current limitations to protein threading approaches. J. Comput. Biol. 4:217-25
174. 174. Srinivasan N, Blundell TL. 1993. An evaluation of the performance of an automated procedure for comparative mod-elling of protein tertiary structure. Protein Eng. 6:501-12
175. 175. Srinivasan S, March CJ, Sudarsanam S. 1993. An automated method for modeling proteins on known templates using distance geometry. Protein Sci. 2:227-89
176. 176. Sternberg MJE, Bates PA, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM. 1999. Progress in protein structure prediction: assessment of CASP3. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:368-73
177. i dimer database. Protein Sci. 4:1412-20
178. 178. Summers NL, Karplus M. 1990. Modeling of globular proteins : a distance-based search procedure for the construction of insertion/deletion regions and pro → non-pro mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 216:991-1016
179. 179. Sutcliffe MJ, Haneef I, Carney D, Blundell TL. 1987. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins. Part I. Three dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1:377-84
180. 180. Taylor WR. 1996. Multiple protein sequence alignment: algorithms and gap insertion. Methods Enzymol. 266:343-67
181. 181. Taylor WR, Flores TP, Orengo CA. 1994. Multiple protein structure alignment. Protein Sci. 3:1858-70
182. 182. Terwilliger TC, Waldo G, Peat TS, Newman JM, Chu K, Berendzen J. 1998. Class-directed structure determination: foundation for a protein structure initiative. Protein Sci. 7:1851-56
183. 183. Thanki N, Zeelen JP, Mathieu M, Jaenicke R, Abagyan RA, Wierenga RK, Schliebs W. 1997. Protein engineering with monomeric triosephosphate isomerase (monoTIM): the modelling and structure verification of a seven-residue loop. Protein Eng. 10:159-67
184. 184. Topham CM, Srinivasan N, Thorpe CJ, Overington JP, Kalsheker NA. 1994. Comparative modelling of major house dust mite allergen der p I: structure validation using an extended environmental amino acid propensity table. Protein Eng. 7:869-94
185. 185. Torda AE. 1997. Perspectives in proteinfold recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:200-5
186. 186. Totrov M, Abagyan R. 1994. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1:259-63
187. 187. Unger R, Harel D, Wherland S, Sussman JL. 1989. A 3-D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins 5:355-73
188. 188. Vajda S, DeLisi C. 1990. Determining minimum energy conformations of polypeptides by dynamic programming. Biopolymers 29:1755-72
189. 189. Vakser IA. 1997. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins (Suppl.) 1:226-30
190. 190. Gelder CWG, Leusen FJJ, Leunissen JAM, Noordik JH. 1994. A molecular dynamics approach for the generation of complete protein structures from limited coordinate data. Proteins 18:174-85
191. 191. Vlijmen HWT, Karplus M. 1997. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J. Mol. Biol. 267:975-1001
192. 192. Vasmatzis G, Brower RC, DeLisi C. 1994. Predicting immunoglobulin-like hypervariable loops. Biopolymers 34:1669-80
193. 193. Vásquez M. 1996. Modeling side-chain conformation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:217-21
194. 194. Vriend G. 1990. WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program. J. Mol Graph. 8:52-56
195. 195. Vriend G, Sander C, Stouten PFW. 1994. A novel search method for protein sequence-structure relations using property profiles. Protein Eng. 7:23-29
196. 196. Wilson C, Gregoret LM, Agard DA. 1993. Modeling side-chain conformation for homologous proteins using an energy-based rotamer search. J. Mol. Biol. 229:996-1006
197. 197. Wilson KS, Dauter Z, Lamsin VS, Walsh M, Wodak S, Richelle J, Pontius J, Vaguine A, Sander RWW Hooft, Vriend G, Thornton JM, Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Dodson EJ, Murshudov G, Oldfield TJ, Kaptein RR, Rullman JAC. 1998. Who checks the checkers? Four validation tools applied to eight atomic resolution structures. J. Mol. Biol. 276:417-36
198. 198. Wojcik J, Mornon J-P, Chomilier J. 1999. New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification. J. Mol. Biol. 289:1469-90
199. 199. Wolf E, Vassilev A, Makino Y, Šali A, Nakatani Y, Burley SK. 1998. Crystal structure of a GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase: Serratia marcescens aminoglycoside 3-N-acetyltransferase. Cell 94:51-61
200. 200. Wu G, Fiser A, Kuile B, Šali A, Müller M. 1999. Convergent evolution of Trichomonas vaginalis lactate dehydrogenase from malate dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6285-90
201. 201. Xu LZ, Sánchez R, Šali A, Heintz N. 1996. Ligand specificity of brain lipid binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 271:24711-19
202. 202. Zarembinski TI, Hung LW, Mueller-Dieckmann HJ, Kim KK, Yokota H, Kim R, Kim SH. 1998. Structure-based assignment of the biochemical function of a hypothetical protein: a test case of structural genomics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15189-93
203. 203. Zhang B, Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. 1998. Similarities and differences between nonhomologous proteins with similar folds: evaluation of threading strategies. Folding Design 2:307-17
204. 204. Zhang ZT. 1997. Relations of the numbers of protein sequences, families and folds. Protein Eng. 10:757-61
205. 205. Zheng Q, Kyle DJ. 1996. Accuracy and reliability of the scaling-relaxation method for loop closure: an evaluation based on extensive and multiple copy conformational samplings. Proteins 24:209-17
206. 206. Lund O, Frimand K, Gorodkiu J, Bohr H, Bohr J, Brunak S. 1997. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Prot. Eng. 10:1241-48
207. 207. Šali A, Kuriyan J. 1999. Challenges at the frontiers of structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:M20-M24
208. 208. Burley SK, Almo SC, Bonanno JB, Capel M, Chance MR, Gaasterland T, Lin D, Šali A, Studier FW, Swaminathan S. 1999. Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project. Nat. Genet. 23:151-57
209. 209. Cort JR, Koonin EV, Bash PA, Kennedy MA. 1999. A phylogenetic approach to target selection for structural genomics: solution structure of YciH. Nucl. Acids Res. 27:4018-27
210. 210. Sánchez R, Pieper U, Mirković N, de Bakker PIW, Wittenstein E, Šali A, 2000. MODBASE a database of annotated comparative protein structure models. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:250-53
211. 211. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-42
212. 212. Jones TA, Kleywegt GJ. 1999. CASP3. Comperative modeling evoluation. Proteins: Struct., Funct. & Gen. Suppl. 3 pp. 30-46
213. 213. Muller A. MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ. 1999. Benchmarking PSI-BLAST in genome anotation J. Mol. Biol. 293:1257-41