Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 277, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1141-1152

  Melo, Francisco ^a   Feytmans, Ernest ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Comparative modeling; Homology modeling; Knowledge based mean force potentials; Protein structure prediction; Three dimensional energy profiles

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENERGY; MOLECULAR MODEL; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY; X RAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032540222     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1665     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abagyan R.A., Totrov M.M. Contact area difference (CAD) a robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J. Mol. Biol. 268:1997;678-685
2. Bernstein F.C., Koetzle T.F., Williams G.J.B., Meyer E.F., Brice M.D. Jr, Rodgers J.R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. Protein data Bank a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542
3. Brandén C.-I., Jones T.A. Between objectivity and subjectivity. Nature. 343:1990;687-689
4. Cardozo T., Totrov M., Abagyan R. Homology modeling by the ICM method. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;403-414
5. Chinea G., Padron G., Hooft R.W.W., Sander C., Vriend G. The use of position specific rotamers in model building by homology. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;415-421
6. Dunbrack R.L., Gerloff D.L., Bower M., Chen X., Lichtarge O., Cohen F.E. Meeting review the second meeting on the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP2). Folding Des. 2:1997;R27-R42. Asilomar, California, December 13-16, 1996
7. Hendlich M., Lackner P., Weitckus S., Floeckner H., Froschauer R., Gottsbacher K., Casari G., Sippl M.J. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. J. Mol. Biol. 216:1990;167-180
8. Hobohm U., Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:1994;522
9. Hobohm U., Scharf M., Schneider R., Sander C. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1:1992;409-417
10. Holm L., Sander C. Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J. Mol. Biol. 225:1992;93-105
11. Kleywegt G.J., Jones T.A. Where freedom is given, liberties are taken. Structure. 3:1995;535-540
12. Kleywegt G.J., Hoier H., Jones T.A. A re-evaluation of the crystal structure of chloromuconate cycloisomerase. Acta Crystallog. Sect. D. 52:1996;858-863
13. Korn A., Rose D.R. Torsion angle differences as a means of pinpointing local polypeptide chain trajectory changes for identical proteins in different conformational states. Protein Eng. 7:1994;961-967
14. Laskowski R.A., MacArthur M.W., Moss D.S., Thornton J.M. PROCHECK a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 26:1993;283-291
15. Lemer C.M.R., Rooman M.J., Wodak S. Protein structure prediction by threading methods evaluation of current techniques. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;337-355
16. Luthy R., Bowie J.U., Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 356:1992;83-85
17. Marsh R.E. Some thoughts on choosing the correct space group. Acta Crystallog. sect. B,. 51:1995;897-907
18. Melo F., Feytmans E. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1997;207-222
19. Mosimann S., Meleshko R., James M.N.G. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;301-317
20. Moult J., Pedersen J.T., Judson R., Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 32:1995;ii-iv
21. Moult J., Hubbard T., Bryant S.H., Fidelis K., Pedersen J.T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) round II. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 1:(suppl):1997;2-6
22. Park B.H., Huang E.S., Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 266:1997;831-846
23. Pontius J., Richelle J., Wodak S.J. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 264:1996;121-136
24. Read R.J., Brayer G.D., Jurasek L., James M.N.G. Critical evaluation of comparative model-building of Streptomyces griseus trypsin. Biochemistry. 23:1984;6570-6575
25. Sali A., Blundell T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:1993;779-815
26. Sali A., Potterton L., Yuan F., van Vlijmen H., Karplus M. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;318-326
27. Samudrala R., Pedersen J.T., Zhou H., Luo R., Fidelis K., Moult J. Confronting the problem of interconnected structural changes in the comparative modeling of proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;327-336
28. Sippl M.J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 213:1990;859-883
29. Sippl M.J. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J-CAMD. 7:1993;473-501
30. Sippl M.J. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 17:1993;355-362
31. Sippl M.J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1995;229-235
32. Sippl M.J., Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 13:1992;258-271